To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Some of the early superstitious beliefs concerning communication by means of magnets are mentioned.
Some of the suggested ‘static telegraphs’ are described, together with the reasons for their failure. An account is given of the rise of the use of the electric current in the telegraph by continental workers early in the nineteenth century, and the manner in which this method became known in England. The work of Cooke and Wheatstone is briefly outlined, and the assistance given to the English workers by Joseph Henry.
The development of the American telegraph in the hands of Morse is reviewed, and the similarity of the difficulties experienced by Morse and by Cooke. The origin of the relay is examined.
The commercial success of the telegraph was largely due to the several needs it fulfilled, and the uses of the telegraph are enumerated.
Submarine telegraphs and especially the Atlantic telegraph are described together with the mechanical and electrical difficulties associated with long distance telegraphy through cables. In this connection the work of William Thomson is very briefly reviewed.
The growth of the telephone out of the telegraph at the hands of Bell in America is described, and is shown to be achieved as a result of the synthesis of Bell's knowledge of physiology and of electricity. The paper concludes with a statement of the commercial success of Bell's telephone.
Simon Bredon was one of a remarkable group of scientists who brought fame to Oxford by their achievements in the sphere of natural science, particularly in astronomy. Though his interests lay chiefly in the field of medicine, as indicated by the large collection of books on this subject which he bequeathed to his friends, he was also a mathematician and astronomer.
The manuscripts of his works, still preserved at Oxford, Cambridge and the British Museum, which include an arithmetic, a commentary on the Almagest, a theory of the planets and astronomical calculations, have never been properly examined and some kind of preliminary investigation seems necessary before his true position among the Merton school of scientists can be assessed.
‘Recent studies of Babylonian sources have shown that we must revise former estimates of the extent to which the Greeks were indebted for the details of their astronomy to the Babylonians; the debt proves to have been much greater than had been imagined, and further researches may prove it to have been greater still.’ So wrote Sir Thomas Heath in 1932; in the previous year, Professor Filon had written, ‘It is gradually beginning to be realized that many of the achievements of Greek culture in the fields of astronomy and mathematics did not spring, fully armed, from the Hellenic brain, but had their more remote origins in the civilizations of the ancient East.’
There is available now sufficient evidence to show that a great deal of the astronomical knowledge which has come down to us from the Hellenistic period (c. 500 b.c. to a.d. 150) was not initially discovered during that period; and such new empiric discoveries as were made in that time were not all due to Greeks, for important contributions were still being made by Babylonians during the Seleucid Era.
To a large extent it seems that the Greeks kept very closely, even in astronomy, to the mode of research advocated by Plato, who said in The Republic, ‘Which things (i.e. “the variegated bodies in the heavens”) truly are to be comprehended by reason and intellect, but not by sight’. The Greeks founded a ‘school’ of theoretical astronomy and, with their highly developed mathematics, were able to go far with it; but their source-material was in very many cases not Greek.
The author of Epinomis states, ‘We may assume that whatever the Greeks take from the barbarians, they bring it to a finer perfection’. Adrastus (second century a.d.) wrote that the methods used by the Chaldeans and Egyptians in astronomy were imperfect because these people lacked physiologia; no doubt this was true, but it was people of these races who had done, and continued to do, most of the equivalent of modern observatory routine work.
In this chapter we shall discuss some of the secondary effects accompanying the emission of αparticles, including the emission of delta rays, the recoil accompanjdng the ejection of an α particle, the heating effect produced by the absorption of α particles, and the production of helium due to the accumulated α particles.
§ 29. Emission of delta rays. When a stream of α particles passes through a thin sheet of matter in a vacuum, a number of electrons are observed to be emitted from both sides of the plate. The energy of the great majority of these electrons is only a few volts, but the total number from each surface of the plate is of the order of 10 times the number of incident α particles. J. J. Thomson, who first studied this emission of electrons from a polonium plate, gave them the name of 8 (delta) rays. A large amount of work has been done to determine the factors involved in the liberation of these electrons, including the effect of velocity of the α particle, the nature of the bombarded material, the state of its surface, and the distribution with velocity of the escaping electrons. Before discussing these data, it is desirable to consider the origin of these electrons. It is clear that the escape of electrons, whether from a radioactive surface or a bombarded plate, is in a sense a secondary effect connected with the absorption of energy of the α rays in their passage through matter.
In fact, on modern views, the emission of δ rays is a necessary and inevitable consequence of the passage of α rays through matter.
§ 56. In the previous chapter those experiments on the scattering of α particles in passing through matter were described which confirm the essential assumption of the present theory of atomic structure, that the atoms of matter contain a positively charged nucleus having practically the whole mass of the atom associated with it. The experiments showed that the magnitude of the positive charge of the nucleus was fixed by the atomic number of the atom, or its position in the ascending series of the chemical elements. In the collisions examined in these experiments, in which no elements of smaller atomic number than copper were investigated, the atomic nucleus and the α particle behaved as point charges repelling each other with a force varying inversely as the square of the distance between them.
It is to be anticipated that divergences from the Coulomb law of force would appear when the collisions between the atomic nucleus and the α particle are sufficiently close, for the nuclei are generally supposed to have a complex structure and to be built up in some way from two common units, the electron and the hydrogen nucleus or proton. Since the closest distance of approach to a nucleus of an α particle of given energy is proportional to the charge of the nucleus, it is in the collisions of fast α particles with the nuclei of the lighter elements that deviations from the normal law of force might be expected to be most readily discovered.
§ 119. In previous chapters we have discussed some of the properties of radioactive nuclei and the types of radiation which accompany their transformations. The instability of these nuclei has given us important information on their structure, but unfortunately such information is not available in the case of the ordinary non-radioactive elements. Apart from their instability, there is no reason to believe that the nuclei of the radioactive elements differ in any marked way in their general type of structure from ordinary elements of high atomic weight. It is thus important to examine the properties of atomic nuclei in general to see whether we can obtain evidence to throw light on their structure and their connection with one another. In particular, it is of great interest to see whether any definite evidence can be obtained of the reasons why the property of radioactivity only manifests itself in any marked degree in the two elements of highest atomic weight, thorium and uranium, and their products of transformation.
In chapter vn an account has been given of the genesis of the nuclear theory of the atom and the evidence in its support. On this theory, the ordinary physical and chemical properties of the atom, excluding its mass, depend on the magnitude of the nuclear charge, for on this depends the number and distribution of the outer electrons.
§ 102. The discovery of the penetrating radiations known as the γ rays was made by observations of the ionisation in an electroscope, and an idea of the penetrating power was obtained by placing a screen of absorbing material between the source and the electroscope. In this way it was found that these radiations were far more penetrating than the β rays, a centimetre of lead being required in some cases to reduce the ionising effect to one-half. It was observed that the γ rays in passing through matter gave rise to swift β rays, and the ionisation in the electroscope was ascribed to β rays liberated from the walls and the gas.
The chief source of γ radiation in the early experiments was radium (B + C), and a number of experiments were made to test the law of absorption by the simple method outlined above. While it was found that with considerable thicknesses the absorption curve approximated closely to a simple exponential law, yet with small thicknesses a greater absorbability was noticed. This led naturally to the deduction that a large part of the radiation was homogeneous in character and that superimposed on this were softer radiations which were more rapidly absorbed.
Systematic observations were made by Soddy and Russell of the absorption of different metals which showed that for the lighter elements the absorption depended only on the mass per square centimetre of the absorber and did not vary with the atomic weight. For the heavier elements such as lead the absorption was twice as great as would have been expected from the results with the light elements.
§124. The apparent radioactivity of ordinary matter. It was pointed out by Schuster in 1903 that every physical property discovered for one element had later been found to be shared by all the other elements in varying degrees. On such general grounds it might perhaps be expected that the instability shown by the elements uranium, thorium, actinium, and their products should be a property common to all matter. It is indeed true that every substance which has been examined shows a feeble radioactivity which can be detected by the ionisation method, but it seems probable that in all cases, with the two exceptions of potassium and rubidium, this activity is to be ascribed to the presence of traces of bodies belonging to the well-known radioactive families rather than to an instability of the element itself.
The early investigations of C. T. R. Wilson on the rate of loss of charge of an insulated conductor in a closed vessel indicated that the ionisation was produced by a radiation proceeding from the walls of the vessel. This view was confirmed by the experiments of Struttf, who found that the rate of discharge of an electroscope depended on the material of which it was composed. In some cases markedly different rates of discharge were found for different specimens of the same metal, indicating that in these cases at least a large part of the effect was due to radioactive impurities. On the other hand, Campbell concluded from an extensive series of measurements that all metals showed a specific radioactivity and emitted characteristic radiations of the α ray type.
§ 88. The greater portion of the β ray emission of a radioactive body is formed by the disintegration electrons. Useful qualitative information can be obtained by investigation of the total emission by methods such as measuring the absorption in aluminium, but while these suffice to show the great difference in penetrating power of the β radiation from different bodies they are not suitable for a detailed analysis.
The chief difficulty in investigating the disintegration electrons lies in distinguishing them from those forming the β ray spectra and any other electrons ejected from the outside electronic structure of the atom by subsidiary processes.
The two lines of research which have yielded the most conclusive evidence have been the determination of the total number of electrons emitted by a known quantity of radioactive material, and further the investigation of the distribution of energy among the emitted electrons. The importance of the first type of experiment lies in the fact that since we know there must be one electron emitted from the nucleus of each disintegrating atom, any excess of electrons above this number must be due to secondary processes such as conversion of the γ rays, collisions and so on. We obtain in this way direct and valuable evidence on the extent to which such processes occur.
The distribution of energy among the disintegration electrons is particularly interesting, since it has brought to light a behaviour quite unlike that of the α ray bodies. Instead of a β ray body emitting electrons all of one speed from the nucleus, they appear to be distributed continuously over a wide range of velocity.
§ 42. The scattering of α particles and the nuclear theory of the atom. When α particles pass through matter, some of them are deviated from their original direction of motion and undergo the process known as scattering. The presence of this scattering was first shown by Rutherford by a photographic method. He found that the image of a narrow slit produced by a beam of α particles had sharply defined edges when the experiment was performed in an evacuated vessel. If air was admitted into the apparatus, or if the slit was covered with a thin sheet of matter, the photographic trace of the pencil of α rays was broadened and the intensity of the photographic effect faded off slowly on either side of the centre.
A detailed examination of the amount and character of the scattering of the α particles in passing through matter was first made by Geiger, using the scintillation method of detecting the particles. These experiments will be described later. It will be sufficient to say here that they showed that the scattering suffered by α particles in penetrating the atoms of matter is relatively very small. The average angle of scattering even by comparatively thick sheets of matter was only a few degrees. About the same time Geiger and Marsden made the very striking observation that some of the α particles in a beam incident on a sheet of matter have their directions changed to such an extent that they emerge again on the side of incidence, that is, they are deflected through angles greater than 90°.
§ 75. The investigation of radioactivity during the last twenty-five years has led to the accumulation of a wealth of data concerning the emission of energy in the form of α, β, and γ rays from the radioactive nuclei and in nearly all cases the rate of disintegration of the element has been determined. This information must have an intimate bearing on the structure of the radioactive nuclei and it provides a variety of quantitative tests which can be applied to any hypothesis of this structure. It is, however, only within very recent times that a picture, even of the most general type, has been given which will explain satisfactorily the spontaneous disintegration of a nucleus with the emission of an α particle, and no application of this has yet been made to the emission of the β, and γ rays.
The difficulty in the way of an adequate theory of the structure of the radioactive nuclei has been twofold. In the first place, early in the study of radioactivity it became clear that the time of disintegration of an atom was independent of its previous history and depended only on chance. Since a nuclear particle, say an α particle, must be held in the nucleus by an attractive field, it seemed necessary, in order to explain its ejection, to invent some mechanism which would provide a spontaneous revulsion to a repulsive field.