Book contents
- Gender, Identity and the Body in Greek and Roman Sculpture
- Frontispiece
- Gender, Identity and the Body in Greek and Roman Sculpture
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Preface by Michael Silk
- Practical Information
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: Approaching Gender
- 1 The Male Body: Doryphoros
- 2 The Female Body: Aphrodite of Cnidos
- 3 The Veiled Body: Tanagra Statuette
- 4 The Ageing Body: Drunken Old Woman
- 5 The Indefinite Body: Sleeping Hermaphrodite
- 6 The Political Body: Prima Porta Augustus
- 7 The Incongruous Body: Portrait of ‘Marcia Furnilla’ as Venus
- 8 The Beloved Body: Antinous
- 9 The Other Body: Marble Relief with Female Gladiators
- 10 The Non-Human Body: Pan and a She-Goat
- Epilogue: Bernini’s ‘Neptune and Triton’
- Glossary of Greek and Latin Terms
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 September 2018
Prepared for publication by
Book contents
- Gender, Identity and the Body in Greek and Roman Sculpture
- Frontispiece
- Gender, Identity and the Body in Greek and Roman Sculpture
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Preface by Michael Silk
- Practical Information
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: Approaching Gender
- 1 The Male Body: Doryphoros
- 2 The Female Body: Aphrodite of Cnidos
- 3 The Veiled Body: Tanagra Statuette
- 4 The Ageing Body: Drunken Old Woman
- 5 The Indefinite Body: Sleeping Hermaphrodite
- 6 The Political Body: Prima Porta Augustus
- 7 The Incongruous Body: Portrait of ‘Marcia Furnilla’ as Venus
- 8 The Beloved Body: Antinous
- 9 The Other Body: Marble Relief with Female Gladiators
- 10 The Non-Human Body: Pan and a She-Goat
- Epilogue: Bernini’s ‘Neptune and Triton’
- Glossary of Greek and Latin Terms
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Gender, Identity and the Body in Greek and Roman Sculpture , pp. 187 - 212Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Ajootian, A. (1997), ‘The Only Happy Couple: Hermaphrodites and Gender’, in Koloski-Ostrow, A. O. and Lyons, C. L. (eds), Naked Truths: Women, Sexuality, and Gender in Classical Art and Archaeology (New York, N.Y.): 220–42.Google Scholar
Alexandridis, A. (2004), Die Frauen des römischen Kaiserhauses. Eine Untersuchung ihrer bildlichen Darstellung von Livia bis Iulia Domna (Mainz).Google Scholar
Alexandridis, A. (2009), ‘Shifting Species. Animal and Human Bodies in Attic Vase Painting of the 6th and 5th Centuries B.C.’, in Fögen, T. and Lee, M. (eds), Bodies and Boundaries in Graeco-Roman Antiquity (Berlin): 261–81.Google Scholar
Alexandridis, A. (2010a), ‘The Other Side of the Coin: Images of the Flavian Imperial Women’, in Reitz, C. and Kramer, N. (eds), Tradition und Erneuerung. Mediale Strategien in der Zeit der Flavier (Berlin): 191–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexandridis, A. (2010b), ‘Neutral Bodies? Female Portrait Statue Types from the Late Republic to the 2nd Century CE’, in Hales, S. and Hodos, T. (eds), Material Culture and Social Identities in the Ancient World (Cambridge): 252–79.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. K. (1991), ‘Hoplite Weapons and Offensive Arms’, in Hanson, V. D. (ed.), The Classical Greek Battle Experience (London): 15–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahrani, Z. (1996), ‘The Hellenization of Ishtar: Nudity, Fetishism, and the Production of Cultural Differentiation in Ancient Art’, Oxford Art Journal 19.2: 3–16.Google Scholar
Bahrani, Z. (2001), Women of Babylon: Gender and Representation in Mesopotamia (London).Google Scholar
Bailey, D. M. (1980), A Catalogue of the Lamps in the British Museum, vol. 2 (London).Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1981), ‘Epic and Novel: Towards a Methodology for the Study of the Novel’, in Holquist, M. (ed.), The Dialogic Imagination (Austin, Tex.): 3–40 [1970].Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1984a), Rabelais and His World, tr. Iswolsky, H. (Bloomington, Ind.) [1965].Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1984b), Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics, tr. Emerson, C. (Minneapolis, Minn.) [1963].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkan, L. (1999), Unearthing the Past: Archaeology and Aesthetics in the Making of Renaissance Culture (New Haven, Conn.).Google Scholar
Barkan, L. (2009), ‘Praxiteles’ Aphrodite and the Love of Art’, in Barkan, L., Cormack, B. and Keilen, S. (eds), The Forms of Renaissance Thought: New Essays in Literature and Culture (London): 15–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrow, R. (2015), ‘The Body, Human and Divine in Greek Sculpture’, in Destrée, P. and Murray, P. (eds), A Companion to Ancient Aesthetics (Chichester): 94–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartman, E. (1999), Portraits of Livia: Imaging the Imperial Woman in Augustan Rome (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Bartman, E. (2001), ‘Hair and the Artifice of Roman Female Adornment’, American Journal of Archaeology 105: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartman, E. (2002), ‘Eros’s Flame: Images of Sexy Boys in Roman Ideal Sculpture’, in Gazda, E. (ed.), The Ancient Art of Emulation: Studies in Artistic Originality and Tradition from the Present to Classical Antiquity (Ann Arbor, Mich.): 249–71.Google Scholar
Baskins, C. L. (1998), Cassone Painting, Humanism, and Gender in Early Modern Italy (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Bastet, F. L. (1966), ‘Feldherr mit Hund auf der Augustusstatue von Prima Porta’, Bulletin Antieke Beschaving 41: 77–90.Google Scholar
Bautista, P. M. (2008), ‘Manifesting Masculinities in Central Italian Renaissance Art’, doctoral thesis, New York University.Google Scholar
Beard, M. (1991), ‘Adopting an Approach II’, in Spivey, N. and Rasmussen, T. (eds), Looking at Greek Vases (Cambridge): 12–35.Google Scholar
Beard, M. (2012), ‘Dirty Little Secrets: Changing Displays of Pompeian Erotica’, in Coates, V. C. Gardiner, Lapatin, K. and Seydl, J. L. (eds), The Last Days of Pompeii (Los Angeles, Calif.): 14–31.Google Scholar
Beard, M. and Henderson, J. (1998), ‘The Emperor’s New Body: Ascent from Rome’, in Wyke, M. (ed.), Parchments of Gender: Deciphering the Body of Antiquity (Oxford): 191–220.Google Scholar
Bell, M. (1990), ‘Tanagras and the Idea of Type’, in Uhlenbrock, J. P. (ed.), The Coroplast’s Art: Greek Terracottas of the Hellenistic World (New York): 39–53.Google Scholar
Bérard, C. (2000), ‘The Image of the Other and the Foreign Hero’, in Cohen, B. (ed.), Not the Classical Ideal: Athens and the Construction of the Other in Greek Art (Leiden): 390–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergmann, B. (1992), ‘Exploring the Grove: Pastoral Space on Roman Walls’, in Hunt, J. Dixon (ed.), The Pastoral Landscape (Washington, D.C.): 21–48.Google Scholar
Bergmann, B. (2002), ‘Art and Nature in the Villa at Oplontis’, in McGinn, T. A. J. et al., Pompeian Brothels, Pompeii’s Ancient History, Mirrors and Mysteries, Art and Nature at Oplontis, the Herculaneum ‘Basilica’ (Portsmouth, R.I.): 87–121.Google Scholar
Bergmann, M. (1998), Die Strahlen der Herrscher: Theomorphes Herrscherbild und politische Symbolik im Hellenismus und in der römischen Kaiserzeit (Mainz).Google Scholar
Best, J. G. P. (1969), Thracian Peltasts and Their Influence on Greek Warfare (Groningen).Google Scholar
Biow, D. (2010), ‘The Beard in Sixteenth-Century Italy’, in Hairston, J. L. and Stephens, W. (eds), The Body in Early Modern Italy (Baltimore, Md.): 176–94.Google Scholar
Birge, D. E., Miller, S. G. and Kraynak, L. H. (2001), Excavations at Nemea: The Early Hellenistic Stadium, vol. 2 (Berkeley, Calif.).Google Scholar
Blum, G. (1913), ‘L’Antinoos de Delphes’, Bulletin de Correspondance Hellénique 37: 323–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, G. (1914), ‘Numismatique d’Antinoos’, Journal International d’Archéologie Numismatique 6: 33–70.Google Scholar
Blume, C. (2010), ‘When Colour Tells a Story: The Polychromy of Hellenistic Sculpture and Terracottas’, in Brinkmann, V., Primavesi, O. and Hollein, M. (eds), Circumlitio. The Polychromy of Antique and Mediaeval Sculpture (Frankfurt): 240–57.Google Scholar
Blundell, S. and Rabinowitz, N. (2008), ‘Women’s Bonds, Women’s Pots: Adornment Scenes in Attic Vase-Painting’, Phoenix 62: 115–44.Google Scholar
Boatwright, M. (1991), ‘The Imperial Women of the Early Second Century’, American Journal of Philology 112: 513–40.Google Scholar
Boehringer, S. (2007), L’homosexualité dans l’antiquité grecque et romaine (Paris).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonfante, L. (1989), ‘Nudity as Classical Costume’, American Journal of Archaeology 93: 543–70.Google Scholar
Bonfante, L. (2009), ‘Some Thoughts on the Baubo Gesture in Classical Art’, in Bell, S. and Nagy, H. (eds), New Perspectives on Etruria and Early Rome: In Honor of Richard Daniel De Puma (Madison, Wis.): 158–70.Google Scholar
Borbein, A. H. (1996), ‘Polykleitos’, in Palagia, O. and Pollitt, J. J. (eds), Personal Styles in Greek Sculpture (Cambridge): 66–90.Google Scholar
Borg, B. (2012), ‘The Face of the Social Climber: Roman Freedmen and Elite Ideology’, in Bell, S. and Ramsby, T. (eds), Free at Last! The Impact of Freed Slaves on the Roman Empire (London): 25–49.Google Scholar
Bourgeois, B. (2010), ‘Arts and Crafts of Colour on the Louvre Tanagra Figurines’, in Jeammet, V. (ed.), Tanagras: Figurines for Life and Eternity (Paris): 238–43.Google Scholar
Braund, S. (1992), ‘Juvenal: Misogynist or Misogamist’, Journal of Roman Studies 82: 71–86.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. (1987), ‘The Old Women of Ancient Greece’, in Blok, J. and Mason, P. (eds), Sexual Asymmetry: Studies in Ancient Society (Amsterdam): 191–213.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. (1991), ‘Walking, Standing and Sitting in Ancient Greek Culture’, in Bremmer, J. and Roodenburg, H. (eds), A Cultural History of Gesture from Antiquity to the Present Day (Cambridge): 15–35.Google Scholar
Brilliant, R. (1963), Gesture and Rank in Roman Art: The Use of Gestures to Denote Status in Roman Sculpture and Coinage (New Haven, Conn.).Google Scholar
Briquel, D. (1992), ‘Les femmes gladiateurs: examen du dossier’, Ktema 17: 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brisson, L. (2002), Sexual Ambivalence: Androgyny and Hermaphroditism in Greco-Roman Antiquity (Berkeley, Calif.).Google Scholar
Brown, S. (1992), ‘Death as Decoration: Scenes from the Arena on Roman Domestic Mosaics’, in Richlin, A. (ed.), Pornography and Representation in Greece and Rome (Oxford): 180–211.Google Scholar
Brown, S. (1997), ‘Ways of Seeing Women in Antiquity’, in Koloski-Ostrow, A. O. and Lyons, C. L. (eds), Naked Truths: Women, Sexuality, and Gender in Classical Art and Archaeology (New York, N.Y.): 12–42.Google Scholar
Brumfiel, E. M. (2006), ‘Methods in Feminist and Gender Archaeology: A Feeling for Difference – and Likeness’, in Nelson, S. Milledge (ed.), Handbook of Gender in Archaeology (Oxford): 31–58.Google Scholar
Brunet, S. (2014), ‘Women with Swords: Female Gladiators in the Roman World’, in Christensen, P. and Kyle, D. G. (eds), A Companion to Sport and Spectacle in Greek and Roman Antiquity (Chichester): 478–91.Google Scholar
Burn, L. and Higgins, R. A. (2001), Catalogue of Greek Terracottas in the British Museum, vol. 3 (London).Google Scholar
Burton, J. (1998), ‘Women’s Commensality in the Ancient Greek World’, Greece and Rome 45: 143–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bussels, S. (2013), The Animated Image: Roman Theory on Naturalism, Vividness and Divine Power (Leiden).Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1993), Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex” (New York, N.Y.).Google Scholar
Butrica, J. L. (2006), ‘Some Myths and Anomalies in the Study of Roman Sexuality’, in Verstraete, B. C. and Provencal, V. (eds), Same-Sex Desire and Love in Greco-Roman Antiquity and in the Classical Tradition of the West (London): 209–69.Google Scholar
Cagniart, P. (2000), ‘The Philosopher and the Gladiator’, Classical World 93.6: 607–18.Google Scholar
Cairns, D. L. (1996), ‘Veiling, Aidôs, and a Red-figure Amphora by Phintias’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 116: 152–7.Google Scholar
Cairns, D. L. (2001), ‘Anger and the Veil in Ancient Greek Culture’, Greece and Rome 48: 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, D. L. (2002), ‘The Meaning of the Veil in Ancient Greek Culture’, in Llewellyn-Jones, L. (ed.), Women’s Dress in the Ancient Greek World (London): 73–94.Google Scholar
Carlsen, J. (2014), ‘Gladiators in Ancient Halikarnassos’, in Karlsson, L., Carlsson, S. and Kullberg, J. Blid (eds), ΛΑΒΡΥΣ: Studies Presented to Pontus Hellström (Uppsala): 441–50.Google Scholar
Chivers, S. (2003), From Old Woman to Older Woman: Contemporary Cultures and Women’s Narratives (Columbus, Ohio).Google Scholar
Clairmont, C. W. (1960), Die Bildnisse des Antinous: ein Beitrag zur Porträtplastik unter Kaiser Hadrian (Rome).Google Scholar
Clarke, J. R. (1993), ‘The Warren Cup and the Contexts for Representations of Male-to-Male Lovemaking in Augustan and Early Julio-Claudian Art’, Art Bulletin 75: 275–94.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. R. (1998), Looking at Lovemaking: Constructions of Sexuality in Roman Art, 100 B.C.–A.D. 250 (Berkeley, Calif.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, J. R. (2002), ‘Look Who’s Laughing at Sex: Men and Women Viewers in the Apodyterium of the Suburban Baths at Pompeii’, in Fredrick, D. (ed.), The Roman Gaze: Vision, Power, and the Body (Baltimore, Md.): 149–81.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. R. (2007), Looking at Laughter: Humor, Power, and Transgression in Roman Visual Culture 100 BC–AD 250 (Berkeley, Calif.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clauss, M. (1999), Kaiser und Gott. Herrscherkult im römischen Reich (Stuttgart).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coarelli, F. (1968), ‘L’Ara di Domizio Enobarbo e la cultura artistica in Roma nel II secolo a.C.’, Dialoghi di Archeologia 2: 302–68.Google Scholar
Cohan, S. and Hark, I. (1993) (eds), Exploring Masculinities in Hollywood Cinema (London).Google Scholar
Cohen, B. (1993), ‘The Anatomy of Kassandra’s Rape: Female Nudity Comes of Age in Greek Art’, Notes in the History of Art 12.2: 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, K. (1990), ‘Fatal Charades: Roman Executions Staged as Mythological Enactments’, Journal of Roman Studies 80: 44–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, K. (2000), ‘Missio at Halicarnassus’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 100: 487–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordier, P. (2005), Nudités romaines: un problème d’histoire et d’anthropologie (Paris).Google Scholar
Corso, A. (1997), ‘The Cnidian Aphrodite’, in Jenkins, I. and Waywell, G. B. (eds), Sculptors and Sculpture of Caria and the Dodecanese (London): 91–8.Google Scholar
Creed, B. (1995), ‘Lesbian Bodies: Tribades, Tomboys and Tarts’, in Grosz, E. and Probyn, E. (eds), Sexy Bodies: The Strange Carnalities of Feminism (London): 86–104.Google Scholar
Cristofovici, A. (1999), ‘Touching Surfaces: Photography, Ageing and the Aesthetics of Change’, in Woodward, K. (ed.), Figuring Age: Women, Bodies, Generations (Bloomington, Ind.): 268–93.Google Scholar
Crowley, J. (2012), The Psychology of the Athenian Hoplite: The Culture of Combat in Classical Athens (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowther, N. B. (1985), ‘Male Beauty Contests in Greece: The Euandria and Euexia’, L’Antiquité Classique 54: 285–91.Google Scholar
Crowther, N. B. (2004), Athletika: Studies on the Olympic Games and Greek Athletics (Hildesheim).Google Scholar
Csapo, E. (1997), ‘Riding the Phallus for Dionysus: Iconology, Ritual, and Gender-Role De/Construction’, Phoenix 51: 253–95.Google Scholar
Curran, L. (1978), ‘Rape and Rape Victims in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, Arethusa 11: 213–41.Google Scholar
D’Ambra, E. (1989), ‘The Cult of Virtues and the Funerary Relief of Ulpia Epigone’, Latomus 48: 392–400.Google Scholar
D’Ambra, E. (1996), ‘The Calculus of Venus: Nude Portraits of Roman Matrons’, in Kampen, N. B. (ed.), Sexuality in Ancient Art (London): 219–32.Google Scholar
D’Ambra, E. (2000), ‘Nudity and Adornment in Female Portrait Sculpture of the Second Century AD’, in Kleiner, D. E. E. and Matheson, S. B. (eds), I, Claudia II: Women in Roman Art and Society (Austin, Tex.): 101–14.Google Scholar
D’Ambra, E. (2013), ‘Mode and Model in the Flavian Female Portrait’, American Journal of Archaeology 117: 511–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Ambra, E. (2014), ‘Beauty and the Female Portrait,’ in Elsner, J. and Meyer, M. (eds), Art and Rhetoric in Roman Culture (Cambridge): 155–80.Google Scholar
Davidson, J. (2007), The Greeks and Greek Love: A Radical Reappraisal of Homosexuality in Ancient Greece (London).Google Scholar
Davies, G. (2005), ‘On Being Seated: Gender and Body Language in Hellenistic and Roman Art’, in Cairns, D. (ed.), Body Language in the Greek and Roman Worlds (Cardiff): 215–38.Google Scholar
Davies, G. (2013), ‘Honorific vs Funerary Statues of Women: Essentially the Same or Fundamentally Different?’, in Hemelrijk, E. and Woolf, G. (eds), Women and the Roman City in the Latin West (Leiden): 171–85.Google Scholar
Davies, P. J. E. (2000), Death and the Emperor: Roman Imperial Funerary Monuments from Augustus to Marcus Aurelius (Cambridge).Google Scholar
De Caro, S. (1987), ‘The Sculptures of the Villa of Poppaea at Oplontis: A Preliminary Report’, in MacDougall, E. B. (ed.), Ancient Roman Villa Gardens (Washington, D.C.): 77–133.Google Scholar
Delcourt, M. (1961), Hermaphrodite: Myths and Rites of the Bisexual Figure in Classical Antiquity (London).Google Scholar
Dillon, M. (2000), ‘Did Parthenoi Attend the Olympic Games? Girls and Women Competing, Spectating and Carrying Out Cult Roles at Greek Religious Festivals’, Hermes 128: 457–80.Google Scholar
Dillon, S. (2006), Ancient Greek Portrait Sculpture: Contexts, Subjects and Styles (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Dillon, S. (2012), ‘Hellenistic Tanagra Figurines’, in James, S. L. and Dillon, S. (eds), A Companion to Women in the Ancient World (Chichester): 231–4.Google Scholar
Doane, M. (1982), ‘Film and Masquerade: Theorizing the Female Spectator’, Screen 23.3–4: 74–88.Google Scholar
Donniger, W. (1999), Splitting the Difference: Gender and Myth in Ancient Greece and India (Chicago, Ill.).Google Scholar
Douglas, M. (2002), Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo (London) [1966].Google Scholar
Edwards, C. (1997), ‘Unspeakable Professions: Public Performance and Prostitution in Ancient Rome’, in Hallett, J. P. and Skinner, M. B. (eds), Roman Sexualities (Princeton, N.J.): 66–98.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. (1996), ‘Image and Ritual: Reflections on the Religious Appreciation of Classical Art’, Classical Quarterly 46: 515–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsner, J. (2007), Roman Eyes: Visuality and Subjectivity in Art and Text (Princeton, N.J.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esler, C. C. (1989), ‘Horace’s Old Girls: Evolution of a Topos’, in Falkner, T. M. and de Luce, J. (eds), Old Age in Greek and Latin Literature (New York, N.Y.): 172–82.Google Scholar
Ewigleben, C. (2000), ‘“What These Women Love is The Sword”: The Performers and Their Audiences’, in Köhne, E. and Ewigleben, C. (eds), Gladiators and Caesars: The Power of Spectacle in Ancient Rome, tr. R. Jackson (London): 125–39.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. (2007), ‘Grenzziehungen. Zu Strategien somatischer Geschlechterdiskurse in der griechischen und römischen Kultur’, in Hartmann, E., Hartmann, U. and Pietzner, K. (eds), Geschlechterdefinitionen und Geschlechtergrenzen in der Antike (Stuttgart): 65–86.Google Scholar
Fagan, G. G. (2011), The Lure of the Arena: Social Psychology and the Crowd in the Roman Games (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Falkner, T. (1995), The Poetics of Old Age in Greek Epic, Lyric, and Tragedy (Norman, Okla.).Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. (1990), ‘Figures of Speech: The Picture of Aidos’, Métis 5: 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, G. (2002), Figures of Speech: Man and Maidens in Ancient Greece (Chicago, Ill.).Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. (2009), ‘Introduction’, in Fögen, T. and Lee, M. M. (eds), Bodies and Boundaries in Graeco-Roman Antiquity (Berlin): 1–10.Google Scholar
Fittschen, K. (1976), ‘Zur Panzerstatue in Cherchel’, Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 91: 175–210.Google Scholar
Fittschen, K. (2010), ‘The Portraits of Roman Emperors and Their Families’, in Ewald, B. C. and Noreña, C. F. (eds), The Emperor and Rome: Space, Representation, and Ritual (Cambridge): 221–46.Google Scholar
Fittschen, K. and Zanker, P. (1985), Katalog der römischen Porträts in den Capitolinischen Museen und den anderen kommunalen Sammlungen der Stadt Rom, I: Kaiser- und Prinzenbildnisse (Mainz).Google Scholar
Flashar, M. (1992), Apollon Kitharodos. Statuarische Typen des musischen Apollon (Cologne).Google Scholar
Flory, M. B. (1989), ‘Octavian and the Omen of the Gallina Alba’, Classical Journal 84: 343–56.Google Scholar
Flory, M. B. (1993), ‘Livia and the History of Public Honorific Statues for Women in Rome’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 123: 287–308.Google Scholar
Flory, M. B. (1995), ‘The Symbolism of Laurel in Cameo Portraits of Livia’, Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 40: 43–68.Google Scholar
Flory, M. B. (1996), ‘Dynastic Ideology, the Domus Augusta, and Imperial Women: A Lost Statuary Group in the Circus Flaminius’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 126: 287–306.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1979), Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, tr. Sheridan, A. (New York, N.Y.) [1975].Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1986), The History of Sexuality, tr. Hurley, R., 3 vols (New York, N.Y.) [1984].Google Scholar
Foxall, L. (2003), ‘Pandora Unbound: A Feminist Critique of Foucault’s History of Sexuality’, in Golden, M. and Toohey, P. (eds), Sex and Difference in the Ancient World (Edinburgh): 167–82 [1994].Google Scholar
Francis, E. and Vickers, M. (1981), ‘Leagros Kalos’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 27: 97–136.Google Scholar
Fredrick, D. (1995), ‘Beyond the Atrium to Ariadne: Erotic Painting and Visual Pleasure in the Roman House’, Classical Antiquity 14: 266–87.Google Scholar
Freedman, L. (1995), ‘Neptune in Classical and Renaissance Visual Art’, International Journal of the Classical Tradition 2: 219–37.Google Scholar
Friesländer, E. (2001), ‘The Mantle Dancer in the Hellenistic Period: Glorification of the Himation’, Assaph 6: 1–30.Google Scholar
Fullerton, M. (1997), ‘Imitation and Intertextuality in Roman Art’, Journal of Roman Archaeology 10: 427–50.Google Scholar
Gazda, E. (1995), ‘Roman Sculpture and the Ethos of Emulation: Reconsidering Repetition’, in Jones, C. P., Segal, C., Tarrant, R. J. and Thomas, R. F. (eds), Greece in Rome: Influence, Integration, Resistance (Cambridge, Mass.): 121–56.Google Scholar
Gazda, E. (2002) (ed.), The Ancient Art of Emulation: Studies in Artistic Originality and Tradition from the Present to Classical Antiquity (Ann Arbor, Mich.).Google Scholar
Geominy, W. (1999), ‘Zwischen Kennerschaft und Cliché: Römische Kopien und die Geschichte ihrer Bewertung’, in Vogt-Spira, G. and Rommel, B. (eds), Rezeption und Identität. Die kulturelle Auseinandersetzung Roms mit Griechenland als europäisches Paradigma (Stuttgart): 38–58.Google Scholar
Gessert, G. (2015), ‘A Giant Corrupt Body: The Gendering of Renaissance Roma in Receptions of Antiquity’, in Rose, M. and Poe, A. C. (eds), Constructions of Gender in European Art, 1300–1600 (Leiden): 98–130.Google Scholar
Gigante, L. (1999), ‘Roman Commemorative Portraits: Women and the Attributes of Venus’, in Reinink, A. W. and Stumpel, J. (eds), Memory and Oblivion: Proceedings of the XXIXth International Congress of the History of Art held in Amsterdam (Dordrecht): 447–53.Google Scholar
Goldberg, M. (1999), ‘Spatial and Behavioural Negotiation in Classical Athenian City Houses’, in Allison, P. M. (ed.), The Archaeology of Household Activities (London): 142–61.Google Scholar
Golden, M. and Toohey, P. (2011) (eds), A Cultural History of Sexuality in the Classical World (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, M. (1975), Eros in Pompeii: The Secret Rooms of the National Museum of Naples (New York, N.Y.).Google Scholar
Graumann, L. A. (2013), ‘Monstrous Births and Retrospective Diagnosis: The Case of Hermaphrodites in Antiquity’, in Laes, C., Goodey, C. F. and Rose, M. L. (eds), Disabilities in Roman Antiquity: Disparate Bodies a Capite ad Calcem (Leiden): 181–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habinek, T. (1997), ‘The Invention of Sexuality in the World of Rome’, in Habinek, T. and Schiesaro, A. (eds), The Roman Cultural Revolution (Cambridge): 23–43.Google Scholar
Halberstam, J. (2005), In a Queer Time and Place: Transgender Bodies, Subcultural Lives (New York, N.Y.).Google Scholar
Hales, S. (2002), ‘How the Venus de Milo Lost her Arms’, in Ogden, D. (ed.), The Hellenistic World (Swansea): 253–73.Google Scholar
Hales, S. (2008), ‘Aphrodite and Dionysus: Greek Role Models for Roman Homes?’, Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 7: 235–55.Google Scholar
Hall, S. (1980), ‘Encoding and Decoding in the Television Discourse,’ in Hall, S., Hobson, D., Love, A. and Willis, P. (eds), Culture, Media, Language (London): 128–38 [1973].Google Scholar
Hallett, C. H. (1986), ‘The Origins of the Classical Style in Sculpture’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 106: 71–84.Google Scholar
Hallett, C. H. (1995), ‘Kopienkritik and the Work of Polykleitos’, in Moon, W. G. (ed.), Polykleitos, the Doryphoros, and Tradition (Madison, Wis.): 121–60.Google Scholar
Hallett, C. H. (2005), The Roman Nude: Heroic Portrait Statuary 200 BC–AD 300 (Oxford).Google Scholar
Halperin, D. M. (1990), One Hundred Years of Homosexuality and Other Essays on Greek Love (London).Google Scholar
Halperin, D. M., Winkler, J. J. and Zeitlin, F. I. (1990) (eds), Before Sexuality: The Construction of Erotic Experience in the Ancient Greek World (Princeton, N.J.).Google Scholar
Hanson, V. D. (1989), The Western Way of War: Infantry Battle in Classical Greece (New York, N.Y.).Google Scholar
Hanson, V. D. (2000), ‘Hoplite Battle as Ancient Greek Warfare’, in van Wees, H. (ed.), War and Violence in Ancient Greece (London): 201–32.Google Scholar
Harami, A. (2007), ‘Les fouilles de sauvetage des nécropoles de l’antique Tanagra’, in Jeammet, V. (ed.), Tanagras: De l’objet de collection à l’objet archéologique (Paris): 67–80.Google Scholar
Harlow, M. (2013), ‘Dressed Women on the Streets of the Ancient City’, in Hemelrijk, E. and Woolf, G. (eds), Women and the Roman City in the Latin West (Leiden): 225–41.Google Scholar
Harlow, M. and Laurence, R. (2002), Growing Up and Growing Old in Ancient Rome (London).Google Scholar
Harpham, G. G. (1982), On the Grotesque: Strategies of Contradiction in Art and Literature (Princeton, N.J.).Google Scholar
Haskell, F. and Penny, N. (1981), Taste and the Antique: The Lure of Classical Sculpture 1500–1900 (New Haven, Conn.).Google Scholar
Häuber, C. (1999), ‘Vier Fragmente der Gruppe Satyr und Hermaphrodit vom Typus Dresdner Symplegma des Museo Nuovo Capitolino in Rom’, Hellenistische Gruppen. Gedenkschrift fűr Andreas Linfert (Mainz): 157–80.Google Scholar
Havelock, C. M. (1995), The Aphrodite of Knidos and Her Successors (Ann Arbor, Mich.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawley, H. (1971), ‘A Terra-Cotta Model for Bernini’s Proserpina’, Bulletin of the Cleveland Museum of Art 58: 107–11.Google Scholar
Heath, J. (2008) (ed.), The Veil: Women Writers on Its History, Lore, and Politics (Berkeley, Calif.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heintze, H. von (1963), ‘Statue des Augustus von Prima Porta’, in Helbig, W., Speier, H. and Andreae, B. (eds), Führer durch die öffentlichen Sammlungen klassischer Altertümer in Rom. Die Päpstlichen Sammlungen im Vatikan und Lateran (Tübingen): 314–19.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (1975), The Maculate Muse: Obscene Language in Attic Comedy (New Haven, Conn.).Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (1987), ‘Older Women in Attic Old Comedy’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 117: 105–29.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (2000), ‘Pherekrates and the Women of Old Comedy, in Harvey, D. and Wilkins, J. (eds), The Rivals of Aristophanes: Studies in Athenian Old Comedy (London): 135–50.Google Scholar
Hesberg-Tonn, B. von (1983), Coniunx carissima. Untersuchungen zum Normcharakter im Erscheinungsbild der römischen Frau (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Himmelmann, N. (1983), Alexandria und der Realismus in der griechischen Kunst (Tübingen).Google Scholar
Himmelmann, N. (1994), Realistische Themen in der griechischen Kunst der Archaischen und Klassischen Zeit (Berlin).Google Scholar
Hodges, F. (2001), ‘The Ideal Prepuce in Ancient Greece and Rome: Male Genital Aesthetics and Their Relation to Lipodermos, Circumcision, Foreskin Restoration, and the Kynodesme’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine 75: 375–405.Google Scholar
Holland, L. A. (1947), ‘Aeneas-Augustus of Prima Porta’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 78: 276–84.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T. (1993), Review of N. Himmelmann, Ideale Nacktheit in der griechischen Kunst, Gnomon 65: 519–28.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T. (2004), The Language of Images in Roman Art, tr. Snodgrass, A. (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Hölscher, T. (2005), ‘Greek Styles and Greek Art in Augustan Rome: Issues of the Present versus Records of the Past’, in Porter, J. I. (ed.), Classical Pasts: The Classical Traditions of Greece and Rome (Princeton, N.J.): 237–69.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S., Spawforth, A. and Eidinow, E. (2012) (eds), The Oxford Classical Dictionary, 4th edn (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, T. (2003), ‘Sex in the Gym: Athletic Trainers and Pedagogical Pederasty’, Intertexts 7: 1–26.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. (2005), ‘Pindar’s Tenth Olympian and Athlete–Trainer Pederasty’, in Verstraete, B. C. and Provencal, V. (eds), Same-Sex Desire and Love in Greco-Roman Antiquity and in the Classical Tradition of the West (New York, N.Y.): 137–71.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. (2011), ‘Athenian Pederasty and the Construction of Masculinity’, in Arnold, J. H. and Brady, S. (eds), What Is Masculinity?: Historical Dynamics from Antiquity to the Contemporary World (London): 189–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurwit, J. M. (2007), ‘The Problem with Dexileos: Heroic and Other Nudities in Greek Art’, American Journal of Archaeology 111: 35–60.Google Scholar
Ingholt, H. (1969), ‘The Prima Porta Statue of Augustus. Part I: The Interpretation of the Breastplate’, Archaeology 22: 176–87.Google Scholar
Jeammet, V. (2010a), ‘The Origin of the Tanagras: Fourth Century B.C. Athens’, in Jeammet, V. (ed.), Tanagra. Figurines for Life and Eternity (Paris): 62–9.Google Scholar
Jeammet, V. (2010b), ‘Tanagra and Theban Workshops’, in Jeammet, V. (ed.), Tanagra. Figurines for Life and Eternity (Paris): 111–18.Google Scholar
Jeammet, V. and Mathieux, N. (2010), ‘The Figurines as a Reflection of Beliefs and Rites’, in Jeammet, V. (ed.), Tanagra. Figurines for Life and Eternity (Paris): 160–75.Google Scholar
Joyce, R. (2008), Ancient Bodies, Ancient Lives: Sex, Gender, and Archaeology (London).Google Scholar
Junkelmann, M. (2000), ‘Familia Gladiatoria: The Heroes of the Amphitheatre’, in Köhne, E. and Ewigleben, C. (eds), Gladiators and Caesars: The Power of Spectacle in Ancient Rome (London): 31–74.Google Scholar
Junker, K. and Stähli, A. (2008) (eds), Original und Kopie. Formen und Konzepte der Nachahmungen in der antiken Kunst (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar
Kampen, N. B. (2007), ‘What Could Hadrian Feel for Antinous? Emotional Possibilities in a Story of Sexual Passion’, in Hartmann, E., Hartmann, U. and Pietzner, K. (eds), Geschlechterdefinitionen und Geschlechtergrenzen in der Antike (Stuttgart): 199–209.Google Scholar
Kampen, N. B. (2009a), ‘Women’s Desire, Archaeology, and Feminist Theory’, in Counts, D. B. and Tuck, A. S. (eds), Koine: Mediterranean Studies in Honor of R. Ross Holloway (Oxford): 207–15.Google Scholar
Karydas, H. P. (1998), Eurykleia and Her Successors: Female Figures of Authority in Greek Poetics (Lanham, Md.).Google Scholar
Kayser, W. (1957), Das Groteske. Seine Gestaltung in Malerei und Dichtung (Oldenburg).Google Scholar
Kellum, B. (1994), ‘The Construction of Landscape in Augustan Rome: The Garden Room at the Villa ad Gallinas’, Art Bulletin 76: 211–24.Google Scholar
Keuls, E. (1985), The Reign of the Phallus: Sexual Politics in Ancient Athens (Berkeley, Calif.).Google Scholar
Kilmer, M. (1982), ‘Genital Phobia and Depilation’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 102: 104–12.Google Scholar
Kilmer, M. (1997), ‘Rape in Early Red-figure Pottery: Violence and Threat in Homo-erotic and Hetero-Erotic Contexts’, in Deacy, S. and Pierce, K. (eds), Rape in Antiquity: Sexual Violence in the Greek and Roman Worlds (London): 123–41.Google Scholar
Kirkham, P. and Thumin, J. (1993) (eds), You Tarzan: Masculinity, Movies and Men (London).Google Scholar
Kleiner, D. E. E. (1981), ‘Second-Century Mythological Portraiture: Mars and Venus’, Latomus 40: 512–44.Google Scholar
Klynne, A. (2005), ‘The Laurel Grove of the Caesars: Looking In and Looking Out’, in Frizell, B. S. and Klynne, A. (eds), Roman Villas around the Urbs: Interaction with Landscape and Environment (Rome): 167–75.Google Scholar
Klynne, A. and Liljenstolpe, P. (2000), ‘Where to Put Augustus? A Note on the Placement of the Prima Porta Statue’, American Journal of Archaeology 121: 121–8.Google Scholar
Koloski-Ostrow, A. O. (1997), ‘Violent Stages in Two Pompeian Houses: Imperial Taste, Aristocratic Response, and Messages of Male Control’, in Koloski-Ostrow, A. O. and Lyons, C. L. (eds), Women, Sexuality and Gender in Classical Art and Archaeology (London): 243–66.Google Scholar
Koortbojian, M. (2008), ‘The Double Identity of Roman Portrait Statues: Costumes and their Symbolism at Rome’, in Edmondson, J. and Keith, A. (eds), Roman Dress and the Fabrics of Roman Culture (Toronto): 71–93.Google Scholar
Koortbojian, M. (2013), The Divinization of Caesar and Augustus: Precedents, Consequences, Implications (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Kos, M. J. (2009), ‘Antinous in Upper Moesia: the Introduction of a New Cult’, in Bertinelli, A., Gabriella, M. and Donati, A. (eds), Opinione pubblica e forme di comunicazione a Roma: il linguaggio dell’epigrafia (Faenza): 205–21.Google Scholar
Kousser, R. (2007), ‘Mythological Group Portraits in Antonine Rome: The Performance of Myth’, American Journal of Archaeology 111: 673–91.Google Scholar
Kousser, R. (2011), ‘The Female Nude in Classical Art: Between Voyeurism and Power’, in Kondoleon, C. and Segal, P. C. (eds), Aphrodite and the Gods of Love (Boston, Mass.): 149–66.Google Scholar
Kraemer, S. R. (1979), ‘Ecstasy and Possession: The Attraction of Women to the Cult of Dionysus’, Harvard Theological Review 72: 55–80.Google Scholar
Kreilinger, U. (2006), ‘To Be or Not to Be a Hetaira: Female Nudity in Classical Athens’, in Schroer, S. (ed.), Images and Gender. Contributions to the Hermeneutics of Reading Ancient Art (Fribourg): 229–37.Google Scholar
Krentz, P. (2013), ‘Hoplite Hell: How Hoplites Fought’, in Kagan, D. and Viggiano, G. F. (eds), Men of Bronze: Hoplite Warfare in Ancient Greece (Princeton, N.J.): 134–65.Google Scholar
Kunze, C. (2002), Zum Greifen nah. Stilphänomene in der hellenistischer Skulptur und ihre inhaltliche Interpretation (Munich).Google Scholar
Kunze, C. (2008), ‘Zwischen Griechenland und Rom. Das “antike Rokoko” und die veränderte Funktion von Skulptur in späthellenistischer Zeit’, in Junker, K., Kunze, C. and Stähli, A. (eds), Original und Kopie. Formen und Konzepte der Nachahmung in der antiken Kunst (Wiesbaden): 77–108.Google Scholar
Kyle, D. G. (2013), ‘Greek Female Sport: Rites, Running, and Racing’, in Christensen, P. and Kyle, D. G. (eds), A Companion to Sport and Spectacle in Greek and Roman Antiquity (Chichester): 258–75.Google Scholar
LaGrace Volcano, D. and Windh, I. (2003), ‘HermLove’: www.dellagracevolcano.com/text2.html.Google Scholar
LaGrace Volcano, D. and Windh, I. (2004), ‘Genderfusion’, in Morland, I. and Willox, A. (eds), Queer Theory (London): 130–41.Google Scholar
Larmour, D., Miller, P. and Platter, C. (1990) (eds), Rethinking Sexuality: Foucault and Classical Antiquity (Princeton, N.J.).Google Scholar
Lateiner, D. (2009), ‘Transsexuals and Transvestites in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, in Fögen, T. and Lee, M. M. (eds), Bodies and Boundaries in Graeco-Roman Antiquity (Berlin): 125–54.Google Scholar
Laubscher, H. P. (1982), Fischer und Landleute. Studien zur hellenistischen Genreplastik (Mainz).Google Scholar
Lavin, I. (1989), ‘Bernini and Antiquity – The Baroque Paradox. A Poetical View’, in Beck, H. and Schulze, S. (eds), Antikenrezeption im Hochbarock (Berlin): 9–36.Google Scholar
Lazzeretti, A. (2014), ‘Verres, Cicero and Other Collectors in Late Republican Roma’, in Gahtan, M. W. and Pegazzano, D. (eds), Museum Archetypes and Collecting in the Ancient World (Leiden): 91–100.Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. (2004), The Social Life of Painting in Ancient Rome and on the Bay of Naples (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. (2006), ‘Freedmen and Immortality in the Tomb of the Haterii’, in D’Ambra, E. and Metraux, G. P. R. (eds), The Art of Citizens, Soldiers and Freedmen in the Roman World (Oxford): 1–18.Google Scholar
Lear, A. and Cantarella, E. (2010), Images of Ancient Greek Pederasty: Boys Were Their Gods (London).Google Scholar
Leftwich, G. V. (1995), ‘Polykleitos and Hippokratic Medicine’, in Moon, W. G. (ed.), Polykleitos, the Doryphoros, and Tradition (Madison, Wis.): 38–51.Google Scholar
Lehman, P. (1993), Running Scared: Masculinity and the Representation of the Male Body (Philadelphia, Pa.).Google Scholar
Leppert, R. D. (2007), The Nude: The Cultural Rhetoric of the Body in the Art of Western Modernity (Boulder, Colo.).Google Scholar
Levick, B. (1983), ‘The Senatus Consultum from Larinum’, Journal of Roman Studies 73: 97–115.Google Scholar
Lewis, S. (2006), ‘Iconography and the Study of Gender’, in Schroer, S. (ed.), Images and Gender. Contributions to the Hermeneutics of Reading Ancient Art (Fribourg): 23–39.Google Scholar
Lissarrague, F. (1990), ‘The Sexual Life of Satyrs’, in Halperin, D. M., Winkler, J. J. and Zeitlin, F. I. (eds), Before Sexuality: The Construction of Erotic Experience in the Ancient Greek World (Princeton, N.J.): 53–81.Google Scholar
Liverani, P. (2004), ‘Augusto di Prima Porta’, in Liverani, P. et al. (eds), I colori del bianco. Policromia nella scultura antica (Rome): 235–42.Google Scholar
Llewellyn-Jones, L. (2002), ‘A Woman’s View? Dress, Eroticism and the Ideal Female Body in Athenian Art’, in Llewellyn-Jones, L. (ed.), Women’s Dress in the Ancient Greek World (London): 171–202.Google Scholar
Llewellyn-Jones, L. (2003), Aphrodite’s Tortoise: The Veiled Woman of Ancient Greece (Swansea).Google Scholar
Llewellyn-Jones, L. (2007), ‘House and Veil in Ancient Greece’, British School at Athens Studies 15: 251–8.Google Scholar
Llewellyn-Jones, L (2010), ‘The Big and Beautiful Women of Asia: Ethnic Conceptions of Ideal Beauty in Achaemenid-Period Seals and Gemstones’, in Hales, S. and Hodos, T. (eds), Material Culture and Social Identities in the Ancient World (Cambridge): 171–200.Google Scholar
Mackinnon, A. and Dworkin, A. (1997) (eds), In Harm’s Way: The Pornography Civil Rights Hearings (Cambridge, Mass.).Google Scholar
Madsen, J. M. (2009), Eager to be Roman: Greek Response to Roman Rule in Pontus and Bithynia (London).Google Scholar
Manas, A. (2011), ‘New Evidence of Female Gladiators: The Bronze Statuette at the Museum für Kunst und Gewerbe of Hamburg’, International Journal of the History of Sport 28.18: 2726–52.Google Scholar
Mannsperger, M. (1998), Frisurenkunst und Kunstfrisur. Die Haarmode der römischen Kaiserinnen von Livia bis Sabina (Bonn).Google Scholar
Marder, T. A. (2004), ‘Bernini’s Neptune and Triton Fountain for the Villa Montalto’, in Bonfait, O. and Coliva, A. (eds), Bernini dai Borghese ai Barberini. La cultura a Roma intorno agli anni Venti (Rome): 119–28.Google Scholar
Martin, T. (2013), ‘The Nude Figure in Renaissance Art’, in Bohn, B. and Saslow, J. M. (eds), A Companion to Renaissance and Baroque Art (Chichester): 402–21.Google Scholar
Marvin, M. (1989), ‘Copying in Roman Sculpture: The Replica Series’, in Preciado, K. (ed.), Retaining the Original: Multiple Originals, Copies, and Reproductions (Washington, D.C.): 29–45.Google Scholar
Marvin, M. (1997), ‘Roman Sculptural Reproductions of Polykleitos: The Sequel’, in Hughes, A. and Ranfft, E. (eds), Sculpture and Its Reproduction (London): 7–28.Google Scholar
Marvin, M. (2008), Language of the Muses: The Dialogue between Roman and Greek Sculpture (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Mattusch, C. C. (2005), The Villa dei Papiri at Herculaneum: Life and Afterlife of a Sculpture Collection (Los Angeles, Calif.).Google Scholar
Mattusch, C. C. (2010), ‘Programming Sculpture? Collection and Display in the Villa of the Papyri’, in Zarmakoupi, M. (ed.), The Villa of the Papyri at Herculaneum: Archaeology, Reception, and Digital Reconstruction (New York, N.Y.): 79–88.Google Scholar
Mayer, E. (2012a), The Ancient Middle Classes: Urban Life and Aesthetics in the Roman Empire, 100 BCE–250 CE (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Mayer, E. (2012b), ‘From Silver Cups to Garden Gnomes: Toward a Contextual Reception of Standardized Images’, Arethusa 45: 283–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullough, A. (2008), ‘Female Gladiators in Imperial Rome: Literary Context and Historical Fact’, Classical World 101: 197–209.Google Scholar
McNally, S. (1985), ‘Ariadne and Others: Images of Sleep in Greek and Early Roman Art’, Classical Antiquity 4: 152–92.Google Scholar
McNiven, T. J. (1995), ‘The Unheroic Penis: Otherness Exposed’, in Davis, E. and Cohen, B. (eds), Representation of the Other in Athenian Art, ca. 510–400 B.C. (special issue of Sources 15.1): 10–16.Google Scholar
Merker, G. S. (2000), The Sanctuary of Demeter and Kore: Terracotta Figurines of the Classical, Hellenistic and Roman Periods (Corinth … Excavations, Vol. XVIII, Part IV) (Princeton, N.J.).Google Scholar
Mernissi, F. (1991), The Veil and the Male Elite: A Feminist Interpretation of Women’s Rights in Islam, tr. Lakeland, M. J. (Reading, Mass.).Google Scholar
Metraux, G. (1995), Sculptors and Physicians in Fifth-Century Greece: A Preliminary Study (Montreal).Google Scholar
Miller, P. A. (1998), ‘The Bodily Grotesque in Roman Satire: Images of Sterility’, Arethusa 31: 257–83.Google Scholar
Milnor, K. (2005), Gender, Domesticity, and the Age of Augustus: Inventing Private Life (Oxford).Google Scholar
Mitchell, A. (2009), Greek Vase Painting and the Origins of Visual Humour (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Mitchell, A. (2013), ‘Disparate Bodies in Ancient Artefacts: The Function of Caricature and Pathological Grotesques among Roman Terracotta Figurines’, in Laes, C., Goodney, C. G. F. and Rose, M. Lynn (eds), Disparate Bodies a Capite ad Calcem in Ancient Rome (Leiden): 275–97.Google Scholar
Mitchell, A. (2015), ‘Humor, Women and Male Anxieties in Ancient Greek Visual Culture’, in Foka, A. and Liliequist, J. (eds), Laughter, Humor, and the (Un)making of Gender (New York, N.Y.): 163–89.Google Scholar
Moellendorff, P. von (1995), Grundlagen einer Ästhetik der Alten Komödie. Untersuchungen zu Aristophanes und Michail Bachtin (Tübingen).Google Scholar
Molho, A. (1988), ‘Deception and Marriage Strategy in Renaissance Florence: The Case of Women’s Ages’, Renaissance Quarterly 41: 193–217.Google Scholar
Montel, S. (2010), ‘The Architectural Setting of the Knidian Aphrodite’, in Smith, A. C. and Pickup, S. (eds), Brill’s Companion to Aphrodite (Leiden): 251–68.Google Scholar
Morales, H. (2011), ‘Fantasising Phryne: The Psychology and Ethics of Ekphrasis’, Cambridge Classical Journal 57: 71–104.Google Scholar
Moreland, I. (2005), ‘The Glans Opens Like a Book: Writing and Reading the Intersexed Body’, Continuum: Journal of Media and Culture 19.3: 335–48.Google Scholar
Moreland, I. (2011), ‘Intersex Treatment and the Promise of Trauma’, in Fisher, J. A. (ed.), Gender and the Science of Difference: Cultural Politics of Contemporary Science and Medicine (New Brunswick, N.J.): 147–63.Google Scholar
Mormando, F. (2011), The Life of Gian Lorenzo Bernini by Domenico Bernini: A Translation and Critical Edition, with Introduction and Commentary (Philadelphia, Pa.).Google Scholar
Morson, G. S. and Emerson, C. (1990), Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a Prosaics (Stanford, Calif.).Google Scholar
Moseley, R. (2002), Growing Up With Audrey Hepburn: Text, Audience, Resonance (Manchester).Google Scholar
Neils, J. (2003), Coming of Age in Ancient Greece: Images of Childhood from the Classical Past (New Haven, Conn.).Google Scholar
Newby, Z. (2010), ‘In the Guise of Gods and Heroes: Portrait Heads on Roman Mythological Sarcophagi’, in Elsner, J. and Huskinson, J. (eds), Life, Death and Representation: Some New Work on Roman Sarcophagi (Berlin): 189–227.Google Scholar
Nodelman, S. (1993), ‘How to Read a Roman Portrait’, in D’Ambra, E. (ed.), Roman Art in Context (Princeton, N.J.): 10–26 [1975].Google Scholar
Ockman, C. (2005), ‘A Woman’s Pleasure: Ingres’s Grande Odalisque’, in Broude, N. and Garrard, M. D. (eds), Reclaiming Female Agency: Feminist Art History after Postmodernism (Berkeley, Calif.): 187–202.Google Scholar
Oehmke, S. (2004), Das Weib im Manne. Hermaphroditos in der griechisch-römischen Antike (Berlin).Google Scholar
Ogden, D. (2002), ‘Controlling Women’s Dress: Gynaikonomoi’, in Llewellyn-Jones, L. (ed.), Women’s Dress in the Ancient Greek World (London): 203–26.Google Scholar
Olender, M. (1990), ‘Aspects of Baubo: Ancient Texts and Contexts’, in Halperin, D. M., Winkler, J. J. and Zeitlin, F. (eds), Before Sexuality: The Construction of Erotic Experience in the Ancient Greek World (Princeton, N.J.): 68–78.Google Scholar
Olson, K. (2014), ‘Masculinity, Appearance, and Sexuality: Dandies in Roman Antiquity’, Journal of the History of Sexuality 23.2: 182–205.Google Scholar
Ormand, K. (2009), Controlling Desires: Sexuality in Ancient Greece and Rome (Westport, Conn.).Google Scholar
Osborne, R. (1994), ‘Looking on Greek Style: Does the Sculpted Girl Speak to Women Too?’, in Morris, I. (ed.), Classical Greece: Ancient Histories and Modern Archaeologies (Cambridge): 81–96.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. (1996), ‘Desiring Women on Athenian Pottery, in Kampen, N. B. (ed.), Sexuality in Ancient Art (Cambridge): 65–80.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. (1997), ‘Men Without Clothes: Heroic Nakedness and Greek Art’, Gender and History 9.3: 504–28.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. (1998b), ‘Sculpted Men of Athens: Masculinity and Power in the Field of Vision’, in Foxall, L. and Salmon, J. (eds), Thinking Men: Masculinity and Self-Representation in the Classical Tradition (London): 23–42.Google Scholar
Padgett, J. M. (2000), ‘The Stable Hands of Dionysos: Satyrs and Donkeys as Symbols of Social Marginalization in Attic Vase Painting’, in Cohen, B. (ed.), Not the Classical Ideal: Athens and the Construction of the Other in Greek Art (Leiden): 43–70.Google Scholar
Parkin, T. (2003), Old Age in the Roman World: A Cultural and Social History (Baltimore, Md.).Google Scholar
Pasquier, A. (2003), ‘Tanagréennes et grande sculpture’, in Jeammet, V. (ed.), Tanagra: Mythe et archéologie (Paris): 153–7.Google Scholar
Perry, E. (2002), ‘Rhetoric, Literary Criticism, and the Roman Aesthetics of Artistic Imitation’, in Gazda, E. (ed.), The Ancient Art of Emulation: Studies in Artistic Originality and Tradition from the Present to Classical Antiquity (Ann Arbor, Mich.): 153–72.Google Scholar
Perry, E. (2005), The Aesthetics of Emulation in the Visual Arts of Ancient Rome (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Peterson, L. H. (1997), ‘Divided Consciousness and Female Companionship: Reconstructing Female Subjectivity on Greek Vases’, Arethusa 30: 35–74.Google Scholar
Pevnick, S. D. (2014) (ed.), Poseidon and the Sea: Myth, Cult and Daily Life (Tampa, Fla.).Google Scholar
Pfanner, M. (1989),‘Über das Herstellen von Porträts. Ein Beitrag zu Rationalisierungsmassnahmen und Produktionsmechanismen von Massenware im späten Hellenismus und in der römischen Kaiserzeit’, Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 104: 157–257.Google Scholar
Pfisterer-Haas, S. (1989), Darstellungen alter Frauen in der griechischen Kunst (Frankfurt a.M.).Google Scholar
Pirenne-Delforge, V. (2007), ‘Something to do with Aphrodite: ta aphrodisia and the Sacred’, in Ogden, D. (ed.), Blackwell Companion to Greek Religion (Oxford): 311–23.Google Scholar
Plass, P. (1995), The Game of Death in Ancient Rome: Arena Sport and Political Suicide (Madison, Wis.).Google Scholar
Platt, V. (2011), Facing the Gods: Epiphany and Representation in Graeco-Roman Art, Literature and Religion (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Pointon, M. (1993), The Body Imaged: The Human Form and Visual Culture since the Renaissance (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Polleross, F. (2001), ‘Rector Marium or Pater Patriae? The Portraits of Andrea Doria as Neptune’, in Freedman, L. and Huber-Rebenich, G. (eds), Wege zum Mythos. Ikonographische Repertorien zur Rezeption des antiken Mythos in Europa (Berlin): 107–21.Google Scholar
Pollini, J. (1987b), ‘The Findspot of the Statue of Augustus from Prima Porta’, Bullettino della Commissione Archeologica Comunale di Roma 92: 103–8.Google Scholar
Pollini, J. (1990), ‘Man or God: Divine Assimilation and Imitation in the Late Republic and Early Principate’, in Raaflaub, K. A. and Toher, M. (eds), Between Republic and Empire: Interpretations of Augustus and his Principate (Berkeley, Calif.): 334–57.Google Scholar
Pollini, J. (1995), ‘The Augustus from Prima Porta and the Transformation of the Polykleitan Heroic Ideal: The Rhetoric of Art’, in Moon, W. G. (ed.), Polykleitos, the Doryphoros and Tradition (Madison, Wis.): 262–82.Google Scholar
Pollini, J. (1999), ‘The Warren Cup: Homoerotic Love and Symposial Rhetoric in Silver’, Art Bulletin 81: 21–52.Google Scholar
Pollini, J. (2003), ‘Slave-Boys for Sexual and Religious Service: Images of Pleasure and Devotion’, in Boyle, A. J. and Dominik, W. J. (eds), Flavian Rome: Culture, Image, Text (Leiden): 149–66.Google Scholar
Pollock, G. (1999), Differencing the Canon: Feminist Desire and the Writing of Art’s Histories (London).Google Scholar
Pomeroy, S. B. (1975), Goddesses, Whores, Wives, and Slaves: Women in Classical Antiquity (New York, N.Y.).Google Scholar
Pope-Hennessy, J. (1964), Catalogue of Italian Sculpture in the Victoria and Albert Museum (London).Google Scholar
Pratt, L. (2000), ‘The Old Women of Ancient Greece and the Homeric Hymn to Demeter’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 130: 41–65.Google Scholar
Price, S. R. F. (1984), Rituals and Power: The Roman Imperial Cult in Asia Minor (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Price, S. R. F. (1987), ‘From Noble Funerals to Divine Cult: The Consecration of Roman Emperors’, in Cannadine, D. and Price, S. R. F. (eds), Rituals of Royalty: Power and Ceremonial in Traditional Societies (Cambridge): 56–105.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. (2003), ‘Athletics, Education and Participation in Classical Athens’, in Phillips, D. J. and Pritchard, D. (eds), Sport and Festival in the Ancient World (Swansea): 293–349.Google Scholar
Purcell, N. (1986), ‘Livia and the Womanhood of Rome’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 212: 78–105.Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, N. and Auanger, L. (2002) (eds), Among Women: From the Homosocial to the Homoerotic in the Ancient World (Austin, Tex.).Google Scholar
Ramsby, T. R. and Severy-Hoven, B. (2007), ‘Gender, Sex, and the Domestication of the Empire in Art of the Augustan Age’, Arethusa 40: 43–71.Google Scholar
Reeder, J. C. (1997), ‘The Statue of Augustus from Prima Porta, the Underground Complex, and the Omen of Gallina Alba’, American Journal of Philology 118: 89–118.Google Scholar
Reeder, J. C. (2001), The Villa of Livia Ad Gallinas Albas: A Study in the Augustan Villa and Garden (Providence, R.I.).Google Scholar
Richlin, A. (1991), ‘Zeus and Metis: Foucault, Feminism, Classics’, Helios 18: 160–79.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. (1992), The Garden of Priapus: Sexuality and Aggression in Roman Humor (New York, N.Y.).Google Scholar
Richlin, A. (1993), ‘Not before Homosexuality: The Materiality of the Cinaedus and the Roman Law against Love between Men’, Journal of the History of Sexuality 3.4: 523–73.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. (2015), ‘Reading Boy-Love and Child-Love in the Greco-Roman World’, in Masterson, M., Rabinowitz, N. and Robson, J. (eds), Sex in Antiquity: Exploring Gender and Sexuality in the Ancient World (London): 352–73.Google Scholar
Ridgway, B. S. (1984), Roman Copies of Greek Sculpture: The Problem of the Originals (Ann Arbor, Mich.).Google Scholar
Ridgway, B. S. (1987), ‘Ancient Greek Women and Art: The Material Evidence’, American Journal of Archaeology 91: 399–409.Google Scholar
Ridgway, B. S. (1990), Hellenistic Sculpture I: The Styles of ca. 331–200 BC (Bristol).Google Scholar
Ridgway, B. S. (1995), ‘Paene ad exemplum: Polykleitos and Other Works’, in Moon, W. G. (ed.), Polykleitos, the Doryphoros and Tradition (Madison, Wis.): 177–99.Google Scholar
Riess, W. (2012), ‘Rari exempli femina: Female Virtues on Roman Funerary Inscriptions’, in James, S. and Dillon, S. (eds), A Companion to Women in the Ancient World (Chichester): 491–501.Google Scholar
Rinaldi, S. (1996), Technica e Restauro della Scultura Lapidea nelle Fonti dal Barocco al Neoclassicismo: Antologia di testi 1650–1802 (Rome).Google Scholar
Robertson, M. (1979), ‘A Muffled Dancer and Others’, in Cambitoglou, A. (ed.), Studies in Honour of Arthur Dale Trendall (Sydney): 129–34.Google Scholar
Robinson, M. (1999), ‘Salmacis and Hermaphroditus: When Two Become One (Ovid, Met. 4.285–388)’, Classical Quarterly 49: 212–23.Google Scholar
Robson, J. (1997), ‘Bestiality and Bestial Rape in Greek Myth’, in Deacy, S. and Pearce, K. (eds), Rape in Antiquity: Sexual Violence in the Greek and Roman Worlds (London): 65–96.Google Scholar
Roccos, L. J. (1989), ‘Apollo Palatinus: The Augustan Apollo on the Sorrento’, American Journal of Archaeology 93: 571–88.Google Scholar
Roccos, L. J. (2002), ‘The Citharode Apollo in Villa Contexts: A Roman Theme with Variations’, in Gazda, E. (ed.), The Ancient Art of Emulation: Studies in Artistic Originality and Tradition from the Present to Classical Antiquity (Ann Arbor, Mich.): 273–93.Google Scholar
Rowland, I. D. (2006), ‘Baroque’, in Kallendorf, C. (ed.), A Companion to the Classical Tradition (Malden, Mass.): 44–56.Google Scholar
Rydström, J. (2003), Sinners and Citizens: Bestiality and Homosexuality in Sweden, 1880–1950 (Chicago, Ill.).Google Scholar
Salomon, N. (1996), ‘The Venus Pudica: Uncovering Art History’s Hidden Agendas and Pernicious Pedigrees’, in Pollock, G. (ed.), Generations and Geographies in the Visual Arts (London): 69–87.Google Scholar
Salomon, N. (1997), ‘Making a World of Difference: Gender, Asymmetry, and the Greek Nude’, in Koloski-Ostrow, A. O. and Lyons, C. L. (eds), Naked Truths, Women, Sexuality, and Gender in Classical Art and Archaeology (London): 197–219.Google Scholar
Saslow, J. M. (2013), ‘The Desiring Eye: Gender, Sexuality and the Visual Arts’, in Bohn, B. and Saslow, J. M. (eds), A Companion to Renaissance and Baroque Art (Chichester): 127–48.Google Scholar
Schäfer, D. (2001), ‘Frauen in der Arena’, in Bellen, H. (ed.), Fünfzig Jahre Forschungen zur antiken Sklaverei an der Mainzer Akademie, 1950–2000 (Stuttgart): 243–68.Google Scholar
Schwartz, A. (2009), Reinstating the Hoplite: Arms, Armour and Phalanx Fighting in Archaic and Classical Greece (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Schwartz, A. (2013), ‘Large Weapons, Small Greeks: The Practical Limitations of Hoplite Weapons and Equipment’, in Kagan, D. and Viggiano, G. F. (eds), Men of Bronze: Hoplite Warfare in Ancient Greece (Princeton, N.J.): 157–75.Google Scholar
Scott, M. (2014), Delphi: A History of the Center of the Ancient World (Princeton, N.J.).Google Scholar
Seaman, K. H. (2004), ‘Retrieving the Original Aphrodite of Knidos’, Atti della Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, 9.15: 531–94.Google Scholar
Sebesta, J. L. (1997), ‘Women’s Costume and Feminine Civic Morality in Augustan Rome’, Gender and History 9.3: 529–41.Google Scholar
Segal, P. C. (2011), ‘The Paradox of Aphrodite: A Philandering Goddess of Marriage’, in Kondoleon, C. and Segal, P. C. (eds), Aphrodite and the Gods of Love (Boston, Mass.): 63–106.Google Scholar
Serwint, N. (1993), ‘The Female Athletic Costume at the Heraia and Prenuptial Initiation Rites’, American Journal of Archaeology 97: 403–22.Google Scholar
Severy-Hoven, B. (2013), ‘Master Narratives and the Wall Painting of the House of the Vettii, Pompeii’, in Gabaccia, D. R. and Maynes, M. J. (eds), Gender History Across Epistemologies (Chichester): 540–80.Google Scholar
Shapiro, H. A. (2000), ‘Leagros and Euphronis: Painting Pederasty in Athens’, in Hubbard, T. K. (ed.), Greek Love Reconsidered (New York, N.Y.): 12–32.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A. (2002), ‘Looking at Looking: Can You Resist a Reading?’, in Fredrick, D. (ed.), The Roman Gaze: Vision, Power, and the Body (Baltimore, Md.): 265–95.Google Scholar
Shirazi, F. (2001), The Veil Unveiled: The Hijab in Modern Culture (Gainesville, Fla.).Google Scholar
Shumka, L. (2008), ‘Designing Women: The Representations of Women’s Toiletries on Funerary Monuments in Roman Italy’, in Edmondson, J. and Keith, A. (eds), Roman Dress and the Fabrics of Roman Culture (Toronto): 172–91.Google Scholar
Silk, M., Gildenhard, I. and Barrow, R. (2014), The Classical Tradition: Art, Literature, Thought (Chichester).Google Scholar
Simon, E. (1957a), ‘Zur Augustusstatue von Prima Porta’, Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Römische Abteilung 64: 46–68.Google Scholar
Simon, E. (1991), ‘Altes und Neues zur Statue des Augustus von Primaporta’, in Binder, G. (ed.), Saeculum Augustum III: Kunst und Bildersprache (Darmstadt): 204–33.Google Scholar
Sinclair, P. (1990), ‘Tacitus’ Presentation of Livia Julia, Wife of Tiberius’ Son Drusus’, American Journal of Philology 111: 238–56.Google Scholar
Skinner, M. B. (2013), ‘Feminist Theory’, in Hubbard, T. K. (ed.), A Companion to Greek and Roman Sexualities (Chichester): 1–11.Google Scholar
Smith, R. R. R. (1996), ‘Typology and Diversity in the Portraits of Augustus’, Journal of Roman Archaeology 9: 31–47.Google Scholar
Smith, R. R. R. (1998), ‘Cultural Choice and Political Identity in Honorific Portrait Statues in the Greek East in the Second Century AD’, Journal of Roman Studies 68: 56–93.Google Scholar
Smith, R. R. R. (2007), ‘Pindar, Athletes and the Early Greek Statue Habit’, in Hornblower, S. and Morgan, C. (eds), Pindar’s Poetry, Patrons and Festivals (Oxford): 83–139.Google Scholar
Smith, T. (2015), ‘Queer Fragments – Sodoma, the Belvedere Torso, and Saint Catherine’s Head’, in Rose, M. and Poe, A. C. (eds), Receptions of Antiquity, Constructions of Gender in European Art, 1300–1600 (Leiden): 169–98.Google Scholar
Sourvinou-Inwood, C. (2004), ‘Hermaphroditos and Salmakis: The Voice of Halikarnassos’, in Isager, S. and Pedersen, P. (eds), The Salmakis Inscription and Hellenistic Halikarnassos (Odense): 59–84.Google Scholar
Spaeth, B. S. (2011), ‘Imperial Cult in Roman Corinth: A Response to Karl Galinsky’s “The Cult of the Roman Emperor: Uniter or Divider?”’, in Brodd, J. and Reed, L. (eds), Rome and Religion: A Cross-Disciplinary Dialogue on the Imperial Cult (Atlanta, Ga.): 61–81.Google Scholar
Spivey, N. (1997), ‘Meditations on a Greek Torso’, Cambridge Archaeological Journal 7: 309–14.Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2013), ‘Embodied Ambiguities on the Prima Porta Augustus’, Art History 36.2: 242–79.Google Scholar
Stacey, J. (1988), ‘Desperately Seeking Difference’, in Gamman, L. and Marshment, M. (eds), The Female Gaze: Women as Viewers of Popular Culture (London): 112–29.Google Scholar
Stackelberg, K. T. von (2014), ‘Garden Hybrids: Hermaphrodite Images in the Roman House’, Classical Antiquity 33: 395–426.Google Scholar
Stafford, E. (1993), ‘Aspects of Sleep in Hellenistic Sculpture’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 38: 105–20.Google Scholar
Stähli, A. (1999), Die Verweigerung der Lüste. Erotische Gruppen in der antiken Plastik (Berlin).Google Scholar
Stähli, A. (2008), ‘Die Kopie. Überlegungen zu einem methodischen Leitkonzept der Plastikforschung’, in Junker, K. and Stähli, A. (eds), Original und Kopie. Formen und Konzepte der Nachahmungen in der antiken Kunst (Wiesbaden): 15–34.Google Scholar
Stansbury-O’Donnell, M. D. (2013), ‘Desirability and the Body’, in Hubbard, T. K. (ed.), A Companion to Greek and Roman Sexualities (Oxford): 31–53.Google Scholar
Steiner, D. (1998), ‘Moving Images: Fifth-Century Victory Monuments and the Athlete’s Allure’, Classical Antiquity 17: 123–50.Google Scholar
Steiner, D. (2001), Images in Mind: Statues in Archaic and Classical Greek Literature and Thought (Princeton, N.J.).Google Scholar
Stephens, J. (2008), ‘Ancient Roman Hairdressing: On (Hair) Pins and Needles’, Journal of Roman Archaeology 21: 111–32.Google Scholar
Stevenson, T. (1998), ‘The Problem with Nude Honorific Statuary and Portraits in Late Republican and Augustan Rome’, Greece and Rome 45: 45–69.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. (1995), ‘Imagining the Other: Amazons and Ethnicity in Fifth-Century Athens’, Poetics Today 16.4: 571–97.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. (2006), ‘Hellenistic Art: Two Dozen Innovations’, in Bugh, G. R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Hellenistic World (Cambridge): 158–85.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. (2010), ‘A Tale of Seven Nudes: The Capitoline and Medici Aphrodites, Four Nymphs at Elean Herakleia, and an Aphrodite at Megalopolis’, Antichthon 44: 12–32.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. (2012), review of Squire, The Art of the Body: Antiquity and Its Legacy, in Reviews in History, www.history.ac.uk/reviews/review/1295.Google Scholar
Sturken, M. and Cartwright, C. (2001), Practices of Looking: An Introduction to Visual Culture (Oxford).Google Scholar
Sutton, R. F. (1992), ‘Pornography and Persuasion on Attic Pottery’, in Richlin, A. (ed.), Pornography and Representation in Greece and Rome (Oxford): 3–35.Google Scholar
Sutton, R. F. (2000), ‘The Good, the Base, and the Ugly: The Drunken Orgy in Attic Vase Painting and the Athenian Self’, in Cohen, B. (ed.), Not the Classical Ideal: Athens and the Construction of the Other in Greek Art (Leiden): 180–202.Google Scholar
Swain, S. (1991), ‘Plutarch, Hadrian, and Delphi’, Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte 40: 318–30.Google Scholar
Swancutt, D. M. (2007), ‘Still before Sexuality: “Greek” Androgyny, the Roman Imperial Politics of Masculinity and the Roman Invention of the Tribas’, in Penner, T. and Stichele, C. Vander (eds), Mapping Gender in Ancient Religious Discourses (Leiden): 11–62.Google Scholar
Tanner, J. (2000), ‘Portraits, Power, and Patronage in the Late Roman Republic’, Journal of Roman Studies 90: 18–50.Google Scholar
Tanner, J. (2001), ‘Nature, Culture and the Body in Classical Greek Religious Art’, World Archaeology 33: 257–76.Google Scholar
Tanner, J. (2006), The Invention of Art History in Ancient Greece: Religion, Society and Artistic Representation (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Taylor, R. (1997), ‘Two Pathic Subcultures in Ancient Rome’, Journal of the History of Sexuality 7: 319–71.Google Scholar
Thommen, L. (1996), ‘Nacktheit und Zivilisationsprozeß in Griechenland’, Historische Anthropologie 4: 438–50.Google Scholar
Thompson, D. B. (1950), ‘A Bronze Dancer from Alexandria’, American Journal of Archaeology 54: 371–85.Google Scholar
Thompson, D. B. (1966), ‘The Origin of Tanagras’, American Journal of Archaeology 70: 51–63.Google Scholar
Tobin, R. (1995), ‘The Pose of the Doryphoros’, in Moon, W. G. (ed.), Polykleitos, the Doryphoros and Tradition (Madison, Wis.): 52–64.Google Scholar
Topp, S. (2013), ‘Against the Quiet Revolution: The Rhetorical Construction of Intersex Individuals as Disordered’, Sexualities 16.1–2: 180–94.Google Scholar
Toscano, M. M. (2013), ‘The Eyes Have It: Female Desire on Attic Greek Vases’, Arethusa 46: 1–40.Google Scholar
Treggiari, S. (1991), Roman Marriage: Iusti Coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian (Oxford).Google Scholar
Treggiari, S. (1996), ‘Women in Roman Society’, in Kleiner, D. E. E. and Matheson, S. B. (eds), I, Claudia: Women in Ancient Rome (New Haven, Conn.): 118–25.Google Scholar
Trimble, J. (2002), ‘Greek Myth, Gender, and Social Structure in a Roman House: Two Paintings of Achilles at Pompeii’, in Gazda, E. (ed.), The Ancient Art of Emulation: Studies in Artistic Originality and Tradition from the Present to Classical Antiquity (Ann Arbor, Mich.): 225–48.Google Scholar
Trimble, J. (2011), Women and Visual Replication in Roman Imperial Art and Culture: Greek Culture in the Roman World (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Trimble, J. and Elsner, J. (2006), ‘Art and Replication: Greece, Rome and Beyond’, Art History 29.2: 201–42.Google Scholar
Tronchin, F. (2012), ‘Introduction: Collecting the Eclectic in Roman Houses’, Arethusa 45: 261–82.Google Scholar
Tsakalou-Tzanavari, K. (2007), ‘Des nécropoles aux sanctuaires: Les Tanagréennes de la Grèce du nord’, in Jeammet, V. (ed.), Tanagras. De l’objet de collection à l’objet archéologique (Paris): 117–31.Google Scholar
Turner, S. (2012), ‘In Cold Blood: Dead Athletes in Classical Athens’, World Archaeology 44.2: 217–33.Google Scholar
Türr, K. M. (1971), Eine Musengruppe hadrianischer Zeit. Die sogenannten Thespiaden (Berlin).Google Scholar
Uhlenbrock, J. P. (1990), ‘The Hellenistic Terracottas of Athens and the Tanagra Style’, in Uhlenbrock, J. P. (ed.), The Coroplast’s Art: Greek Terracottas of the Hellenistic World (New York, N.Y.): 48–53.Google Scholar
Valentine, D. and Wilchins, R. A. (1997), ‘One Percent on the Burn Chart: Gender, Genitals, and Hermaphrodites with Attitude’, Social Text 52/53: 215–22.Google Scholar
Van Bremen, R. (1996), The Limits of Participation: Women and Civic Life in the Greek East in the Hellenistic and Roman Periods (Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Van Wees, H. (2007), ‘War and Society’, in Sabin, P., Van Wees, H. and Whitby, M. (eds), The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Warfare (Cambridge): 273–99.Google Scholar
Vannini, P. and Waskul, D. (2006) (eds), Body/Embodiment: Symbolic Interaction and the Sociology of the Body (Aldershot).Google Scholar
Varner, E. (1995), ‘Domitia Longina and the Politics of Portraiture’, American Journal of Archaeology 99.2: 187–206.Google Scholar
Varner, E. (2006), ‘Reading Replications: Roman Rhetoric and Greek Quotations’, Art History, 29.2: 280–303.Google Scholar
Vasari, G. (1912–15), Lives of the Most Eminent Painters, Sculptors and Architects, tr. De Vere, G. du C., 10 vols (London) [1550/68].Google Scholar
Vernant, J. P. (1988), ‘Dim Body, Dazzling Body’, in Feher, M. (ed.), Fragments of the History of the Body (New York, N.Y.): 19–47.Google Scholar
Vernant, J. P. (1991), Mortals and Immortals: Collected Essays, tr. Zeitlin, F. (Princeton, N.J.).Google Scholar
Verstraete, B. C. (2009), review of Davidson, Greek Love, in Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2009.09.61.Google Scholar
Verstraete, B. C. (2012), ‘Reassessing Roman Pederasty in Relation to Roman Slavery: The Portrayal of Pueri Delicati in the Love-Poetry of Catullus, Tibullus and Horace’, Journal of International Social Research 5: 157–67.Google Scholar
Voisin, J.-L. (1994), ‘Antinoüs varius, multiplex, multiformis’, in Le Bohec, Y. (ed.), L’Afrique, la Gaule, la religion à l’époque romaine (Brussels): 730–41.Google Scholar
Vout, C. (2005), ‘Antinous, Archaeology and History’, Journal of Roman Studies 95: 80–96.Google Scholar
Vout, C. (2006a), ‘What’s in a Beard? Rethinking Hadrian’s Hellenism’, in Goldhill, S. and Osborne, R. (eds), Rethinking Revolutions Through Ancient Greece (Cambridge): 96–123.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1988), ‘The Social Structure of the Roman House’, Papers of the British School at Rome 56: 43–97.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1989), ‘Rome’s Cultural Revolution’, Journal of Roman Studies 79: 157–64.Google Scholar
Walsh, D. (2009), Distorted Ideals in Greek Vase-Painting: The World of Mythological Burlesque (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Walters, J. (1997), ‘Invading the Roman Body: Manliness and Impenetrability’, in Hallett, J. P. and Skinner, M. (eds), Roman Sexualities (Princeton, N.J.): 29–43.Google Scholar
Waters, S. (1995), ‘“The Most Famous Fairy in History”: Antinous and Homosexual Fantasy’, Journal of the History of Sexuality 6: 194–230.Google Scholar
Wheeler, E. L. (2007), ‘Land Battles’, in Sabin, P., Van Wees, H. and Whitby, M. (eds), The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Warfare (Cambridge): 186–247.Google Scholar
Wilchins, R. (2004), Queer Theory, Gender Theory: An Instant Primer (Los Angeles, Calif.).Google Scholar
Wilkins, A. T. (2000), ‘Bernini and Ovid: Expanding the Concept of Metamorphosis’, International Journal of the Classical Tradition 6: 383–408.Google Scholar
Williams, D. (1983), ‘Women on Athenian Vases: Problems of Interpretation’, in Cameron, A. and Kuhrt, A. (eds), Images of Women in Antiquity (Detroit, Mich.): 92–106.Google Scholar
Williams, M. F. (2004), ‘Philopoemen’s Special Forces: Peltasts and a New Kind of Greek Light-Armed Warfare’, Historia. Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte 53: 257–77.Google Scholar
Winkler, J. J. (1990), Constraints of Desire: The Anthropology of Sex and Gender in Ancient Greece (New York, N.Y.).Google Scholar
Winner, M. (1985), ‘Bernini the Sculptor and the Classical Heritage in his Early Years: Praxiteles’, Bernini’s, and Lanfranco’s Pluto and Proserpina’, Römisches Jahrbuch für Kunstgeschichte 22: 191–207.Google Scholar
Winner, M. (1998), ‘Ermafrodito’, in Coliva, A. and Schütze, S. (eds), Bernini scultore: la nascita del barocco a casa Borghese (Rome): 124–33.Google Scholar
Wittkower, R. (1952), ‘Bernini Studies, I. The Group of Neptune and Triton’, Burlington Magazine 94: 68–76.Google Scholar
Wittkower, R. (2008), ‘The Role of Classical Models in Bernini’s and Poussin’s Preparatory Work’, in Dixon, S. M. (ed.), Italian Baroque Art (Oxford): 305–10 [1963].Google Scholar
Wojcik, M. R. (1986), La Villa dei Papiri ad Ercolano: contributo alla ricostruzione dell’ideologia della nobilitas tardorepubblicana (Rome).Google Scholar
Wolf, G. (2000), ‘The Body and Antiquity in Alberti’s Art Theoretical Writings’, in Payne, A., Kuttner, A. and Smick, R. (eds), Antiquity and Its Interpreters (Cambridge): 174–90.Google Scholar
Wolfthal, D. (1999), Images of Rape: The Heroic Tradition and Its Alternatives (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Woodhull, M. (2012), ‘Imperial Mothers and Monuments in Rome’, in Petersen, L. Hackworth and Salzman-Mitchell, P. (eds), Mothering and Motherhood in Ancient Greece and Rome (Austin, Tex.): 225–51.Google Scholar
Wrede, H. (1971), ‘Das Mausoleum der Claudia Semne und die bürgerliche Plastik der Kaiserzeit’, Römische Mitteilungen 78: 125–66.Google Scholar
Wrede, H. (1981), Consecratio in formam deorum. Vergöttlichte Privatpersonen in der römischen Kaiserzeit (Mainz).Google Scholar
Wrede, H. (1991)‚ ‘Matronen im Kult des Dionysos. Zur hellenistischen Genreplastik’, Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Römische Abteilung 98: 163–88.Google Scholar
Wyke, M. (1994), ‘Woman in the Mirror: The Rhetoric of Adornment in the Roman World’, in Archer, L., Fischler, S. and Wyke, M. (eds), Women in Ancient Societies: An Illusion of the Night (London): 134–51.Google Scholar
Zajko, V. (2009), ‘Listening With Ovid: Intersexuality, Queer Theory, and the Myth of Hermaphroditus and Salmacis’, Helios 36: 175–202.Google Scholar
Zanker, G. (2015), ‘The Contexts and Experience of Poetry and Art in the Hellenistic World’, in Destrée, P. and Murray, P. (eds), A Companion to Ancient Aesthetics (Chichester): 47–67.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. (1974), Klassizistische Statuen. Studien zur Veränderung des Kunstgeschmacks in der römischen Kaiserzeit (Mainz).Google Scholar
Zanker, P. (1990), The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus, tr. Shapiro, A. (Ann Arbor, Mich.).Google Scholar
Zanker, P. (1992), ‘Nachahmen als kulturelles Schicksal’, in Lenz, C. (ed.), Probleme der Kopie von der Antike bis zum 19. Jahrhundert (Munich): 9–24.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. (1995), The Mask of Socrates: The Image of the Intellectual in Antiquity, tr. Shapiro, A. (Berkeley, Calif.).Google Scholar
Zanker, P. and Ewald, B. C. (2012), Living with Myths: The Imagery of Roman Sarcophagi (Oxford).Google Scholar
Zarmakoupi, M. (2008), ‘Designing the Landscapes of the Villa of Livia at Prima Porta’, in Kurtz, D. (ed.), Essays in Classical Archaeology for Eleni Hatzivassiliou 1977–2007 (Oxford): 269–76.Google Scholar
Zarmakoupi, M. (2014), Designing for Luxury on the Bay of Naples: Villas and Landscapes c. 100 BCE – 79 CE (Oxford).Google Scholar
Zeiler, K. and Wickström, A. (2009), ‘Why Do “We” Perform Surgery on Newborn Intersexed Children? The Phenomenology of the Parental Experience of Having a Child with Intersex Anatomies’, Feminist Theory 10: 359–78.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, M. (2000), Apuleius Madaurensis: Metamorphoses, Book X: Text, Introduction and Commentary (Groningen).Google Scholar