Global Norms; Local Resistance: Addressing Impunity in Japan and Beyond

doi:10.1017/9781108605991.012

11 - Global Norms; Local Resistance: Addressing Impunity in Japan and Beyond

from Part III

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 June 2019

Sophia O’Brien

Edited by

Vito Breda

Show author details

Vito Breda: Affiliation:
University of Southern Queensland

Book contents

Get access

Summary

This chapter analyses the nature of legal changes produced by the anti-impunity norm, an emerging doctrine in international law. As its name would suggest, the anti-impunity norm seeks to ensure that perpetrators of human rights violations and serious international crimes, such as genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, do not evade accountability for their actions. Relatedly, it also seeks to ensure that victims of rights violations and international crimes enjoy access to justice and suitable reparations, and that societies afflicted with impunity suitably recognize and memorialize past violations. As such, the anti-impunity norm is not only infused with key tenets of international human rights law, international humanitarian law, international criminal law, and transitional justice; it is a deeply political and moral agenda too.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Legal Transplants in East Asia and Oceania , pp. 256 - 296

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108605991.012 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

IX Bibliography

Akhavan, P., ‘Beyond Impunity: Can International Criminal Justice Prevent Future Atrocities?’, American Journal of International Law 95 (2001), 7.Google Scholar

Alston, P., ‘Transplanting Foreign Norms: Human Rights and Other International Legal Norms in Japan’, European Journal of International Law 10 (1999), 627.Google Scholar

Arthur, P., ‘How Transitions Reshaped Human Rights: A Conceptual History of Transitional Justice’, Human Rights Quarterly 31 (2009), 321.Google Scholar

Ba, A., Kuik, C. C. and Sueo, S., Institutionalizing East Asia: Mapping and Reconfiguring Regional Cooperation (Routledge, 2016).Google Scholar

Bagas, J., ‘Duterte and Donor Withdrawal’, Sur – International Journal on Human Rights 26 (2017), 37.Google Scholar

Baird, N., ‘The Role of International Non-Governmental Organisations in the Universal Periodic Review of Pacific Island States: Can Doing Good Be Done Better’, Melbourne Journal of International Law 16 (2015), 550.Google Scholar

Banks, C. and Baker, J. Comparative, International, and Global Justice: Perspectives from Criminology and Criminal Justice (SAGE, 2015).Google Scholar

Boehringer, G., ‘Duterte’s Drug War: Violating Rights for a Quick Fix’, Alternative Law Journal 42 (2017), 233.Google Scholar

Burns, C., Sexual Violence and the Law in Japan (Routledge, 2005).Google Scholar

Chan, J., Gender and Human Rights Politics in Japan: Global Norms and Domestic Networks (Stanford University Press, 2004).CrossRef Google Scholar

Cheah, W., ‘Walking the Long Road in Solidarity and Hope’, Harvard Human Rights Journal 22 (2009), 99.Google Scholar

Cheesman, N., D’Costa, B. and Haberkon, T. ‘Anticipating the Struggle against Everyday Impunity in Myanmar through Accounts from Bangladesh and Thailand’, Asia and The Pacific Policy Studies 3 (2016), 48.Google Scholar

Chesterman, S., ‘International Criminal Law with Asian Characteristics?’, Columbia Journal of Asian Law 27 (2013), 142.Google Scholar

Chesterman, S.‘Asia’s Ambivalence about International Law and Institutions: Past, Present and Futures’, European Journal of International Law 27 (2016), 950.Google Scholar

Dalton, E., Women and Politics in Contemporary Japan (Routledge, 2015).Google Scholar

Deutrom, Rhian, ‘Japanese ‘Comfort Women’s’ Memorial In 18 C Complaint’, The Australian, 15 December 2016 www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/war-womens-memorial-in-18 c-complaint/news-story/f4a13f4a10fede4b1c19c96e403679aa accessed 14 September 2017.Google Scholar

Dicker, N., ‘Aiding Transitional Justice in Solomon Islands’, Buffalo Human Rights Law Review 21 (2015), 77.Google Scholar

Digital Museum: The Comfort Women Issue and the Asian Women’s Fund, ‘From a Memorandum sent by Tadaichi Kawahara, Adjutant in the Ministry of War, “Measures to Enforce Military Discipline from the Experiences in the China Incident’ www.awf.or.jp/e1/facts-02.html accessed 20 December 2017.Google Scholar

Digital Museum: The Comfort Women Issue and the Asian Women’s Fund‘Statement by Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi on the 60th Anniversary of the End of the War’ (Asian Women’s Fund, 2005) www.awf.or.jp/e6/statement-36.html accessed 12 September 2017.Google Scholar

Dolgopol, U., ‘Cold Comfort’, Alternative Law Journal 21 (1996), 156.Google Scholar

Dolgopol, U.‘Crimes against the Comfort Women in the Tokyo Trial’ in Tanaka, Y., L. H. McCormack, T., Simpson, G., Beyond Victor’s Justice? The Tokyo War Crimes Trial Revisited (BRILL, 2011).Google Scholar

Dolgopol, U.and Paranjape S, ‘Comfort Women: An Unfinished Ordeal’ (Report, International Commission of Jurists, 1994) 197 http://icj.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/1994/01/Japan-comfort-women-fact-finding-report-1994-eng.pdf accessed 21 January 2019.Google Scholar

Dolidze, A., ‘Bridging Comparative and International Law: Amicus Curiae Participation as a Vertical Legal Transplant’, European Journal of International Law 26 (2015), 851.Google Scholar

Donghua, H., ‘The Tokyo Trials and Japanese Revisionism: Political Maneuver or Criminal Justice’, China Legal Science Journal 3 (2015), 71.Google Scholar

du Plessis, M. and Ford, J. ‘Transitional Justice: A Future Truth Commission for Zimbabwe?’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 58 (2009), 87.Google Scholar

Dussich, J., Fujiwara, Y. and Sagisaka, A. ‘Decisions Not to Report Sexual Assault in Japan’, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 45 (2001), 35.Google Scholar

Engle, K., ‘A Genealogy of the Criminal Turn in Human Rights’ in Engle, K., Miller, Z. and Davis, D. M. (eds.), Anti-Impunity and the Human Rights Agenda (Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Freeland, S., ‘A Prosecution Too Far? Reflections on the Accountability of Heads of State under International Criminal Law’, Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 41 (2010), 179.Google Scholar

Futamura, M., War Crimes Tribunals and Transitional Justice: The Tokyo Trial and the Nuremberg Legacy (Routledge, 2007).Google Scholar

Galindo, G., ‘Legal Transplants between Time and Space’ in Duve, Thomas (ed.), Entanglements in Legal History: Conceptual Approaches (Max Planck, 2014).Google Scholar

Goldsmith, J. and Levinson, D., ‘Law for States: International Law, Constitutional Law, Public Law’, Harvard Law Review 122 (2009), 1.Google Scholar

Gustafsson, K., ‘The ‘History Problem’ in Sino-Japanese Relations: What’s the Problem?’ (E-International Relations, 31 October 2016) www.e-ir.info/2016/10/31/the-history-problem-in-sino-japanese-relations-whats-the-problem/ accessed 21 January 2018.Google Scholar

Haley, J., Authority without Power: Law and the Japanese Paradox (Oxford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Harding, A., ‘Global Doctrine and Local Knowledge: Law in South East Asia’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 51 (2002),35.Google Scholar

Hata, I., ‘No Organised or Forced Recruitment: Misconceptions about Comfort Women and the Japanese Military’ (Society for the Dissemination of Historical Fact, 2007) www.sdh-fact.com/category/comfort-women/ accessed 5 October 2017.Google Scholar

Hayashi, Y., ‘Implementation of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women in Japan’, Journal of East Asian and International Law 6 (2013), 341.Google Scholar

Hearman, V., ‘Between Citizenship and Human Rights: The Struggle for Justice after Indonesia’s 1965 Mass Violence’, Citizenship Studies 22 (2018), 175.Google Scholar

Hee-Seok Shin, E., ‘The “Comfort Women” Reparation Movement: Between Universal Women’s Human Right and Particular Anti-Colonial Nationalism’, Florida Journal of International Law 28 (2016), 87.Google Scholar

Hein, L., ‘Savage Irony: The Imaginative Power of the ‘Military Comfort Women’ in the 1990s’, Gender and History 11 (1999), 336.Google Scholar

Hein, P., ‘Unresolved Comfort Women Issue: How Pragmatism Precludes Reconciliation’, The Korean Journal of International Studies 14 (2016), 447.Google Scholar

Hessbruegge, J., ‘Justice Delayed, Not Denied: Statutory Limitations and Human Rights Crimes’, Georgetown Journal of International Law 43 (2012), 335.Google Scholar

Hicks, G., Japan’s War Memories: Amnesia or Concealment (Ashgate, 1997).Google Scholar

Igarashi, M., ‘Post-War Compensation Cases, Japanese Courts and International Law’, Japanese Annual of International Law 45 (2000), 45.Google Scholar

International Center for Transitional Justice, ‘Briefing Paper: Transitional Justice in the United Nations Human Rights Council’ (International Center for Transitional Justice, 6 July 2011) www.ictj.org/publication/transitional-justice-united-nations-human-rights-council accessed 15 September 2017.Google Scholar

Iwanaga, K., ‘Women’s Political Representation in Japan’ in Iwanaga, K. (ed.), Women’s Political Participation and Representation in Asia: Obstacles and Challenges (NIAS Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Iwasawa, Y., ‘International Law in the Japanese Legal Order: Recent Developments’, American Society of International Law Proceedings 91 (1997), 302.Google Scholar

Jeffery, R. and Kim, H. (eds.), Transitional Justice in the Asia-Pacific (Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Johnson, D., The Japanese Way of Justice: Prosecuting Crime in Japan (Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Kaur, J., ‘A Judicial Blackout: Judicial Impunity for Disappearances in Punjab, India’, Harvard Human Rights Journal 15 (2002), 269.Google Scholar

Kaur Sarkaria, M., ‘Lessons from Punjab’s Missing Girls: Toward a Global Feminist Perspective on Choice in Abortion [comments]’, California Law Review 97 (2009), 905.Google Scholar

Kazi, S., ‘Rape, Impunity and Justice in Kashmir’, Socio-Legal Review 10 (2014), 14.Google Scholar

Kim, H., ‘Missed Opportunities in the Judicialisation of International Criminal Law? Asian States in the Emergence and Spread of the Rome Statute System to Punish Atrocity Crimes’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 35 (2017), 246.Google Scholar

Kimura, M., Unfolding the ‘Comfort Women’ Debates: Modernity, Violence, Women’s Voices (Springer, 2016).Google Scholar

Kingston, J., ‘History Haunts Japan’s Prime Minister Abe’, Asia-Pacific Journal 13 (2015).Google Scholar

Knop, K. and Riles, A., ‘Space, Time, and Historical Injustice: A Feminist Conflict-of-Laws Approach to the Comfort Women Agreement’, Cornell Law Review 102 (2017), 853.Google Scholar

Lambourne, W., ‘Justice after Genocide: Impunity and the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia’, Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal 8 (2014), 29.Google Scholar

Landino, J., ‘Ianfu: No Comment Yet for Korean Comfort Women and the Impact of House Resolution 121’, Cardozo Journal of Law and Gender 15 (2009), 333.Google Scholar

Le Clercq Ortega, J. and Sánchez Lara, G. (eds.), Global Impunity Index (Fundación Universidad de las Américas Puebla, 2015).Google Scholar

Lee, S., ‘Comforting the Comfort Women: Who Can Make Japan Pay?’, University of Pennsylvania Journal of Economics and Law 24 (2003), 509.Google Scholar

Legrand, P., ‘The Impossibility of ‘Legal Transplants’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 4 (1997), 111.Google Scholar

Liddick, E. and Gagnon, J. ‘Striving for Peace and Reconciliation in Sri Lanka: A Creative Solution to Conflict’, War Crimes, Genocide and Crimes against Humanity 3 (2009), 39.Google Scholar

Liu, H., Law’s Impunity (Hart Publishing, 2015).Google Scholar

Lutz, E. and Sikkink, K. ‘The Justice Cascade: The Evolution and Impact of Foreign Human Rights Trials in Latin America’, Chicago Journal of International Law 2 (2001), 8.Google Scholar

Manirabona, A. and Wemmers, J.-A. ‘It Doesn’t Go Away with Time: Victims’ Need for Reparation Following Crimes against Humanity’ in Wemmers, J.-A. (ed.), Reparation for Victims of Crimes against Humanity: the Healing Role of Reparation (Routledge, 2014), 77.Google Scholar

McCargo, D., ‘Transitional Justice and Its Discontents’, Journal of Democracy 26 (2015), 5.Google Scholar

McCurry, J., ‘Former Sex Slaves Reject Japan and South Korea’s “Comfort Women” Accord’ The Guardian, 26 January 2016 www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jan/26/former-sex-slaves-reject-japan-south-koreas-comfort-women-accord accessed 14 September 2017.Google Scholar

McDougall, G., ‘Addressing State Responsibility for the Crime of Military Sexual Slavery during the Second World War: Further Attempts for Justice for the Comfort Women’, Korean Journal of International and Comparative Law 1 (2013), 137.Google Scholar

McGregor, K., ‘Exposing Impunity: Memory and Human Rights Activism in Indonesia and Argentina’, Journal of Genocide Research 19 (2017), 551.Google Scholar

Mera, K., Comfort Women not ‘Sex Slaves’: Rectifying the Myriad of Perspectives (Xlibris, 2015).Google Scholar

Merry, S., Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice (Chicago University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Merry, S.‘Transnational Human Rights and Local Activism’, American Anthropologist 108 (1) (2006), 44.Google Scholar

Merry, S. and Levitt, P. ‘Vernacularization on the Ground: Local Uses of Global Women’s Rights in Peru, China, India and the United States’, Global Networks 9 (2009), 441.Google Scholar

Morris, N., ‘Review: Yuki Tanaka – Japan’s Comfort Women: Sexual Slavery and Prostitution during World War II and the US Occupation’, Intersections: Gender, History and Culture in the Asian Context 9 (2003) http://intersections.anu.edu.au/issue9/morris_review.html accessed 21 January 2019.Google Scholar

Nelken, D., ‘Signaling Conformity: Changing Norms in Japan and China’, Michigan Journal of International Law 27 (2006), 933.Google Scholar

Odanaka, N., ‘From Responsibility to Compassion: Lessons from the Controversy over ‘Comfort Women in Japan’, Journal of Japanese Law 31 (2011), 49.Google Scholar

Onuma, Y., ‘Japanese War Guilt and Postwar Responsibilities of Japan’, Berkeley Journal of International Law 20 (2003), 600.Google Scholar

Orakhelashvili, A., ‘Between Impunity and Accountability for Serious International Crimes: Legal and Policy Approaches’, Netherlands International Law Review 55 (2009), 217.Google Scholar

Orentlicher, D., “Settling Accounts’ Revisited: Reconciling Global Norms with Local Agency’, International Journal of Transitional Justice 1 (2007),19.Google Scholar

Örücü, E., ‘Law as Transposition’, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 51 (2002), 205.Google Scholar

Ottley, B., ‘Legal Dissonance: The Interaction of Criminal Law and Customary Law in Papua New Guinea’, Asia Pacific Law Review 24 (2016), 83.Google Scholar

Park Hsu, Y., “Comfort Women’ From Korea: Japan’s World War II Sex Slaves and the Legitimacy of Their Claims for Reparations’, Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal 2 (1993), 97.Google Scholar

Park Sonen, M., ‘Healing Multidimensional Wounds of Injustice: Intersectionality and the Korean “Comfort Women”’, Berkeley La Raza Law Journal 22 (2012), 269.Google Scholar

Peerenboom, R., ‘Assessing Human Rights in China: Why the Double Standard’, Cornell International Law Journal 38 (2005), 71.Google Scholar

Penrose, M., ‘Impunity- Inertia, Inaction, and Invalidity: A Literature Review’, Boston University International Law Journal 17 (1999), 273.Google Scholar

Port, K., ‘The Impact of Human Rights Law in Japan’, Stanford Journal of International Law 28 (1991), 140.Google Scholar

Qiu, P., Zhiliang, S. and Lifei, C., Chinese Comfort Women: Testimonies from Imperial Japan’s Sex Slaves (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Robertson, C., ‘Ending Impunity: How International Criminal Law Can Put Tyrants on Trial’, Cornell International Law Journal 38 (2005), 649.Google Scholar

Rajan, S., ‘Domestication of International Criminal Law: International Crimes Tribunal of Bangladesh, A Case Study’, ISIL Year Book of International Humanitarian and Refugee Law 12–13 (2013), 132.Google Scholar

Sakamoto, R., ‘The Women’s International War Crimes Tribunal on Japan’s Military Sexual Slavery: A Legal and Feminist Approach to the ‘Comfort Women’ Issue’, New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies 3 (2001), 49.Google Scholar

Say, B., ‘Ripe for Justice: A New UN Tool to Strengthen the Position of the “Comfort Women” and to Corner Japan into Its Reparation Responsibility’, Pennsylvania State International Law Review 23 (2004), 953.Google Scholar

Scharf, M., ‘From the eXile Files: An Essay on Trading Justice for Peace’, Washington and Lee Law Review 63 (2006), 342.Google Scholar

Scharf, M.‘The Letter of the Law: The Scope of the International Legal Obligation to Prosecute Human Rights Crimes’, Law and Contemporary Problems 53 (1996), 60.Google Scholar

Schmidt, D., Ianfu, the Comfort Women of the Japanese Imperial Army of the Pacific War: Broken Silence (Edwin Mellen Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Schmidt, P., ‘Disabled Colonial Veterans of the Imperial Japanese Forces and the Right to Receive Social Welfare Benefits from Japan’, Sydney Law Review 21 (1999), 240.Google Scholar

Se, T. and Karatsu, R. ‘A Conception of Human Rights Based on Japanese Culture: Promoting Cross-Cultural Debates’, Journal of Human Rights 3 (2004), 283.Google Scholar

Seaton, P., Japan’s Contested War Memories: The ‘Memory Rifts’ in Historical (Routledge, 2007).Google Scholar

Seibert-Fohr, A., Prosecuting Serious Human Rights Violations (Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Selden, M. and Yoshiko, N., ‘Japanese Textbook Controversies, Nationalism, and Historical Memory: Intra- and Inter-National Conflicts’, The Asia Pacific Journal – Japan Focus 7 (2009).Google Scholar

Senda, K., Jugun lanfu (San’Ichi Shobo, 1978).Google Scholar

Sigur Center for Asian Studies at the George Washington University, ‘Korean Comfort Women v. Japan’ (Memory and Reconciliation in the Asia-Pacific) https://memoryreconciliation.org/topics/comfort-women/comfort-women-korea/ accessed 13 September 2017.Google Scholar

Soh, S., The Comfort Women: Sexual Violence and Postcolonial Memory in Korea and Japan (University of Chicago Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Tanaka, Y., “Comfort Women Bashing’ and Japan’s Social Formation’ in Lewis, M. (ed.), ‘History Wars’ and Reconciliation in Japan and Korea: The Roles of Historians, Artists and Activists (Springer, 2016).Google Scholar

Terrill, R., World Criminal Justice Systems: A Comparative Survey (Routledge, 2015).Google Scholar

Teubner, G., ‘Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends Up in New Differences’, Modern Law Review 61 (1998), 11.Google Scholar

Totsuka, E., ‘Proposals for Japan and the ROK to Resolve the “Comfort Women” Issue: Creating trust and peace in light of international law’, Asia Pacific Journal: Japan Focus 11 (2013), 1.Google Scholar

The Mainichi, ‘S. Korean Foundation a Vital Bridge to Solve ‘Comfort Women’ Issue’, The Mainichi, 29 August 2016 http://mainichi.jp/english/articles/20160829/p2a/00m/0na/016000 c#csidx54df400df19be84bb8e6ad12acf4533 accessed 13 September 2017.Google Scholar

Tsutomu, N., ‘Behind The Comfort Women Controversy: How Lies Became Truth’ (2007) Society for Dissemination of Historical Fact, www.sdh-fact.com/category/comfort-women/ accessed 5 October 2017.Google Scholar

Twining, W., ‘Diffusion of Law: A Global Perspective’ in Twining, W. General Jurisprudence: Understanding Law from a Global Perspective (Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Twining, W.‘Social Science and Diffusion of Law’, Journal of Law and Society 32 (2005), 203.Google Scholar

Urabe, N., ‘Rule of Law and Due Process: A Comparative View of the United States and Japan’, Law and Contemporary Problems 53 (1990), 69.Google Scholar

van Boven, T., ‘Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law’ (United Nations Archive, Audiovisual Library of International Law, 16 December 2005) http://legal.un.org/avl/ha/ga_60–147/ga_60–147.html accessed 22 November 2017.Google Scholar

Watson, A., ‘Comparative Law and Legal Change’, Cambridge Law Journal 37 (1978), 315.Google Scholar

Watson, A.Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law 2nd edn (University of Georgia Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Wolfe, S., The Politics of Reparations and Apologies (Springer, 2013).Google Scholar

Women’s Caucus for Gender Justice, ‘Re: Judgment of the Women’s International War Crimes Tribunal 2000 for the Trial of Japanese Military Sexual Slavery, ‘In the matter of the Prosecutors and the Peoples of the Asia-Pacific Region v. Emperor Hirohito et al. and the Government of Japan’ (Women’s Caucus for Gender Justice, 2000) www.iccwomen.org/wigjdraft1/Archives/oldWCGJ/tokyo/judgmentannounce.html accessed 12 September 2017.Google Scholar

Zarni, M. and Brinham, N. ‘Reworking the Colonial-Era Indian Peril: Myanmar’s State-Directed Persecution of Rohingyas and Other Muslims’, Brown Journal of World Affairs 24 (2017), 53.Google Scholar

Zhao, B., ‘Land Expropriation, Protest, and Impunity in Rural China’, European Journal of Anthropology 54 (2009), 97.Google Scholar

Zwanenburg, M., ‘The Van Boven / Bassiouni Principles: An Appraisal’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 24 (2006), 641.Google Scholar

Cases

Filartiga v. Pena-Irala, 630 F2d 876 (2d Cir 1980).Google Scholar

Koichi Mera and GAHT-US Corporation v. City of Glendale (9th Cir 2016).Google Scholar

Prosecutors and Peoples of Asia Pacific Region v. Hirohito; Prosecutors and Peoples of Asia Pacific Region v. Japan, Summary of Findings and Preliminary Judgment, Women’s International War Crimes Tribunal 2000 (12 December 2000).Google Scholar

International Treaties and Instruments

Agreement on the Settlement of Problems concerning Property and Claims and on Economic Co-Operation between Japan and the Republic of Korea (entered into force 18 December 1965) 583 UNTS 258.Google Scholar

Convention against the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women (entered into force 3 September 1981) 1249 UNTS 13.Google Scholar

International Convention for the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearance (opened for signature 6 February 2007, entered into force 23 December 2010) 2716 UNTS 3.Google Scholar

International Convention on the Non-Applicability of Statutory Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity (adopted 26 November 1968, entered into force 11 November 1970) 754 UNTS 73.Google Scholar

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (adopted 16 December 1966, entered into force 23 March 1976) 999 UNTS 171.Google Scholar

Reparations Agreement between Japan and the Philippines (entered into force 9 May 1956) 285 UNTS 3.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace between Japan and the Republic of Indonesia (entered into force 15 April 1958) 324 UNTS 235 and Reparations Agreement 324 UNTS 247.Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace between the Union of Burma and Japan (entered into force 16 April 1955) 251 UNTS 201.Google Scholar

Treaty on Basic Relations between Japan and the Republic of Korea (entered into force 22 June 1965) 583 UNTS 44.Google Scholar

UNCHR (Sub-Commission), ‘Question of the Impunity of Perpetrators of Violations of Human Rights (Civil and Political Rights): Final Report prepared by Mr L Joinet, pursuant to Subcommission resolution 1995/35’ (29 June 1996) UN Doc E/CN.4/Sub.2/1996/18 annex II ‘Set of Principles for The Protection and Promotion of Human Rights through Action to Combat Impunity’.Google Scholar

UNHRC, ‘Report of the Independent Expert [Diane Orentlicher] to Update the Set of Principles to Combat Impunity’ UN Doc E/CN.4/2005/102/Add.1 (8 February 2005) addendum ‘Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights through Action to Combat Impunity’.Google Scholar

Universal Declaration of Human Rights (adopted 10 December 1948) UNGA Res 217 A(III).Google Scholar

World Conference on Human Rights: Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action (adopted 25 June 1993) A/CONF.157/23.Google Scholar

Japanese Government Sources

Ministry of Foreign Affairs, ‘Statement by Chief Cabinet Secretary Koichi Kato on the Issue of the so-called “Wartime Comfort Women” from the Korean Peninsula’ (Japanese Government, 6 July 1992) www.mofa.go.jp/policy/postwar/state9207.html accessed 11 September 2017.Google Scholar

Ministry of Foreign Affairs‘Statement by the Chief Cabinet Secretary Yohei Kono on the result of the study on the issue of “comfort women” (‘Kono Statement’)’ (Japanese Government, 4 August 1993) www.mofa.go.jp/policy/women/fund/state9308.html accessed 11 September 2017.Google Scholar

Ministry of Foreign Affairs‘Statement by Prime Minister Tomiichi Murayama on the occasion of the establishment of the “Asian Women’s Fund”’ (Japanese Government, July 1995) www.mofa.go.jp/policy/women/fund/state9507.html accessed 11 September 2017.Google Scholar

Ministry of Foreign Affairs‘Statement by the Chief Cabinet Secretary’ (Japanese Government, 14 June 1995) www.mofa.go.jp/policy/women/fund/state9506.html accessed 11 September 2017.Google Scholar

Ministry of Foreign Affairs‘Announcement by Foreign Ministers of Japan and the Republic of Korea at the Joint Press Occasion’ (Japanese Government, 28 December 2015) www.mofa.go.jp/a_o/na/kr/page4e_000364.html accessed 13 September 2017.Google Scholar

Ministry of Foreign Affairs‘Reply of the Government of Japan to the Letter Sent by the Special Rapporteur for Follow-up to Concluding Observations of the Human Rights Committee’ (Japanese Government, 19 April 2016) www.mofa.go.jp/policy/human/cove_civil/index.html accessed 13 September 2017.Google Scholar

Ministry of Foreign Affairs‘Japan-ROK Foreign Ministers’ Telephone Talk’ (Japanese Government, 12 August 2016) www.mofa.go.jp/a_o/na/kr/page4e_000490.html accessed 13 September 2017.Google Scholar

Non-Governmental and United Nations Sources

Assembly of States Parties to the ICC, ‘Statement by Ambassador Motohide Yoshikawa, at the thirteenth session of the ASP to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court’ (Assembly of States Parties, 11 December 2014) https://asp.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/asp_docs/ASP13/GenDeba/ICC- ASP13-GenDeba-Japan-ENG.pdf accessed 2 October 2017.Google Scholar

UN Committee against Torture, ‘Concluding Observations on the Second Periodic Report of Japan’ (28 June 2013) UN Doc CAT/C/JPN/CO/2.Google Scholar

UNHRC ‘Consideration of Reports Submitted By States Parties under Article 40 of the Covenant : International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: 6th Periodic Report of States Parties: Japan’ (9 October 2012) UN Doc CCPR/C/JPN/6.Google Scholar

UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, ‘Report of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women’ (12 April 1994) UN Doc A/49/38.Google Scholar

UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women‘Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 18 of the Convention, Seventh and eighth periodic reports of States parties due in 2014: Japan’ (16 September 2014) UN Doc CEDAW/C/JPN/7–8.Google Scholar

UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against WomenConcluding Observations on the Combined Seventh and Eighth Periodic Reports of Japan’ (10 March 2016) UN Doc CEDAW/C/JPN/CO/7–8.Google Scholar

UNCHR, ‘Report of the Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences, Ms Radhika Coomaraswamy, in accordance with Commission on Human Rights resolution 1994/45: Report on the mission to the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea and Japan on the issue of military sexual slavery in wartime’ (7 February 1996) UN Doc E/CN.4/1996/53/Add. 1/Corr. 1.Google Scholar

UNCHR‘Final report submitted by Ms Gay J McDougall, Special Rapporteur’ (22 June 1998) UN Doc E/CN.4/Sub.2/1998/13.Google Scholar

UNCHR‘Report of the Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea’ (2014) UN Doc A/HRC/25/63.United Nations, ‘Fact-Finding Mission on Myanmar: Concrete and Overwhelming Information Points to International Crimes’ (United Nations, 12 March 2018) www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/Pages/NewsDetail.aspx?NewsID=22794&LangID=E accessed 12 April 2018.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.