Book contents
- Practice in Second Language Learning
- Practice in Second Language Learning
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Introduction
- Part I Theoretical Perspectives
- Part II Receptive Practice
- Part III Productive Practice
- 6 Using Computer-assisted Language Learning (CALL) Tools to Enhance Output Practice
- 7 Practising Online with Your Peers: The Role of Text Chat for Second Language Development
- 8 Language Practice and Study Abroad
- 9 How Does Collaborative Practice Facilitate Learning? Processes Involved in a Wiki-mediated Collaborative Writing Task
- 10 Conclusion
- Index
- References
10 - Conclusion
Implications for Pedagogy and Research
from Part III - Productive Practice
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2018
Edited by
Book contents
- Practice in Second Language Learning
- Practice in Second Language Learning
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Introduction
- Part I Theoretical Perspectives
- Part II Receptive Practice
- Part III Productive Practice
- 6 Using Computer-assisted Language Learning (CALL) Tools to Enhance Output Practice
- 7 Practising Online with Your Peers: The Role of Text Chat for Second Language Development
- 8 Language Practice and Study Abroad
- 9 How Does Collaborative Practice Facilitate Learning? Processes Involved in a Wiki-mediated Collaborative Writing Task
- 10 Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
This aim of this final chapter is to draw together the different threads we can learn from the chapters in this volume and attempt to point towards ways forward in both research and teaching. The conclusions I draw are deliberately modest because, as mentioned in the introduction, research volumes dedicated to practice have been few and far between and the area is potentially fairly vast. In some ways, this means that a volume of this nature can only scratch the surface in its investigations of the effects of practice in all its myriad forms. Nonetheless, I feel there are some useful conclusions we can draw from the chapters presented which can at least give us clear indications for second language teaching and research in this area. It can also show us the way forwards to possible agendas which research and teaching could usefully follow in the future.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Practice in Second Language Learning , pp. 254 - 264Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Alali, F. and Schmitt, N. 2012. ‘Teaching formulaic sequences: The same or different from teaching single words?’, TESOL Journal 3(2): 53–80.10.1002/tesj.13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergsleithner, J. H., Frota, S. N. and Yoshioka, J. K. (eds.) 2013. Noticing and Second Language Aquisition: Studies in Honour of Richard Schmidt. Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawai’i.Google Scholar
Boers, F. and Lindstromberg, S. 2012. ‘Experimental and intervention studies on formulaic sequences in a second language’, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32: 83–110.10.1017/S0267190512000050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brumfit, C. and Johnson, K. (eds.) 1979. The Communicative Approach to Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, R. and McCarthy, M. 2006. Cambridge Grammar of English: A Comprehensive Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, R. and McCarthy, M. 2015. ‘Spoken grammar: Where we are and where we are going’? Applied Linguistics: Available online at: http://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu080 [Accessed 1 November 2016].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (ed.) 2007. Practice in a Second Language: Perspectives from Applied Linguistics and Cognitive Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511667275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frota, S. N. and Bergsleithner, J. M. 2013. ‘Instruction in support of noticing: An empirical study of EFL in Brazil’, in Bergsleithner, J. H, Frota, S. N. and Yoshioka, J. K. (eds.), Noticing and Second Language Acquisition: Studies in Honour of Richard Schmidt. Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawai’i, 139–150.Google Scholar
Godfroid, A. and Schmidke, J. 2013. ‘What do eye movements tell us about awareness? A triangulation of eye-movement data, verbal reports and vocabulary learning scores’, in Bergsleithner, J. H., Frota, S. N. and Yoshioka, J. K. (eds.), Noticing and Second Language Acquisition: Studies in Honour of Richard Schmidt. Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawai’i, 183–205.Google Scholar
Howatt, A. 2004. A History of English Language Teaching. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jarvis, H. and Achilleos, M. 2013. ‘From computer assisted language learning (CALL) to mobile assisted language use’, TESL E-Journal 16(4): 1–18.Google Scholar
Jones, C. and Carter, R. 2014. ‘Teaching spoken discourse markers explicitly: A comparison of III and PPP’, International Journal of English Studies 14 (1): 37–54.10.6018/ijes/14/1/161001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, M. and Haywood, S. 2004. ‘Facilitating the acquisition of formulaic sequences: An exploratory study in an EAP context’, in Schmitt, N. (ed.), Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, Processing and Use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 269–300.10.1075/lllt.9.14jonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, D., Adolphs, S. and Carter, R. 2014. ‘CANELC: Constructing an e-language corpus’, Corpora 9(1): 29–56.10.3366/cor.2014.0050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S. D. 1985. The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Leow, R. P. 2001. ‘Do learners notice enhanced forms while interacting with the L2?’, Hispania 84(3): 496–509.10.2307/3657810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Keeffe, A., McCarthy, M. and Carter, R. 2007. From Corpus to Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511497650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawley, A. and Syder, F. H. 1983. ‘Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency’, in Richards, J. C. and Schmidt, R. W. (eds.), Language and Communication. London: Longman, 191–226.Google Scholar
Pigada, M. and Schmitt, N. 2006. ‘Vocabulary acquisition from reading: A case study’, Reading in a Foreign Language 18(1). Available online at: http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/April2006/pigada/pigada.html [Accessed 4 November 2016].10.64152/10125/66611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prabhu, N. S. 1990. ‘There is no best method: Why?’, TESOL Quarterly 24(2): 161–176.10.2307/3586897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinders, H. and Cho, M. 2010. ‘Extensive listening practice and input enhancement using mobile phones: Encouraging out-of-class learning with mobile phones’, TESL E- Journal 14(2). Available online at: www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume14/ej54/ej54m2/ [Accessed 30 September 2016].Google Scholar
Richards, J. C. and Rodgers, T. S. 2010. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosa, E. and O’Neill, M. 1999. ‘Explicitness, intake and the issue of awareness: Another piece to the puzzle’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21(4): 511–566.10.1017/S0272263199004015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. W. 1990. ‘The role of consciousness in second language learning’, Applied Linguistics 11: 129–158.10.1093/applin/11.2.129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N. (ed.) 2004. Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, Processing, and Use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N. 2010. Researching Vocabulary: A Vocabulary Research Manual. London: Palgrave Press.10.1057/9780230293977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shintani, N., Li, S. and Ellis, R. 2013. ‘Comprehension-based versus production-based grammar instruction: A meta-analysis of comparative studies’, Language Learning 63(2): 296–329.10.1111/lang.12001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. 2013. ‘Nurturing noticing’, in Bergsleithner, J. H., Frota, S. N. and Yoshioka, J. K. (eds.), Noticing and Second Language Acquisition: Studies in Honour of Richard Schmidt. Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawai’i, 169–180.Google Scholar
Thornbury, S. and Slade, D. 2006. Conversation: From Description to Pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511733123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmis, I. 2012. ‘Spoken language research and ELT: Where are we now?’, ELT Journal 66(4): 514–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, D. 2003. Rules, Patterns and Words: Grammar and Lexis in English Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511733000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, D. 2009. ‘Effects of focused instruction of formulaic sequences on fluent expression in second language narratives: A case study’, Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics 12(1): 39–57.Google Scholar
Wray, A. 2005. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.