Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-8p85h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-15T08:58:09.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Halosulfuron Tank-Mixes Applied PRE in White Bean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Zhenyi Li ,
Rene C. Van Acker ,
Darren E. Robinson ,
Nader Soltani  and
Peter H. Sikkema
Zhenyi Li
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, 120 Main St. East, Ridgetown, ON, N0P 2C0, Canada
Rene C. Van Acker
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, 120 Main St. East, Ridgetown, ON, N0P 2C0, Canada
Darren E. Robinson
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, 120 Main St. East, Ridgetown, ON, N0P 2C0, Canada
Nader Soltani*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, 120 Main St. East, Ridgetown, ON, N0P 2C0, Canada
Peter H. Sikkema
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, 120 Main St. East, Ridgetown, ON, N0P 2C0, Canada
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: soltanin@uoguelph.ca.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

White bean tolerance and weed control were examined by applying halosulfuron alone or in combination with pendimethalin, dimethenamid-P, or S-metolachlor applied PRE. All herbicides applied alone or in combination caused less than 3% visible injury 1 and 4 wk after emergence (WAE). Halosulfuron applied PRE provided greater than 95% control of common lambsquarters, wild mustard, redroot pigweed, and common ragweed and less than 55% control of green foxtail at 4 and 8 WAE. Weed density and dry weight at 8 WAE paralleled the control ratings. Dry bean yields in halosulfuron plus a soil applied grass herbicide did not differ compared to the weed-free control. Green foxtail competition with halosulfuron PRE applied alone resulted in reduced white bean yield compared to the weed-free control.

La tolerancia del frijol blanco y el control de malezas fueron examinados para aplicaciones PRE de halosulfuron solo o en combinación con pendimethalin, dimethenamid-P, o S-metolachlor. Todos los herbicidas aplicados solos o en combinación causaron menos de 3% de daño visible, a 1 y 4 semanas después de la emergencia (WAE). Halosulfuron aplicado PRE brindó un control mayor a 95% de Chenopodium album, Sinapis arvensis, Amaranthus retroflexus, y Ambrosia trifida, y menor a 55% para el control de Setaria viridis, a 4 y 8 WAE. Las reducciones en la densidad y peso seco de las malezas a 8 WAE fueron proporcionales a las evaluaciones de control. Los rendimientos del frijol blanco con combinaciones de halosulfuron más otro herbicida no fueron diferentes al compararse con el testigo libre de malezas. La competencia causada por S. viridis en parcelas con halosulfuron PRE aplicado solo resultó en reducciones en el rendimiento del frijol blanco al compararse con el testigo libre de malezas.

Keywords

Dimethenamid-PhalosulfuronpendimethalinS-metolachlorcommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L.common ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.green foxtail, Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv.redroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L.wild mustard, Sinapis arvensis L.white bean, Phaseolus vulgaris L.Dry beaninjuryseed moisture contentweed controlweed emergenceyield

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 57 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Associate Editor for this paper: William Johnson, Purdue University.

References

Literature Cited

Arnold, RN, Murray, MW, Gregory, EJ, Smeal, D (1993) Weed control in pinto beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) with imazethapyr combinations. Weed Technol 7:361–364 Google Scholar
Bauer, TA, Renner, KA, Penner, D, Kelly, JD (1995) Pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) varietal tolerance to imazethapyr. Weed Sci 43:417–424 Google Scholar
Betts, MF, Morrison, IN (1979) Fall and spring applications of trifluralin and metribuzin in fababeans (Vicia faba). Weed Sci 27:691–695 Google Scholar
Blackshaw, RE, Saindon, G (1996) Dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) tolerance to imazethapyr. Can J Plant Sci 76:915–919 Google Scholar
Brown, D, Masiunas, J (2002) Evaluation of herbicides for pumpkin (Cucurbita spp.). Weed Technol 16:282–292 Google Scholar
Chikoye, D, Weise, SF, Swanton, CJ (1995) Influence of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) time of emergence and density on white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Sci 43:375–380 Google Scholar
Chomas, AJ, Kells, JJ (2004) Triazine-resistant common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) control in corn with preemergence herbicides. Weed Technol 18:551–554 Google Scholar
Dermiyati, SK, Yamamoto, I (1997) Degradation of the herbicide halosulfuron-methyl in two soils under different environmental conditions. J Pestic Sci 22:282–287 Google Scholar
Ferrell, JA, Murphy, TR, Burpee, LL, Vencill, WK (2003) Effect of brown patch (caused by Rhizoctonia solani) control on preemergence herbicide efficacy in tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea). Weed Technol 17:747–750 Google Scholar
Grey, TL, Vencill, WK, Mantripagada, N, Culpepper, AS (2007) Residual herbicide dissipation from soil covered with low-density polyethylene mulch or left bare. Weed Sci 55:638–643 Google Scholar
[HCPMRA] Health Canada Pest Management Regulatory Agency (2010). Imazethapyr. http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2011/sc-hc/H113-27-2010-2-eng.pdf. Accessed May 12, 2014Google Scholar
Hutchinson, PJ, Ransom, CV, Boydston, RA, Beutler, BR (2005) Dimethenamid-P: efficacy and potato (Solanum tuberosum) variety tolerance. Weed Technol 19:996–971Google Scholar
Isaacs, MA, Hatzios, KK, Wilson, HP, Toler, J (2006) Halosulfuron and 2,4-D mixtures' effects on common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album). Weed Technol 20:137–142 Google Scholar
Malik, VS, Swanton, CJ, Michaels, TE (1993) Interaction of white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars, row spacing, and seeding density with annual weeds. Weed Sci 41:62–68 Google Scholar
[OMAF] Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food (2012) Guide to weed control Toronto, ON. Canada OMAF Publication 75. 396 pGoogle Scholar
Poling, KW, Renner, KA, Penner, D (2009) Dry edible bean class and cultivar response to dimethenamid and metolachlor. Weed Technol 23:73–80 Google Scholar
Senseman, SA (2007) Herbicide Handbook. 9th edn. Champaign, II. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America Pp 76–78 Google Scholar
Sikkema, PH, Soltani, N, Shropshire, C, Cowan, T (2004) Tolerance of white beans to postemergence broadleaf herbicides. Weed Technol 18:893–901 Google Scholar
Soltani, N, Nurse, RE, Shropshire, C, Sikkema, PH (2012a) Weed control, environmental impact and profitability of pre-plant incorporated herbicides in white bean. Am J Plant Sci 3:846–853 Google Scholar
Soltani, N, Nurse, RE, Shropshire, C, Sikkema, PH (2012b) Weed control in dry bean with pendimethalin plus reduced rates of imazethapyr. Int Res J Agric Sci Soil Sci 2:312–317 Google Scholar
Soltani, N, Nurse, RE, Shropshire, C, Sikkema, PH (2013a) Response of dry bean to pendimethalin applied preplnat incorporated or preemergence. Afr J Agric Res 8:4827–4832 Google Scholar
Soltani, N, Nurse, RE, Shropshire, C, Sikkema, PH (2013b) Weed control in white bean with pendimethalin applied preplant followed by postemergence broadleaved herbicides. Open Plant Sci J 7:24–30 Google Scholar
Soltani, N, Nurse, RE, Shropshire, C, Sikkema, PH (2013c) Weed mangement in white beans with postemergence herbicide tankmixes. Can J Plant Sci 93:669–674 Google Scholar
Soltani, N, Nurse, RE, Shropshire, C, Sikkema, PH (2014a) Sensitivity of dry bean to dimethenamid-P, saflufenacil and dimethenamid-p/saflufenacil. Am J Plant Sci 5:3288–3294 Google Scholar
Soltani, N, Nurse, RE, Shropshire, C, Sikkema, PH (2014b) Weed control in white bean with various halosulfuron tankmixes. Adv Agric 2014:1–7 Google Scholar
Soltani, N, Nurse, RE, Shropshire, C, Sikkema, PH (2014c) Weed control with halosulfuron applied preplant incorporated, preemergence or postemergence in white bean. Agric Sci 5:875–881 Google Scholar
Soltani, N, Nurse, RE, Shropshire, C, Sikkema, PH (2014d) Weed management in kidney bean with tankmixes of S-metolachlor, imazethapyr and linuron. Agric Sci 5:611–617 Google Scholar
Soltani, N, Shropshire, C, Cowan, T, Sikkema, PH (2004) White bean sensitivity to preemergence herbicides. Weed Technol 18:675–679 Google Scholar
Soltani, N, VanEerd, LL, Vyn, R, Shropshire, C, Sikkema, PH (2007) Weed management in dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) with dimethenamid plus reduced doses of imazethapyr applied preplant incorporated. Crop Prot 26:739–745 Google Scholar
Statistics Canada (2015) Table 001-0010—Estimated areas, yield, production and average farm price of field crops, in metric units annual, CANSIM (database). http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/a47. Accessed on April 18, 2015Google Scholar
Van Acker, RC, Thomas, AG, Leeson, JY, Knezevic, SZ, Frick, BL (2000) Comparison of weed communities in Manitoba ecoregions and crops. Can J Plant Sci 80:963–972 Google Scholar
Wilson, RG, Miller, SD (1991) Dry edible bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) response to imazethapyr. Weed Technol 5:22–26 Google Scholar