So sits enthron’d in vegetable pride
Imperial KEW by Thames's glittering side;
Obedient sails from realms unfurrow’d bring
For her the unnam’d progeny of spring;
Attendant Nymphs her dulcet mandates hear,
And nurse in fostering arms the tender year,
Plant the young bulb, inhume the living feed,
Prop the weak stem, the erring tendril lead;
Or fan in glass-built fanes the stranger flowers
With milder gales, and steep with warmer showers.
Delighted Thames through tropic umbrage glides,
And flowers antarctic, bending o’er his tides;
Drinks the new tints, the sweets unknown inhales,
And calls the sons of science to his vales.
In one bright point admiring Nature eyes
The fruits and foliage of discordant skies,
Twines the gay floret with the fragrant bough,
And bends the wreath round GEORGE's royal brow….
Nature was an indispensable part of the British domination of the world. Visualization of nature was inextricably linked with the political legitimacy of the British Indian Empire. This chapter explores the complex entanglements of the natural environment and imperialism. I am interested in how visual representations of flora and fauna became inextricable to colonial natural historical enquiries in India, a topic yet to receive attention at par with the histories of natural history in Europe. Imagery of nature, as we shall see here, became a metaphor for British rule as well as its limitations.
By the second half of the eighteenth century, British interest in India's natural world had become nothing short of material enrichment, as evident from Erasmus Darwin's portrayal of the Britannic Majesty adorned in the productions of nature.