Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  1. Home
  2. Browse subjects
  3. Classical Studies
  4. Classical studies (general)
  5. Content listing

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

60621 results in Classical studies (general)

Page 1521 of 3032

  • Sophocles, Oedipvs Tyrannvs 876–877

  • A. S. Henry
  • Journal:
    The Classical Quarterly / Volume 15 / Issue 2 / December 1965
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    11 February 2009, pp. 203-205
    Print publication:
    December 1965

  • I print the text as given in Pearson. I agree with Jebb and Sheppard that the strophe is sound, and therefore I would retain at 866–7. The problem now lies with the antistrophe, where with the manuscript reading at 877 we lack either or-to give proper responsion with 867.

    The manuscript text can be vindicated if we detect that simplest of scribal errors, haplography. Thus for 876–7 I would read

  • Horace, Odes 1. 4: A Sonic Circle

  • M. Owen Lee
  • Journal:
    The Classical Quarterly / Volume 15 / Issue 2 / December 1965
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    11 February 2009, pp. 286-288
    Print publication:
    December 1965

  • Walter Savage Landor's exasperated marginal comment on line 13 of Horace, C. 1. 4 (‘pallida mors has nothing to do with the above’) has sent modern commentators scurrying to the poem's defence. The skirmish has been won for Horace, but at the expense perhaps of magnifying the importance of line 13: A. Y. Campbell insisted that pallida mors, far from being irrelevant, was ‘the focus of the whole poem’

  • Correspondence

  • Paul Siwek, S.J.
  • Journal:
    The Classical Review / Volume 15 / Issue 3 / December 1965
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    27 February 2009, pp. 374-375
    Print publication:
    December 1965
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

  • CAR volume 15 issue 3 Front matter

  • Journal:
    The Classical Review / Volume 15 / Issue 3 / December 1965
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    27 February 2009, pp. f1-f5
    Print publication:
    December 1965
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Page 1521 of 3032