To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
From 8 February until at least 19 April 1686, the Dublin Philosophical Society was occupied with a prodigiously talented young girl whose name was never recorded. She was less than eleven years of age, but still much older than the society itself, which had begun meeting less than three years previously. Although one of many wonders engaging the curiosity of the nascent society, this girl served a surprising range of purposes, so that accompanying her anonymity was a curious malleability. Pressed into several different roles and identities, her exploitation affords a glimpse into the various qualities that could make a spectacle useful in a philosophical climate that was unique among the British Isles. The use of this girl therefore not only sheds light on the needs of a less familiar learned society, but also shows how these could differ from those of its better-understood counterparts. For a period of time, it was the versatility not of the gentlemen in Dublin, but of the prodigy they used, that best served this group on the periphery.
Collecting seeds and specimens was an integral aspect of botany and natural history in the eighteenth century. Historians have until recently paid less attention to the importance of collecting, trading and compiling knowledge of their cultivation, but knowing how to grow and maintain plants free from disease was crucial to agricultural and botanical projects. This is particularly true in the case of food security. At the close of the eighteenth century, European diets (particularly among the poor) began shifting from wheat- to potato-dependence. In Britain and Ireland during these decades, extensive crop damage was caused by diseases like ‘curl’ and ‘dry rot’ – leading many agriculturists and journal editors to begin collecting data on potato cultivation in order to answer practical questions about the causes of disease and methods that might mitigate or even eliminate their appearance. Citizens not only produced the bulk of these data, but also used agricultural print culture and participation in surveys to shape and direct the interpretation of these data. This article explores this forgotten scientific ambition to harness agricultural citizen science in order to bring stability and renewed vitality to the potato plant and its cultivation. I argue that while many agriculturists did recognize that reliance upon the potato brought with it unique threats to the food supplies of Britain and Ireland, their views on this threat were wholly determined by the belief that the diseases attacking potato plants in Europe had largely been produced or encouraged by erroneous cultivation methods.
Two aerodynamic concepts theorized in the early twentieth century – laminar-flow control and flying wings – offer the potential for more efficient aircraft. However, despite compelling advantages on paper and optimistic predictions, the fuel-saving benefits of these technologies have not yet been fully realized. This paper documents British work on these concepts, with a particular focus on laminar-flow control. Faced with an increasingly difficult funding context and a lack of a clear military rationale, these potentially significant advances in aircraft efficiency were stymied by a catch-22: the government was only prepared to provide financial support for the development of an operational prototype if operational performance had already been demonstrated. This case also highlights the challenges faced in the commercial uptake of radical aviation technologies, even when they appear to offer greater efficiency and environmental benefits.
According to Benedict Anderson, the historian of nationalism, “few countries give the observer a deeper feeling of historical vertigo than the Philippines.” The history of science in the Philippines produces a similar giddy sensation – indeed, one might easily substitute apparent conundrums of scientific development for Anderson’s strange political and social juxtapositions. For example, after three hundred years of Spanish clerical colonialism, fewer than 10 percent of the local inhabitants were literate in Spanish, yet the Catholic religious orders had supported pioneering natural history and astronomical research, and from the seventeenth century had even sponsored universities in the archipelago.
Greece became an independent state in 1830 and reached its present frontiers after the end of World War II, with the acquisition of the Dodecanese islands from Italy. Before the foundation of the Greek state, Greek-speaking communities expanded throughout a large part of the Ottoman Empire and the Venetian possessions, a geographic area consisting of present-day Greece, the Balkans, Asia Minor, and the Middle East. In this chapter we will deal with these communities before 1830 and with the Greek state afterward.
The main objective of this volume of the Cambridge History of Science is to explore modern science using different frames of reference: national, transnational, international, and global. The chapters in the volume primarily analyze the history of modern science during the late-eighteenth, nineteenth, twentieth, and early twenty-first centuries. However, authors were encouraged to explore earlier periods where appropriate, especially when necessary as background. Chapters in Part II of the volume focus on particular national and regional contexts covering all parts of the world.
The Middle East is diverse in terms of language, ethnicity, religion, and degrees of modernization. This chapter deals with a number of predominantly Arab countries, mostly Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, and Egypt, where science was present throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, and only episodically with other Arab countries in the region, relative newcomers to science. It also covers three largely non-Arab countries: Turkey, Iran, and Israel, the latter being a special case in many respects. By 2015 the territories under Israeli control actually had a majority of Arabs even though the official ideology of the state, Zionism, stipulated that Israel is a “Jewish state.”
The Maghreb is located at the confluence of Mediterranean civilizations. This circumstance has conferred on the region a scientific and cultural heritage unique in Africa. Maghreb is a foreign word incorporated by the Arabic language meaning island of the west, or the land between the sea and the sands of the Sahara. The Maghreb covers present-day Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, and Libya. This chapter focuses principally on Morocco, Algeria, and Tunisia from the era of European colonization through political independence.
The national sentiment that had already resonated in the background of the International Geomagnetic Project would, in the following decades, grow into an influential co-determinant of international cooperation: its extension, depth, and stability. During the war of 1870–1 renowned scientists would confront each other in acrimonious debates revealing dregs of resentments and distrust that would never be absorbed completely, the oncoming upswing and diversification of transnational relations notwithstanding. Increasingly aware of their contribution to their fatherlands’ industrial strength and intellectual prestige, scientists were going to reflect more and more on their role in society and their nation’s status in the world.