Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-02T16:46:59.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 8 - Office management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

from Section II - Office interventions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2016

Martin Olsen
Affiliation:
East Tennessee State University
Botros Rizk
Affiliation:
University of South Alabama
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Montz, FJ. Management of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and potential complications. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2000 Jun; 43(2): 394409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solomon, D, Davey, D, Kurman, R, et al. The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA 2002; Apr 24; 287(16): 2114–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waxman, AG, Chelmow, D, Darragh, TM, et al. Revised terminology for cervical histopathology and its implications for management of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120: 1465–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Cancer Institute. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End results Program. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2009.Google Scholar
Center for Disease Control and Prevention. United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2011 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. Atlanta, GA: Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Cancer Institute; 2014. Available at: http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/uscs. Accessed 2 Feb 2015.Google Scholar
Cendejas, BR, Smith-McCune, KK, Khan, MJ. Does treatment for cervical and vulvar dysplasia impact women’s sexual health? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015 Mar; 212(3): 291–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, TC, Schiffman, M. Adding a test for human papillomavirus DNA to cervical cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2003 Feb 6; 348(6): 489–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muñoz, N, Bosch, FX, de Sanjosé, S, et al. Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kjaer, SK, Frederiksen, K, Munk, C, Iftner, T. Long-term absolute risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse following human papillomavirus infection: role of persistence. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010 Oct 6; 102(9): 1478–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kjaer, SK, van den Brule, AJ, Paull, G, et al. Type specific persistence of high risk human papillomavirus (HPV) as indicator of high grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions in young women: population based prospective follow up study. BMJ 2002; 325: 572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCredie, MRE, Sharples, KJ, Paul, C, et al. Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2008 May; 9: 425–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lammé, J, Pattaratornkosohn, T, Mercado-Abadie, J, et al. Concurrent anal human papillomavirus and abnormal anal cytology in women with known cervical dysplasia. Obstet Gynecol Aug; 124(2 pt.1): 242–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ACOG Committee on Adolescent Health Care. Committee Opinion No. 588: human papillomavirus vaccination. Obstet Gynecol 2014 Mar; 123: 712–18.Google Scholar
Beller, U, Abu-Rustum, NR. Cervical cancers after human papillomavirus vaccination. Obstet Gynecol 2009 Feb; 113(2 p. 2): 550–2. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318191a54a.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teixeira, JC, Derchain, SFM, Oliveira, ERZ, et al. Microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the cervix in a young woman vaccinated against human papillomavirus: the screening must be continued. J Lower Genit Tract Dis 2014; 18(2): E50–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sung, HY, Kearney, KA, Miller, M, et al. Papanicolaou smear history and diagnosis of invasive cervical carcinoma among members of a large prepaid health plan. Cancer 2000 May 15; 88(10): 2284–9.3.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leyden, WA, Manos, MM, Geiger, AM, et al. Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: attributable factors in the screening process. J National Can Instit 2005 May; 97(9): 675–83.Google ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 109: screening for cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2009 Dec; 109: 118.Google Scholar
Committee Opinion No. 534: Guidelines for women’s healthcare. A resource manual. 4th ed. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120: 421–4.Google Scholar
Huh, WK, Sidri, M, Stoler, M, et al. Relevance of random biopsy at the transformation zone when colposcopy is negative. Obstet Gynecol 2014 Oct; 124(4): 670–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 99: management of abnormal cervical cytology and histology. Obstet Gynecol 2008 Dec; 112(6): 1419–44. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318192497c.Google Scholar
Bosgraaf, RP, Mast, PP, Struik-van der Zanden, PHTH, et al. Overtreatment in a see-and-treat approach to cervical intraepithelial lesions. Obstet Gynecol 2013 Jun; 121(6): 1209–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, S, Leeman, L. Treatment options for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2013 Jun; 40(2): 291316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ciavattini, A, Clemente, N, Delli Carpini, G, et al. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and risk of miscarriage. Fertil Steril 2015 Apr; 103(4): 1043–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Massad, LS, Einstein, MH, Huh, WK, et al. 2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. J Lower Genit Tract Dis 2013; 17(5): S127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 140: management of abnormal cervical cancer screening test results and cervical cancer precursors. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122: 1338–67. (Replaces Practice Bulletin No. 99, Dec 2008.)Google Scholar
Roberts, OA, Owonikoko, KM, Abdus-Salam, AA, Ogun, O. Advanced carcinoma of the cervix in a 17-year-old girl. J Obstet Gynaecol 2013 Oct; 33(7): 747–8. doi: 10.3109;01443615.2013.813911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, Y, Song, L, Liu, H. Cervical clear cell adenocarcinoma infected with human papillomavirus type 18 in an adolescent. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2014 Feb; 27 (1): e13. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2013.04.007. Epub 2013 Jul 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goncalves, CV, Quintana, SM, Marcolin, AC, et al. Microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix in a 14-year-old adolescent: case report and literature review. São Paulo Med J 2009 May; 127(2): 105–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, MJ, Tadros, T, Tackett, E, Naib, Z. Vaginocervical cytology in victims of sexual assault. Diagn Cytopathol 1991; 7(4): 337–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coker, AL, Hopenhayn, C, DeSimone, CP, et al. Violence against women raises risk of cervical cancer. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2009 Aug; 18(8): 1179–85. doi:10.1089/jwh.2008.1048.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1993 revised classification system HIV infection and expanded surveillance case definition for AIDS among adolescents and adults. MMWR 1992; 41: 119.Google Scholar
Massad, LS, Xie, X, D’Souza, G, et al. Incidence of cervical precancers among HIV-seropositive women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015 May; 212(5): 606.e1–8. Epub 2014 Dec 10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denslow, SA, Rositch, AF, Firnhaber, C, et al. Incidence and progression of cervical lesions in women with HIV: a systematic global review. In J STD AIDS 2014 Mar; 25(3): 163–77. doi:10.1177/0956462413491735.Google ScholarPubMed
Lofgren, S, Tadros, T, Herring-Bailey, G, et al. Progression and regression of cervical pap test lesions in an urban AIDS clinic in the combined antiretroviral therapy era: a longitudinal, retrospective study. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2015 Feb; 19: 120.Google Scholar
Huchko, MJ, Leslie, H, Maloba, M, et al. Outcomes up to twelve months after treatment with loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia among HIV-infected women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2015 Feb; 2: 119.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×