To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Neuroimaging studies have consistently revealed neuroanatomical abnormalities in individuals with bipolar disorder (BD), major depressive disorder (MDD), and schizophrenia (SZ). However, it remains unknown whether and to what extent disorder-selective gray matter variations occur in these prominent psychiatric disorders. This study conducted a meta-analysis of 25 years of published voxel-based morphometry (VBM) research to assess the presence of selective and robust neuroanatomical substrates of gray matter variation in BD, MDD, and SZ.
Methods
Peer-reviewed experiments encompassing subjects with target disorders were systematically searched in the MEDLINE database. Additionally, peer-reviewed data on 30 other psychiatric disorders and 65 neurological diseases were obtained from the BrainMap database. Experiments reporting whole-brain group comparisons between patients and healthy controls were included if they identified significant reductions in gray matter morphometry.
Results
The data were analyzed using the Bayes fACtor mOdeliNg algorithm. A total of 1,021 VBM experiments were included, comprising 29,540 patients and 28,177 healthy controls. Primary analyses of psychiatric data revealed strong evidence of gray matter reduction in the right middle temporal gyrus for BD and the posterior dorsal anterior cingulate cortex for SZ (P ≥ 95% selectivity). The robustness of these findings was confirmed using the fail-safe method tailored to the neuroimaging meta-analytic environment. No selective findings were observed in additional analyses that included neurological diseases.
Conclusions
Taken together, these findings offer a framework that underscores the significance of diagnosis-selective neural substrates in psychopathology, a new perspective that could inform distinct pathophysiological processes and assist in diagnosis and treatment.
This chapter examines the historical development of psychology through the framework of empiricism, beginning with behaviorism’s emphasis on stimulus–response relationships and extending to cognitive psychology’s focus on mental processes. It describes neuroscience’s potential to synthesize these perspectives: preserving the behaviorist mandate of referring only to measurable phenomena while acknowledging the existence of important processes that occur between stimulus and response and that may be rationally characterized using some of the language of psychology. The chapter also introduces a conceptual framework for understanding neuroscience’s practical contributions to psychology while describing critiques of redundancy and the logical difficulties posed by reverse inference. Finally, this chapter advocates for the value of clear empirical communication in describing psychology’s relationship with behavior, citing historical examples of ambiguous language in biological psychology.
We introduce basic principles of the statistical analysis of hemodynamic imaging data, including concepts like the General Linear Model, data cleaning, efficiency, parametric hypothesis testing, correction for multiple comparisons, first- and second-level analyses, region of interest analysis, double dipping, and the issue of statistical inference with reference to forward and reverse inferences.
Despite decades of brain MRI research demonstrating atypical neuroanatomical substrate in patients with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), it remains unclear whether and to what extent disorder-selective neuroanatomical abnormalities occur in this spectrum. This, and the fact that multiple brain disorders report a common neuroanatomical substrate, makes transference and the application of neuroimaging findings into the clinical setting an open challenge.
Objectives
To investigate the selective neuroanatomical alteration profile of the ASD brain, we employed a meta-analytic, data-driven, and reverse inference-based approach (i.e.; Bayes fACtor mOdeliNg).
Methods
Eligible voxel-based morphometry data were extracted by a standardized search on BrainMap and MEDLINE databases (849 published experiments, 131 brain disorders, 22747 clinical subjects, 16572 x-y-z coordinates). Two distinct datasets were generated: the ASD dataset, composed of ASD-related data; and the non-ASD dataset, composed of all other clinical conditions data. Starting from the two unthresholded activation likelihood estimation (ALE) maps, the calculus of the Bayes fACtor mOdeliNg was performed. This allowed us to obtain posterior probability distributions on the evidence of brain alteration specificity in ASD.
Results
We revealed both cortical and cerebellar areas of neuroanatomical alteration selectivity in ASD. Eight clusters showed a selectivity value ≥ 90%, namely the bilateral precuneus, the right inferior occipital gyrus, left lobule IX, left Crus II, right Crus I, and the right lobule VIIIA (Fig. 1).
Conclusions
The identification of this neuroanatomical pattern provides new insights into the complex pathophysiology of ASD, opening attractive prospects for future neuroimaging-based interventions.
Neuroimaging methods are of interest to those in search of non-traditional methods, and hopefully new insights, for the study of syntax. To the extent that activation in a “syntax area” of the brain can be used to discriminate among syntactic theories, we must have good confidence in the localization of syntax to begin with. Therefore what seem like separate interests – the linguist’s interest in using neuroimaging experiments to understand language, and the neuroscientist’s interest in spatial localization of language – are in fact inseparable. Section 27.2 introduces the reader to the various neuroimaging methods currently available and provides a crash course in the cortical neuroanatomy relevant to language. Section 27.3 reviews attempts to localize syntax in the brain through the use of neuroimaging methods. Section 27.4 discusses attempts to use neuroimaging data to adjudicate linguistic questions: the adequacy of syntactic theories, parsing models, and particular structural analyses.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.