The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was founded in 1988 to provide governments with policy-relevant assessments of climate science as well as options for adaptation and mitigation. It is now recognized as providing the leading global compilation of climate science, adaptation, and mitigation research. The volunteer scientists who write these reports have carried out five complete assessment cycles, with the sixth cycle to be completed in 2022. Here, we review how information from and about archaeology and other forms of cultural heritage has been incorporated into these reports to date. Although this review shows that archaeology has not been wholly absent from work of the IPCC, we suggest that archaeology has more to offer the IPCC and global climate response. We propose five ways to more fully engage both archaeologists and knowledge from and about the human past in IPCC assessments and reports.

The purpose of this article is to discuss the challenges and opportunities for integrating archaeological information in landscape-scale conservation design while aligning archaeological practice with design and planning focused on cultural resources. Targeting this opportunity begins with statewide archaeological databases. Here, we compare the structure and content of Pennsylvania's and Florida's statewide archaeological databases, identifying opportunities for leveraging these data in landscape conservation design and planning. The research discussed here was part of a broader project, which was working through the lens of Landscape Conservation Cooperatives in order to develop processes for integrating broadly conceived cultural resources with natural resources as part of multistate or regional landscape conservation design efforts. Landscape Conservation Cooperatives offer new ways to think about archaeological information in practice and potentially new ways for archaeology to contribute to design and planning. Statewide archaeological databases, in particular, offer transformative potential for integrating cultural resource priorities in landscape conservation design. Targeted coordination across state boundaries along with the development of accessible derivative databases are two priorities to advance their utility.

The product. Coconut water (Cocosnucifera L.) is an ancient tropical beverage whose originalproperties have drawn the attention of manufacturers as a naturalfunctional drink. Preservation. This refreshing liquidcomes mainly from immature coconuts which are difficult to collect,store and thus to commercialise. Nevertheless, some studies, mostlyfrom Asian countries, tend to prove that the shelf life of immaturecoconut fruits could be prolonged thanks to post-harvest treatments. Processing. Coconut water itself, extracted from thenut, is obviously easier to handle but is also very sensitive tobiological and chemical injuries. Thermal treatment combined withchemical additives are already used by the industry but other technologiessuch as micro-and ultrafiltration are not yet available on anindustrial scale. Whatever the process, taste, aroma and colour(linked to enzymatic activities) are still difficult to control. Discussion. Resultsof former and recent investigations are discussed. Finally, suggestionsare made for further research to increase our knowledge of thisoriginal tropical juice.