A Systems Engineering Approach to Counterterrorism

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511761225.018

18 - A Systems Engineering Approach to Counterterrorism

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Edited by

James C. Kaufman and

Amihud Hari: Affiliation:
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
David H. Cropley: Affiliation:
University of South Australia
Arthur J. Cropley: Affiliation:
University of Hamburg
James C. Kaufman: Affiliation:
California State University at San Bernardino
Mark A. Runco: Affiliation:
University of Georgia

Book contents

Get access

Summary

TERRORISM AS CREATIVITY

Terrorism is “the systematic use of violence to create a general climate of fear in a population and thereby to bring about a particular political objective” (Encyclopaedia Britannica, 2005). Terrorism has a long history, and it affects almost every nation on earth: The terrorist activities of September 11, 2001 (abbreviated here as 9/11) brought this home with particular force. Terrorist actions such as 9/11 have two properties that are of particular interest for the present discussion: They must surprise the people against whom they are directed (otherwise the intended targets will implement appropriate prevention or avoidance measures), and they must be effective. If they do not have any concrete effect (such as killing people), they are a failure and even may lead to loss of resources for no gain, “gain” being understood in terms of dealing out death and destruction. This means that in order to cause a climate of fear, the malevolent products of terrorists must satisfy the two basic criteria of creativity (novelty and effectiveness). Thus they are an example of the dark side of creativity – indeed, because they deliberately seek to cause harm, of malevolent creativity.

Unlike most people and organizations that generate effective novelty, terrorists function more or less outside the conventional moral system. In terms of Sternberg's position (Chapter 17 of this volume), they do not concern themselves with the common good (although terrorists often claim that they are pursuing a higher-order common good, even in the societies they claim to be defending their work is often rejected or condemned), so they are not affected by moral considerations.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The Dark Side of Creativity , pp. 329 - 338

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761225.018 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Altshuller, G. S. (1984). Creativity as an exact science. New York: Gordon & Breach.Google Scholar

Clausing, D. (1994). Total quality development. New York: ASME Press.Google Scholar

Cropley, D. H. & Cropley, A. J. (2005). Engineering creativity: A systems concept of functional creativity. In Kaufman, J. C. and Baer, J. (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 169–185). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Cropley, D. H., Kaufmann, J., & Cropley, A. J. (2008). Malevolent creativity: A functional model of creativity in terrorism and crime, Creativity Research Journal, 20, 105–115.CrossRef Google Scholar

,DODAF. (2004). DoD architecture framework, Version 1.0, Vol. 1, February 9,. Washington D.C., 83 pp.Google Scholar

Dove, R. (2001). Response ability: The language, structure and culture of the agile enterprise. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Britannica, Encyclopædia. “Terrorism.” In Encyclopedia Brittanica. Available at http://www.britannica.com. Accessed May 13, 2005.

Gordon, W. J. J. (1961). Synectics, the development of creative capacity. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Hari, A. & Weiss, M. P. (1996). ICDM – an inclusive method for customer-driven conceptual design. In Proceeding of the 2nd ASI Annual Total Product Development, November 1996, Pomona CA (pp. 721–747).Google Scholar

Houghton, Mifflin. (1976). American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

,INCOSE. (2002). Mackey, W. F., Pyster, A., Crisp, H., Cropley, D., Mayian, S., Raza, S., Cropley, A. The role of systems engineering in combating terrorism. In INCOSE 2002 – 12th Annual International Symposium Proceedings, Las Vegas, NV.Google Scholar

,INCOSE. (2003). Mackey, W. F., Crisp, H., Cropley, D., Long, J., Mayian, S., Raza, S. The role of systems engineering in combating terrorism. In INCOSE 2003 – 13th Annual International Symposium Proceedings, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

,INCOSE. (2004). Mackey, W. F., Long, J., Ewald, W., Weinmann, I., Zonnenshain, A., Gianni, B. Recent systems development and legal efforts to secure national borders in the US, Europe, Israel, and Iraq. In INCOSE 2004 – 14th Annual International Symposium Proceedings, Toulouse, France.Google Scholar

,INCOSE. (2005). Mackey, W. F., Sutton, S. J., Long, J., Wright, D. M., Zonnenshain, A., Ewald, W. Will current international counterterrorism strategy reduce or eradicate terrorism? A debate on the issues. In INCOSE 2005 – 15th Annual International Symposium Proceedings, Rochester, NY.Google Scholar

Osborn, A. F. (1957). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative thinking. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar

Tibi, D. Y. (2003). Autoimmune concept for dealing with the problem of airplane hijacking. Paper presented at the Technologies, Systems, and Architecture for Transnational Defense Conference, AeroSense, SPIE, Orlando, Florida, April.

Wilson, M. A. & Mooz, H. (2003). Agile systems engineering for rapid project solution development. In INCOSE 2003 – 13th Annual International Symposium Proceedings, Washington, D.C.: INCOSE.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.