Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  1. Home
  2. Browse subjects
  3. Classical Studies
  4. Classical studies (general)
  5. Content listing

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

60619 results in Classical studies (general)

Page 1399 of 3031

  • A Displacement in the Text of the Cratylus

  • Malcolm Schofield
  • Journal:
    The Classical Quarterly / Volume 22 / Issue 2 / December 1972
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    11 February 2009, pp. 246-253
    Print publication:
    December 1972

  • In this paper I argue that the stretch of dialogue from 385 b 2–d 1 (Burnet's lineation) in the Cratylus does not belong where it is found in the MSS. (and consequently in our published texts), but fits rather between 387 c 5 and 387 c 6. I suggest further that at any rate my negative thesis receives some measure of support from the fragments of Proclus' commentary on the dialogue.

  • CAR volume 22 issue 3 Front matter

  • Journal:
    The Classical Review / Volume 22 / Issue 3 / December 1972
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    27 February 2009, pp. f1-f5
    Print publication:
    December 1972
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

  • Terence Adelphoe 67 and an Alleged Meaning of Adiungere

  • John N. Grant
  • Journal:
    The Classical Quarterly / Volume 22 / Issue 2 / December 1972
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    11 February 2009, pp. 326-327
    Print publication:
    December 1972

  • In these lines Micio criticizes the way in which his brother Demea rears his son and implies comparison with his own method. Two types of imperium are contrasted, ‘imperium ’ and ‘illud quod amicitia adiungitur’. It is the latter phrase which will be discussed here. If this meant ‘si imperium tibi amicitia adiungas’, there would be no difficulty: cf. Cic. Mur. 41 ‘benevolentiam adiungit lenitate audiendi’; Sext. Rose. 116 ‘auxilium sibi se putat adiunxisse.’ The acquisition of imperium, however, is not relevant here; Micio is talking of the imperium that a man has qua father (the patria potestas) and the point at issue is the manner in which each man administers this imperium.

  • Habeo and Aveo: The Romance Future

  • A. S. Gratwick
  • Journal:
    The Classical Quarterly / Volume 22 / Issue 2 / December 1972
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    11 February 2009, pp. 388-398
    Print publication:
    December 1972

  • ‘The sudden emergence of all the post-classical functions of habeo+Infinitive in Tertullian is very remarkable’, as Mr. Coleman has said in his important paper (p. 226) on the origin and development of this structure, so prominent in the formation of the Future and Conditional paradigms of the main Romance languages. The functions which he has in mind are all Prospective: he distinguishes meanings tangential, as he puts it, to Possibility, Obligation/Necessity, Futurity, and, for the past tenses of habeo, Futurity-in-the-Past and Conditioned Unreality (p. 217). In this he essentially follows received opinion, though there have been those who would also distinguish a meaning tangential to Volition. Mr. Coleman gives these short shrift (p. 217 n. 3, p. 219 n. 2). Whether rightly, the reader may judge from what follows.

Page 1399 of 3031