Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working Memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bokander, L., & Bylund, E. (2020). Probing the internal validity of the LLAMA language aptitude tests. Language Learning, 70(1), 11–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1965). The prediction of success in intensive foreign language training. In Glaser, R. (ed.), Training, Research and Education. New York: Wiley, pp. 87–136.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1966). A Parametric Study of Language Training in the Peace Corps. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1981). Twenty-five years of research on foreign language aptitude. In Diller, K. C. (ed.), Individual Differences and Universals in Language Learning Aptitude. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, pp. 83–118.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of Factor-Analytic Studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B., & Sapon, S. M. (1959). Modern Language Aptitude Test Manual. New York, NY: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale NJ: Erbaum.Google Scholar

DeKeyser, R. (2019). The future of language aptitude research. In Wen, Z., Skehan, P., Biedroń, A., Li, S., & Sparks, R. (eds.), Language Aptitude: Advancing Theory, Testing, Research and Practice. London: Routledge, pp. 317–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003). Individual differences in second language learning. In Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 589–630.Google Scholar

Doughty, C. J. (2019). Cognitive language aptitude. Language Learning, 69(Suppl S1), 101–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ehrman, M., & Oxford, R. (1995). Cognition plus: Correlates of language learning success. Modern Language Journal, 79(1), 67–89.Google Scholar

Granena, G. (2013). Cognitive aptitudes for second language learning and the LLAMA Language Aptitude Test. In Granena, G. & Long, M. H. (eds.), Sensitive Periods, Language Aptitude, and Ultimate L2 Attainment. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 105–129.Google Scholar

Granena, G. (2016). Cognitive aptitudes for implicit and explicit learning and information-processing styles: An individual differences study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(3), 577–600.Google Scholar

Granena, G. (2019). Cognitive aptitudes and L2 speaking proficiency: Link between LLAMA and Hi-LAB. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(2), 313–336.Google Scholar

Grigorenko, E. L., Sternberg, R. J., & Ehrman, M. E. (2000). A theory-based approach to the measurement of foreign language learning ability: The Canal-F theory and test. The Modern Language Journal, 84(3), 390–405.Google Scholar

Harrington, M., & Sawyer, M.. (1992). L2 working memory capacity and L2 reading skill. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14(1), 25–38.Google Scholar

Hatcher, L. (1994). Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar

Hummel, K. M. (2009). Aptitude, phonological memory, and second language proficiency in non-novice adult learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30(2), 225–249.Google Scholar

Li, L. R. (2014). Developing an instrument to measure foreign language aptitude of Chinese learners of foreign languages (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.Google Scholar

Li, L. R., & Luo, S. Q. (2019). Development and preliminary validation of a foreign language aptitude test for Chinese learners of foreign languages. In Wen, Z., Skehan, P., Biedroń, A., Li, S., & Sparks, R. (eds.). Language aptitude: Advancing theory, testing, research and practice (pp. 59–90). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Li, S. F. (2016). The construct validity of language aptitude: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(4), 801–842.Google Scholar

Li, S. F. (2019). Six decades of language aptitude research: A comprehensive and critical review. In Wen, Z., Skehan, P., Biedroń, A., Li, S., & Sparks, R. (eds.), Language Aptitude: Advancing Theory, Testing, Research and Practice. New York: Routledge, pp. 78–96.Google Scholar

Li, S. F., & Qian, J. C. (2021). Exploring syntactic priming as a measure of implicit language aptitude. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263120000698CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Linck, J. A., Hughes, M. M., & Campbell, S. G. et al. (2013). Hi-LAB: A new measure of aptitude for high-level language proficiency. Language Learning, 63(3), 530–566.Google Scholar

Liu, J., & Jiang, N. (2006) A report on English language aptitude test among Chinese learners. Foreign Languages in China, 3(4), 63–68.Google Scholar

Liu, J. D, & Wu, S. (2019). The Research on China’s Standards of English Language Ability. Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar

Liu, T., Liu, L., & Deng, J. (2005). A study on correlation coefficients of grammar sensitivity. Journal of Southwest Minzu University (Humanities and Social Science), 26(10), 292–295.Google Scholar

McLaughlin, B. (1995). Aptitude from an information processing perspective. Language Testing, 12(3), 370–387.Google Scholar

Meara, P. M. (2005). Llama Language Aptitude Tests. Swansea: Lognostics.Google Scholar

Miyake, A., & Freidman, N. P. (1998). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. In Healy, A. & Bourne, L. (eds.), Foreign Language Learning: Psycholinguistic Studies on Training and Retention. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erbaum, pp. 339–364.Google Scholar

Petersen, C. R., & Al-Haik, A. R. (1976). The development of the defense language aptitude battery (DLAB). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 36(2), 369–380.Google Scholar

Pimsleur, P. (1966). Pimsleur Language Aptitude Battery. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (2005). Cognitive abilities, chunk-strength, and frequency effects in implicit artificial grammar and incidental L2 learning: Replications of Reber, Walkenfield, and Hernstatd (1991) and Knowlton and Squire (1996) and their relevance for SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 235–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robinson, P. (2007). Aptitudes, abilities, contexts, and practice. In DeKeyser, R. M. (ed.), Practice in a Second Language: Perspectives from Applied Linguistics and Cognitive Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 256–286.Google Scholar

Rogers, V., Meara, P., Barnett-Legh, T., Curry, C., & Davie, E. (2017). Examining the LLAMA aptitude tests. Journal of the European Second Language Association, 1(1), 49–60.Google Scholar

Safar, A., & Kormos, J. (2008). Revisiting problems with foreign language aptitude. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 46(2), 113–136.Google Scholar

Sagarra, N. (2007). Working memory and L2 processing of redundant grammatical forms. In Han, Z. & Park, E. S. (eds.), Understanding Second Language. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters, pp. 133–147.Google Scholar

Sagarra, N., & Herschensohn, J. (2010). The role of proficiency and working memory in gender and number agreement processing in L1 and L2 Spanish. Lingua, 120(8), 2002–2039.Google Scholar

Sawyer, M., & Ranta, L. (2001). Aptitude, individual differences, and instructional design. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 319–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skehan, P. (1998). A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (2002). Theorizing and updating aptitude. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 69–94.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (2012). Language aptitude. In Gass, S. & Mackey, A. (eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 381–395.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (2015). Foreign language aptitude and its relationship with grammar: A critical overview. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 367–384.Google Scholar

Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., & Patton, J. (1995). Prediction of performance in first-year foreign language courses: Connections between native and foreign language learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(4), 638–655.Google Scholar

Sparks, R., Patton, J., Ganschow, L., & Humbach, N. (2011). Subcomponents of second language aptitude and second language proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 95(2), 253–273.Google Scholar

Suzuki, Y. (2021). Probing the construct validity of LLAMA_D as a measure of implicit learning aptitude: Incidental instructions, confidence ratings, and reaction time. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263120000704Google Scholar

Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. (2017). The interface of explicit and implicit knowledge in a second language: Insights from individual differences in cognitive aptitudes. Language Learning, 67(4), 747–790.Google Scholar

Walter, C. (2004). Transfer of reading comprehension skills to L2 is linked to mental representation of text and to L2 working memory. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 315–339.Google Scholar

Wen, Z. S. (2019). Working memory as language aptitude: The Phonological/Executive model. In Wen, Z., Skehan, P., Biedroń, A., Li, S., & Sparks, R., Language Aptitude: Advancing Theory, Testing, Research and Practice. London: Routledge, pp.187–214.Google Scholar

Wen, Z. S., Biedroń, A., & Skehan, P. (2017). Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Language Teaching, 50(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wen, Z. S., & Skehan, P. (2011). A new perspective on foreign language aptitude research: Building and supporting a case for “working memory as language aptitude.” Ilha do Desterro, 60, 15–43.Google Scholar

Weir, C. J. (2005). Language Testing and Validation: An Evidence-Based Approach. New York: Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar

Winke, P. (2013). An investigation into second language aptitude for advanced Chinese language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 97(1), 109–130.Google Scholar

Wu, Y. A., Liu, R, Q., & Jeffrey, P. (1993). Learner factors and language learning achievement: A survey. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 93(1), 36–46.Google Scholar

Xia, H. Y. (2011). A language aptitude test for native Chinese: Development and validation. Shandong Foreign Languages Teaching Journal, 32(5), 52–55.Google Scholar

Yalçın, S., Cecen, S., & Erçetin, G. (2016). The relationship between aptitude and working memory: An instructed SLA context. Language Awareness, 25(1–2), 144–158.Google Scholar

Yalçın, S., & Erçetin, G. (2019). Relationships among working memory, language aptitude, and listening comprehension in an instructed foreign language setting. Zhuhai International Roundtable on Language Aptitude. November 2019.Google Scholar

Yoshimura, Y. (2001). The role of working memory in language aptitude. In Bonch-Bruevich, X., Crawford, W. J., Hellermann, J., Higgins, C., & Nguyen, H. (eds.), The Past, Present, and Future of Second Language Research. Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, pp. 144–163.Google Scholar

Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2008). The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(4), 481–509.Google Scholar

Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2009). Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59(2), 249–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Artieda, G., & Muñoz, C. (2016). The LLAMA tests and the underlying structure of language aptitude at two levels of foreign language proficiency. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 42–48.Google Scholar

Asher, J. J. (1977). Defense language aptitude battery. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/325703CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. (2012). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999999-0Google Scholar

Benson, S., & DeKeyser, R. (2019). Effects of written corrective feedback and language aptitude on verb tense accuracy. Language Teaching Research, 23(6), 702–726.Google Scholar

Bigelow, M., & Tarone, E. (2004). The role of literacy level in second language acquisition: Doesn’t who we study determine what we know? TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 689–700.Google Scholar

Bokander, L., & Bylund, E. (2020). Probing the internal validity of the LLAMA language aptitude tests. Language Learning, 70(1), 11–47.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1964). The prediction of success in intensive foreign language training. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED038051Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1973). Implications of aptitude test research and psycholinguistic theory for foreign-language teaching. Linguistics, 11(112), 5–14.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1981). Twenty-five years of research on foreign language aptitude. In Diller, K. C. (ed.), Individual Differences and Universals in Language Learning Aptitude. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, pp. 83–118.Google Scholar

Chaffee, K. E., Lou, N. M., & Noels, K. A. (2020). Does stereotype threat affect men in language domains? Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1302. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01302CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chaffee, K. E., Lou, N. M., Noels, K. A., & Katz, J. W. (2020). Why don’t “real men” learn languages? Masculinity threat and gender ideology suppress men’s language learning motivation. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 23(2), 301–318.Google Scholar

Christiner, M., Rüdegger, S., & Reiterer, S. M. (2018). Sing Chinese and tap Tagalog? Predicting individual differences in musical and phonetic aptitude using language families differing by sound-typology. International Journal of Multilingualism, 15(4), 455–471.Google Scholar

Cox, J. G., Lynch, J. M., Mendes, N., & Zhai, C. (2019). On bilingual aptitude for learning new languages: The roles of linguistic and nonlinguistic individual differences. Language Learning, 69(2), 478–514.Google Scholar

Curcic, M., Andringa, S., & Kuiken, F. (2019). The role of awareness and cognitive aptitudes in L2 predictive language processing. Language Learning, 69, 42–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeKeyser, R. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 499–533. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100004022Google Scholar

DeKeyser, R. (2012). Age effects in second language learning. In Gass, S. M. & Mackey, A. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Routledge, pp. 442–460.Google Scholar

DeKeyser, R. (2019). The future of language aptitude research. In Wen, Z., Skehan, P., Biedroń, A., Li, S., & Sparks, R. L. (eds.), Language Aptitude: Advancing Theory, Testing, Research and Practice. Routledge, pp. 317–329.Google Scholar

DeKeyser, R., Alfi-Shabtay, I., & Ravid, D. (2010). Cross-linguistic evidence for the nature of age effects in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31(3), 413–438. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716410000056Google Scholar

del Mar Suárez, M., & Gesa, F. (2019). Learning vocabulary with the support of sustained exposure to captioned video: Do proficiency and aptitude make a difference? The Language Learning Journal, 47(4), 497–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1617768Google Scholar

Delage, H., & Franck, J. (2021). Diagnostic de troubles du langage chez l’enfant réfugié: Challenges actuels. Babylonia Journal of Language Education, 2, 44–51.Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003). Individual differences in second language learning. In Doughty, C. J. and Long, M. H. (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Blackwell, pp. 589–630.Google Scholar

Drozdova, P., Van Hout, R., & Scharenborg, O. (2017). L2 voice recognition: The role of speaker-, listener-, and stimulus-related factors. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(5), 3058–3068.Google Scholar

Escobar, G. P., Kalashnikova, M., & Escudero, P. (2018). Vocabulary matters! The relationship between verbal fluency and measures of inhibitory control in monolingual and bilingual children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 170, 177–189.Google Scholar

Granena, G. (2012). Age differences and cognitive aptitudes for implicit and explicit learning in ultimate second language attainment. PhD thesis, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar

Granena, G. (2014). Language aptitude and long-term achievement in early childhood L2 learners. Applied Linguistics, 35(4), 483–503. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu013Google Scholar

Granena, G. (2016). Cognitive aptitudes for implicit and explicit learning and information-processing styles: An individual differences study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(3), 577–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Granena, G. (2019). Cognitive aptitudes and L2 speaking proficiency: Links between LLAMA and Hi-LAB. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(2), 313–336.Google Scholar

Granena, G., & Long, M. H. (2013). Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research, 29(3), 311–343.Google Scholar

Granena, G., & Yilmaz, Y. (2018). Aptitude-treatment interaction in L2 learning: A research synthesis. Studies in English Education, 4, 803–830.Google Scholar

Hamrick, P. (2015). Declarative and procedural memory abilities as individual differences in incidental language learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 44, 9–15.Google Scholar

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010a). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), 29–29.Google Scholar

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010b). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83.Google Scholar

Huang, T., Loerts, H., & Steinkrauss, R. (2020). The impact of second- and third-language learning on language aptitude and working memory. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(2), 1–17.Google Scholar

Ishikawa, M. (2019). Written languaging, learners’ aptitude and second language learning. PhD thesis, University College London.Google Scholar

Jackson, D. O. (2014). Learner differences in metalinguistic awareness: Exploring the influence of cognitive abilities and language experience. In Miller, R. T., Martin, K. I., Eddington, C. M. et al. (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 2012 Second Language Research Forum: Building Bridges between Disciplines, October 18–21, 2012, University of Pittsburgh and Carnegie Mellon University, pp. 211–226. www.lingref.com/cpp/slrf/2012/index.htmlGoogle Scholar

Kachinske, I. (2016). The role of rules, examples and individual differences in the acquisition of declarative and procedural second language knowledge. PhD thesis, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar

Kourtali, N.-E. (2018). The effects of task complexity, mode of interaction and L2 aptitude on the development of the present third person singular through recasts. PhD thesis, University College London.Google Scholar

Kourtali, N.-E., & Révész, A. (2020). The roles of recasts, task complexity, and aptitude in child second language development. Language Learning, 70(1), 179–218.Google Scholar

Lambelet, A. (2021). Lexical diversity development in newly arrived parent–child immigrant pairs: Aptitude, age, exposure, and anxiety. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190521000039Google Scholar

Lambelet, A., & Berthele, R. (2019). Difficulty and ease in foreign language learning at the primary school level: General learning ability, language aptitude or working memory. In Wen, Z., Skehan, P., Biedroń, A., Li, S., & Sparks, R. L. (eds.), Language Aptitude: Advancing Theory, Testing, Research and Practice. Routledge, pp. 99–122.Google Scholar

Lambelet, A., Berthele, R., & Udry, I. (2019). Les aptitudes langagières: Construit et opérationnalisation: Une revue de la littérature. Institut de plurilinguisme.Google Scholar

Larson-Hall, J., & Dewey, D. (2012). An examination of the effects of input, aptitude, and motivation on the language proficiency of missionaries learning Japanese as a second language. Second Language Acquisition Abroad: The LDS Missionary Experience, 45, 51–88.Google Scholar

Linck, J. A., Hughes, M. M., Campbell, S. G., et al. (2013). Hi-LAB: A new measure of aptitude for high-level language proficiency. Language Learning, 63(3), 530–566.Google Scholar

Ma, D., Yao, T., & Zhang, H. (2018). The effect of third language learning on language aptitude among English-major students in China. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 39(7), 590–601.Google Scholar

Meara, P. (2005). LLAMA Language Aptitude Tests: The Manual. University of Wales, Swansea. www.lognostics.co.uk/tools/llama/llama_manual.pdfGoogle Scholar

Medin, D., Ojalehto, B., Marin, A., Bang, M. (2017) Systems of (non)diversity. Nature Human Behaviour 1, Article 0088. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0088CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Métraux, J.-C. (2017). L’impact du vécu des réfugiés sur leur apprentissage de la langue d’accueil. Babylonia, 1, 19–22.Google Scholar

Michaud, G. (2020). À quel moment enseigner la forme dans le cadre d’un enseignement basé sur la tâche? PhD thesis, Université de Montréal.Google Scholar

Moon, J. (2012). Maturational and non-maturational factors in heritage language acquisition. PhD thesis, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar

Moorman, C. M. (2017). Individual differences and linguistic factors in the development of mid vowels in L2 Spanish learners: A longitudinal study. PhD thesis, Georgetown University.Google Scholar

Okumura, Y., & Okumura, M. Y. (2012). Package ‘rpsychi.’ R package. Published online: http://www2.uaem.mx/r-mirror/web/packages/rpsychi/rpsychi.pdfGoogle Scholar

Parry, T. S., & Child, J. R. (1990). Preliminary investigation of the relationship between VORD, MLAT and language proficiency. Spons Agency, 30–66.Google Scholar

Petersen, C. R., & Al-Haik, A. R. (1976). The development of the defense language aptitude battery (DLAB). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 36(2), 369–380.Google Scholar

Portocarrero, J. S., Burright, R. G., & Donovick, P. J. (2007). Vocabulary and verbal fluency of bilingual and monolingual college students. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22(3), 415–422.Google Scholar

Rodríguez Silva, L. H. (2017). The role of cognitive individual differences and learning difficulty in instructed adults’ explicit and implicit knowledge of selected L2 grammar points: A study with Mexican learners of English. PhD thesis, University of Essex.Google Scholar

Rogers, V., Meara, P., Barnett-Legh, T., Curry, C., & Davie, E. (2017). Examining the LLAMA aptitude tests. Journal of the European Second Language Association, 1(1), 49–60. www.euroslajournal.org/articles/10.22599/jesla.24/Google Scholar

Rosselli, M., Ardila, A., Salvatierra, J., et al. (2002). A cross-linguistic comparison of verbal fluency tests. International Journal of Neuroscience, 112(6), 759–776.Google Scholar

Rüdegger, S. (2017). Language aptitude in primary school children and its effects on other cognitive domains. Master’s thesis, University of Vienna.Google Scholar

Saito, K. (2017). Effects of sound, vocabulary, and grammar learning aptitude on adult second language speech attainment in foreign language classrooms. Language Learning, 67(3), 665–693.Google Scholar

Saito, K. (2019). The role of aptitude in second language segmental learning: The case of Japanese learners’ English/ɹ/pronunciation attainment in classroom settings. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(1), 183–204.Google Scholar

Saito, K., Sun, H., & Tierney, A. (2018). Explicit and implicit aptitude effects on second language speech learning: Scrutinizing segmental and suprasegmental sensitivity and performance via behavioural and neurophysiological measures. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22(5), 1–18.Google Scholar

Segall, M. H., Campbell, D. T., & Herskovits, M. J. (1966). The Influence of Culture on Visual Perception. Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10(1–4), 209–232.Google Scholar

Søndergaard, H.-P. (2017). Language learning in refugees, an account of a Swedish study. Babylonia, 1, 15–18.Google Scholar

Tran, M. N. (2019). Scrutinizing the effects of the 4/3/2 activity: Repetition, increasing time pressure, accuracy enhancement and cognitive individual differences. PhD thesis, Birkbeck, University of London.Google Scholar

Turker, S., Seither-Preisler, A., Reiterer, S. M., & Schneider, P. (2019). Cognitive and behavioural weaknesses in children with reading disorder and AD (H) D. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–11.Google Scholar

UN DESA. (2019, September 17). The number of international migrants reaches 272 million, continuing an upward trend in all world regions, says UN. www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/international-migrant-stock-2019.htmlGoogle Scholar

Yalçın, Ş., Çeçen, S., & Erçetin, G. (2016). The relationship between aptitude and working memory: An instructed SLA context. Language Awareness, 25(1–2), 144–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2015.1122026Google Scholar

Yalçın, Ş., & Spada, N. (2016). Language aptitude and grammatical difficulty: An EFL classroom-based study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(2), 239–263.Google Scholar

Yilmaz, Y. (2013). Relative effects of explicit and implicit feedback: The role of working memory capacity and language analytic ability. Applied Linguistics, 34(3), 344–368.Google Scholar

Yilmaz, Y., & Granena, G. (2016). The role of cognitive aptitudes for explicit language learning in the relative effects of explicit and implicit feedback. Bilingualism, 19(1), 147.Google Scholar

Abrahamsson, N. (2012). Age of onset and nativelike L2 ultimate attainment of morphosyntactic and phonetic intuition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(2), 187–214.Google Scholar

Abrahamsson, N. & Hyltenstam, K. (2008). The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(4), 481–509.Google Scholar

Abrahamsson, N. & Hyltenstam, K. (2009). Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59(2), 249–306.Google Scholar

Amedi, A., Floel, A., Knecht, S., Zohary, E., & Cohen, L. G. (2004). Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the occipital pole interferes with verbal processing in blind subjects. Nature Neuroscience, 7(11), 1266–1270.Google Scholar

Amedi, A., Raz, N., Pianka, P., Malach, R., & Zohary, E. (2003). Early “visual” cortex activation correlates with superior verbal memory performance in the blind. Nature Neuroscience, 6(7), 758–766.Google Scholar

Ameringer, V., Green, L., Leisser, D., & Turker, S. (2018). Introduction: Towards an interdisciplinary understanding of language aptitude. In Reiterer, S. M. (ed.), Exploring Language Aptitude: Views from Psychology, the Language Sciences, and Cognitive Neuroscience. Springer, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1–29.Google Scholar

Bavelier, D., & Neville, H. J. (2002). Cross-modal plasticity: Where and how? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(6), 443–452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bedny, M. (2017). Evidence from blindness for a cognitively pluripotent cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(9), 637–648.Google Scholar

Bedny, M., Pascual-Leone, A., Dodell-Feder, D., Fedorenko, E., & Saxe, R. (2011). Language processing in the occipital cortex of congenitally blind adults. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(11), 4429–4434.Google Scholar

Bialystok, E. (2009). Bilingualism: The good, the bad, and the indifferent. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12(1), 3–11.Google Scholar

Bialystok, E. (2016). The signal and the noise: Finding the pattern in human behavior. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 6(5), 517–534.Google Scholar

Bialystok, E. (2017). The bilingual adaptation: How minds accommodate experience. Psychological Bulletin 143(3), 233–262.Google Scholar

Bokander, L., & Bylund, E. (2020). Probing the internal validity of the LLAMA language aptitude tests. Language Learning, 70(1), 11–47.Google Scholar

Bylund, E., Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N. (2021). Age of acquisition – not bilingualism – is the primary determinant of less than nativelike L2 ultimate attainment. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 24(1), 18–30.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1958). A factor analysis of two foreign language aptitude batteries. Journal of General Psychology, 59(1), 3–9.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1962). The prediction of success in intensive foreign language training. In Glaser, R. (ed.), Training Research and Education. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 87–136.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1973). Implications of aptitude test research and psycholinguistic theory for foreign language teaching. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 2, 5–14.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1981). Twenty-five years of research on foreign language aptitude. In Diller, K. C. (ed.), Individual Differences and Universals in Language Learning Aptitude. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, pp. 83–118.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B., & Sapon, S. M. (1959). Modern Language Aptitude Test. Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Cenoz, J. (2013). The influence of bilingualism on third language acquisition: Focus on multilingualism. Language Teaching, 46(1), 71–86.Google Scholar

Chalmers, J. (2017). How stable is second language aptitude? Effects of second language learning and language analysis training on second language aptitude test scores. Doctoral dissertation, Griffith University, USA.Google Scholar

Cox, J. G., Lynch, J. M., Mendes, N., & Zhai, C. (2019). On bilingual aptitude for learning new languages: The roles of linguistic and nonlinguistic individual differences. Language Learning, 69(2), 478–514.Google Scholar

DeKeyser, R. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 499–533.Google Scholar

DeKeyser, R., & Koeth, J. (2011). Cognitive aptitudes for second language learning. In Hinkel, E. (ed.), Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 395–406.Google Scholar

Dick, A. S., Garcia, N. L., Pruden, S. M., et al. (2019). No evidence for a bilingual executive function advantage in the nationally representative ABCD study. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(7), 692–701.Google Scholar

Dietrich, S., Hertrich, I., & Ackermann, H. (2013). Ultra-fast speech comprehension in blind subjects engages primary visual cortex, fusiform gyrus, and pulvinar – a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study. BMC Neuroscience 14 , 74.Google Scholar

Donnelly, S., Brooks, P. J., & Homer, B. D. (2019). Is there a bilingual advantage on interference-control tasks? A multiverse meta-analysis of global reaction time and interference cost. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26, 1122–1147.Google Scholar

Doughty, C. (2019). Cognitive language aptitude. Language Learning, 69(S1), 101–126.Google Scholar

Eisenstein, M. (1980). Childhood bilingualism and adult language learning aptitude. International Review of Applied Psychology 29(1–2), 159–172.Google Scholar

Forsberg-Lundell, F., & Sandgren, M. (2013). High-level proficiency in late L2 acquisition. Relationships between collocational production, language aptitude and personality. In Granena, G. & Long, M. (eds.), Sensitive Periods, Language Aptitude, and Ultimate L2 Attainment. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins, pp. 231–258.Google Scholar

Frasnelli, J., Collignon, O., Voss, P., & Lepore, F. (2011). Crossmodal plasticity in sensory loss. Progress in Brain Research, 191, 233–249.Google Scholar

Ganschow, L., & Sparks, R. (1995). Effects of direct instruction in Spanish phonology on the native-language skills and foreign-language aptitude of at-risk foreign-language learners. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28(2), 107–120.Google Scholar

Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social Psychology and Second Language Learning: The Role of Attitudes and Motivation. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Granena, G. (2013). Cognitive aptitudes for second language learning and the LLAMA language aptitude test. In Granena, G. & Long, M. (eds.), Sensitive Periods, Language Aptitude, and Ultimate L2 Attainment. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 105–130.Google Scholar

Granena, G., & Long, M. (2013). Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research, 29(3), 311–343.Google Scholar

Grigorenko, E. L., Sternberg, R. J., & Ehrman, M. E. (2000). A theory-based approach to the measurement of foreign language learning ability: The Canal-F theory and test. The Modern Language Journal, 84(3), 390–405.Google Scholar

Harley, B., & Hart, D. (1997). Language aptitude and second language proficiency in classroom learners of different starting ages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(3), 379–400.Google Scholar

Harley, B., & Hart, D. (2002). Age, aptitude, and second language learning on a bilingual exchange. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 301–30.Google Scholar

Herdina, P., & Jessner, U. (2002). A Dynamic Model of Multilingualism: Perspectives of Change in Psycholinguistics. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Hirosh, Z., & Degani, T. (2017). Direct and indirect effects of multilingualism on novel language learning: An integrative review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(3), 892–916.Google Scholar

Holmes, J., Gathercole, S. E., & Dunning, D. L. (2009). Adaptive training leads to sustained enhancement of poor working memory in children. Developmental Science, 12(4), F9–F15.Google Scholar

Hugdahl, K., Ek, M., Takio, F., et al. (2004). Blind individuals show enhanced perceptual and attentional sensitivity for identification of speech sounds. Cognitive Brain Research, 19(1), 28–32.Google Scholar

Hyltenstam, K. (2021). Language aptitude and language awareness: Polyglot perspectives. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 41, 55–75.Google Scholar

Ioup, G., Boustagui, E., El Tigi, M., & Moselle, M. (1994). Reexamining the critical period hypothesis: A case study in a naturalistic environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(1), 73–98.Google Scholar

Jessner, U. (2006). Linguistic Awareness in Multilinguals: English as a Third Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Klingberg, T. (2010). Training and plasticity of working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(7), 317–324.Google Scholar

Kormos, J. (2013). New conceptualizations of language aptitude in second language attainment. In Granena, G. & Long, M. (eds.), Sensitive Periods, Language Aptitude, and Ultimate L2 Attainment. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 131–152.Google Scholar

Krashen, S. D. (1977). The monitor model of adult second language performance. In Burt, M., Dulay, H., & Finocchiaro, M. (eds.), Viewpoints on English as a Second Language. New York: Regents, pp. 152–161.Google Scholar

Krashen, S. D. (1981). Aptitude and attitude in relation to second language acquisition and learning. In Diller, K. C. (ed.), Individual Differences and Universals in Language Learning Aptitude. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, pp. 155–175.Google Scholar

Lamendella, J. T. (1977). General principles of neurofunctional organization and their manifestation in primary and nonprimary language acquisition. Language Learning, 27(1), 155–196.Google Scholar

Lehtonen, M., Soveri, A., Laine, A., et al. (2018). Is bilingualism associated with enhanced executive functioning in adults? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 144(4), 394–425.Google Scholar

Leivada, E., Westergaard, M., Andoni Duñabeitia, J., & Rothman, J. (2021). On the phantom-like appearance of bilingualism effects on neurocognition: (How) should we proceed? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 24(1), 197–210.Google Scholar

Li, S. (2016). The construct validity of language aptitude. A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(4), 801–842.Google Scholar

Li, S. (2019). Six decades of language aptitude research. A comprehensive and critical review. In Wen, Z. (E.), Skehan, P., Biedroń, A., Li, S., & Sparks, R. L. (eds.), Language Aptitude. Advancing Theory, Testing, Research and Practice. New York: Routledge, pp. 78–96.Google Scholar

Linck, J. A., Hughes, M. M., Campbell, S. G., et al. (2013). Hi-LAB: A new measure of aptitude for high-level language proficiency. Language Learning, 63(3), 530–566.Google Scholar

Loiotile, R., Lane, C., Omaki, A., & Bedny, M. (2020). Enhanced performance on a sentence comprehension task in congenitally blind adults. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(8), 1010–1023.Google Scholar

Lowe, C. J., Cho, I., Goldsmith, S. F., & Morton, J. B. (2021). The bilingual advantage in children’s executive functioning is not related to language status: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Science, 32(7), 1115–1146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797621993108Google Scholar

Ma, D., Yao, T., & Zhang, H. (2018). The effect of third language learning on language aptitude among English-major students in China. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 39(7), 590–601.Google Scholar

Meara, P. (2005a). LLAMA Language Aptitude Tests. Swansea, UK: Lognostics.Google Scholar

Meara, P. (2005b). LLAMA Language Aptitude Tests: The Manual. Swansea, UK: Lognostics.Google Scholar

Meara, P., Milton, J., & Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2003). Swansea Language Aptitude Tests (LAT) v2.0. Swansea, UK: Lognostics.Google Scholar

Miller, L. (1992). Diderot reconsidered: Visual impairment and auditory compensation. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 86(5), 206–210.Google Scholar

Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. (1998). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. In Healy, A. & Bourne, L. (eds.), Foreign Language Learning: Psycholinguistic Studies on Training and Retention. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 339–364.Google Scholar

Novén, M., Olsson, H., Helms, G., et al. (2021). Cortical and white matter correlates of language-learning aptitudes. Human Brain Mapping, 42(15), 5037–5050 First view: https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25598Google Scholar

Ottó, I. (2002). Magyar Egységes Nyelvérzékmérő-Teszt [Hungarian Language Aptitude Test]. Kaposvár: Mottó-Logic Bt.Google Scholar

Paap, K. R. (2019). The bilingual advantage debate. Quantity and quality of the evidence. In Schwieter, J. W. (ed.), The Handbook of the Neuroscience of Multilingualism. London: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 701–735.Google Scholar

Paap, K. R., Mason, L., Zimiga, B., Ayala-Silva, Y., & Frost, M. (2020). The alchemy of confirmation bias transmutes expectations into bilingual advantages: A tale of two new meta-analyses. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(8), 1290–1299.Google Scholar

Peterson, C. R., & Al-Haik, A. R. (1976). The development of the Defense Language Aptitude Battery (DLAB). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 36(2), 369–380.Google Scholar

Planchon, A., & Ellis, E. (2014). A diplomatic advantage? The effects of bilingualism and formal language training on language aptitude amongst Australian diplomatic officers. Language Awareness, 23(3), 203–219.Google Scholar

Ranta, L. (2002). The role of learners’ language analytic ability in the communicative classroom. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 159–180.Google Scholar

Raz, N., Amedi, A., & Zohary, E. (2005). V1 activation in congenitally blind humans is associated with episodic retrieval. Cerebral Cortex, 15(9), 1459–1468.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (1997). Individual differences and the fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit adult second language learning. Language Learning, 47(1): 45–99.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (2002). Effects of individual differences in intelligence, aptitude and working memory on incidental second language learning: A replication and extension of Reber, Walkenfield and Hernstadt (1991). In Robinson, P. (ed.), Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 212–266.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (2005). Aptitude and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 46–73.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (2007). Aptitudes, abilities, contexts, and practice. In DeKeyser, R. (ed.), Practice in a Second Language: Perspectives from Applied Linguistics and Cognitive Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 256–286.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (2012). Individual differences, aptitude complexes, SLA processes, and aptitude test development. In Pawlak, M. (ed.), New Perspectives on Individual Differences in Language Learning and Teaching. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 57–75.Google Scholar

Röder, B., & Neville, H. J. (2003). Developmental functional plasticity. In Grafman, J. & Robertson, I. H. (eds.), Handbook of Neuropsychology. Oxford: Elsevier Science, pp. 231–270.Google Scholar

Röder, B., Rösler, F., & Neville, H. J. (2000). Event-related potentials during auditory language processing in congenitally blind and sighted people. Neuropsychologia, 38(11), 1482–1502.Google Scholar

Röder, B., Rösler, F., & Neville, H. J. (2001). Auditory memory in congenitally blind adults: A behavioral-electrophysiological investigation. Cognitive Brain Research, 11(2), 289–303.Google Scholar

Roehr-Brackin, K., & Tellier, A. (2019). The role of language-analytic ability in children’s instructed second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(5), 1111–1131.Google Scholar

Rogers, V., Meara, P., Barnett-Legh, T., Curry, C., & Davie, E. (2017). Examining the LLAMA aptitude tests. Journal of the European Second Language Association, 1, 49–60.Google Scholar

Rokem, A., & Ahissar, M. (2009). Interactions of cognitive and auditory abilities in congenitally blind individuals. Neuropsychologia, 47(3), 843–848.Google Scholar

Rowland, C. (1983). Patterns of interaction between three blind infants and their mothers. In Mills, A. E. (ed.), Language Acquisition in the Blind Child: Normal and Deficient. San Diego: College Hill Press, pp. 114–132.Google Scholar

Rowland, C. (1984). Preverbal communication of blind infants and their mothers. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 78(7), 297–302.Google Scholar

Sáfár, A., & Kormos, J. (2008). Revisiting problems with foreign language aptitude. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 46(2), 113–136.Google Scholar

Sawyer, M. (1992). Language aptitude and language experience: Are they related? The Language Programs of the International University of Japan Working Papers, 3, 27–45.Google Scholar

Sawyer, M., & Ranta, L. (2001). Aptitude, individual differences, and instructional design. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 319–353.Google Scholar

Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language teaching, 10(3), 209–231.Google Scholar

Service, E. (1992). Phonology, working memory, and foreign-language learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 45(1), 21–50.Google Scholar

Service, E., & Kohonen, V. (1995). Is the relation between phonological memory and foreign language learning accounted for by vocabulary acquisition? Applied Psycholinguistics, 16(2), 155–172.Google Scholar

Singleton, D. (2014). Apt to change: The problematic of language awareness and language aptitude in age-related research. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(3), 557–571.Google Scholar

Singleton, D. (2017). Language aptitude: Desirable trait or acquirable attribute? Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 89–103.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (1989). Individual Differences in Second Language Learning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (1998). A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (2002). Theorising and updating aptitude. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 69–95.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (2012). Language aptitude. In Gass, S. & Mackey, A. (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. London: Routledge, pp. 381–395.Google Scholar

Smeds, H. (2015). Blindness and Second Language Acquisition. Studies of Cognitive Advantages in Blind L1 and L2 Speakers. Doctoral dissertation in Bilingualism. Stockholm: Stockholm University.Google Scholar

Snow, R. E. (1994). Abilities in academic tasks. In Sternberg, R. J. & Wagner, R. K. (eds.), Mind in Context: Interactionist Perspectives on Human Intelligence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–37.Google Scholar

Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (1993). The effects of multisensory structured language instruction on native language and foreign-language aptitude skills of at-risk high-school foreign-language learners: A replication and follow-up-study. Annals of Dyslexia, 43(1), 194–216.Google Scholar

Sparks, R. L., Artzer, M., Patton, J., et al. (1998). Benefits of multisensory structured language instruction for at-risk foreign language learners: A comparison study of high school Spanish students. Annals of Dyslexia, 48, 239–270.Google Scholar

Sparks, R. L., Ganschow, L., Artzer, M., & Patton, J. (1997). Foreign language proficiency of at-risk and not-at-risk learners over 2 years of foreign language instruction: A follow-up study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(1), 92–98.Google Scholar

Sparks, R. L., Ganschow, L., Fluharty, K., & Little, S. (1995). An exploratory study on the effects of Latin on the native language skills and foreign language aptitude of students with and without learning disabilities. The Classical Journal, 91(2), 165–184.Google Scholar

Sparks, R. L., Humbach, N., Patton, J., & Ganschow, L. (2011). Subcomponents of second‐language aptitude and second‐language proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 95(2), 253–273.Google Scholar

Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Pohlman, J., Skinner, S., & Artzer, M. (1992). The effects of multisensory structured language instruction on native language and foreign language aptitude skills of at-risk high school foreign language learners. Annals of Dyslexia, 42(1), 25–53.Google Scholar

Speciale, G., Ellis, N. C., & Bywater, T. (2004). Phonological sequence learning and short-term store capacity determine second language vocabulary acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25(2), 293–321.Google Scholar

Spolsky, B. (1989). Conditions for Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Stevens, A. A., & Weaver, K. (2005). Auditory perceptual consolidation in early-onset blindness. Neuropsychologia, 43(13), 1901–1910.Google Scholar

Stevens, A. A., & Weaver, K. E. (2009). Functional characteristics of auditory cortex in the blind. Behavioural Brain Research, 196(1), 134–138.Google Scholar

Thompson, A. S. (2013). The interface of language aptitude and multilingualism: Reconsidering the bilingual/multilingual dichotomy. The Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 685–701.Google Scholar

Tomasello, R., Wennekers, T., Garagnani, M., & Pulvermüller, F. (2019). Visual cortex recruitment during language processing in blind individuals is explained by Hebbian learning. Scientific Reports, 9, 3579.Google Scholar

Turker, S. (2019). Exploring the Neuroanatomical and Behavioural Correlates of Foreign Language Aptitude. Doctoral dissertation, Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz. UniPub.Google Scholar

Turker, S., Reiterer, S. M., Schneider, P., & Seither-Preisler, A. (2018). The neuroanatomical correlates of foreign language aptitude. In: Reiterer, S. (ed.), Exploring Language Aptitude: Views from Psychology, the Language Sciences, and Cognitive Neuroscience (pp. 119–148). Springer, Cham, pp. 119–148.Google Scholar

Turker, S., Reiterer, S. M., Schneider, P., & Seither-Preisler, A. (2019). Auditory cortex morphology predicts language learning potential in children and teenagers. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13, 824. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00824Google Scholar

Turker, S., Reiterer, S. M., Seither-Preisler, A., & Schneider, P. (2017). “When music speaks”: Auditory Auditory cortex morphology as a neuroanatomical marker of language aptitude and musicality. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2096.Google Scholar

von Bastian, C. C., Souza, A. S., & Gade, M. (2016). No evidence for bilingual cognitive advantages: A test of four hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(2), 246–258.Google Scholar

Wen, Z., Biedroń, A., & Skehan, P. (2017). Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Language Teaching, 50(1), 1–31.Google Scholar

Wen, Z., & Skehan, P. (2011). A new perspective on foreign language aptitude research: Building and supporting a case for “working memory as language aptitude”. Ilha do Desterro: A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies, 60, 15–44.Google Scholar

Wen, Z., & Skehan, P. (2021). Stages of acquisition and the P/E model of working memory: Complementary or contrasting approaches to foreign language aptitude? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 41, 6–24.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. R. (2010). Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications, 7th ed. New York: Worth Publishing.Google Scholar

Bokander, L. (This volume, Chapter 5). Exploring the predictive validity of the LLAMA language aptitude tests: A research synthesis.Google Scholar

Bokander, L., & Bylund, E. (2020). Probing the internal validity of LLAMA language aptitude tests. Language Learning, 70(1), 11–47.Google Scholar

Buffington, J., & Morgan-Short, . (2019). Declarative and procedural memory as individual differences in second language aptitude. In Wen, Z., Skehan, P., Biedron, A., Li, S., & Sparks, R. L. (eds.), Language Aptitude: Advancing Theory, Testing, Research and Practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1962). The prediction of success in intensive foreign language training. In Glaser, R. (ed.), Training Research and Education. Pittsburg, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 87–136.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1973). Implications of aptitude test research and psycholinguistic theory for foreign language teaching. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 2, 5–14.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of Factor-Analytic Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B., & Sapon, S. (1959). Modern Language Aptitude Test (MLAT). New York: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Chan, E., & Skehan, P. (2011). Developing an aptitude test based on Pienemann’s Processability Theory (Technical Report No.1). English Dept., Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar

Chan, E., Skehan, P., & Gong, G. (2011). Working memory, phonemic coding ability and foreign language aptitude: Potential for construction of specific language aptitude tests – the case of Cantonese. Ilho do Desterro: A Journal of English Language, Literatures and Cultural Studies, 60(1), 45–73.Google Scholar

DeKeyser, R. (2019). The future of language aptitude research. In Wen, Z., Skehan, P., Biedroń, A., Li, S., & Sparks, R. (eds.), Language Aptitude: Advancing Theory, Testing, Research and Practice. New York: Routledge, pp. 317–329.Google Scholar

Doughty, C. J. (2019). Cognitive language aptitude. Language Learning, 69(S1), 101–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12322Google Scholar

Godfroid, A., & Kim, K. M. (2021). The contributions of implicit-statistical learning aptitude to implicit second language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(3), 606–634.Google Scholar

Granena, G. (2013). Cognitive aptitude for second language learning and the LLAMA Language Aptitude Test. In Granena, G. & Long, M. H. (eds.), Sensitive Periods, Language Aptitude, and Ultimate L2 Attainment.. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 105–130.Google Scholar

Granena, G. (2019). Cognitive aptitudes and L2 speaking proficiency: Links between LLAMA and Hi-LAB. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(2), 313–336.Google Scholar

Granena, G. (2020). Implicit Language Aptitude. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Granena, G., & Yilmaz, Y. (2019). Corrective feedback and the role of implicit sequence learning ability in L2 online performance. Language Learning, 69(S1), 127–156.Google Scholar

Green, P. S. (1975). Aptitude testing: An ongoing experiment. Audio-Visual Language Journal, 12, 205–210.Google Scholar

Grigorenko, E. L., Sternberg, R. J., & Ehrman, M. (2002). A theory-based approach to the measurement of foreign language learning ability: The CANAL-F theory and test. Modern Language Journal, 84(3), 390–405.Google Scholar

Hawkins, R., & Hattori, H. (2006). Interpretation of English multiple wh-questions by Japanese speakers: A missing uninterpretable feature account. Second Language Research, 22(2), 269–301.Google Scholar

Hughes, M., Golonka, E., Tseng, A., & Campbell, S. (This volume, Chapter 4). The High-Level Language Aptitude Test Battery (Hi-LAB): Development, Validation, and Use.Google Scholar

Kempe, V., & Brooks, P. (2016). Miniature natural language learning in L2 acquisition research. In Granena, G., Jackson, D. O., & Yilmaz, Y. (eds.), Cognitive Individual Differences in Second Language Processing and Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 41–68.Google Scholar

Klein, W. (1986). Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Knowlton, B. J., Mengels, J. A., & Squire, L. R. (1996). A neostriatal learning system in humans. Science, 273, 1399–1402.Google Scholar

Krashen, S. D. (1981). Aptitude and attitude in relation to second language acquisition and learning. In Diller, K. C., K. C. (ed.), Individual Differences and Universals in Language Learning Aptitude. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, pp. 155–175.Google Scholar

Li, S. (2015). The associations between language aptitude and second language grammar acquisition: A meta-analytic review of five decades of research. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 385–408.Google Scholar

Li, S., & Qian, J. (2021). Exploring syntactic priming as a measure of implicit language aptitude. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(3), 1–32.Google Scholar

Linck, J. A., Hughes, M. M., Campbell, S. G., et al. (2013). Hi-LAB: A new measure of aptitude for high-level language proficiency. Language Learning, 63(3), 530–566.Google Scholar

MacWhinney, B. (2005). A unified model of language acquisition. In Kroll, J. F. & De Groot, A. M. B. (eds.), Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 49–67.Google Scholar

Meara, P. (2005). LLAMA Language Aptitude Tests. Swansea: Lognostics.Google Scholar

Meisel, J. M. (2011). First and Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and Procedural Determinants of Second Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Perruchet, P. (2021). Why is the componential construct of implicit language aptitude so difficult to capture? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(3), 677–691.Google Scholar

Petersen, C. R., & Al-Haik, A. (1976). The development of the Defense Language Aptitude Battery (DLAB). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 36, 369–380.Google Scholar

Pienemann, M. (1998). Language Processing and Second Language Development: Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Pimsleur, P. (1966). Pimsleur Language Aptitude Battery (PLAB). New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Pimsleur, P. (1968). Language aptitude testing. In Davies, A. (ed.), Language Testing Symposium: A Psycholinguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

The R Project for Statistical Computing. (2020). The R Project for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistics. https://R-Project.org/.Google Scholar

Reber, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 6, 855–863.Google Scholar

Reed, D., & Stansfield, C. (This volume, Chapter 2). The MLAT-Elementary: History, Adaptations and Current Uses.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (2002). Learning conditions, aptitude complexes and SLA: A framework for research and pedagogy. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 113–133.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (2005). Aptitude and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 46–73.Google Scholar

Rogers, V., Meara, P., & Rogers, B. (This volume, Chapter 3). Testing language aptitude: LLAMA evolution and refinement.Google Scholar

Rothman, J., & Slabakova, R. (2018). The generative approach to SLA and its place in modern second language studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(3), 417–442.Google Scholar

Sasaki, M. (1996). Second Language Proficiency, Foreign Language Aptitude, and Intelligence: Quantitative and Qualitative Analyses. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Shallice, T. (1982). Specific impairments of planning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 298 , 199–209.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (1988). A comparison of first and foreign language learning ability. ESOL Department, Institute of Education, UCL: Working Documents No. 8Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (1989). Individual Differences in Second Language Learning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (2015). Foreign language aptitude and its relationship with grammar: A critical overview. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 367–384.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (2016). Foreign language aptitude, acquisitional sequences, and psycholinguistic processes. In Granena, G., Jackson, D., & Yilmaz, Y. (eds.), Cognitive Individual Differences in L2 Processing and Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 17–40.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (2019). Language aptitude implicates language and cognitive skills. In Wen, Z., Skehan, P., Biedroń, A., Li, S., & Sparks, R. (eds.), Language Aptitude: Advancing Theory, Testing, Research and Practice. New York: Routledge, pp. 56–77.Google Scholar

Sparks, R. (2012). Individual differences in L2 learning and long-term L1–L2 relationships. Language Learning, 62(Suppl. 2), 5–27.Google Scholar

Sparks, R. (This volume, Chapter 11). The Linguistic Coding Differences Hypothesis (LCDH) and L2 Learning: A Thirty-Year RetrospectiveGoogle Scholar

Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. (2017). The interface of explicit and implicit knowledge in a second language. Language Learning, 67(4), 747–797.Google Scholar

Ullman, M. T. (2015). The declarative/procedural model: A neurobiologically motivated theory of first and second language. In VanPatten, B. & Williams, J. (eds.), Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction, 2nd ed. London: Routledge, pp. 135–158.Google Scholar

Wesche, M. B. (1981). Language aptitude measures in streaming, matching students with methods, and diagnosis of learning problems. In Diller, K. C. (ed.), Individual Differences and Universals in Language Learning Aptitude. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar