To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
When rapidly successive objects or object replicas are presented as sensory streams, a stimulus within a stream is perceptually facilitated relative to an otherwise identical stimulus not within the stream. Experiments on perceptual latency priming and flash-lag have convincingly shown this. Unfortunately, no consensus exists on what is (are) the mechanism(s) responsible for in-stream facilitation. Here, I discuss several alternative explanations: perceptual extrapolation of change in the specific properties of continuous stimulation, time-saving for target processing due to the early microgenetic/formation stages for target being completed on pretarget in-stream items, control of focused selective attention by the onsets of stimulus input, and preparation of the nonspecific perceptual retouch by the preceding nontarget input in stream for the succeeding target input in stream. Revisions are outlined to overcome the explanatory difficulties that the retouch theory has encountered in the face of new phenomena of perceptual dissociation.
Introduction
Objects that do not occur in isolation are processed differently compared to when they appear as separate entities. If we compare the visual latency of an object presented alone with the latency of its replica that is presented after another object (which is presented nearby in space and time), we see that the object that comes after having been primed by other input achieves awareness faster (Neumann 1982; Bachmann 1989; Scharlau & Neumann 2003a & b; Scharlau 2004). In a typical experiment, a visual prime stimulus is presented, followed by another stimulus that acts as a backward mask to the prime.
There is a delay before sensory information arising from a given event reaches the central nervous system. This delay may be different for information carried by different senses. It will also vary depending on how far the event is from the observer and stimulus properties such as intensity. However, it seems that at least some of these processing time differences can be compensated for by a mechanism that resynchronizes asynchronous signals and enables us to perceive simultaneity correctly. This chapter explores how effectively simultaneity constancy can be achieved, both intramodally within the visual and tactile systems and cross-modally between combinations of auditory, visual, and tactile stimuli. We propose and provide support for a three-stage model of simultaneity constancy in which (1) signals within temporal and spatial windows are identified as corresponding to a single event, (2) a crude resynchronization is applied based on simple rules corresponding to the average processing speed differences between the individual sensory systems, and (3) fine-tuning adjustments are applied based on previous experience with particular combinations of stimuli.
Introduction
Although time is essential for the perception of the outside world, there is no energy that carries duration information, and consequently there can be no sensory system for time. Time needs to be constructed by the brain, and because this process itself takes time, it follows that the perception of when an event occurs must necessarily lag behind the occurrence of the event itself.
Information about eye position comes from efference copy, a record of the innervation to the extraocular muscles that move the eye and proprioceptive signals from sensors in the extraocular muscles. Together they define extraretinal signals and indicate the position of the eye. By pressing on the eyelid of a viewing eye, the extraocular muscles can be activated to maintain a steady gaze position without rotation of the eye. This procedure decouples efference copy from gaze position, making it possible to measure the gain of the efference copy signal. The gain is 0.61; the gain of oculomotor proprioception, measured by a similar eye press technique, is 0.26. The two signals together sum to only 0.87, leading to the conclusion that humans underestimate the deviations of their own eyes and that extraretinal signals cannot be the mechanisms underlying space constancy (the perception that the world remains stable despite eye movements). The underregistration of eye deviation accounts quantitatively for a previously unexplained illusion of visual direction. Extraretinal signals are used in static conditions, especially for controlling motor behavior. The role of extraretinal signals during a saccade, if any, is not to compensate the previous retinal position but to destroy it. Then perception can begin with a clean slate during the next fixation interval.
To what extent are human beings capable of changing their physical characteristics and behavioural patterns over the course of their lives? This question has engaged scientists for decades: the fundamental issue is plasticity. In this wide-ranging book, Richard Lerner explores the relevant theory and empirical evidence in a variety of disciplines: molecular genetics, neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, evolutionary biology, anthropology, comparative and developmental psychology, and sociology. The processes studied by each of these disciplines show evidence of plasticity. Conclusions about plasticity have important implications for interventions aimed at enhancing human life, as well as for future research agendas. On the Nature of Human Plasticity will be a valuable resource for all those scientists concerned with human development at biological and social levels and for their students.
We live in a world in which inconsistency is the rule rather than the exception and this is particularly true for rewards and frustrations. In some cases, rewards and frustrative non-rewards appear randomly for what seems to be the same behaviour; in others a sequence of rewards is suddenly followed by non-rewards, or large rewards by small rewards. The important common factor in these and other cases is frustration - how we learn about it and how we respond to it. This book provides a basis in learning theory and particularly in frustration theory, for a comprehension not only of the mechanisms controlling these dispositions, but also of their order of appearance in early development and, to an approximation at least, their neural underpinnings.
Research during the past two decades has produced major advances in understanding sleep within particular species. Simultaneously, molecular advances have made it possible to generate phylogenetic trees, while new analytical methods provide the tools to examine macroevolutionary change on these trees. These methods have recently been applied to questions concerning the evolution of distinctive sleep state characteristics and functions. This book synthesizes recent advances in our understanding of the evolutionary origins of sleep and its adaptive function, and it lays the groundwork for future evolutionary research by assessing sleep patterns in the major animal lineages.
There is growing clinical evidence that many psychiatric illnesses have overlapping genetic mechanisms. Understanding these mechanisms is important to the improvement of psychiatric treatment and preventions of the disorders, and animal genetic models continue to be a critical avenue of research towards these ends. As serotonin is a key neurotransmitter with important roles in normal behavioral processes and has been implicated in the pathogenesis of psychopathological conditions such as depression, anxiety, and addiction, it is a prime target for investigation in behavioral neurogenetics. The serotonin transporter (SERT) is a key brain protein that regulates the amount of serotonin that can activate the receptor. It is becoming evident that SERT interacts with brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), an important modulator of dopaminergic, cholinergic, and serotonergic neurons, which has been linked to memory function, activity, eating behavior, depression, and anxiety. The pivotal roles played by these two brain molecules have resulted in the development of numerous mutant animal models that have reduced function of SERT, BDNF, or both. Interestingly, SERT × BDNF mutant mice show numerous different behavioral phenotypes that are distinct from either SERT mutants or BDNF mutants alone, displaying phenotypes that are highly relevant to human clinical scenarios and bringing them added validity. This chapter will provide data from numerous experiments utilizing these rodent models and will explain their relevance and validity for research into the genetics of neuropsychiatric disorders.
Many antidepressants are believed to relieve depressed mood and excessive anxiety by inhibiting the reuptake of serotonin so as to cause increases in extracellular serotonin. This homeostatic alteration is thought to underlie further adaptive processes – which have not been fully clarified – that together constitute the cellular mechanisms of current antidepressant therapy. Here, we review the literature on presynaptic adaptive responses to chronic antidepressant treatment, focusing on alterations in serotonin transporter (SERT) expression, extracellular and intracellular serotonin levels, and serotonergic innervation. We contrast this with studies on constitutive loss of SERT gene expression. A partial genetic reduction in SERT expression results in modest increases in extracellular serotonin, while the total absence of SERT is associated with substantial increases in extracellular serotonin, decreases in intracellular serotonin, and a reduction in serotonin immunopositive cell bodies and axons in the dorsal raphe and hippocampus, respectively. Adaptive changes in SERT protein levels and extracellular and intracellular serotonin concentrations following many different regimens of chronic antidepressant administration were found to be more variable, often falling in between those resulting from partial and complete genetic ablation of SERT. This might reflect incomplete pharmacologic inhibition of SERT and the wide variety of drug administration paradigms utilized. The microdialysis literature, in particular, suggests that it is difficult to conclude that chronic antidepressant treatment reliably causes elevated extracellular serotonin.
The serotonin system plays a key modulatory role in central nervous system processes that appear to be dysregulated in psychiatric disorders. Specifically, the serotonin transporter (SERT) is thought to be critical to many aspects of emotional dysregulation and has been a successful target for medications that treat several psychiatric disorders. Here, we narrowly focused on two psychiatric conditions; anxiety and depression, for which mice with SERT genetic manipulations have provided insight. Specifically, we suggest that dissecting syndromes according to a trait and state perspective may help us understand the complex and at times contradictory rodent results. The most compelling reason for this approach is provided by human studies, in which increased trait-neuroticism and stress-mediated vulnerability to develop depression were reported for subjects carrying the 5-HTTLPR s/s allele of the SERT gene, and thus placing the contribution of SERT to mood disorders in a gene × environment and trait/state context. Accordingly, current behavioral results in SERT knock-out (KO) mice are consistent with both increased trait and state anxiety-like behaviors, while evidence in support of a trait-based model of depression in SERT KO mice are inconsistent and mostly based on tests with limited relevance to human depression. However, comorbid symptoms associated with a wider definition of depression, such as altered gastrointestinal functions, lower pain threshold, and greater sensitivity to stress, have been reported in SERT KO mice, suggesting the presence of a pro-depressive state resulting from low SERT.
Serotonin transporter (SERT, 5-HTT) plays an important role in the regulation of emotional states. It is a target for the most widely used class of antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and is also related to a genetic factor underlying the pathogenesis of affective disorders. Humans with lower SERT expression genotypes show a higher neuroticism score and are more sensitive to stress, suggesting that low SERT expression during development may be a trigger for affective disorders. On the other hand, repeated administration of SSRIs reduces the stress response and treats affective disorders. These observations suggest that disruption of SERT function early in life and in adulthood produces different phenotypes. Thus, understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying these phenotypes will help us to understand the pathogenesis of affective disorders and develop better therapeutic approaches for their treatment. Animal models with altered SERT function provide useful tools for the studies concerning this purpose. This chapter is intended to overview current available data concerning the cellular and molecular alterations in the models in which SERT functions are disrupted during different developmental stages. We will focus on a comparison between constitutive SERT knock-out mice and repeated administration of SSRIs in adulthood. Furthermore, studies concerning the prenatal administration of SSRIs and genomic manipulation of SERT expression in adulthood are also discussed.
INTRODUCTION
The serotonin (5-HT) transporter (SERT, 5-HTT) functions as a 5-HT reuptake site to take extracellular 5-HT back into the nerve terminals and, therefore, terminates the action of 5-HT. Thus, the function of SERT is critical for controlling 5-HT activity, which plays an important role in emotional regulation.
From invertebrates to humans, serotonin (5-HT) exerts structural effects, especially during development. The 5-HT transporter (SERT) directly regulates these effects by maintaining extracellular 5-HT concentrations within a physiological range and possibly by modulating the intracellular redox state of the cell. This chapter addresses 5-HT trophic effects on developing neural and non-neural mammalian cells, and summarizes SERT roles in 5HT-mediated structural effects from basic neurodevelopment to human teratology.
INTRODUCTION
The neurotransmitter serotonin (5-HT) is known to influence behavioral, autonomic, and cognitive functions, including learning and memory, sleep, temperature regulation, appetite, and mood. 5HT also plays a major role in human disorders such as anxiety, fear, depression, obsessive compulsive behavior, autism, and aggression. In addition to triggering a wide variety of electrophysiological effects, 5-HT also exerts important developmental roles in neural and non-neural tissues from early embryogenesis. In many regions of the central nervous system (CNS), this dual “functional” and “structural” involvement is interestingly paralleled at the histological and molecular levels by classical synaptic neurotransmission co-existing with paracrine mechanisms typical of “volume” or “mass” transmission. Indeed, many serotoninergic presynaptic terminals are not in direct proximity to postsynaptic elements. Many 5-HT receptors display CNS distributions necessarily implying the existence of abundant extrasynaptic binding sites, and the 5-HT transporter (SERT) is distributed along 5-HT axonal membranes mostly at extrasynaptic, non-junctional sites.
Depression is an etiologically and clinically heterogeneous syndrome frequently co-occurring in a wide spectrum of psychiatric disorders. Characterized by a wide range of symptoms that reflect alterations in cognitive, emotional, and psychomotor processes, this syndrome is moderately to highly heritable, and caused by interaction of genes and adverse life events. Differentiation of risk-related psychobiological and neuropsychological markers is essential for the dissection of the complex genetic susceptibility to depression and comorbid disorders. A brain serotonin (5-HT) system dysfunction is thought to be involved in the pathogenesis of depression by modulating cognitive dysfunction, stress response, neuroadaptive processes, and resulting pervasive emotional disturbance. A regulatory variation in the gene encoding the 5-HT transporter (5-HTT), the master controller in the fine-tuning of 5-HT signaling, is not only associated with anxiety-related traits, but also modifies the risk of developing disorders of emotion regulation. Yet the neural and molecular mechanisms underlying gene × environment interaction are poorly understood. This paper investigates innate variability of brain 5-HTT function from an interdisciplinary perspective blending behavioral genetics and cognitive neuroscience. Following an appraisal of imaging neural correlates of genomic variation and epigenetic mechanisms as a strategy for psychiatric disorder risk assessment, future challenges for biosocial sciences in the perspective of the complex genetic architecture of emotional behavior and social interaction in non-human primates and humans are defined.
By selective breeding for the extreme values of platelet serotonin level (PSL), two sublines of rats with constitutional hyperserotonemia/hyposerotonemia were developed. The velocity of platelet serotonin uptake (PSU), the main determinant of PSL, was used as a further, more specific selection criterion. Directed breeding for its extremes resulted in two sublines of rats with constitutional upregulation/downregulation of platelet 5HT transporter activity, and showed consequent alterations of entire 5HT homeostasis. These sublines, termed Wistar–Zagreb 5HT (WZ-5HT) rats, constitute a genetic rodent model described in this chapter. Besides changes in peripheral 5HT homeostasis, high-5HT and low-5HT sublines of WZ-5HT rats also demonstrate changes in central serotonergic mechanisms. Under physiological conditions, neurochemical differences in the 5HT system between sublines were almost undetectable, but they became evident upon specific pharmacologic challenge as shown by brain microdialysis study. Differential behavioral phenotypes of 5HT sublines in response to various environmental challenges provide further evidence for differences in their brain functioning. Thus, high-5HT rats exhibit enhanced anxiety-like behaviors while depressive-like behavior and higher alcohol intake co-occur in low-5HT rats. Observed functional and behavioral differences between sublines of WZ-5HT rats strongly indicate that brain serotonergic activity was increased in rats from the high-5HT subline as compared to low-5HT rats. The WZ-5HT rat model may represent an integrative model for serotonin and serotonin transporter research, incorporating changes at the genomic/genetic and phenotypic (neurodevelopmental, structural, biochemical, behavioral, etc.) levels, and encompassing both central and peripheral 5HT functioning.
Numerous studies provide persuasive evidence that a polymorphism in the serotonin promoter, 5-HTTLPR, interacts with environmental risk factors to produce heightened rates of depression, anxiety, antisocial and borderline personality disorders, and substance abuse in adults and adolescents. Investigations with the rhesus monkey have demonstrated similar gene–environment (G×E) interactions on both behavioral and biological outcomes. In this chapter, we review the history of primate models in serotonin transporter (5-HTT) research. Work with non-human primates has noted associations between behavioral differences and variation in serotonin metabolism (5-hydroxy-indole acetic acid, 5-HIAA). Investigations in several non-human primate species have also indicated that manipulation of early experience results in changes in behavior along with alterations in serotonergic functioning. These lines of research have contributed to the discovery of short (s) and long (l) forms within the serotonin promoter (rh5-HTTLPR) in the rhesus monkey. Researchers have since documented associations between the l/s or s/s genotypes and reduced cognitive flexibility, greater impulsivity, and anxious-like behavior, as well as higher rates of alcohol consumption. Furthermore, multiple G×E interactions have been documented for levels of 5-HIAA, hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenocortical (HPA) axis activity, alcohol consumption, rates of behavioral pathology, social play, aggression, and infant temperament. In most cases, these interactions were due to worse outcomes in l/s subjects that had been subjected to early maternal deprivation. This program of research demonstrates that l/s monkeys are more vulnerable to the effects of early-life stress, whereas l/l monkeys are more resilient.
This chapter dicusses the most recent data on the serotonin transporter knock-out rat, a unique rat model that has been generated by target-selected N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) driven mutagenesis. The knock-out rat is the result of a premature stopcodon in the serotonin transporter gene, and the absence of the serotonin transporter has been confirmed at mRNA, protein, and functional levels. The serotonin transporter (SERT) plays a crucial role in serotonin reuptake and its absence has a huge effect on serotonin neurotransmission – exemplified by increased extracellular serotonin levels, reduced serotonin tissue/platelet/blood levels, and reduced evoked serotonin release – yet the animals appear normal and do not differ from wildtype littermates in respect to breeding and health. Behavioral phenotypes are only apparent when the animals are exposed to certain stimuli. For instance, the serotonin transporter knock-out rat displays increased stress sensitivity in a variety of anxiety- and depression-like tests, such as the elevated plus maze test and the forced swim test. Also remarkable, while general activity is not changed, the knock-out rats show a “neurotic-like” exploratory pattern. In line with the serotonin hypothesis of impulsivity, which argues that there is an inverse relationship between the two, serotonin transporter knock-out rats show reduced motor impulsivity in the five-choice serial reaction time task, and a reduction in social interaction during play and aggressive encounters. Interestingly, abdominal fat seems to be increased in the knock-out rat, despite normal body weight. Pharmacological compounds also elicit genotype-dependent responses in the knock-out rats.