Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Introduction
- PART I HISTORY AND FOUNDATIONS OF DECISION ANALYSIS
- PART II STRUCTURING DECISION PROBLEMS
- PART III PROBABILITIES AND BAYES NETS
- PART IV UTILITIES
- PART V RISK ANALYSIS
- PART VI DECISION ANALYSIS IN A BEHAVIORAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT
- 18 What Have We Learned from Our Mistakes?
- 19 Decision Conferencing
- 20 Resource Allocation Decisions
- 21 From Decision Analysis to the Decision Organization
- 22 Building Decision Competency in Organizations
- 23 Negotiation Analysis: Between Decisions and Games
- PART VII APPLICATIONS OF DECISION ANALYSIS
- Index
- References
19 - Decision Conferencing
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Introduction
- PART I HISTORY AND FOUNDATIONS OF DECISION ANALYSIS
- PART II STRUCTURING DECISION PROBLEMS
- PART III PROBABILITIES AND BAYES NETS
- PART IV UTILITIES
- PART V RISK ANALYSIS
- PART VI DECISION ANALYSIS IN A BEHAVIORAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT
- 18 What Have We Learned from Our Mistakes?
- 19 Decision Conferencing
- 20 Resource Allocation Decisions
- 21 From Decision Analysis to the Decision Organization
- 22 Building Decision Competency in Organizations
- 23 Negotiation Analysis: Between Decisions and Games
- PART VII APPLICATIONS OF DECISION ANALYSIS
- Index
- References
Summary
ABSTRACT. This chapter presents the current status of the decision conference process, a way of helping a group of key players to resolve important issues in their organization by working together, under the guidance of an impartial facilitator, with the aid of a decision analysis model of participants' perspectives on the issues, developed on-the-spot over a period of two days. The facilitator serves as a process consultant, guiding the group through the stages of discussing the issues, developing a model, and exploring the results, without contributing to the content of discussions. The model serves as a “tool for thinking,” not as providing an optimal solution or “the right answer.” Participants are encouraged to express their sense of unease at any stage in the process, for it is the discrepancy between model results and intuitive judgment that drives the dialectic in the group. Exploration generates new insights and stimulates creative thinking, resulting in changes to the model and to intuitions. As this process settles down, participants develop a shared understanding of the issues, generate a sense of common purpose, and gain commitment to the way forward. Two case studies illustrate a typical individual decision conference and how sustained engagement with a client, decision conferencing, can lead to committed alignment in a group. Research on decision conferences provides insights into why decision conferences work.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Advances in Decision AnalysisFrom Foundations to Applications, pp. 375 - 399Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007
References
Ascher, K., and Nare, B. (1990). Strategic planning in the public sector. In (Ed.), International Review of Strategic Management, Vol. 1. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
, and (1992). Decision conference on emergency reference levels for relocation. Radiological Protection Bulletin, 133.Google Scholar
, , , , and (2002). Facilitating bid evaluation in public call for tenders: A socio-technical approach. Omega, 30, 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2004). Multicriteria evaluation of flood control measures: The case of Ribeira do Livramento. Water Resources Management, 18, 263–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2001). Conflict dissolution in the public sector: A case-study. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(2), 388–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1990). Image Theory: Decision Making in Personal and Organizational Contexts. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
, , , , and (1997). Airborne and space-borne reconnaissance force mixes: A decision analysis approach. Military Operations Research, 3(4), 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1992). Applications of decision analysis to the military systems acquisition process. Interfaces, 22(6), 110–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989). Giving up ‘The Smoke’: A major institution investigates alternatives to being sited in the city. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 40(8), 711–717.Google Scholar
, and (1995). Prioritizing projects and creating portfolios. Executive Briefing, 16, 33–36.Google Scholar
(1992). Analysis of Decision Conferencing: A UK/USA Comparison. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
, and (2003). Decision Analysis for Management Judgment, 3rd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Hickling, A. (1990). Decision spaces: A scenario about designing appropriate rooms for ‘activity-based’ decision management. In and (Eds.), Tackling Strategic Problems: The Role of Group Decision Support. London: Sage, pp. 167–177.Google Scholar
. (2003). The Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
(1998). Decision conferencing – a tool for budget allocation. Focus on Police Research and Development, May 1998(10), 22–23.Google Scholar
(1998). Requisite Organisation: A Total System for Effective Managerial Organization and Managerial Leadership for the 21st Century. Arlington, VA: Cason Hall.Google Scholar
(2002). Maps of bounded rationality: A perspective on intuitive judgment and choice. The Nobel Foundation. Retrieved December 8, 2002, from the World Wide Web.Google Scholar
(1992). Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
, and (1976). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
, and (1998). The Smart Organization: Creating Value through Strategic R&D. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
, and (1995). Managerial openness to change and the introduction of GDSS: Explaining initial success and failure in decision conferencing. Organization Science, 6(5), 569–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1982). Requisite decision modelling: A case study. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 33, 303–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, L. D. (1986). Decision analysis and its applications in industry. In (Ed.), Computer Assisted Decision Making. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Phillips, L. D. (1989). People-centred group decision support. In , , and (Eds.), Knowledge-Based Management Support Systems. Chichester, UK: Ellis Horwood.Google Scholar
Phillips, L. D. (1990). Requisite decision modelling for technological projects. In and (Eds.), Social Decision Methodology for Technological Projects. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 95–110.Google Scholar
, and (2007). Transparent prioritisation, budgeting and resource allocation with multi-criteria decision analysis and decision conferencing. Annals of Operations Research, in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1993). Facilitated work groups: Theory and practice. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 44(6), 533–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994). Improving the accuracy of group judgment: A process intervention combining group facilitation, social judgment analysis, and information technology. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 246–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RIIA. (1927). Royal Institute of International Affairs. Retrieved, from the World Wide Web, on February 3, 2007: http://www.chathamhouse.org.uk/
(1999). Process Consultation Revisited: Building the Helping Relationship. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
(2002). The Skilled Facilitator: A Comprehensive Resource for Consultants, Facilitators, Managers, Trainers and Coaches. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
(1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003). Thirsting for consensus: Multicriteria decision analysis helps clarify water resources planning in South Africa. OR/MS Today, 30(2), 30–34.Google Scholar
, and (Eds.). (1990). The Social Engagement of Social Science: A Tavistock Anthology (Vol. I: The Socio-Psychological Perspective). London: Free Association Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1996). Decision conferencing GDSS in environmental policy making: developing a long-term environmental plan in Hungary. Risk Decision and Policy, 1(1), 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooler, S., and Barclay, S. (1988). Strategy for reducing dependence on a strike-prone production facility. In and and and (Eds.), Strategic Decision Support, Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
- 96
- Cited by