To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
A trace of a sequence is generated by deleting each bit of the sequence independently with a fixed probability. The well-studied trace reconstruction problem asks how many traces are required to reconstruct an unknown binary sequence with high probability. In this paper, we study the multidimensional version of this problem for matrices and hypermatrices, where a trace is generated by deleting each row/column of the matrix or each slice of the hypermatrix independently with a constant probability. Previously, Krishnamurthy, Mazumdar, McGregor and Pal showed that $\exp (\widetilde {O}(n^{d/(d+2)}))$ traces suffice to reconstruct any unknown $n\times n$ matrix (for $d=2$) and any unknown $n^{\times d}$ hypermatrix. By developing a dimension reduction procedure and establishing a multivariate version of the Littlewood-type result that lower bounds sparse complex polynomials around $1$, we improve this upper bound by showing that $\exp (\widetilde {O}(n^{3/7}))$ traces suffice to reconstruct any unknown $n\times n$ matrix, and $\exp (\widetilde {O}(n^{3/5}))$ traces suffice to reconstruct any unknown $n^{\times d}$ hypermatrix. In contrast to the earlier bound, our new exponent is bounded away from $1$ even as $d$ becomes very large.
Tree trace reconstruction aims to learn the binary node labels of a tree, given independent samples of the tree passed through an appropriately defined deletion channel. In recent work, Davies, Rácz, and Rashtchian [10] used combinatorial methods to show that $\exp({\mathrm{O}} (k \log_{k} n))$ samples suffice to reconstruct a complete k-ary tree with n nodes with high probability. We provide an alternative proof of this result, which allows us to generalize it to a broader class of tree topologies and deletion models. In our proofs we introduce the notion of a subtrace, which enables us to connect with and generalize recent mean-based complex analytic algorithms for string trace reconstruction.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.