Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T08:35:55.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2019

Ernesto Calvo
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Maria Victoria Murillo
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Non-Policy Politics
Richer Voters, Poorer Voters, and the Diversification of Electoral Strategies
, pp. 277 - 296
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abal Medina, J., and Suárez Cao, J. (ND). Analisis critico del sistema electoral argentino. Evolucion histórica y desempeño efectivo. (Unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
Abal Medina, J., Suárez Cao, J., and Cavarozzi, M. (2002). La competencia partidaria en la Argentina: sus implicancias sobre el régimen democrático. In El asedio a la política: Los partidos latinoamericanos en la era neoliberal (163185). Beunos Aires: Homo Sapiens.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D., and Robinson, J. A. (2005). Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Achen, C. H. (1992). Social psychology, demographic variables, and linear regression: Breaking the iron triangle in voting research. Political Behavior, 14(3), 195211.Google Scholar
Achen, C. H., and Bartels, L. M. (2004). Musical chairs: Pocketbook voting and the limits of democratic accountability. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Achen, C. H., and Bartels, L. M. (2016). Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Acuña, C. (1995). Algunas notas sobre los juegos, las gallinas, y la política de los pactos constitucionales, In Acuña, C. (Ed.) La nueva Matriz Política Argentina. Buenos Aires: EUDEBA.Google Scholar
Adams, J. (2012). Causes and electoral consequences of party policy shifts in multiparty elections: Theoretical results and empirical evidence. Annual Review of Political Science. 15(1), 401419. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-031710-101450Google Scholar
Adams, J., Merrill, S., and Grofman, B. (2005). A Unified Theory of Party Competition : A Cross-National Analysis Integrating Spatial and Behavioral Factors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agüero, F., Tironi, E., Valenzuela, E., and Sunkel, G. (1998). Votantes, partidos e información política: la frágil intermediación política en el Chile post-autoritario. Revista de ciencia política, 19(2), 159193.Google Scholar
Alcañiz, I. (2016). Environmental and Nuclear Networks in the Global South: How Skills Shape International Cooperation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alcañiz, I., and Hellwig, T. (2011). Who’s to blame? The distribution of responsibility in developing democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 41(02), 389411. doi:10.1017/S0007123409990317Google Scholar
Alcañiz, I., Calvo, E., and Rubio, J. M. (2016). Educadamente desiguales: Género y salario en el Sector Público argentino (2003–2010). Desarrollo Economico, 55(217), 343357.Google Scholar
Alcantara, M., and Freidenberg, F. (2001). Los partidos poclitios en America Latina. Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca. América Latina Hoy, 27, 1735Google Scholar
Alcántara, M., and Tagina, M. L. (2013). Elecciones y política en América Latina 2009–2011. México: Instituto Federal Electoral.Google Scholar
Aldrich, J. H. (1995). Why Parties?: The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago, MA: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Alesina, A., and Rosenthal, H. (1995). Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alesina, A., Baqir, R., and Easterly, W. (1997). Public Goods and Ethnic Divisions. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Alonso, P. (2000). Entre la revolución y las urnas. Los orígenes de la Unión. Cívica Radical y la política argentina en los años '90. Buenos Aires: Editorial Sudamericana.Google Scholar
Alonso, P. (2010). Jardines secretos, legitimaciones públicas: El Partido Autonomista Nacional y la política argentina de fines del siglo XIX. Buenos Aires: Edhasa.Google Scholar
Ames, B. (1987). Political Survival: Politicians and Public Policy in Latin America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, S., and Snyder, J. M. Jr (2000). Valence politics and equilibrium in spatial election models. Public Choice, 103(3), 327336.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, S., and Snyder, J. M. Jr (2007). Party control of state government and distribution of public expenditures. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 108 (4), 547569.Google Scholar
Auyero, J. (2001). Poor People’s Politics: Peronist Survival Networks and the Legacy of Evita. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Auyero, J., and Swistun, D. A. (2009). Flammable: Environmental Suffering in an Argentine Shantytown. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Avendaño, O., and Sandoval, P. (2016). Desafección política y estabilidad de los resultados electorales en Chile, 1993–2009. Perfiles latinoamericanos, 24(47), 175198.Google Scholar
Baker, A., Ames, B., and Renno, L. R. (2006). Social context and campaign volatility in new democracies: Networks and neighborhoods in Brazil’s 2002 elections. American Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 382399.Google Scholar
Baldwin, K. (2016). The Paradox of Traditional Leaders in Democratic Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bambaci, J., Spiller, P., and Tommasi, M. (2007). The bureaucracy. In Spiller, P. and Tommasi, M. (Eds.) The Institutional Foundations of Public Policy in Argentina. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barozet, E. (2004). Elementos Explicativos de la Votación de los Sectores Populares en Iquique: Lógica y Eficiencia de las Redes Clientelares. Politica, 43, 205251.Google Scholar
Barozet, E. (2006). Relecturas de la noción de clientelismo: una forma diversificada de intermediación política y social. Debate (Ecuador), 69, 77101.Google Scholar
Barozet, E., and Aubry, M. (2005). De las reformas internas a la candidatura presidencial autónoma: Los nuevos caminos institucionales de Renovación Nacional. Politica, 45, 165196.Google Scholar
Barrueto, F., and Navia, P. (2015). Evolución de las preferencias políticas y de políticas públicas entre el sector popular y el resto de la sociedad chilena entre 1990 y 2010. Perfiles Latinoamericanos, 23(46) México jul./dic., 6189.Google Scholar
Bartels, L. M. (2002). Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions. Political Behavior, 24(2), 117150.Google Scholar
Bartels, L. M. (2008). Unequal Democracy : The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. New York, Princeton, NJ: Russell Sage Foundation, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bartle, J., and Bellucci, P. (2009). Political Parties and Partisanship: Social Identity and Individual Attitudes. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bascuñán, C. (1990). La izquierda sin Allende. Santiego, Chile: Editorial Planeta.Google Scholar
Bateson, R. (2012). Crime victimization and political participation. American Political Science Review, 106(03), 570587.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, F. R., and Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bawn, K., Cohen, M., Karol, D., Masket, S., Noel, H., and Zaller, J. (2012). A theory of political parties: Groups, policy demands and nominations in American politics. Perspectives on Politics, 10(03), 571597.Google Scholar
Bélanger, É., and Meguid, B. M. (2008). Issue salience, issue ownership, and issue-based vote choice. Electoral Studies, 27(3), 477491.Google Scholar
Beramendi, P., and Rueda, D. (2014). Inequality and institutions: the case of economic coordination. Annual Review of Political Science, 17, 251271.Google Scholar
Bernhardt, M. D., and Ingerman, D. E. (1985). Candidate reputations and the ‘incumbency effect’. Journal of Public Economics, 27(1), 4767.Google Scholar
Bértola, L., and Ocampo, J. A. (2012). The Economic Development of Latin America Since Independence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bianchi, S., and Sanchís, N. (1988). El Partido Peronista Femenino (Vol. 208). Buenos Aires: Centro editor de América latina.Google Scholar
Bishop, G. F. (1976). The effect of education on ideological consistency. Public Opinion Quarterly, 40(3), 337348.Google Scholar
Blais, A., Martin, P., and Nadeau, R. (1998). Can people explain their own vote? Introspective questions as indicators of salience in the 1995 Quebec referendum on sovereignty. Quality & Quantity, 32(4), 355.Google Scholar
Bleck, J., van de Walle, N. (2013). Valence issues in African elections navigating uncertainty and the weight of the past. Comparative Political Studies, 46(11), 13941421.Google Scholar
Boix, C. (2003). Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Borzutzky, S. (2002). Vital Connections: Politics, Social Security, and Inequality in Chile. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Botana, N. R. (1984). El Orden Conservador. Buenos Aires: Editorial Sudamericana.Google Scholar
Brader, T., Tucker, J. A., and Duell, D. (2013). Which parties can lead opinion? Experimental evidence on partisan cue taking in multiparty democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 46(11), 14851517.-Google Scholar
Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., and Golder, M. (2006). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis, 14(1), 6382. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpi014Google Scholar
Brooks, C., and Manza, J. (2006). Why do Welfare States Persist? Journal of Politics, 68 (4), 816827.Google Scholar
Brusco, V., Nazareno, M., and Stokes, S. C. (2004). Vote buying in Argentina. Latin American Research Review, 39(2), 6688.Google Scholar
Bruter, M., Erikson, R., and Strauss, A. (2010). Uncertain candidates, valence, and the dynamics of candidate position taking. Public Choice, 144, 153168.Google Scholar
Carnes, N., and Lupu, N. (2015). Rethinking the comparative perspective on class and representation: evidence from Latin America. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 118.Google Scholar
Calvo, E., and Escolar, M. (2005). La nueva politica de partidos en la Argentina : crisis politica, realineamientos partidarios y reforma electoral. Buenos Aires: Prometeo-Pent.Google Scholar
Calvo, E., and Hellwig, T. (2011). Centripetal and centrifugal incentives under different electoral systems. American Journal of Political Science, 55(1), 2741. doi: 10.1111/j.1540–5907.2010.00482.xGoogle Scholar
Calvo, E., and Moscovich, L. (2017). Inequality, protests, and the progressive allocation of cash transfers in the Argentine provinces. Latin American Politics and Society, 59(2), 326.Google Scholar
Calvo, E., and Murillo, M. V. (2004). Who delivers? Partisan clients in the Argentine electoral market. American Journal of Political Science, 48(4), 742757.Google Scholar
Calvo, E., and Murillo, M. V. (2005). A new law of Argentine politics. In Murillo, M. V. and Levitsky, S. (Eds.) Argentine Democracy : The Politics of Institutional Weakness. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
Calvo, E., and Murillo, M. V. (2012). The persistence of Peronism. Journal of Democracy, 23(2), 148161.Google Scholar
Calvo, E., and Murillo, M. V. (2013). When parties meet voters assessing political linkages through partisan networks and distributive expectations in Argentina and Chile. Comparative Political Studies, 46(7), 851882.Google Scholar
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., and Stokes, D. E. (1964). The American Voter: An Abridgment. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Campello, D. (2013). What is left of the Brazilian Left? Available at SSRN 2243118.Google Scholar
Campello, D., and Zucco, C. Jr. (2015). Presidential success and the world economy. The Journal of Politics, 78 (2).Google Scholar
Cantú, F., and Saiegh, S. M. (2011). Fraudulent democracy? An analysis of Argentina’s “Infamous Decade” using supervised machine learning. Political Analysis, 409–433.Google Scholar
Carey, J. M., and Siavelis, P. (2006). Election insurance and coalition survival. Informal institutions and democracy: Lessons from Latin America. In Helmke, Gretchen and Levitsky, Steven (Eds.) Informal Institutions and Democracy: Lessons from Latin America (160). Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Castro, M. O. (2008). El ocaso de la república oligárquica: poder, política y reforma electoral, 1898–1912. Buenos Aires: Edhasa.Google Scholar
Cavarozzi, M. (1984). Sindicatos y política en Argentina: Buenos Aires: Centro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad.Google Scholar
Chandra, K. (2004). Why Ethnic Parties Succeed : Patronage and Ethnic Head Counts in India. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, J., and Rodden, J. (2013). Unintentional gerrymandering: Political geography and electoral bias in legislatures. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 8(3), 239269.Google Scholar
Ciria, A. (1983). Política y cultura popular: la Argentina peronista, 1946–1955. Beunos Aires: De la Flor.Google Scholar
Clark, M. (2009). Valence and electoral outcomes in Western Europe, 1976–1998. Electoral Studies, 28(1), 111122.Google Scholar
Clark, M., and Leiter, D. (2014). Does the ideological dispersion of parties mediate the electoral impact of valence? A cross-national study of party support in nine Western European democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 47(2), 171202.Google Scholar
Clarke, H. D., Sanders, D., Stewart, M. C., and Whiteley, P. F. (1992). Performance Politics and the British Voter. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, H., Sanders, D., Stewart, M., and Whiteley, P. (2011). Valence politics and electoral choice in Britain, 2010. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 21(2), 237253.Google Scholar
Converse, P. E. (1962a). Information flow and the stability of partisan attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 26(4), 578599.Google Scholar
Converse, P. E. (1962b). The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics: Survey Research Center. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Corstange, D. (2009). Sensitive questions, truthful answers? Modeling the list experiment with LISTIT. Political Analysis, 17(1), 4563.Google Scholar
Corstange, D. (2016). The Price of a Vote in the Middle East: Clientelism and Communal Politics in Lebanon and Yemen. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, G. (1999). Electoral rules and electoral coordination. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 145161.Google Scholar
Cox, G. W. (2007). Swing voters, core voters and distributive politics. Paper presented at the Elections and Redistribution, Yale University.Google Scholar
Cox, G. W., and McCubbins, M. D. (1986). Electoral politics as a redistributive game. The Journal of Politics, 48(2), 370389.Google Scholar
Crisp, B. F., and Simoneau, W. M. (2018). Electoral systems and constituency service. In Herron, E. S., Pekkanen, R. J., and Shugart, M. S. (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Systems, 345361. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Croissant, Y. (2012). Estimation of multinomial logit models in R: The mlogit Packages. R package version 0.2–2. http://cran. r-project. org/web/packages/mlogit/vignettes/mlogit. pdfGoogle Scholar
Dahlberg, M., and Johansson, E. (2002). On the vote-purchasing behavior of incumbent governments. American Political Science Review, 96(01), 2740. doi:10.1017/S0003055402004215Google Scholar
Dávila, M. (2010). Tecnocracia y democracia en el Chile contemporáneo: el caso de los gobiernos de la Concertación (1990–2010). Revista de sociología, 24, 199217.Google Scholar
De la Maza, G. (2010). Construcción democrática, participación ciudadana y políticas públicas en Chile. PhD Dissertation, Department of Languages and Cultures of Latin America, Faculty of Humanities, Leiden University.Google Scholar
De la Maza, G., Maillet, A., and Martinez, C. (2016). ¿El despertar de la fuerza? Análisis exploratorio de la politización de los conflictos socioterritoriales y sus consecuencias en Chile (2005–2014). Paper presented at the Annual Repal Conference, MIT, Cambridge.Google Scholar
De La O, A. L. (2013). Do conditional cash transfers affect electoral behavior? Evidence from a randomized experiment in Mexico. American Journal of Political Science, 57(1), 114.Google Scholar
De Privitellio, L. (2011). Las elecciones entre dos reformas: 1900–1955. In Sabato, H., Ternavasio, M., de Privitellio, L., and Persello, A. (Eds.) Historia de las elecciones en la Argentina. Buenos Aires: El Ateneo.Google Scholar
Diaz-Cayeros, A., Estevez, F., and Magaloni, B. (2016). The Political Logic of Poverty Relief: Electoral Strategies and Social Policy in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Díaz, J. B., Rolf Lüders, S., and Gert Wagner, H. (2005). Chile, 1810--2000, La República en Cifras: Mimeograph, Instituto de Economía, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.Google Scholar
Dixit, A., and Londregan, J. (1996). The determinants of success of special interests in redistributive politics. The Journal of Politics, 58(4), 11321155.Google Scholar
Dixit, A., and Londregan, J. (1998). Ideology, Tactics, and Efficiency in Redistributive Politics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(2), 497529.Google Scholar
Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Drake, P. W. (1978). Socialism and Populism in Chile, 1932–52. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Duch, R. M., and Stevenson, R. T. (2008). The Economic Vote : How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eifert, B., Miguel, E., and Posner, D. N. (2010). Political competition and ethnic identification in Africa. American Journal of Political Science, 54(2), 494510.Google Scholar
Escolar, M. (2013). La ilusión unitaria: Política territorial y nacionalización política en Argentina. Revista SAAP, 7(2), 441451.Google Scholar
Escudero, L. (2001). Argentina. In Alcántara Sáez, M. and Freidenberg, F. (Eds.) Partidos Políticos de América Latina: Cono Sur. Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.Google Scholar
Espinoza, E. (2008). Mapa de las redes de poder en el seno de la élite política chilena desde el retorno de la democracia. El caso de los diputados (1990–2005). Paper presented in the Congress on Technology and Cultures. A Cros-Disciplinary Dialogue. Looking to the Future in Latin America and the Caribean. October 20–November 2, 2008, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Chile.Google Scholar
Espinoza, V., and Madrid, S. (2010). Trayectoria y Eficacia Política de los Militantes en Juventudes Políticas. Estudio de la elite política emergente. Santiago de Chile: Instituto de Estudios Avanzados.Google Scholar
Etchemendy, S., and Garay, C. (2010). Between moderation and defiance: Argentina’s left populism in comparative perspective (2003–2009). In Levitsky, S. and Roberts, K. (Eds.) Latin America’s Left Turn: Causes and Implications. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Falleti, T. G. (2005). A sequential theory of decentralization: Latin American cases in comparative perspective. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 327346.Google Scholar
Falleti, T. G. (2010). Decentralization and Subnational Politics in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fearon, J. D. (1999). Electoral accountability and the control of politicians: Selecting good types versus sanctioning poor performance. In Przeworski, A., Stokes, S., and Manin, B. (Eds.) Democracy, Accountability, and Representation (5597). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ferreres, O. (2005). Dos siglos de economía argentina. Fundación Norte y Sur.Google Scholar
Finan, F., and Schechter, L. (2012). Vote-buying and reciprocity. Econometrica, 80(2), 863881.Google Scholar
Fiorina, M. P. (1981). Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Flores-Macias, G. (2012). After Neoliberalism? The Left and Economic Reforms in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Folke, O., Hirano, S., and Snyder, J. M. (2011). Patronage and elections in US states. American Political Science Review, 105(03), 567585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuentes, C. (1999). Partidos y coaliciones en el Chile de los 90. Entre pactos y proyectos. Santiago de Chile: Lom Editores.Google Scholar
Galway, T. (2014). Machine Made: Tammany Hall and the Creation of Modern American Politics. New York: WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Gamboa, R., and Morales, M. (2015). Deciding on the electoral system: Chile’s adoption of proportional representation in 1925. Latin American Politics and Society, 57(2), 4166.Google Scholar
Gamboa, R., and Salcedo, R. (2009). El Faccionalismo en el Partido Socialista de Chile (1990–2006): características y efectos políticos en sus procesos de toma de decisión. Revista de ciencia política (Santiago), 29(3), 667692.Google Scholar
Gamboa, R., Lopez, M. A., and Baeza, J. (2013). La evolución programática de los partidos chilenos 1970–2009: De la polarización al consenso, Revista de ciencia política, 33(2), 443–467.Google Scholar
Gamboa Valenzuela, R. (2011). Reformando reglas electorales: La cédula única y los pactos electorales en Chile (1958–1962). Revista de ciencia política (Santiago), 31(2), 159186.Google Scholar
Gans-Morse, J., Mazzuca, S., and Nichter, S. (2014). Varieties of clientelism: machine politics during elections. American Journal of Political Science, 58(2), 415432.Google Scholar
Garay, C. (2007). Social policy and collective action: Unemployed workers, community associations, and protest in Argentina. Politics & Society, 35(2), 301328.Google Scholar
Garay, C. (2016). Social Policy Expansion in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garreton, M. A. (2012). Neoliberalismo corregido y progresismo limitado. Los gobiernos de la Concertación en Chile, 1990–2010. Santiago de Chile: Santiago Editorial Arcis-CLACSO.Google Scholar
Gelman, A., and Hill, J. (2007). Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gerber, A., and Green, D. (1999). Misperceptions about perceptual bias. Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1), 189210.Google Scholar
Gerchunoff, P., and Torre, J. C. (1992). What role for the state in Latin America. In Teitel, S. (Ed.) Towards a New Development Strategy for Latin America: Pathways from Hirschman’s Thought (259280). Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Gibson, E. L. (1996). Class & Conservative Parties: Argentina in Comparative Perspective. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, E. L., and Calvo, E. (2000). Federalism and low-maintenance constituencies: Territorial dimensions of economic reform in Argentina. Studies in Comparative International Development, 35(3), pg: 32.Google Scholar
Gibson, E., and Calvo, E. F. (2001). Federalismo y Sobrerrepresentación: La Dimensión Territorial de la Reforma Económica en la Argentina. In Calvo, E. F. and Abal Medina, J. M. H. (Eds.) El Federalismo Electoral Argentino (179204). Buenos Aires: EUDEBA.Google Scholar
Gilens, M. (2012). Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gingerich, D. W. (2010). Understanding off-the-books politics: Conducting inference on the determinants of sensitive behavior with randomized response surveys. Political Analysis, 18(3), 349380. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpq010Google Scholar
Giraudy, A. (2007). The distributive politics of emergency employment programs in Argentina (1993–2002). Latin American Research Review, 42(2), 3355.Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Ocantos, E., Kiewiet de Jonge, C., Meléndez, C., Osorio, J., and Nickerson, D. (2010). Vote Buying and Social Desirability Bias: Experimental Evidence from Nicaragua. Paper presented at the Yale Conference on Redistribution, Public Goods and Political Market Failures, New Haven.Google Scholar
Granberg, D., and Brent, E. (1980). Perceptions of issue positions of presidential candidates: Candidates are often perceived by their supporters as holding positions on the issues that are closer to the supporters’ views than they really are. American Scientist, 68(6), 617625.Google Scholar
Greene, S. (2004). Social identity theory and partisan identification. Social Science Quarterly, 85(1), 136153.Google Scholar
Green, D. P., Palmquist, B., and Schickler, E. (2004). Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Grindle, M. S. (2012). Jobs for the Boys. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Groseclose, T. (2001). A model of candidate location when one candidate has a valence advantage. American Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 862886.Google Scholar
Grossman, G. M., and Helpman, E. (2002). Interest Groups and Trade Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Grzymała-Busse, A. (2007). Rebuilding Leviathan: Party Competition and State Exploitation in Post-Communist Democracies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gryzmala-Busse, A. (2015). Nations under God: How Churches Use Moral Authority to Influence Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez, R. A., and Isuani, F. (2013). Luces y sombras de la política ambiental argentina entre 1983 y 2013. Revista SAAP, 7(2), 317328.Google Scholar
Habyarimana, J., Macartan, H., Posner, D. N., and Weinstein, J. M. (2009). Coethnicity: Diversity and the Dilemmas of Collective Action. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hammouya, M. (1999). Statistics on Public Sector Employment: Methodology, Structures and Trends (Vol. W.P.144). Geneva: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
Hellwig, T., and Samuels, D. (2008). Electoral accountability and the variety of democratic regimes. British Journal of Political Science, 38(01), 6590. doi:10.1017/S0007123408000045Google Scholar
Hinich, M. J., and Munger, M. C. (1994). Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Hite, K. (2000). When the Romance Ended: Leaders of the Chilean Left, 1968–1998. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Holland, A. C. (2013). Right on crime?: Conservative party politics and Mano Dura policies in El Salvador. Latin American Research Review, 48(1), 4467.Google Scholar
Hora, R. (2001). The Landowners of the Argentine Pampas: A Social and Political History 1860–1945. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Horowitz, J. (2010). Argentina’s Radical Party and Popular Mobilization, 1916–1930. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Huneeus, C. (2000). El Regimen de Pinochet. Santiago: Editorial Sudamericana.Google Scholar
Huneeus, C. (2016). La oposición en el autoritarismo El caso del Partido Demócrata Cristiano durante el régimen del general Pinochet en Chile. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, 61(227), 247271.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political Order in Changing Socities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Iacovella, M. (2006) Análisis comparativo por subsistemas. In Echevarria, Koldo (Ed.) Informe sobre la situación del servicio civil en América Latina. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Iyengar, S. (1994). Is Anyone Responsible?: How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Iyengar, S., and Kinder, D. R. (2010). News That Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, L. R., and Shapiro, R. Y. (2000). Politicians Don’t Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jacoby, W. G. (1991). Ideological identification and issue attitudes. American Journal of Political Science, 178–205.Google Scholar
Jones, B. D., and Baumgartner, F. R. (2005). The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jones, M. P., Lauga, M., and León-Roesch, M. (2005). Argentina. In Nohlen, D. (Ed.) Elections in the Americas: A Data Handbook (Vol. 2, South America, 59122). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, N., Park, D. K., and Ridout, T. N. (2006). Dialogue in American political campaigns? An examination of issue convergence in candidate television advertising. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 724736.Google Scholar
Kaplan, S. B. (2016). Partisan technocratic cycles in Latin America, Electoral Studies.Google Scholar
Karol, D. (2009). Party Position Change in American Politics: Coalition Management. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kasara, Kimuli. (2017). Tax me if you can: Ethnic geography, democracy, and the taxation of agriculture in Africa. American Political Science Review 101(1), 159172.Google Scholar
Kaufman, R. (2011). The political left, the export boom, and the populist temptation. In Levitsky, S. and Roberts, K. (Eds.) The Resurgence of the Latin American Left (93116). Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press,Google Scholar
Kedar, O. (2005). When moderate voters prefer extreme parties: policy balancing in parliamentary elections. American Political Science Review, 99(2), 185199.Google Scholar
Keefer, P. (2007). Clientelism, credibility, and the policy choices of young democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 804821.Google Scholar
Keefer, P., and Vlaicu, R. (2008). Democracy, credibility, and clientelism. Journal of Law Economics & Organization, 24(2), 371406. doi: 10.1093/jleo/ewm054Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H. (1994). The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H. (2000). Linkages between citizens and politicians in democratic polities. [Review]. Comparative Political Studies, 33(6–7), 845879.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H., and Kselman, D. M. (2013). Economic development, democratic experience, and political parties’ linkage strategies. Comparative Political Studies, 46(11), 14531484.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H., and Wilkinson, S. (2007). Patrons, Clients, and Policies : Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H., Hawkins, K. A., Luna, J. P., Rosas, G., and Zechmeister, E. J. (2010). Latin American Party Systems. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koenker, R. (2005). Quantile Regression. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koenker, R. (2013). quantreg: Quantile Regression. R package version 5.05. R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna) Available at: http://CRAN. R-project. org/package= quantreg.Google Scholar
Koenker, R., and Bassett, G. Jr (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 33–50.Google Scholar
Laver, M., and Sergenti, E. (2012) Party Competition: An Agent-Based Model. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lax, J. R., and Phillips, J. H. (2009). How should we estimate public opinion in the states? American Journal of Political Science, 53(1), 107121.Google Scholar
Leiras, M. (2007). Todos los caballos del rey: la integración de los partidos políticos y el gobierno democrático de la Argentina. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.Google Scholar
Levitsky, S. (2003). Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murillo, M. V., and Levitsky, S. (2019) Crisis, boom, and the restructuring of the Argentine party system (1999–2015). In Lupu, N., Oliveros, V., and Schiumerini, L. (Eds.) Campaigns and Voters in Developing Democracies: Argentina in Comparative Perspective. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press.Google Scholar
Levitsky, S., and Roberts, K. M. (2013). The Resurgence of the Latin American Left: Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, M. S., and Ratto, M. C. (2013). Economic voting in Latin America: A general model. Electoral Studies, 32(3), 489493.Google Scholar
Lindbeck, A., and Weibull, J. W. (1987). Balanced-budget redistribution and the outcome of political competition. Public Choice, 52(3), 273297.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. M., and Rokkan, S. (1967). Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives (Contributors: Robert R. Alford and others). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Llach, L. (2007). The Wealth of the Provinces: The Rise and Fall of the Interior in the Political Economy of Argentina, 1880--1910: Doctorial Dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Lodola, G. (2005). Protesta popular y redes clientelares en la Argentina: el reparto federal del Plan Trabajar (1996–2001). Desarrollo Economico, 515–536.Google Scholar
Londregan, J., and Romer, T. (1993). Polarization, incumbency, and the personal vote. Political Economy: Institutions, Competition, and Representation, 355–377.Google Scholar
Longo, F. (2006). Análisis comparativo por índices. In Echevarria, K. (Ed.) Informe sobre la situación del servicio civil en América Latina. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Loxton, J. (2016). Authoritarian successor parties and the new right in Latin America. In Levitsky, S., Loxton, J., Van Dyck, B., and Domínguez, J. I. (Eds.) Challenges of Party-Building in Latin America (245272). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Luna, F. (1972). Argentina de Péron a Lanusse, 1943–1973. Barcelona: Planeta.Google Scholar
Luna, J. P. (2008). Partidos Políticos y Sociedad en Chile: Trayectoria Histórica y Mutaciones Recientes. In Fontaine, A., Walter, I., Navarrete, J., and Larroulet, C. (Eds.) Reforma de los Partidos Políticos en Chile. Santiago: PNUD.Google Scholar
Luna, J. P. (2010). Segmented party voter linkages in Latin America: The case of the UDI. Journal of Latin American Studies, 42(2), 325356.Google Scholar
Luna, J. P. (2014). Segmented Representation: Political Party Strategies in Unequal Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Luna, J. P. (2016). Chile’s crisis of representation. Journal of Democracy, 27(3), 129138.Google Scholar
Luna, J. P. (2017). Sistema de partidos y campaña electorales a nivel local. Quienes logran ser electos y re-electos. In Luna, J. P. and Mardones, R. (Eds). La columna vertebral fracturada: revisitando intermediarios políticos en Chile. Santiago de Chile: Ril Editores.Google Scholar
Luna, J. P., and Altman, D. (2011). Uprooted but stable: Chilean parties and the concept of party system institutionalization. Latin American Politics and Society, 53(2), 128.Google Scholar
Luna, J. P., and Mardones, R. (2017). Politicas de Distribucion Selectivas: Uso Politico de Fondos Sociales Focalizados en Chile. In Luna, J. P. and Mardones, R. (Eds.) La Columna Vertebral Fracturada: Revisitando Intermediarios Politicos en Chile. Santiago de Chile: RIL Editores.Google Scholar
Luna, J. P., and Rosenblatt, F. (2012). ¿Notas para una autopsia? Los partidos políticos en el Chile actual. In Diaz, F. J. and Sierra, L. (Eds.) Democracia con partidos. CEP-CIEPLAN.Google Scholar
Luna, J. P., and Rosenblatt, F. (2017). La Columna Vertebral ¿Fracturada? In Luna, J. P. and Mardones, R. (Eds). La columna vertebral fracturada: revisitando intermediarios políticos en Chile. Santiago de Chile: Ril Editores.Google Scholar
Luna, J. P., Rosenblatt, F., and Toro, S. (2011). Desk Review on Programmatic Parties. Estocolmo: IDEA-International, no publicado.Google Scholar
Lupu, N. (2011). Party Brands in Crisis: Partisanship, Brand Dilution and the Breakdown of Political Parties in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lupu, N. (2013). Party brands and partisanship: Theory with evidence from a survey experiment in Argentina. American Journal of Political Science, 57(1), 4964.Google Scholar
Lupu, N. (2016). Party Brands, Partisan Erosion, and Party Breakdown Latin American Party Systems: Institutionalization, Decay, and Collapse. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lupu, N., and Stokes, S. (2009). The social bases of political parties in Argentina, 1912–2003. Latin American Research Review, 44(1), 5887.Google Scholar
Lustig, N., Lopez-Calva, L. F., and Ortiz-Juarez, E. (2013). Declining inequality in Latin America in the 2000s: the cases of Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico. World Development, 44, 129141.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, M. M. (2002). Los años formativos del Partido Peronista: resultados de una investigacion, Desarrollo Economico, 117–127.Google Scholar
Machado, F., Scartascini, C., and Tommasi, M. (2011). Political institutions and street protests in Latin America. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 55(3), 340365.Google Scholar
Madrid, R. L. (2012). The Rise of Ethnic Politics in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Magaloni, B. M., Diaz-Cayeros, A., and Estevez, F. (2006). Clientelism and portfolio diversification: A model of electoral investment with applications to Mexico. In Kitschelt, H. and Wilkinson, S. (Eds.) Patrons, Clients, and Policies : Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge, UK ; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Magar, E., Rosemblum, M. R., and Samuels, D. (1998). The absence of centripetal incentives in double-member districts: The case of Chile. Comparative Political Studies, 31(6), 714739.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, S., and Scully, T. (1995). Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Malamud, A., and De Luca, M. (2015). La Politica en Tiempos de Los Kirchner. Beunos Aires: Eudeba.Google Scholar
Manin, B. (1997). The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Manin, B., Przeworski, A., and Stokes, S. (1999). Elections and representation. In Przeworski, A., Stokes, S., and Manin, B. (Eds.) Democracy, Accountability, and Representation (2954). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J. (2003). Rethinking representation. American Political Science Review, 97(04), 515528.Google Scholar
Mares, I., and Young, L. (2016). Buying, expropriating, and stealing votes. Annual Review of Political Science, 19, 267288.Google Scholar
McCarty, C., Killworth, P. D., and Rennell, J. (2007). Impact of methods for reducing respondent burden on personal network structural measures. Social Networks, 29(2), 300315. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2006.12.005Google Scholar
McCarty, C., Killworth, P. D., Bernard, H. R., Johnsen, E., and Shelley, G. A. (2000). Comparing two methods for estimating network size. Human Organization, 60, 2839.Google Scholar
McGuire, J. W. (1997). Peronism without Perón: Unions, Parties, and Democracy in Argentina. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Meltzer, A. H., and Richard, S. F. (1981). A rational theory of the size of government. The Journal of Political Economy, 914–927.Google Scholar
Miller, G., and Schofield, N. (2003). Activists and partisan realignment in the United States. American Political Science Review, 97(02), 245260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, W. E., and Shanks, J. M. (1996). The New American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ministerio del Interior. (2008). Historia Electoral Argentina (1912–2007). Buenos Aires: Ministerio de Interior.Google Scholar
Mora y Araujo, M., and Llorente, I. (Eds.) (1980). El Voto Peronista: Ensayos sobre la Sociología Electoral Argentina. Buenos Aires: Editorial Sudamericana.Google Scholar
Morales, M. Q., and Bugueño, R. (2001). La UDI, como expresión de la nueva derecha en Chile. Estudios Sociales (Chile), 215–248.Google Scholar
Morales, M., and Navia, P. (2010). El sismo electoral de 2009. In Morales, M. and Navia, P. (Eds.) El sismo electoral de 2009. (956). Santiago de Chile: Ediciones Universidad Diego Portales.Google Scholar
Morales, M., and Sanchez, M. J. (2010). La segunda es la vencida: Piñeira y sus bases de apoyo. In Morales, M. y Navia, P. (Eds.) El sismo electoral de 2009. Santiago de Chile: Ediciones Universidad Diego Portales.Google Scholar
Morris, E. (2010). The Rise of Theodore Roosevelt. New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar
Moseley, M. W. (2018). Protest State: The Rise of Everyday Contention in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Munoz, P. (2018). Buying Audiences: An Informational Theory of Campaign Clientelism in Weak Party Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murillo, M. V. (2001). Labor Unions, Partisan Coalitions and Market Reforms in Latin America. Cambridge, UK; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murillo, M. V. (2009). Political Competition, Partisanship, and Policymaking in Latin American Public Utilities. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murillo, M. V., and Visconti, G. (2017). Economic performance and incumbents’ support in Latin America. Electoral Studies, 45, 180190.Google Scholar
Murillo, M. V., Oliveros, V., and Vaishnav, M. (2010). Electoral revolution or democratic alternation? Latin American Research Review, 45(3), 87114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murillo, M. V., Oliveros, V., and Vaishnav, M. (2011). Economic constraints and presidential agency. In Levitsky, S. and Roberts, K. (Eds.) The Resurgence of the Latin American Left (5270). Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Murmis, M., and Portantiero, J. C. (1974). Estudios sobre los orígenes del peronismo. Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno Editores.Google Scholar
Navia, P. (2004). Las grandes alamedas: el Chile post Pinochet (1st edn.). Santiago de Chile: Tercera-Mondadori.Google Scholar
Navia,. P., and Godoy, R. (2014). The Alianza quest to win power democratically. In Sehnbruch, K. and Siavelis, P. (Eds.) Democratic Chile: The Politics and Policies of a Historic Coalition, 1990–2010. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Navia, P., Morales Quiroga, M., and Briceño Espinoza, R. (2009). El genoma electoral chileno : dibujando el mapa genético de las preferencias políticas en Chile (1st edn.). Santiago, Chile: Ediciones Universidad Diego Portales.Google Scholar
Navia, P., and Osorio, R. (2015). It’s the Christian Democrats' fault: Declining political identification in Chile, 1957–2012. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 48(4), 815838.Google Scholar
Navia, P., Osorio, R., and Valenzuela, F. (2013). Sesgo político en las lunas de miel presidenciales: El Mercurio y La Tercera, 1994–2010. Intermedios. Medios de comunicación y democracia en Chile (3557). Santiago, Chile: Ediciones Universidad Diego Portales.Google Scholar
Navia, P., and Rojas, P. (2005). Representación y tamaño de los distritos electorales en Chile, 1988–2002. Revista de ciencia política (Santiago), 25(2), 91116.Google Scholar
Negretto, G. L. (2013). El papel de la Constitución en la nueva democracia argentina. Revista SAAP, 7(2), 297305.Google Scholar
Negretto, G. L. (2013). Making Constitutions: Presidents, Parties, and Institutional Choice in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nichter, S. (2008). Vote buying or turnout buying? Machine politics and the secret ballot. American Political Science Review, 102(01), 1931. doi:10.1017/S0003055408080106Google Scholar
Nohlen, D. (2005). Elections in the Americas: A Data Handbook: Volume 2 South America (Vol. 2): Oxford University Press on Demand.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, M. (2005). El aparato : los intendentes del Conurbano y las cajas negras de la política (1st edn.). Buenos Aires: Aguilar.Google Scholar
Olivella, S., and Tavits, M. (2014). Legislative effects of electoral mandates. British Journal of Political Science, 44(2), 301321.Google Scholar
Oliveros, V. (2013). A Working Machine: Patronage Jobs and Political Services in Argentina. PhD Dissertation, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Oliveros, V. (2016). Making it personal: Clientelism, favors, and the personalization of public administration in Argentina. Comparative Politics, 48(3), 373391.Google Scholar
Page, B. I., and Shapiro, R. Y. (1992). The Rational Public : Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pedrosa, F. (2005). Las relaciones personales también importan. Instituciones informales, redes y partidos políticos. Paper presented at the Actas Primer Congreso Latinoamericano de Antropología Simposio Análisis de redes sociales: aplicaciones en antropología.Google Scholar
Perez, O. (2015). The impact of crime on voter choice in Latin America. In Carlin, R. E., Singer, M. M., and Zechmeister, E. J. (Eds.) The Latin American Voter: Pursuing Representation and Accountability in Challenging Contexts. Ann Arbour, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Pérez, G. J., and Pereyra, S. (2013). La protesta social entre las crisis de la democracia argentina, Revista SAAP, 7(2), 463471.Google Scholar
Persello, A. V. (2005). El Partido Radical, oposición y gobierno. Estudios Sociales, 11(1), 6784.Google Scholar
Petrocik, J. R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 825850.Google Scholar
Piattoni, S. (2001). Clientelism, Interests, and Democratic Representation: The European Experience in Historical and Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pinto, C. (2006). UDI: la conquista de corazones populares (1983–1987). Santiago de Chile: A & V.Google Scholar
Pirro, J. C. M. (2009). El peronismo después del peronismo: resistencia, sindicalismo y política luego del 55. Beunos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno Editores.Google Scholar
Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The Concept of Representation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Plumb, D. (1998). El Partido por la democracia: The Birth of Chile’s Postmaterialist Catch-All Left. Party Politics, 4(1), 93106.Google Scholar
Pollack, M. (1999). New Right in Chile. USA: Springer.Google Scholar
Posner, D. N. (2005). Institutions and Ethnic Politics in Africa. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pribble, J. (2015). Welfare and Party Politics in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pribble, J., and Huber, E. (2011). Social policy and redistribution: Chile and Uruguay. In Levitsky, S. and Roberts, K. (Eds.) The Resurgence of the Latin American Left (117138). Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Pribble, J., Huber, E., and Stephens, J. D. (2009). Politics, policies, and poverty in Latin America, Comparative Politics, 41(4), 387407.Google Scholar
Rahn, W. M. (1993). The role of partisan stereotypes in information processing about political candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 472–496.Google Scholar
Ratto, M. C. (2011). El proceso de atribución de responsabilidades en América Latina: un estudio sobre el voto económico entre 1996 y 2004. Revista SAAP, 5(1), 5992.Google Scholar
Ratto, M. C. (2013). Rechazo a la democracia o al partido de gobierno? Despejando el camino para el estudio de la accountability electoral o algunas reflexiones sobre la relación entre crisis económica y voto en los últimos 30 años. Revista SAAP, 7(2).Google Scholar
Remmer, K. L. (2012). The rise of leftist–populist governance in Latin America The roots of electoral change. Comparative Political Studies, 45(8), 947972.Google Scholar
Rhodes, S. (2005). Social Movements and Free Market Capitalism in Latin America. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, K. M. (1998). Deepening Democracy?: The Modern Left and Social Movements in Chile and Peru. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, K. M. (2013). Market reform, programmatic (de) alignment, and party system stability in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies, 46(11), 14221452.Google Scholar
Roberts, K. M., and Wibbels, E. (1999). Party systems and electoral volatility in Latin America: a test of economic, institutional, and structural explanations. American Political Science Review, 93(3), 575590.Google Scholar
Robinson, J., and Verdier, T. (2002). The Political Economy of Clientelism(3205). London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.Google Scholar
Rock, D. (1972). Machine politics in Buenos Aires and the Argentine Radical Party, 1912–1930. Journal of Latin American Studies, 4(02), 233256.Google Scholar
Rock, D. (1975). Politics in Argentina, 1890–1930 : The Rise and Fall of Radicalism. Cambridge, UK.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rodden, J. (2002). The dilemma of fiscal federalism: Grants and fiscal performance around the world, American Journal of Political Science, 670–687.Google Scholar
Rodden, J. (2006). Hamilton’s Paradox: The Promise and Peril of Fiscal Federalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rodrik, D. (1997). What Drives Public Employment?. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Rouquié, A., and Zadunaisky, D. (1984). El estado militar en América Latina: Buenos Aires: Emecé.Google Scholar
Sabato, H. (2001). The Many and the Few: Political Participation in Republican. Buenos Aires, Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sabato, H., and Ternavasio, M. (2015). El voto en la república. Historia del sufragio en el siglo XIX. In Sabato, H., Ternavasio, M.. Di Privitello, L., and Persello, A. V. (Eds.) Historia de las elecciones en la, Argentina (17134). Beunos Aires: Editorial El Ateneo.Google Scholar
Sanders, D., Clarke, H. D., Stewart, M. C., and Whiteley, P. (2011). Downs, stokes and the dynamics of electoral choice. British Journal of Political Science, 41(02), 287314.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (2005). Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Colchester, UK: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Scartascini, C., Stein, E. H., Tommasi, M., Jones, M. P., Saiegh, S., Magaldi de Sousa, M., Martínez-Gallardo, C., et al. (2010). How Democracy Works: Political Institutions, Actors and Arenas in Latin American Policymaking. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Schaffer, F. C. (2007). Elections for Sale: The Causes and Consequences of Vote Buying. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Schaffer, J., and Baker, A. (2015). Clientelism as persuasion-buying: Evidence from Latin America. Comparative Political Studies, 48(9), 10931126.Google Scholar
Schefter, M. (1994). Political Parties and the State: The American Historical Experience. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schiumerini, L. (2016). Macri’s victory: A right-wing mandate? Paper presented at the Conference on Campaigns and Voters in a Developing Democracy: Argentina’s 2015 Election in Comparative Perspective, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, May 19–20, 2016.Google Scholar
Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S., and Brady, H. E. (2012). The Unheavenly Chorus Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schofield, N. (2003). Valence competition in the spatial stochastic model. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15(4), 371383.Google Scholar
Schofield, N., and Sened, I. (2006). Multiparty Democracy: Elections and Legislative Politics. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
Scully, T. R. (1992). Rethinking the Center: Party Politics in Nineteenth-and Twentieth-Century Chile. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Scully, T., and Valenzuela, J. S. (1993). From Democracy to Democracy : Continuities and Changes of Electoral Choices and the Party System in Chile. Notre Dame, IN.: Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies, University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Serra, G. (2010) Why primaries? The party’s tradeoff between policy and valence. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 23(1), 2151.Google Scholar
Serra, G. (2011). Polarization of what? A model of elections with endogenous valence. Journal of Politics, 72(2), 426437.Google Scholar
Siavelis,. P. M. (2000). The President and Congress in Postauthoritarian Chile : Institutional Constraints to Democratic Consolidation. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Siavelis, P., and Morgenstern, S. (2008). Pathways to Power: Political Recruitment and Candidate Selection in Latin America. University Park, PA.: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, W., Acuña, C., and Gamarra, A. (Eds.) (1994). Democracy, Markets, and Structural Reform in Latin America. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Snyder, J. M. (1989). Election Goals and the Allocation of Campaign Resources, Econometrica, 57(3), 637660.Google Scholar
Soto, Á. (2001). La irrupción de la UDI en las poblaciones 1983–1987. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Latin American Studies Association.Google Scholar
Spiegelhalter, D., Thomas, A., Best, N., and Lunn, D. (2003). WinBUGS user Manual 1.4. Retrieved from www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/bugsGoogle Scholar
Steinmo, S. (1993). Taxation and Democracy: Swedish, British, & American Approaches to Financing the Modern State. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, D. (1963). Spatial models of party competition. The American Political Science Review, 57(2), 368377.Google Scholar
Stokes, D. (1992). Valence politics. Electoral Politics, 141–164.Google Scholar
Stokes, S. C. (1999). What do policy switches tell us about democracy? In Przeworski, A., Stokes, S., and Manin, B. (Eds.) Democracy, Accountability, and Representation (98130). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, S. C. (2001). Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, S. C. (2005). Perverse accountability: A formal model of machine politics with evidence from Argentina. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 315325.Google Scholar
Stokes, S. C. (2007). Political Clientelism Oxford handbooks of political science. (xi, 1021). Oxford; New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Stokes, S. C., Dunning, T., Nazareno, M., and Brusco, V. (2013). Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Suárez Cao, J., Cavarozzi, M., and Abal Medina, J. M. (2002). La competencia partidaria en la Argentina: sus implicancias sobre el régimen democrático. In El asedio a la política: Los partidos latinoamericanos en la era neoliberal (163185). Buenos Aires: Homo Sapiens.Google Scholar
Szwarcberg, M. (2012). Uncertainty, political clientelism, and voter turnout in Latin America: Why parties conduct rallies in Argentina. Comparative Politics, 45(1), 88106.Google Scholar
Szwarcberg, M. (2015). Mobilizing Poor Voters: Machine Politics, Clientelism, and Social Networks in Argentina. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316286913Google Scholar
Tagina, M. L. (2012). Factores contextuales, predisposiciones de largo plazo y accountabilty electoral en Argentina en tiempos del kirchnerismo. In Política y Gobierno, XIX(2).Google Scholar
Tcach, C. (1991). Sabatinismo y peronismo. Buenos Aires: Sudamericana.Google Scholar
Thachil, T. (2014). Elite parties and poor voters: Theory and evidence from India. American Political Science Review, 108(02), 454477.Google Scholar
Tomz, M., and Van Houweling, R. P. (2009). The electoral implications of candidate ambiguity. American Political Science Review, 103(01), 8398.Google Scholar
Tomz, M., and Van Houweling, R. P. (2010). Candidate Repositioning. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Torcal, M., and Mainwaring, S. (2003). The political recrafting of social bases of party competition: Chile, 1973–95. British Journal of Political Science33(1), 5584: Cambridge Journals Online. doi:10.1017/S0007123403000036Google Scholar
Torre, J. C. (1974). El proceso político interno de los sindicatos en Argentina. Buenos Aires: Instituto Torcuato Di Tella, Centro de Investigaciones Sociales.Google Scholar
Torre, J. C. (2003). Los huérfanos de la política de partidos Sobre los alcances y la naturaleza de la crisis de representación partidaria. Desarrollo Economico, 42(168), 647665.Google Scholar
Torre, J. C. (2006). La vieja guardia sindical y Perón: sobre los orígenes del peronismo (2nd edn.). Argentina: Editorial de la Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero.Google Scholar
Treisman, D. (1999). Political decentralization and economic reform: A game-theoretic analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 43(2), 488517.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, G. (1990). Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, A. (1977). Political Brokers in Chile. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, A. (1978). The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Chile (Vol. 4). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, A. (1998). La política de partidos y la crisis del presidencialismo en Chile: una propuesta para una forma parlamentaria de gobierno. Paper presented at the Las crisis del presidencialismo.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, G. U. (1992). Historia política de Chile y su evolución electoral: desde 1810 a 1992. Santiago, de Chile: Editorial Jurídica de Chile.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, J. P. (1997). Descentralización fiscal: Los ingresos municipales y regionales en Chile. Santiago de Chile: ECLAC.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, J. S. (1985). Democratización vía reforma: la expansión del sufragio en Chile (Vol. 6) Buenos Aires: Instituto de Desarrollo Económico y Social.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, J. S. (1999). Reflexiones sobre el presente y futuro del paisaje político chileno a la luz de su pasado. Estudios Públicos, 75, 273290.Google Scholar
Valobra, A. M. (2008). La ciudadanía política de las mujeres y las elecciones de 1951. Anuario del Instituto de Historia Argentina 8, 5389.Google Scholar
Vavreck, L. (2009). The Message Matters: The Economy and Presidential Campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Visconti, G. (2017). Crime Victimization and Policy Preferences. Columbia University. New York. (unpublished manuscript)Google Scholar
Vommaro, G., Morresi, S., and Bellotti, A. (2015). Mundo Pro: anatomía de un partido fabricado para ganar. Beunos Aires: Planeta.Google Scholar
Von Stackelberg, H. (2010). Market Structure and Equilibrium: Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, M., and Austen-Smith, D. (2008). Selected Works of Michael Wallerstein : The Political Economy of Inequality, Unions, and Social Democracy. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wattenberg, M. P. (2009). The Decline of American Political Parties, 1952–1996: Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Weitz-Shapiro, R. (2012). What wins votes: Why some politicians opt out of clientelism. American Journal of Political Science.Google Scholar
Weitz-Shapiro, R. (2014). Curbing Clientelism in Argentina: Politics, Poverty, and Social Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weyland, K. (1977). Growth with equity in Chile's new democracy? Latin American Research Review, 32(1), 3767.Google Scholar
Wibbels, E. (2000). Federalism and the politics of macroeconomic policy and performance. American Journal of Political Science, 44(4), 687702. doi:10.2307/2669275Google Scholar
Wilkinson, S. I. (2006). Votes and Violence: Electoral Competition and Ethnic Riots in India. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zaller, J. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zaller, J., and Feldman, S. (1992). A simple theory of the survey response: Answering questions versus revealing preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 36(3), 579.Google Scholar
Zarazaga, R. (2015). Plugged in brokers: A model of vote-buying and access to resources. Journal of Applied Economics, 18(2), 369390.Google Scholar
Zarazaga, R. (2016). Party machines and voter-customized rewards strategies. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 28(4), 678701.Google Scholar
Zechmeister, E. J., and Corral, M. (2013). Individual and contextual constraints on ideological labels in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies, 46( 6), 675701.Google Scholar
Zheng, T., Salganik, M., and Gelman, A. (2006). How many people do you know in prison?: Using overdispersion in count data to estimate social structure in networks. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101, 474.Google Scholar
Zucco, C. (2007). Where’s the bias? A reassessment of the Chilean electoral system. Electoral Studies, 26(2), 303314.Google Scholar
Zucco, C. (2013). When payouts pay-off: Conditional cash transfers and voting behavior in Brazil 2002–10. American Journal of Political Science, 57(4), 810822.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Ernesto Calvo, University of Maryland, College Park, Maria Victoria Murillo, Columbia University, New York
  • Book: Non-Policy Politics
  • Online publication: 25 January 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108683708.020
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Ernesto Calvo, University of Maryland, College Park, Maria Victoria Murillo, Columbia University, New York
  • Book: Non-Policy Politics
  • Online publication: 25 January 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108683708.020
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Ernesto Calvo, University of Maryland, College Park, Maria Victoria Murillo, Columbia University, New York
  • Book: Non-Policy Politics
  • Online publication: 25 January 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108683708.020
Available formats
×