Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2010
  • Online publication date: October 2010

22 - Perceptual asynchronies and the dual-channel differential latency hypothesis

from Part IV - Spatial phenomena: forward shift effects
Summary

Summary

The dual-channel differential latency hypothesis (Öğmen et al. 2004) successfully accounts for many aspects of the flash-lag effect (FLE). Here we use the dual-channel differential latency hypothesis to explain an illusion of perceived line length that can be viewed as one component of an illusion reported by Cai and Schlag (2001a). In the phenomenon studied here, a flash is presented collinear with a moving line that is simultaneously changing in length. The moving line is perceived to be misaligned with the flash (the FLE) and the length of the moving line is perceived to differ from its physical length at the instant of the flash. We designate this phenomenon the Cai line-Length Effect (CLE). Our analysis treats a horizontally moving line that also changes its vertical length as composed of two simultaneous motion components: (1) horizontal motion, and (2) vertical expansion or contraction. We measured perceived position misalignment and length misperception in the CLE paradigm, as well as separately for stimuli with the individual motion components of the CLE, as a function of target luminance. Perceived position misalignment and length misperception varied similarly with target luminance, both in the CLE paradigm and when the individual motion components were tested separately. The misperception of stimulus position and length in the CLE reflects an additional processing delay that may be caused by an interaction between the motion components in two directions. […]

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Space and Time in Perception and Action
  • Online ISBN: 9780511750540
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750540
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
References
Adelson, E. H., & Movshon, J. A. (1982). Phenomenal coherence of moving visual pattern. Nature 300: 523–525.
Arnold, D. (2005). Perceptual pairing of colour and motion. Vision Res 45: 3015–3026.
Arnold, D. H., Clifford, C. W., & Wenderoth, P. (2001). Asynchronous processing in vision: color leads motion. Curr Biol 11: 596–600.
Bedell, H. E., Chung, S. T. L., Öğmen, H., & Patel, S. S. (2003). Color and motion: which is the tortoise and which is the hare? Vision Res 43: 2403–2412.
Bedell, H. E., Patel, S. S., Chung, S. T. L., & Öğmen, H. (2006). Perceptual consequences of timing differences within parallel feature-processing systems in human vision. In H., Öğmen & B. G., Breitmeyer (eds.), The First Half Second: The Microgenesis and Temporal Dynamics of Unconscious and Conscious Visual Processes (245–258). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brenner, E., & Smeets, J. B. J. (2000). Motion extrapolation is not responsible for the flash-lag effect. Vision Res 40: 1645–1648.
Cai, R. H. (2003). The Fröhlich effect is not due to a failure to perceive the beginning portion of motion trajectoryJ Vis 3: 485a.
Cai, R. H., & Cavanagh, P. (2002). Motion interpolation of a unique feature into stimulus gaps and blind spots. J Vis 2: 30a.
Cai, R. H., & Schlag, J. (2001a). A new form of illusory conjunction between color and shape. J Vis 1: 127a.
Cai, R. H., & Schlag, J. (2001b). Asynchronous feature binding and the flash-lag illusion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42: S711.
Cai, R. H., Schlag-Rey, M., & Schlag, J. (2000). Displacement of the moving bar exists in the flash-lag effect. Society for Neuroscience Abstract 561: 1.
Eagleman, D. M., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2000). Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science 287: 2036–2038.
Fennema, C. L., & Thompson, W. B. (1979). Velocity determination in scenes containing several moving objects. Computer Graphics and Image Processing 9: 301–315.
Grzywacz, N., & Yuille, A. (1991). Theories for the visual perception of local velocity and coherent motion. In J., Landy & J., Movshon (eds.), Computational Models of Visual Processing (231–252). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Harris, L. R., Duke, P. A., & Kopinska, A. (2006). Flash lag in depth. Vision Res 46: 2735–2742.
Kanai, R., Sheth, B. R., & Shimojo, S. (2004). Stopping the motion and sleuthing the flash-lag effect: spatial uncertainty is the key to perceptual mislocalization. Vision Res 44: 2109–2128.
Kerzel, D., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2003). Neuronal processing delays are compensated in the sensorimotor branch of the visual system. Curr Biol 13: 1975–1978.
Krekelberg, B., & Lappe, M. (2001). Neuronal latencies and the position of moving objects. Trends Neurosci 24: 335–339.
Laurenceau, J., & Shiffrar, M. (1992). The influence of terminators on motion integration across space. Vision Res 32: 263–273.
Marr, D., & Ullman, S. (1981). Directional selectivity and its use in early visual processing. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 211: 151–180.
McKee, S. P., & Taylor, D. G. (1984). Discrimination of time: comparison of foveal and peripheral sensitivity. J Opt Soc Am A 1: 620–627.
Mingolla, E., Todd, J. T., & Norman, J. F. (1992). The perception of globally coherent motion. Vision Res 32: 1015–1031.
Moutoussis, K., & Zeki, S. A. (1997). Direct demonstration of perceptual asynchrony in vision. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 264: 393–399.
Nijhawan, R. (1994). Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature 370: 256–257.
Nijhawan, R. (2002). Neural delays, visual motion and the flash-lag effect. Trends Cogn Sci 6: 387–393.
Öğmen, H., Patel, S. S., Bedell, H. E., & Camuz, K. (2004). Differential latencies and the dynamics of the position-computation process for moving targets, assessed with the flash-lag effect. Vision Res 44: 2109–2128.
Pack, C. C., Berezovskii, V. K., & Born, R. T. (2001). Dynamic properties of neurons in cortical area MT in alert and anaesthetized macaque monkeys. Nature 414: 905–908.
Patel, S. S., Öğmen, H., Bedell, H. E., & Sampath, V. (2000). Flash-lag effect: differential latency, not postdiction. Science 290: 1051a.
Purushothaman, G., Patel, S. S., Bedell, H. E., & Öğmen, H. (1998). Moving ahead through differential latency. Nature 396: 424.
Regan, D., & Beverley, K. I. (1978). Looming detectors in human visual pathway. Vision Res 18: 415–421.
Roufs, J. A. (1974). Dynamic properties of vision – V. Vision Res 14: 853–869.
Tyler, C. W. (1985). Analysis of visual modulation sensitivity. II. Peripheral retina and the role of photoreceptor dimensions. J Opt Soc Am A 2: 393–398.
Wallach, H. (1995). Über Visuell Wahrgenommene Bewegungrichtung. Psychologische Forschung 20: 325–380.
Whitney, D., Murakami, I., & Cavanagh, P. (2000). Illusory spatial offset of a flash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and flashed stimuli. Vision Res 40: 137–149.
Williams, J. M., & Lit, A. (1983). A luminance-dependent visual latency for the Hess effect, the Pulfrich effect, and simple reaction time. Vision Res 23: 171–179.