Patients undergoing craniotomy experience a higher risk of seizures in the ensuing months. Consensus is lacking regarding the appropriate timeframe for safe return to driving following craniotomy in patients not otherwise limited by neurological deficits or a history of epilepsy.

The Canadian Neurosurgery Research Collaborative (CNRC) distributed an anonymous, voluntary, electronic cross-sectional survey via SurveyMonkey to Canadian neurosurgeons. The survey comprised 16 questions designed to assess practice variations regarding recommendations for return to driving following craniotomy, stratified according to pathological diagnosis.

Forty-eight Canadian neurosurgeons responded to the survey. Driving recommendations varied greatly, with most surgeons recommending return to driving within one month of the craniotomy. The rationale behind these restrictions varied widely, consistent with the lack of evidence-based data to guide decision-making.

This study emphasizes the lack of standardized practices regarding return to driving recommendations for patients undergoing craniotomy without prior seizures. Development of national return to driving guidelines would assist Canadian clinicians in making informed decisions regarding the optimal timeframe for the safe return to driving.

Patients undergoing craniotomy experience a higher risk of seizures in the ensuing months. Consensus is lacking regarding the appropriate timeframe for safe return to driving following craniotomy in patients not otherwise limited by neurological deficits or a history of epilepsy.

We performed a systematic literature review on driving recommendations post-craniotomy. We then performed a scoping review on the risk of seizure post-craniotomy and used risk calculations and accepted risk thresholds from the epilepsy literature to develop an evidence-based approach to driving recommendations post-craniotomy.

The systematic review of driving recommendations revealed national guidelines (the United Kingdom, New Zealand, Australia). We transposed risk calculations and accepted risk thresholds from the epilepsy literature (accident risk ratio [ARR] < 2; chance of occurrence of a seizure in the next year < 20%) to patients who undergo a craniotomy. Using data from a large meta-analysis of seizure risk post-craniotomy, we calculated ARRs for various underlying pathologies at different postoperative timepoints and compared them with accepted risk thresholds from the epilepsy literature. We determine that patients who undergo a craniotomy for a higher-risk condition (like high-grade glioma) may resume driving after at least 1 month without seizure, whereas those patients undergoing a craniotomy for lower-risk conditions (like infratentorial pathology) may resume driving without consideration for the risk of seizure.

This systematic review of the literature and evidence-based approach to risk threshold calculations derived from the epilepsy literature provides a preliminary framework to guide clinicians regarding recommendations for return to driving following craniotomy.