Predictability – a problem partly solved

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511617652.004

Chapter 3 - Predictability – a problem partly solved

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 December 2009

Edward N. Lorenz

Edited by

Tim Palmer and

Renate Hagedorn

Show author details

Edward N. Lorenz: Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge
Tim Palmer: Affiliation:
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
Renate Hagedorn: Affiliation:
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Ed Lorenz, pioneer of chaos theory, presented this work at an earlier ECMWF workshop on predictability. The paper, which has never been published externally, presents what is widely known as the Lorenz 1996 model. Ed was unable to come to the 2002 meeting, but we decided it would be proper to acknowledge Ed's unrivalled contribution to the field of weather and climate predictability by publishing his 1996 paper in this volume.

The difference between the state that a system is assumed or predicted to possess, and the state that it actually possesses or will possess, constitutes the error in specifying or forecasting the state. We identify the rate at which an error will typically grow or decay, as the range of prediction increases, as the key factor in determining the extent to which a system is predictable. The long-term average factor by which an infinitesimal error will amplify or diminish, per unit time, is the leading Lyapunov number; its logarithm, denoted by λ1, is the leading Lyapunov exponent. Instantaneous growth rates can differ appreciably from the average.

With the aid of some simple models, we describe situations where errors behave as would be expected from a knowledge of λ1, and other situations, particularly in the earliest and latest stages of growth, where their behaviour is systematically different. Slow growth in the latest stages may be especially relevant to the long-range predictability of the atmosphere.

Type: Chapter
Information: Predictability of Weather and Climate , pp. 40 - 58

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617652.004 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Charney, J. G., Fleagle, R. G., Lally, V. E., Riehl, H. and Wark, D. Q. (1966). The feasibility of a global observation and analysis experiment. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 47, 200–20Google Scholar

Farrell, B. F. (1989). Optimal excitation of baroclinic waves. J. Atmos. Sci., 46, 1193–2062.0.CO;2>CrossRef Google Scholar

Kalnay, E. and Dalcher, A. (1987). Forecasting forecast skill. Mon. Weather Rev., 115, 349–562.0.CO;2>CrossRef Google Scholar

Leith, C. E. (1965). Lagrangian advection in an atmospheric model. In WMO-IUGG Symposium on Research and Development Aspects of Long-range Forecasting, WMO Technical Note 66, 168–76Google Scholar

Lorenz, E. N. (1969a). The predictability of a flow which possesses many scales of motion. Tellus, 21, 289–307CrossRef Google Scholar

Lorenz, E. N. (1969b). Atmospheric predictability as revealed by naturally occurring analogues. J. Atmos. Sci., 26, 636–462.0.CO;2>CrossRef Google Scholar

Lorenz, E. N. (1982). Atmospheric predictability experiments with a large numerical model. Tellus, 34, 505–13CrossRef Google Scholar

Lorenz, E. N. (1993). The Essence of Chaos. University of Washington PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Mintz, Y. (1965). Very long-term global integration of the primitive equations of atmospheric motion. In WMO-IUGG Symposium on Research and Development Aspects of Long-range Forecasting, WMO Technical Note 66, 141–67Google Scholar

Palmer, T. N. (1988). Medium and extended range predictability and stability of the Pacific/North American mode. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 114, 691–713CrossRef Google Scholar

Simmons, A. J., Mureau, R. and Petroliagis, T. (1995). Error growth and estimates of predictability from the ECMWF forecasting system. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 121, 1739–1771CrossRef Google Scholar

Smagorinsky, J. (1965). Implications of dynamic modelling of the general circulation on long-range forecasting. In WMO-IUGG Symposium on Research and Development Aspects of Long-range Forecasting, WMO Technical Note 66, 131–7Google Scholar

Smagorinsky, J. (1969). Problems and promises of deterministic extended range forecasting. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 50, 286–311CrossRef Google Scholar

Thompson, P. D. (1957). Uncertainty of initial state as a factor in the predictability of large-scale atmospheric flow patterns. Tellus, 9, 275–95CrossRef Google Scholar

Toth, Z. and Kalnay, E. (1993). Ensemble forecasting at NMC: the generation of perturbations. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 74, 2317–302.0.CO;2>CrossRef Google Scholar

Zebiak, S. E. and Cane, M. A. (1987). A model El Niño-Southern Oscillation. Mon. Weather Rev., 115, 2262–782.0.CO;2>CrossRef Google Scholar