To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The following article by L. L. Wyman is reprinted from Fifty Years of Progress in Metallurgical Techniques, ASTM STP 430, 1968, contains information on the early role of ASTM Committee E-4 in the publication of the early Powder Diffraction File data cards and in the formation of the Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards. In fact, Roy Wyman was probably the single most instrumental individual in obtaining the sponsorship by ASTM for the continued publication of the PDF up to 1969 when JCPDS became an independent corporation. Roy was on the Board of Directors of JCPDS from the time of its incorporation until his death in 1976. He was Treasurer of JCPDS from 1971 to 1974 and Chairman from 1974 to 1975. Committee E-4 is still active and is the Committee within ASTM which maintains Cooperative Society status with the JCPDS-ICDD.
The titled compound, Hg2[Fe(CN)5NO], was synthesized and studied by X-ray powder diffraction, infrared spectroscopy, Mössbauer spectroscopy, and atomic force microscopy. The results arising from this study indicate that this compound is anhydrous and crystallizes in the P222 orthorhombic symmetry. The unit cell parameters were quantified as a=16.5905(9) Å, b=12.3145(8) Å, and c=8.7576(5) Å. The measured and calculated density values are Dm=1.149 g/cm3 and Dc=1.145 g/cm3, respectively, with Z=2.
The crystal structure of the two isostructural rare earth tungstates Ln6WO12 (Ln=Y, Ho) has been refined by the Rietveld method from X-ray powder diffraction data. They crystallize with a three-dimensional rhombohedral structure (S.G. R3¯ and Z=3 for the R-centered setting) closely related to that of the binary oxides Ln7O12 and deriving from the ideal fluorite structure. Final refinements, with isotropic thermal motion for each atom, resulted in profile and structure factors Rwp=0.166, RF=0.037 with Ln=Y and Rwp=0.121, RF=0.040 with Ln=Ho. The rare earth element is sevenfold coordinated with Ln–O bond lengths ranging from 2.19 to 2.70 Å for Y6WO12 and from 2.18 to 2.68 Å for Ho6WO12; the coordination polyhedron may be described as a monocapped trigonal prism. The tungsten atom is located at the center of a WO6 octahedron with a unique W–O distance of 1.98 and 1.92 Å for Y6WO12 and Ho6WO12, respectively.
The crystal structure of the rare earth (RE) compound CeFeGe3 has been studied by X-ray powder diffraction and refined by the Rietveld profile fitting method. The compound has the tetragonal BaNiSn3-type structure, space group I4mm (No. 107) a=4.3294(1) Å, c=9.9444(3) Å, V=186.39 Å3, Z=2, and Dx=7.372 g·cm−3. The figure of merit FN for the powder data is F30=184.3(0.0037,44). The structure refinement was performed with 106 reflections and led to Rp=13.2% and Rwp=18.2%. Powder data are given.
By means of X-ray single crystal Weissenberg photographs, the crystal of the low-temperature solid form of 2-methyl-2-nitro-propanol, (CH3)2C(NO2)(CH2OH), has been determined and found to be of the monoclinic type, space group P21/c. The cell constants were refined from X-ray powder diffraction data: a=6.195(3) Å, b=19.116(7) Å, c=16.598(7) Å, and β = 90.12(2)° with Z = 12. The indexed pattern at 293 K is given.
Fifteen reference patterns of oxides, nitrides, borides, carbides, silicides, and sulfides are included in this report. The general methods of producing these X-ray powder diffraction reference patterns are described in this Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1, pg. 40(1986).
Samples were mixed with one or two internal standards: silicon (SRM640a), silver, tungsten, or fluorophlogopite (SRM675). Expected 2θ values for these internal standards are specified in the methods described (ibid.). Data were measured with a computer controlled diffractometer. The POWDER-PATTERN system of computer programs was used to locate peak positions, to calibrate the patterns, and to perform indexing and least-squares cell refinement. A check on the overall internal consistency of the data was also provided by a computer program.
Intensities were measured as peak heights above background and were read manually from strip charts. To minimize preferred orientation effects, the powders were passed through a 400 mesh sieve and were mixed with an amorphous diluent material, glass powder. Samples were prepared by side-drifting the mixture into the holder or by dusting a thin layer on a glass slide coated with a thin smear of silicone grease.
The support and interest of the ICDD in this project is gratefully acknowledged. The expert guidance of R. Roth of the Ceramics Division on material synthesis and the careful review of the manuscript by S. Block of the Ceramics Division and A. D. Mighell of the Reactor Division are fully appreciated. Acknowledgement is also extended to D. Minor for performing sample analysis by using SEM. In the production of these standard powder patterns, the ability to search NBS CRYSTAL DATA has proven invaluable.
A new preparation procedure to obtain tetragonal pure zirconia powders is reported together with a detailed analysis of the profile of X-ray Diffraction (XRD) peaks. The crystallization kinetic up to 800°C is described through r.m.s. microstrain and crystallite size distributions. The results of two methods of profile analysis are compared. After thermal treatments up to 100°C the samples of amorphous gel prepared crystallize in the tetragonal structure. The monoclinic phase occurs only above this temperature. Moreover the tetragonal to monoclinic transformation has a strong effect in changing the shape of the distributions. Studying the crystallite size distributions we can infer a critical size of about 300 Å for the tetragonal crystallites to transform. The shape of the mean crystallite of a fully tetragonal sample is also described.
The usefulness of a high X-ray flux instrument to improve the accuracy of a powder diffraction pattern is demonstrated. In this case, very weak reflections of a well-characterized and well-known natural mineral can be detected by an often-used X-ray rotating anode diffractometer. High purity natural dolomite, CaMg(CO3)2, for example, was used to produce a slightly more comprehensive indexed X-ray powder diffraction. The powder pattern obtained in this study was compared with that of the reported high quality PDF pattern (36-426, with “*” mark) and that of a calculated pattern derived from single crystal structure data. A very weak 003 reflection at low angle and many weak reflections at high angles, not reported in the PDF pattern, were successfully identified using this high-power X-ray instrument. Unit cell parameters were determined to be a=4.8090±0.0001 Å and c=16.0182±0.0003 Å, which were in good agreement with the extant PDF pattern. Accuracy of the relative intensities between the measured and calculated patterns was apparently somewhat improved in this study, probably also attained through less preferred orientation and the higher purity of the sample used.
The measurement of x-ray diffraction line intensities is the basis for quantitative phase analysis (see for example, Chung (1974), Davis (1986), and Hubbard and Snyder (1988)). While there are many sources of error in such measurements, in recent years computer automation of powder diffractometers and associated analytical software has made such measurements more practical and accurate. For example, profile fitting software has made it possible to determine integrated peak areas and to deconvolute overlapping lines. Another problem which affects quantitative analysis is the systematic error in instrument sensitivity as a function of 20 diffraction angle. This effect has been partially responsible for poor reproducibility of relative intensities between laboratories (Schreiner and Kimmel (1987), and Jenkins and Schreiner (1989)). But, because the error is systematic, corrections may be made by using a standard such as the National Institute of Standards and Technology SRM 1976 alumina plate (NIST 1991). These and other advances have led to a renewed interest in the determination of I/Ic (also called RIR - Reference Intensity Ratio) values for crystalline substances (e.g., Snyder (1992)). I/Ic is defined as the ratio of the intensity of the strongest line of an analyte to the corundum (113) line when the analyte is mixed 50:50 by weight with corundum. We present here a standard procedure used in our laboratory to experimentally measure I/Ic values, and which explicitly incorporates profile fitting and instrument sensitivity corrections. The procedure is written in the format of an ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) standard test method, however, inter-laboratory round robin tests have not been carried out to determine precision and bias associated with the method. While the method calls for corundum as the internal standard, another standard material, s, may be used, in which case the procedure will result in a ratio I/Is. Hubbard and Snyder (1988) have shown how to convert between I/Is and I/Ic. This method is based on the procedure routinely published in NBS Monograph 25 until 1986. It is augmented with corrections for the angularly dependent instrument sensitivity and with calculations of I/Ic for both variable and fixed divergence slit configurations. A Quattro Pro spreadsheet is used in our laboratory to do the calculations. An example of the spreadsheet is given in the appendix for one of two I/Ic runs of MgCO3. We also utilize the corundum in the I/Ic runs as an internal standard to determine displacement error corrections for preparation of digitized patterns of pure analyte phases. These patterns are submitted to the International Centre for Diffraction Data for inclusion in a whole pattern data file planned for some time in the future. The notation used here is the standard notation developed for the RIR method by Hubbard and Snyder (1988) and systematically extended by Snyder (1992). A table of the notation is given in the Terminology section below.
An in situ high pressure study using energy dispersive X-ray diffraction has been carried out on the polycrystalline high-Tc superconductor, HgBa2CuO4+δ (Hg-1201), to study its phase stability under pressure and also to measure its compressibility and bulk modulus. No evidence of pressure-induced polymorphism was found in the pressure range investigated, i.e., from 0.1 MPa (1 atm) to 5 GPa. The compound exhibited anisotropic elastic properties. The axial compressibility along the c axis was measured to be (3.96±0.35)×10−3GPa−1 and along the a axis (3.42±0.13)×10−3GPa−1, corresponding to an anisotropy ratio of 1.16±0.11. The bulk modulus was determined to be (94.7±4.2) GPa and, assuming a Poisson's ratio of 0.2, Young's modulus was estimated to be (170±8) GPa.