Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:52:02.245Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 14 - On the predictability of flow-regime properties on interannual to interdecadal timescales

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2009

Franco Molteni
Affiliation:
Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste
Fred Kucharski
Affiliation:
Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste
Susanna Corti
Affiliation:
Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate ISAC-CNR, Bologna
Tim Palmer
Affiliation:
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
Renate Hagedorn
Affiliation:
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Atmospheric flow regimes are usually defined as large-scale circulation patterns associated with statistical equilibria in phase space, in which the dynamical tendencies of the large-scale flow are balanced by tendencies due to non-linear interactions of high-frequency transients. The existence of states with such properties can be verified in a rigorous way in numerical simulations with simplified numerical models (as in the pioneering study of Reinhold and Pierrehumbert, 1982, or in the experiments by Vautard and Legras, 1988). By contrast, the existence of flow regimes in the real atmosphere has been strongly debated. The detection of regimes in the observational record of the upper-air field is indeed a complex task, which has been approached by a number of research groups with a variety of sophisticated statistical methods (see Section 14.3).

Although the regime classifications provided by the different observational studies were not identical, a ‘core’ number of regimes were consistently detected in most studies devoted to a specific spatial domain. For example, the three northern-hemisphere clusters found by Cheng and Wallace (1993) were also identified by Kimoto and Ghil (1993a), Corti et al. (1999) and Smyth et al. (1999). However, consistency does not necessarily imply statistical significance, and one may question whether the level of confidence attached to these regime classifications is sufficiently high.

The search for regimes in the real atmosphere is also made complex by the fact that, unlike in simple dynamical models, the sources of energy and momentum at the lower boundary display variations on seasonal, interannual and interdecadal timescales.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bourke, W. (1974). A multilevel spectral model. I: Formulation and hemispheric integrations. Mon. Weather Rev., 102, 687–7012.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bracco, A., Kucharski, F., Kallummal, R. and Molteni, F. (2004). Internal variability, external forcing and climate trends in multi-decadal AGCM ensembles. Climate Dyn., 23, 659–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brankovic, C. and Molteni, F. (1997). Sensitivity of the ECMWF model northern winter climate to model formulation. Clim. Dynam., 13, 75–101Google Scholar
Cehelsky, P. and Tung, K. K. (1987). Theories of multiple equilibria and weather regimes – a critical re-examination. II: Baroclinic two-layer models. J. Atmos. Sci, 44, 3282–3032.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charney, J. G., and Straus, D. M. (1980). Form-drag instability, multiple equilibria and propagating planetary waves in baroclinic, orographically forced, planetary wave systems. J. Atmos. Sci., 37, 1157–762.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, X. and Wallace, J. M. (1993). Cluster analysis on the Northern Hemisphere wintertime 500-hPa height field: spatial patterns. J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 2674–952.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chessa, P. A. and Lalaurette, F. (2001). Verification of the ECMWF ensemble prediction system forecasts: a study of large-scale patterns. Weather Forecast., 5, 611–192.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corti, S., Molteni, F. and Palmer, T. N. (1999). Signature of recent climate change in frequencies of natural atmospheric circulation regimes. Nature, 398, 799–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrea, D' F. and Vautard, R. (2001). Extratropical low-frequency variability as a low dimensional problem. I: A simplified model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 127, 1357–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrendorfer, M. (1994). The Liouville equation and its potential usefulness for the prediction of forecast skill. I: Theory. Mon. Weather Rev., 122, 703–132.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghil, M. (1987). Dynamics, statistics and predictability of planetary flow regimes. In Irreversible Phenomena and Dynamical Systems Analysis in the Geosciences, ed. Nicolis, C. and Nicolis, G., pp. 241–283. Reidel, D.Google Scholar
Gleeson, T. A. (1970). Statistical-dynamical predictions. J. Appl. Meteor., 9, 333–442.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haines, K. and Hannachi, A. (1995). Weather regimes in the Pacific from a GCM. J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 2444–622.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, A. R. and Sutera, A. (1986). On the probability density distribution of large-scale atmospheric wave amplitude. J. Atmos. Sci., 43, 3250–652.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, A. R. and Sutera, A. (1995). The probability density distribution of planetary-scale atmospheric wave amplitude revisited. J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 2463–722.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, I. M. and Suarez, M. J. (1994). A proposal for the intercomparison of the dynamical cores of atmospheric general circulation models. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 75, 1825–302.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoerling, M. P., Hurrell, J. W. and Xu, T. (2001). Tropical origins for recent North Atlantic climatic change. Science, 292, 90–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houtekamer, P. L., Lefaivre, L., Derome, J., Ritchie, H. and Mitchell, H. L. (1996). A system simulation approach to ensemble prediction. Mon. Weather Rev, 124, 1225–422.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, C. J. and Zwiers, F. (2001). Climate change in recurrent regimes and modes of Northern Hemisphere atmospheric variability. J. Geophy. Res.-Atmos, 106, 20145–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, C. J. and Zwiers, F.IPCC (2001). Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, eds. Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D. J., et al. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., et al. (1996). The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77, 437–712.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimoto, M. and Ghil, M. (1993a). Multiple flow regimes in the Northern Hemisphere winter. I: Methodology and hemispheric regimes. J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 2625–432.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimoto, M. and Ghil, M. (1993b). Multiple flow regimes in the Northern Hemisphere winter. II: Sectorial regimes and preferred transitions. J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 2645–732.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, E. N. (1975). Climate predictability. In The Physical Basis of Climate Modeling, pp. 132–6. GARP Publication Series, 16 WMOGoogle Scholar
Marshall, J. and Molteni, F. (1993). Toward a dynamical understanding of planetary-scale flow regimes. J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 1792–8182.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelangeli, P.-A., Vautard, R. and Legras, B. (1995). Weather regimes: recurrence and quasi-stationarity. J. Atmos. Sci. 52, 1237–562.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mo, K. C. and Ghil, M. (1987). Statistics and dynamics of persistent anomalies. J. Atmos. Sci., 44, 877–9012.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mo, K. C. and Ghil, M. (1988). Cluster analysis of multiple planetary flow regimes. J. Geophys. Res., 93D, 10927–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molteni, F. (2003). Atmospheric simulations using a GCM with simplified physical parametrizations. I: Model climatology and variability in multi-decadal experiments. Clim. Dynam., 20, 175–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molteni, F. and Corti, S. (1998). Long term fluctuations in the statistical properties of low-frequency variability: dynamical origin and predictability. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 124, 495–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molteni, F., Tibaldi, S. and Palmer, T. N. (1990). Regimes in the wintertime circulation over northern extratropics. I: Observational evidence. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 116, 31–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molteni, F., Ferranti, L., Palmer, T. N. and Viterbo, P. (1993). A dynamical interpretation of the global response to equatorial Pacific SST anomalies. J. Climate, 6, 777–952.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molteni, F., Buizza, R., Palmer, T. N. and Petroliagis, T. (1996). The ECMWF ensemble prediction system: methodology and validation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 122, 73–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molteni, F., Corti, S., Ferranti, L. and Slingo, J. M. (2003). Predictability experiments for the Asian summer monsoon: impact of SST anomalies on interannual and intraseasonal variability. J. Climate, 16, 4001–212.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nitsche, G., Wallace, J. M. and Kooperberg, C. (1994). Is there evidence of multiple equilibria in planetary wave amplitude statistics?J. Atmos. Sci., 51, 314–222.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, T. N. (1993). Extended-range atmospheric prediction and the Lorenz model. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 74, 49–662.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, T. N. (1999). A nonlinear dynamical perspective on climate prediction. J. Climate, 12, 575–912.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhold, B. and Pierrehumbert, R. T. (1982). Dynamics of weather regimes: quasi- stationary waves and blocking. Mon. Weather Rev., 110, 1105–452.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, B. W. (1981). Using kernel-density estimators to investigate multimodality. J. Roy. Stat. Soc., B43, 97–9Google Scholar
Silverman, B. W. (1986). Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Chapman and HallCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. A. and Sardeshmukh, P. (2000). The effect of ENSO on the intraseasonal variance of surface temperature in winter. Int. J. Climatol., 20, 1543–573.0.CO;2-A>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T. M., Reynolds, R. W., Livezey, R. E. and Stokes, D. C. (1996). Reconstruction of historical sea surface temperatures using empirical orthogonal functions. J. Climate, 9, 1403–202.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, P., Die, K. and Ghil, M. (1999). Multiple regimes in Northern Hemisphere height fields via mixture model clustering. J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 3704–232.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, D. B., Hannachi, A. and Neill, A. O' (2004). On the existence of multiple climate regimes. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 130, 583–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straus, D. and Molteni, F. (2004). Circulation regimes and SST forcing: results from large GCM ensembles. J. Climate, 17, 1641–562.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, D. W. J. and Wallace, J. M. (1998). The Arctic Oscillation signature in the wintertime geopotential height and temperature fields. Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 1297–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toth, Z. and Kalnay, E. (1993). Ensemble forecasting at NMC: the generation of perturbations. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 74, 2317–302.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trenberth, K. E. and Hoar, T. J. (1997). El Niño and climate change. Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 3057–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vautard, R. (1990). Multiple weather regimes over the North Atlantic. Analysis of precursor and successors. Mon. Weather Rev. 118, 2056–812.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vautard, R. and Legras, B. (1988). On the source of midlatitude low-frequency variability. II: Nonlinear equilibration of weather regimes. J. Atmos. Sci., 45, 2845–672.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, J. M., Zhang, Y. and Bajuk, L. (1996). Interpretation of interdecadal trends in Northern Hemisphere surface air temperature. J. Climate, 9, 249–592.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y., Wallace, J. M. and Battisti, D. S. (1997). ENSO-like interdecadal variability: 1900–93. J. Climate, 10, 1004–202.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×