Artieda, G., & Muñoz, C. (2016). The LLAMA tests and the underlying structure of language aptitude at two levels of foreign language proficiency. Learning and Individual Differences, 50 , 42–48. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.06.023Google Scholar

Bokander, L., & Bylund, E. (2020). Probing the internal validity of the LLAMA language aptitude tests. Language Learning, 70, 11–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12368CrossRefGoogle Scholar

CAN-8 Virtual Lab [Computer software]. (2018). Toronto, ON: Sounds Virtual Inc. www.can8.com/Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1965). The prediction of success in intensive foreign language training. In Glaser, R. (ed.), Training, Research, and Education. New York, NY: Wiley, pp. 87–136.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B., & Sapon, S. M. (1959). Modern Language Aptitude Test: MLAT; Manual. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

DeKeyser, R. (2015). Skill acquisition theory. In VanPatten, B. & Williams, J. (eds.), Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-Based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141–172.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (2018). Reflections on Task-Based Language Teaching. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Ellis, R., & Shintani, N. (2014). Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2020). Task-Based Language Teaching: Theory and Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Erlam, R. (2005). Language aptitude and its relationship to instructional effectiveness in second language acquisition. Language Teaching Research, 9(2), 147–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erlam, R. (2006). Elicited imitation as a measure of L2 implicit knowledge: An empirical validation study. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 464–491. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml001Google Scholar

Forsberg, F., & Bartning, I. (2010). Can linguistic features discriminate between the communicative CEFR‐levels? A pilot study of written L2 French. EUROSLA Monographs Series, 1, 133–158.Google Scholar

Granena, G. (2013). Cognitive aptitudes for second language learning and the LLAMA language aptitude test. In Granena, G. & Long, M. (eds.), Sensitive Periods, Language Aptitude, and Ultimate L2 Attainment. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins, pp. 105–129.Google Scholar

Gutiérrez, X. (2013). The construct validity of grammaticality judgement tests as measures of implicit and explicit knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000041Google Scholar

Hwu, F., & Sun, S. (2012). The aptitude–treatment interaction effects on the learning of grammar rules. System, 40, 505–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hwu, F., Wei, P., & Sun, S. (2014). Aptitude–treatment interaction effects on explicit rule learning: A latent growth curve analysis. Language Teaching Research, 18, 294–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813510381CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kachinske, I., & DeKeyser, R. (2019). The interaction between timing of explicit grammar explanation and individual differences in second language acquisition. Journal of Second Language Studies, 2(2), 197–232. https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.19003.kacCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kim, J., & Nam, H. (2017). Measures of implicit knowledge revisited: Processing modes, time pressure, and modality. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(3), 431–457. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000510Google Scholar

Li, S. (2013). The interactions between the effects of implicit and explicit feedback and individual differences in language analytic ability and working memory. The Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 634–654. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12030.xGoogle Scholar

Li, S. (2015). The associations between language aptitude and second language grammar acquisition: A meta-analytic review of five decades of research. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 385–408.Google Scholar

Li, S. (2016). The construct validity of language aptitude. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(4), 801–842. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311500042XGoogle Scholar

Li, S., Ellis, R., & Zhu, Y. (2016). Task-based versus task-supported language instruction: An experimental study. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 205–229.Google Scholar

Li, S., Ellis, R., & Zhu, Y. (2019). The associations between cognitive ability and L2 development under five different instructional conditions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(3), 693–722. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716418000796Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (2015). Second Language Acquisition and Task-Based Language Teaching. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Loschky, L., & Bley-Vroman, R. (1993). Grammar and task-based methodology. In Crookes, G. & Gass, S. (eds.), Tasks and Language Learning: Integrating Theory and Practice. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, pp. 123–167.Google Scholar

Meara, P. (2005). LLAMA Language Aptitude Tests [Measurement instruments]. Swansea, UK: Lognostics. www.lognostics.co.uk/tools/llama/Google Scholar

Michaud, G. (2020). À quel moment enseigner la forme dans le cadre d’un enseignement basé sur la tâche? [Doctoral dissertation, Université de Montréal]. Papyrus. http://hdl.handle.net/1866/23557Google Scholar

Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Does type of instruction make a difference? Substantive findings from a meta-analysis review. Language Learning, 51(1), 157–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.2001.tb00017.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poplack, S. (1990). Prescription, intuition et usage : le subjonctif français et la variabilié inhérente [Prescription, intuition and use: The French subjunctive and inherent variability]. Langage et société, 54 , 5–33. https://doi.org/10.3406/lsoc.1990.2499Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (2005). Aptitude and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 46–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sheen, Y. (2007). The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In Mackey, A. (ed.), Conversational Interaction in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 301–322.Google Scholar

Shintani, N. (2017). The effects of the timing of isolated FFI on the explicit knowledge and written accuracy of learners with different prior knowledge of the linguistic target. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(1), 129–166. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000127CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skehan, P. (1998). A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (2015). Foreign language aptitude and its relationship with grammar: A critical overview. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 367–384.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (2016). Foreign language aptitude, acquisitional sequences, and psycholinguistic processes. In Granena, G., Jackson, D. O., & Yilmaz, Y. (eds.), Cognitive Individual Differences in Second Language Processing and Acquisition. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins, pp. 17–40.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (2019). Language aptitude implicates language and cognitive skills. In Wen, Z., Skehan, P., Biedroń, A., Li, S., & Sparks, R. (eds), Language Aptitude: Advancing Theory, Testing, Research and Practice. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 56–77.Google Scholar

Spada, N. (2011). Beyond form-focused instruction: Reflections on past, present and future research. Language Teaching, 44(2), 225–236.Google Scholar

Suzuki, Y. (2021). Probing the construct validity of LLAMA_D as a measure of implicit learning aptitude: Incidental instructions, confidence ratings, and reaction time measure. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1(14), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263120000704Google Scholar

Trofimovich, P., Ammar, A., & Gatbonton, E. (2007). How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytical ability. In Mackey, A. (ed.), Conversational Interaction in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 171–195.Google Scholar

Van den Branden, K. (2016). Task-based language teaching. In Hall, G. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of English Language Teaching. New York, NY: Rougledge, pp. 238–251.Google Scholar

Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2007). Doing Task-Based Teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Yalçın, Ş., & Spada, N. (2016). Language aptitude and grammatical difficulty: An EFL classroom-based study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(2), 239–263.Google Scholar

Yilmaz, Y., & Granena, G. (2016). The role of cognitive aptitudes for explicit language learning in the relative effects of explicit and implicit feedback. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(1), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672891400090XGoogle Scholar

Zhang, R. (2015). Measuring university-level L2 learners’ implicit and explicit linguistic knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 457–486. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000370Google Scholar

Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2008). The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(4), 481–509. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310808073XGoogle Scholar

Andringa, S., & Curcic, M. (2015). How explicit knowledge affects online L2 processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(s2), 237–268. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000017Google Scholar

Andringa, S., & Rebuschat, P. (2015). New directions in the study of implicit and explicit learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(s2), 185–196. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311500008XGoogle Scholar

Bolibaugh, C., & Foster, P. (2021). Implicit statistical learning in naturalistic and instructed morphosyntactic attainment: An aptitude–treatment interaction design. Language Learning, 71(4), 959–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1991). Cognitive abilities in foreign language aptitude: Then and now. In Parry, T. & Stansfield, C. (eds.), Language Aptitude Reconsidered. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp. 11–29.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B., & Sapon, S. M. (1959). Modern Language Aptitude Test: MLAT. New York, NY: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Chambers, C. G., Tanenhaus, M. K., Eberhard, K. M., Filip, H., & Carlson, G. N. (2002). Circumscribing referential domains during real-time language comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(1), 30–49.Google Scholar

Cheng, L., & Sybesma, R. (1998). Yi-wan tang, yi-ge tang: Classifiers and massifiers. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, 28(3), 385–412.Google Scholar

Cheng, L., & Sybesma, R. (1999). Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of np. Linguistic inquiry, 30(4), 509–542.Google Scholar

DeKeyser, R. M. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 499–534. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100004022CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeKeyser, R. M. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In Doughty, C. J. & Long, H. M. (eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 312–348.Google Scholar

DeKeyser, R. M. (2005). What makes learning second language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language Learning, 55(S1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00294.xGoogle Scholar

DeKeyser, R. M. (2012). Interactions between individual differences, treatments, and structures in SLA. Language Learning, 62(s2), 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00712.xGoogle Scholar

DeKeyser, R. M. (2016). Of moving targets and chameleons: Why the concept of difficulty is so hard to pin down. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(2), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000024Google Scholar

DeKeyser, R. M., Alfi-Shabtay, I., & Ravid, D. (2010). Cross-linguistic evidence for the nature of age effects in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31(3), 413–438. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716410000056Google Scholar

DeKeyser, R. M., Alfi-Shabtay, I., Ravid, D., & Shi, M. (2017). The role of salience in the acquisition of Hebrew as a second language: Interaction with age of acquisition. In Gass, S., Spinner, P., & Behney, J. (eds.), Salience in Second Language Acquisition. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 131–146.Google Scholar

DeKeyser, R. M., & Li, S. (2021). Epilogue: Evidence for the validity of implicit aptitude and the need for construct validation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(3), 692–697. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000140Google Scholar

Dussias, P. E., Valdés Kroff, J. R., Guzzardo Tamargo, R. E., & Gerfen, C. (2013). When gender and looking go hand in hand. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(2), 353–387. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000915Google Scholar

Ellis, N. C. (2015). Implicit and explicit language learning: Their dynamic interface and complexity. In Rebuschat, P. (ed.), Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 3–24.Google Scholar

Ellis, N. C., Hafeez, K., Martin, K. I., et al. (2012). An eye-tracking study of learned attention in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35(3), 547–579. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716412000501Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 141–172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050096Google Scholar

Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS: London, UK: Sage Publications Limited.Google Scholar

Gass, S. M., Spinner, P., & Behney, J. (2017). Salience in Second Language Acquisition. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Godfroid, A. (2016). The effects of implicit instruction on implicit and explicit knowledge development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(2), 177–215. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000388Google Scholar

Godfroid, A. (2019). Eye Tracking in Second Language Acquisition and Bilingualism: A Research Synthesis and Methodological Guide. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Godfroid, A., & Kim, K. (2021). The contributions of implicit-statistical learning aptitude to implicit second-language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(3), 606–634. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000085Google Scholar

Godfroid, A., Loewen, S., Jung, S., et al. (2015). Timed and untimed grammaticality judgements measure distinct types of knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(s2), 269–297. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000850Google Scholar

Granena, G. (2013a). Individual differences in sequence learning ability and second language acquisition in early childhood and adulthood. Language Learning, 63(4), 665–703. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12018CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Granena, G. (2013b). Reexamining the robustness of aptitude in second language acquisition. In Granena, G., & Long, M. H. (eds.), Sensitive Periods, Language Aptitude, and Ultimate L2 Attainment. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 179–204.Google Scholar

Granena, G. (2019). Cognitive aptitudes and L2 speaking proficiency: Links between LLAMA and Hi-LAB. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(2), 313–336. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263118000256Google Scholar

Granena, G. (2020). Implicit Language Aptitude. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Granena, G., & Long, M. H. (2013). Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research, 29(3), 311–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658312461497Google Scholar

Graus, J., & Coppen, P.-A. (2015). Defining grammatical difficulty: A student teacher perspective. Language Awareness, 24(2), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2014.994639Google Scholar

Hagedorn, J., Hailpern, J., & Karahalios, K. G. (2008). Vcode and vdata: Illustrating a new framework for supporting the video annotation workflow. Paper presented at the Advanced Video Interface, May 28–30, 2008, Naples, Italy. http://social.cs.uiuc.edu/papers/pdfs/vcode.pdfGoogle Scholar

Housen, A. (2014). Difficulty and complexity of language features and second language instruction. In Chapelle, C. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar

Housen, A., & Simoens, H. (2016). Introduction: Cognitive perspectives on difficulty and complexity in L2 acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(2), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000176Google Scholar

Hua, D., & Lee, H. (2005). Chinese ESL learners’ understanding of the English count-mass distinction. In Dekydtspotter, L., Sprouse, R. A., & Liljestrand, A. (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2004), Somerville, MA, pp. 138–149.Google Scholar

Hulstijn, J. H. (2002). Towards a unified account of the representation, processing and acquisition of second language knowledge. Second Language Research, 18(3), 193–223. https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658302sr207oaGoogle Scholar

Hulstijn, J. H. (2005). Theoretical and empirical issues in the study of implicit and explicit second-language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050084Google Scholar

Ionin, T., Zubizarreta, M. L., & Philippov, V. (2009). Acquisition of article semantics by child and adult L2-English learners. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12(3), 337–361. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990149Google Scholar

Isbell, D. R., & Rogers, J. (2021). Measuring implicit and explicit learning and knowledge. In Winke, P. & Brunfaut, P. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Language Testing. New York: Routledge, pp. 304–313.Google Scholar

Jiang, N., Hu, G., Chrabaszcz, A., & Ye, L. (2015). The activation of grammaticalized meaning in L2 processing: Toward an explanation of the morphological congruency effect. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006915603823CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jiang, N., Novokshanova, E., Masuda, K., & Wang, X. (2011). Morphological congruency and the acquisition of L2 morphemes. Language Learning, 61(3), 940–967. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00627.xGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, S. B., DeYoung, C. G., Gray, J. R., et al. (2010). Implicit learning as an ability. Cognition, 116(3), 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kim, M. (2020). Exploring the interface of explicit and implicit second-language knowledge: A longitudinal perspective. Ph.D. dissertation, Michigan State University, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.Google Scholar

Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Krashen, S. D. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar

Lardiere, D. (2007). Ultimate Attainment in Second Language Acquisition: A Case Study. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Leung, J. H. C., & Williams, J. N. (2014). Crosslinguistic differences in implicit language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(4), 733–755. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000333Google Scholar

Li, S., & DeKeyser, R. M. (2021). Implicit language aptitude: Conceptualizing the construct, validating the measures, and examining the evidence: Introduction to the special issue. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(3), 473–497. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000024Google Scholar

Linck, J. A., Hughes, M. M., Campbell, S. G., et al. (2013). Hi-LAB: A new measure of aptitude for high-level language proficiency. Language Learning, 63(3), 530–566. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12011Google Scholar

Lu, C. F.-C. (2001). The acquisition of English articles by Chinese learners. Second Language Studies, 20(1), 43–78.Google Scholar

Lyons, C. (1999). Definiteness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Matin, E., Shao, K., & Boff, K. R. (1993). Saccadic overhead: Information-processing time with and without saccades. Perception and Psychophysics, 53(4), 372–380. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206780Google Scholar

Meara, P. M. (2005). LLAMA Language Aptitude Tests: The Manual. Swansea, UK: Lognostics. www.lognostics.co.uk/tools/llama/llama_manual.pdfGoogle Scholar

Murakami, A., & Alexopoulou, T. (2016). L1 influency on the acquisition order of English grammartical morphemes: A learner corpus study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(3), 365–401. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000352Google Scholar

Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and Procedural Determinants of Second Languages. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Reber, A. S., Walkenfeld, F. F., & Hernstadt, R. (1991). Implicit and explicit learning: Individual differences and IQ. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(5), 888–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.17.5.888Google Scholar

Roberts, L., & Liszka, S. A. (2013). Processing tense/aspect-agreement violations on-line in the second language: A self-paced reading study with French and German L2 learners of English. Second Language Research, 29(4), 413–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658313503171Google Scholar

Robertson, D. (2000). Variability in the use of the English article system by Chinese learners of English. Second Language Research, 16(2), 135–172. https://doi.org/10.1191/026765800672262975Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (1997). Individual differences and the fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit adult SLA. Language Learning, 47(1), 45–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.21997002Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (2005). Cognitive abilities, chunk-strength and frequency effects during implicit artificial grammar, and incidental second language learning: Replications of Reber, Walkenfeld, and Hernstadt (1991) and Knowlton and Squire (1996) and their relevance to SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 235–268. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050126Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (2002). Theorising and updating aptitude. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 69–94.Google Scholar

Snape, N. (2008). Resetting the nominal mapping parameter in L2 English: Definite article use and the count-mass distinction. Bilingualism Language and Cognition, 11(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728907003215Google Scholar

Suzuki, Y. (2015). Using new measures of implicit L2 knowledge to study the interface of explicit and implicit knowledge. (Doctoral dissertation), University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.Google Scholar

Suzuki, Y. (2017). Validity of new measures of implicit knowledge: Distinguishing implicit knowledge from automatized explicit knowledge. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38(5), 1229–1261. https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271641700011XGoogle Scholar

Suzuki, Y. (2021). How does Japanese grammatical knowledge develop in naturalistic setting: Roles of grammatical features and individual difference factors. [dainigengokankyou de nihongo no bunpou chishiki wa donoyouni hattatsushiteikuka: Bunpoukoumoku no tokuchou to gakushusha no kojinsa no eikyou]. In Suzuki, W., Sakuma, Y., & Terasawa, T. (eds.), What Are the Roles of Explicit and Implicit Knowledge in Foreign Language Learning?. Tokyo, Japan: Taishukan, pp. 33–48.Google Scholar

Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. M. (2015). Comparing elicited imitation and word monitoring as measures of implicit knowledge. Language Learning, 65(4), 860–895. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12138Google Scholar

Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. M. (2017). The interface of explicit and implicit knowledge in a second language: Insights from individual differences in cognitive aptitudes. Language Learning, 67(4), 747–790. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12241Google Scholar

Suzuki, Y., Jeong, H., Cui, H., et al. (2022). An fMRI validation study of the word-monitoring task as a measure of implicit knowledge: Exploring the role of explicit and implicit aptitudes in behavioral and neural processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, first view. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263122000043Google Scholar

Trenkic, D. (2002). Form–meaning connections in the acquisition of English articles. EUROSLA Yearbook, 2(1), 115–133.Google Scholar

Trenkic, D. (2008). The representation of English articles in second language grammars: Determiners or adjectives? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728907003185Google Scholar

Trenkic, D., Mirkovic, J., & Altmann, G. T. M. (2014). Real-time grammar processing by native and non-native speakers: Constructions unique to the second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(2), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000321Google Scholar

Vafaee, P., Suzuki, Y., & Kachinske, I. (2017). Validating grammaticality judgment tests: Evidence from two new psycholinguistic measures. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(1), 59–95. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000455Google Scholar

White, L. (2003). Fossilization in steady state L2 grammars: Persistent problems with inflectional morphology. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6(02), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728903001081Google Scholar

Williams, J. N. (2009). Implicit learning in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. C. & Bhatia, T. K. (eds.), The New Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Bingly, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 319–353.Google Scholar

Xia, H.-Y. (2011). A language aptitude test for native Chinese: Development and validation. [汉语语境下的外语学能测试研究及效度验证]. Shandong Foreign Language Teaching Journal, 5, 52–55.Google Scholar

Yalçın, Ş., & Spada, N. (2016). Language aptitude and grammatical difficulty. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(2), 239–263. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000509Google Scholar

Young, R. (1996). Form-function relations in articles in English interlanguage. In Bayley, R. & Preston, D. R. (eds.), Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 135–175.Google Scholar

Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (2009). What statistical learning can and can’t tell us about language acquisition. In Colombo, J., McCardle, P., & Freund, L. (eds.), Infant Pathways to Language: Methods, Models, and Research Disorders. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 15–29.Google Scholar

**Brooks, P. J., & Kempe, V. (2013). Individual differences in adult foreign language learning: The mediating effect of metalinguistic awareness. Memory & Cognition, 41(2), 281–296. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0262-9Google Scholar

**Brooks, P. J., Kwoka, N., & Kempe, V. (2017). Distributional effects and individual differences in L2 morphology learning. Language Learning, 67(1), 171–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12204Google Scholar

Büerkner, P.-C. (2017). brms: An R package for Bayesian Multilevel Models using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software, 80(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v080.i01Google Scholar

Chan, R. K., & Leung, J. H. (2014). Implicit learning of L2 word stress regularities. Second Language Research, 30(4), 463–484. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0267658313510169Google Scholar

Cheung, M. W.-L. (2014). Modeling dependent effect sizes with three-level meta-analyses: A structural equation modelling approach. Psychological Methods, 19(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032968Google Scholar

Christiansen, M. H. (2019). Implicit statistical learning: A tale of two literatures. Topics in Cognitive Science, 11(3), 468–481 https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12332Google Scholar

**Chui, Y. L. (2017). The role of language proficiency and statistical learning in on-line comprehension of syntax among bilingual adult readers. Master’s thesis, Australian National University. https://doi.org/10.25911/5D6668CFE6E31Google Scholar

Conway, C. M., Bauernschmidt, A., Huang, S. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (2010). Implicit statistical learning in language processing: Word predictability is the key. Cognition, 114(3), 356–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.009Google Scholar

Cooper, H. (2017). Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

*Cox, J. G. (2013). Bilingualism, aging, and instructional conditions in non-primary language development. Doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University. http://hdl.handle.net/10822/707455Google Scholar

**Ćurčić, M. (2018). Explaining Differences in Adult Second Language Learning: The Role of Language Input Characteristics and Learners’ Cognitive Aptitudes. Utrecht, the Netherlands: LOT.Google Scholar

Deeks, J. J., Higgings, J. P. T., & Altman, D. G. (2019). Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In Higgings, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., et al. (eds.), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, 2nd ed. London, UK: Cochrane, pp. 241–284.Google Scholar

**Degani, T., & Goldberg, M. (2019). How individual differences affect learning of translation‐ambiguous vocabulary. Language Learning, 69(3), 600–651. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lang.12344Google Scholar

Doughty, C. J., Campbell, S. G., Mislevy, M. A., et al. (2010). Predicting near-native ability: The factor structure and reliability of Hi-LAB. In Prior, M. T., Watanabe, Y., & Lee, S.-K. (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 2008 Second Language Research Forum. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, pp. 10–31.Google Scholar

Frost, R., Armstrong, B. C., & Christiansen, M. H. (2019). Statistical learning research: A critical review and possible new directions. Psychological Bulletin, 145(12), 1128–1153. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000210Google Scholar

Frost, R., Armstrong, B. C., Siegelman, N., & Christiansen, M. H. (2015). Domain generality versus modality specificity: The paradox of statistical learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(3), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.12.010Google Scholar

**Frost, R., Siegelman, N., Narkiss, A., & Afek, L. (2013). What predicts successful literacy acquisition in a second language? Psychological Science, 24(7), 1243–1252. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0956797612472207Google Scholar

Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., et al. (2013). Bayesian Data Analysis, 3rd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar

Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Science, 7, 457–511. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177011136Google Scholar

Godfroid, A., & Kim, K. M. (2021). The contribution of implicit-statistical learning aptitude to implicit second-language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(s3), 606–634. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000085Google Scholar

Gómez, R. L. (2002). Variability and detection of invariant structure. Psychological Science, 13(5), 431–436. https://doi.org/10.1111%2F1467-9280.00476Google Scholar

**Granena, G. (2013). Individual differences in sequence learning ability and second language acquisition in early childhood and adulthood. Language Learning, 63(4), 665–703. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12018Google Scholar

**Granena, G. (2019). Cognitive aptitudes and L2 speaking proficiency: Links between LLAMA and Hi-LAB. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(2), 313–336. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263118000256Google Scholar

Granena, G. (2020). Implicit Language Aptitude. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Granena, G., & Yilmaz, Y. (2019). Corrective feedback and the role of implicit sequence-learning ability in L2 online performance. Language Learning(s1), 69, 127–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12319Google Scholar

Granena, G., Jackson, D. O., & Yilmaz, Y. (eds.) (2016). Cognitive Individual Differences in L2 Processing and Acquisition. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hamrick, P. (2015). Declarative and procedural memory abilities as individual differences in incidental language learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 44, 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.10.003Google Scholar

Hamrick, P., & Rebuschat, P. (2012). How implicit is statistical learning? In Williams, J. & Rebuschat, P. (eds.), Statistical Learning and Language Acquisition. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, pp. 365–382.Google Scholar

Hamrick, P., Lum, J. A., & Ullman, M. T. (2018). Child first language and adult second language are both tied to general-purpose learning systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(7), 1487–1492. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1713975115Google Scholar

Harrer, M., Cuijpers, P., Furukawa, T. A, & Ebert, D. D. (2019). Doing Meta-Analysis in R: A Hands-On Guide. London, UK: Routledge. https://bookdown.org/MathiasHarrer/Doing_Meta_Analysis_in_R/Google Scholar

Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998). Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 486–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.486Google Scholar

**Kaufman, S. B., DeYoung, C. G., Gray, J. R., et al. (2010). Implicit learning as an ability. Cognition, 116(3), 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.011Google Scholar

Kaushanskaya, M., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Marian, V. (2020). The language experience and proficiency questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Ten years later. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728919000038Google Scholar

**Kerz, E., & Wiechmann, D. (2019). Effects of statistical learning ability on the second language processing of multiword sequences. In Pastor, G. C. & Mitkov, R. (eds.), Computational and Corpus-Based Phraseology. Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. 200–214.Google Scholar

Kidd, E., & Arciuli, J. (2016). Individual differences in statistical learning predict children’s comprehension of syntax. Child Development, 87(1), 184–193.Google Scholar

**Lee, O. S. (2014). Individual differences in first and second language sentence processing: Evidence from statistical learning. Doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/100442Google Scholar

**Lee, O. S. (2016). Artificial grammar learning ability predicts L2 processing of English number agreement. Language Research, 52(1), 87–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12461Google Scholar

Lenth, R. V. (2020). Emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. CRAN-R Project. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeansGoogle Scholar

Li, S. (2015). The associations between language aptitude and second language grammar acquisition: A meta-analytic review of five decades of research. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 385–408. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu054Google Scholar

Li, S., & DeKeyser, R. (2021). Implicit language aptitude: Conceptualizing the construct, validating the measures, and examining the evidence: Introduction to the special issue. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(3), 473–497. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000024Google Scholar

*Linck, J. A., Hughes, M. M., Campbell, S. G., et al. (2013). Hi‐LAB: A new measure of aptitude for high‐level language proficiency. Language Learning, 63(3), 530–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12011Google Scholar

Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(4), 861–88. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0565-2Google Scholar

Long, M. (2015). Second Language Acquisition and Task-Based Language Teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

**McDonough, K., & Trofimovich, P. (2016). The role of statistical learning and working memory in L2 speakers’ pattern learning. The Modern Language Journal, 100(2), 428–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12331Google Scholar

**McDonough, K., Kielstra, P., Crowther, D., & Smith, G. (2016). Structural priming in L2 speech production: Examining relationships among English L2 speakers’ production, cognitive abilities, and awareness. In Mackey, A. & Marsden, E. (eds.), Advancing Methodology and Practice: The IRIS Repository of Instruments for Research into Second Languages. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 112–131.Google Scholar

Misyak, J. B., Christiansen, M. H., & Tomblin, J. B. (2009). Statistical learning of nonadjacencies predicts on-line processing of long-distance dependencies in natural language. In Taatgen, N. A. & van Rijn, H. (eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society, pp. 177–182.Google Scholar

**Mor, B., & Prior, A. (2020). Individual differences in L2 frequency effects in different script bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 24(4), 672–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/136700691987635Google Scholar

Norouzian, R., de Miranda, M. A., & Plonsky, L. (2018). The Bayesian revolution in second language research: An applied approach. Language Learning, 68, 1032–1075. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12310Google Scholar

Onnis, L. (2012). The potential contribution of statistical learning to second language acquisition. In Rebuschat, P. & Williams, J. N. (eds.), Statistical learning and language acquisition. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 203–235.Google Scholar

**Onnis, L., Frank, S. L., Yun, H., & Lou-Magnuson, M. (2016). Statistical learning bias predicts second-language reading efficiency. In Papafragou, A., Grodner, D., & Mirman, D. (eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Cognitive Science Society, pp. 2105–2110.Google Scholar

Onnis, L., Monaghan, P., Richmond, K., & Chater, N. (2005). Phonology impacts segmentation in online speech processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 53(2), 225–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.011Google Scholar

Onnis, L., Waterfall, H. R., & Edelman, S. (2008). Learn locally, act globally: Learning language from variation set cues. Cognition, 109(3), 423–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.10.004Google Scholar

Paciorek, A., & Williams, J. (2015). Implicit learning of semantic preferences of verbs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(2), 359–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000108Google Scholar

Perruchet, P. (2021). Why is the componential construct of implicit language aptitude so difficult to capture?: A commentary on the special issue. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(3), 677–691. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226312100019XGoogle Scholar

Perruchet, P., & Pacton, S. (2006). Implicit learning and statistical learning: One phenomenon, two approaches. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(5), 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.006Google Scholar

Pigott, T. D. (2009). Handling missing data. In Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (eds.), The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 399–416.Google Scholar

Reber, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 855–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(67)80149-XGoogle Scholar

Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge: An Essay on the Cognitive Unconscious. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rebuschat, P. (ed.) (2015). Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Rebuschat, P., & Williams, J. N. (2012a). Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(4), 829–856. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716411000580Google Scholar

Rebuschat, P., & Williams, J. N. (eds.) (2012b). Statistical Learning and Language Acquisition. Berlin, Germany: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar

**Robinson, P. (2005). Cognitive abilities, chunk-strength, and frequency effects in implicit artificial grammar and incidental L2 learning: Replications of Reber, Walkenfeld, and Hernstadt (1991) and Knowlton and Squire (1996) and their relevance for SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 235–268. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050126Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (2010). Implicit artificial grammar and incidental natural second language learning: How comparable are they? Language Learning, 60(s2), 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00608.xGoogle Scholar

Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (1996). Word segmentation: The role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(4), 606–621. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.0032Google Scholar

Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129Google Scholar

Seipel, B. E. (2011). The role of implicit learning in incidental vocabulary acquisition while reading. Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota. http://hdl.handle.net/11299/116315.Google Scholar

Shadish, W. R., & Haddock, C. K. (2009). Combining estimates of effect size. In Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (eds.), The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 257–277.Google Scholar

Siegelman, N., & Frost, R. (2015). Statistical learning as an individual ability: Theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence. Journal of Memory and Language, 81, 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.02.001Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (2016). Foreign language aptitude, acquisitional sequences, and psycholinguistic processes. In Granena, G., Jackson, D. O. & Yilmaz, Y. (eds.), Cognitive Individual Differences in L2 Processing and Acquisition. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins, pp. 15–38.Google Scholar

Stan Development Team (2018). Stan: A C++ library for programming and sampling. Retrieved from http://mc-stan.orgGoogle Scholar

**Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. (2015). Comparing elicited imitation and word monitoring as measures of implicit knowledge. Language Learning, 65(4), 860–895. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12138Google Scholar

**Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. (2017). The interface of explicit and implicit knowledge in a second language: Insights from individual differences in cognitive aptitudes. Language Learning, 67(4), 747–790. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12241Google Scholar

Suzuki, Y, DeKeyser, R., & Huang, Y. (Chapter 15, this volume). Implicit (not explicit) learning aptitude predicts the acquisition of difficult (not easy) structure: A visual-world eye-tracking study. In Wen, Z. E., Skehan, P., & Sparks, R. (eds.), Language Aptitude Theory and Practice (pp. xxx–xxx). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Thomas, M. (2006). Research synthesis and historiography: The case of assessment of second language proficiency. In Norris, J. M. & Ortega, L. (eds.), Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and Teaching. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 279–298.Google Scholar

Vuong, L. C., Meyer, A. S., & Christiansen, M. H. (2016). Concurrent statistical learning of adjacent and nonadjacent dependencies. Language Learning, 66(1), 8–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12137Google Scholar

Weiss, D. J., Schwob, N., & Lebkuecher, A. L. (2020). Bilingualism and statistical learning: Lessons from studies using artificial languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(1), 92–97. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728919000579Google Scholar

Wen, Z. E., Borges Mota, M., & McNeill, A. (2015). Working Memory in Second Language Acquisition and Processing. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Wen, Z. E., Skehan, P., Biedroń, A., Li, S., & Sparks, R. L. (eds.) (2019). Language Aptitude: Advancing Theory, Testing, Research and Practice. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Williams, J. N. (2005). Learning without awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 269–304. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050138Google Scholar

**Yi, W. (2018). Statistical sensitivity, cognitive aptitudes, and processing of collocations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(4), 831–856. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263118000141Google Scholar

**Yilmaz, Y., & Granena, G. (2019). Cognitive individual differences as predictors of improvement and awareness under implicit and explicit feedback conditions. The Modern Language Journal, 103(3), 686–702. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12587Google Scholar