Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T08:26:24.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The Role of P in Spanish Unaccusative Constructions

from I - Syntax–Lexicon Interface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2019

Mónica Cabrera
Affiliation:
Loyola Marymount University, California
José Camacho
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

Unaccusative verbs have been the object of much study and research, especially regarding the causative alternation. While there have been many studies that analyze the causative alternation or the nature of the aspectual properties of the clitic se in Romance languages (see for example, Alexiadou et al., 2015; Basilico, 2010; De Cuyper, 2006; Kempchinsky, 2004; Nishida, 1994; Schäfer, 2008; Zagona, 1996), there are not many which provide a uniform account for the distribution of the clitics with the different types of unaccusative verbs in Spanish as a whole, whether they participate or not in the causative alternation. This chapter provides a uniform account for all unaccusative verbs in Spanish, and analyzes the distribution of obligatory PPs and clitics. The analysis adopted here is based on Hale & Keyser’s (2002) model, as developed in Zubizarreta & Oh (2007), which is summarized in Section 3.2, and Mayoral Hernández (2008, 2010).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E., & Schäfer, F. (2015). External arguments in transitivity alternations: a layering approach. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basilico, D. (2010). The se clitic and its relationship to paths. Probus: International Journal of Latin and Romance Linguistics, 22, 271302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bello, A. (1847). Gramática de la lengua castellana destinada al uso de los americanos. Buenos Aires: Losada.Google Scholar
Borer, H. (2005). Structuring sense. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosque, I. (1997). Preposición tras preposición. In Almeida, M., ed., Contribuciones al estudio de la lingüística hispánica: homenaje a Ramón Trujillo, vol. I. Tenerife: Montesinos, pp. 13145.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1993). A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In Hale, K. & Keyser, S. J., eds., The view from Building 20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 152.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.(1995). The minimalist program. Current Studies in Linguistics, 28. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
De Cuyper, G. (2006). La estructura léxica de la resultatividad y su expresión en las lenguas germánicas y románicas. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Demonte, V. (2002). Preliminares de una clasificación léxico-sintáctica de los predicados verbales del español. In Grosse, S. & Schönberger, A., eds., Ex oriente lux: Festchrift für Eberhard Gärtner zu seinem 60. Geburtstag. Frankfurt am Main: Valentia, pp. 121–44.Google Scholar
den Dikken, M. (2003). On the syntax of locative and directional adpositional phrases. Unpublished ms. City University of New York.Google Scholar
Folli, R. (2001). Constructing telicity in English and in Italian (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Oxford University.Google Scholar
Folli, R. & Harley, H. (2006). On the licensing of causatives of directed motion: Waltzing Matilda all over. Studia Linguistica, 60(2), 121–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure, Cognitive Theory of Language and Culture. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hale, K. L. & Keyser, S. J. (1993). On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In Hale, K. & Keyser, S. J., eds., The view from Building 20. Current Studies in Linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 53110.Google Scholar
Hale, K. L. & Keyser, S. J.(2002). Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1990). Semantic structures. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R.(1996). The proper treatment of measuring out, telicity, and perhaps even quantification in English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 14, 305–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempchinsky, P. (2004). Romance SE as an aspectual element. In Auger, J., Clements, Clancy, & Vance, Barbara, eds., Contemporary approaches to Romance linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 239–56.Google Scholar
Krifka, M. (1989). Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In Bartsch, R., van Benthem, J., & van Emde Boas, P., eds., Semantics and contextual expression. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 75115.Google Scholar
Koopman, H. (1997). Prepositions, postpositions, circumpositions and particles: the structure of Dutch PPs. Ms., University of California–Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Levin, B. & Rappaport Hovav, M. (1995). Unaccusativity: at the syntax – lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marantz, A. (1984). On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mayoral Hernández, R. (2008). The locative alternation: unaccusative constructions and subject position (unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California–Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Mayoral Hernández, R.(2010). The locative alternation: on the symmetry between verbal and prepositional locative paradigms. Probus: International Journal of Latin and Romance Linguistics, 22(2), 211–39.Google Scholar
Mendikoetxea, A. (1999). Construcciones inacusativas y pasivas. In Bosque, I. & Demonte, V., eds., Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa, pp. 1575–630.Google Scholar
Nishida, C. (1994). The Spanish reflexive clitic se as an aspectual class marker. Linguistics, 32, 425–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez Jiménez, I. & Moreno Quibén, N. (2007). ¿Son todos los verbos inacusativos aspectualmente télicos en español? El papel de la telicidad en la interficie léxico-sintaxis. In Cano López, Pablo, ed., Actas del VI Congreso de Lingüística General. Madrid: Arco-Libros, pp. 1807–20.Google Scholar
Real Academia Española: CREA Corpus [online]. Corpus de referencia del español actual. www.rae.es.Google Scholar
Schäfer, F. (2008). The syntax of (anti-)causatives. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sorace, A. (2000). Gradients in auxiliary selection with intransitive verbs. Language, 76, 859–90.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: semantic structures in lexical forms. In Shopen, T., ed., Language typology and syntactic description, vol. III:grammatical categories and the lexicon. Cambridge University Press, pp. 57149.Google Scholar
Tenny, C. L. (1987). Grammaticalizing aspect and affectedness (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Tenny, C. L.(1994). Aspectual roles and the syntax–semantics interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Tenny, C. L.(1995). How motion verbs are special: the interaction of semantic and pragmatic information in aspectual verb meanings. Pragmatics and Cognition, 3, 31–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tortora, C. (2005). The preposition’s preposition in Italian: evidence for boundedness of space. In Gess, R. & Rubin, E., eds., Current issues in linguistic theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 307–27.Google Scholar
Tortora, C.(2006). On the aspect of space: the case of PLACE in Italian and Spanish. In Penello, N. & Pescarini, D., eds., Atti dell’undicesima giornata di dialettologia, Quaderni di lavoro ASIS, 5. Padua: CNR, pp. 5069.Google Scholar
Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and times. Philosophical Review, 56, 143–60.Google Scholar
Zagona, K. (1996). Compositionality of aspect: evidence from Spanish aspectual se. In Parodi, C., Quicoli, C., Saltarelli, M., and Zubizarreta, M. L., eds., Aspects of Romance linguistics: selected papers from the Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages XXIV. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 475–88.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, M. L. & Oh, E. (2007). On the syntactic composition of manner and motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×