The simplest curved spacetimes of general relativity are the ones with the most symmetry, and the most useful of these is the geometry of empty space outside a spherically symmetric source of curvature – for example, a spherical star. This is called the Schwarzschild geometry. To an excellent approximation, this is the curved spacetime outside the Sun and therefore leads to the predictions of Einstein’s theory most accessible to experimental test. In this chapter, we explore the geometry of Schwarzschild’s solution, assuming it’s given. We will concentrate on predicting the orbits of test particles and light rays in the curved spacetime of a spherical star that exhibit some of the famous effects of general relativity – the gravitational redshift, the precession of the perihelion of a planet, the gravitational bending of light, and the time delay of light.

Black holes are the outcome of unhalted gravitational collapse. Gravitational collapse to a black hole occurs on a wide range of mass scales in the universe because gravity is an attractive and universal force. This chapter describes black holes of three different origins, with three different mass scales, how they have or could be identified, and sketches how they are at the heart of some of the most energetic phenomena in astrophysics. These are black holes in X-ray binaries, black holes in galaxy centers, and exploding primordial black holes. Black holes are not only interesting because they check general relativity, they also contribute to the explanation of frontier astrophysical phenomena.

Chapter 9’s analysis of the orbits of test particles and light rays in the Schwarzschild geometry identified four effects of general relativity that can be tested in the solar system: the gravitational redshift, the deflection of light by the Sun, the precession of the perihelion of a planetary orbit, and the time delay of light. This list does not exhaust the tests that can be carried out in the solar system, but describes some of the more important ones. Experiments that measure these effects confirm the predictions of general relativity in the solar system to a typical accuracy of a fraction of 1 percent. The discussion in this chapter is not a review of the experimental situation in general relativity either in the past or at the time of writing. Instead, it presents a discussion of representative experiments that are currently among the most accurate, but are not necessarily the most accurate.

The Schwarzschild geometry that underlies much of the physics in previous chapters is exactly spherically symmetric. It is an excellent approximation to the geometry outside a nonrotating star, and is the exact geometry outside a nonrotating black hole. However, no body in nature is exactly nonrotating. The Sun, for example, is rotating at the equator with a period of approximately 27 days, and it is not exactly spherically symmetric, but is slightly squashed along the rotation axis (it is less than 1 part in 100,000 longer than a diameter along the rotation axis). The small value of that difference is why the Schwarzschild geometry is an excellent approximation to the curved spacetime geometry outside the Sun. The curved spacetimes produced by rotating bodies have a richer and more complex structure than the Schwarzschild geometry. This chapter explores one simple example of a gravitomagnetic effect – the dragging of inertial frames by a slowly rotating body.

We will trace out some parts of the path that led Einstein to a new theory of gravity that is, unlike Newtonian gravity, consistent with the principle of relativity. The result will be general relativity, a theory that is qualitatively different from Newtonian gravity. In general relativity, gravitational phenomena arise not from forces and fields, but from the curvature of four-dimensional spacetime. The starting point for these considerations is the equality of gravitational and inertial mass, one of the most accurately tested principles in all physics. This leads to Einstein’s equivalence principle, the idea that there is no experiment that can distinguish a uniform acceleration from a uniform gravitational field – the two are fully equivalent.

Which of the four-parameter family of Friedman–Robertson–Walker (FRW) cosmological models best fits our universe and why? This chapter addresses these two central questions for observation and theory in cosmology. Of the four parameters that define an FRW model, only two are determined by observations so far: the Hubble constant; and the ratio of energy density in radiation to the critical density. To determine the others, the spacetime geometry of the universe must be measured on large scales through a study of how matter moves through it. We describe two illustrative ways of doing that – one based on observations of distant supernovae, and the other on observations of the cosmic background radiation. Remarkably, the best cosmological parameter values are consistent with the universe being spatially flat – right on the borderline between positive and negative spatial curvature.

The laws of Newtonian mechanics have to be changed to be consistent with the principles of special relativity introduced in the previous chapter. This chapter describes special relativistic mechanics from a four-dimensional, spacetime point of view. Newtonian mechanics is an approximation to this mechanics of special relativity that is appropriate when motion is at speeds much less than the velocity of light in a particular inertial frame. We begin with the central idea of four-vectors, defined as a directed line segment in four-dimensional flat spacetime, and how to manipulate them. Special relativistic kinematics shows how four-vectors are used for describing the motion of a particle in spacetime terms. Concepts such as four-velocity and four-momentum are introduced. We will posit the principle of extremal proper time for a free particle in curved spacetime, and use it to derive the free particle equation of motion.

The observations described in Chapter 17 show our universe to be approximately homogeneous and isotropic on spatial distance scales above several hundred megaparsecs. The simplest cosmological models enforce these symmetries exactly as a first approximation. For instance, the matter in galaxies and the radiation are approximated by smooth density distributions that are exactly uniform in space. Similarly, the geometry of spacetime incorporates the homogeneity and isotropy of space exactly. These simplifying assumptions define the Friedman–Robertson–Walker (FRW) family of cosmological models, which are the subject of this chapter.

Gravitational waves provide a window on the universe of astronomical phenomena that is different from any in the electromagnetic spectrum. Mass in many different varieties of motion is a source of propagating ripples in spacetime curvature. In order to interpret the observations of gravitational wave detectors on Earth and in space, it is necessary to solve the Einstein equation for the gravitational radiation produced by given sources. Predicting the gravitational radiation from strong-curvature, rapidly varying sources is a problem generally tractable only by numerical simulation of the fully nonlinear Einstein equation – a subject well beyond the scope of this book. However, some insight into the production of gravitational waves can be obtained from examining the more tractable problem of the small ripples in spacetime emitted by weak, nonrelativistic sources.

This chapter discusses the geometry of space and the notion of time assumed in Newtonian mechanics. This discussion will also serve to review aspects of mechanics and special relativity that will be important for later developments. Newtonian mechanics assumes a geometry for space and a particular idea for time. The laws of Newtonian mechanics take their standard and simplest forms in inertial frames. Using the laws of mechanics, an observer in an inertial frame can construct a clock that measures the time. Coordinate transformations can make the connection between different inertial frames. Newtonian mechanics assumes there is a single notion of time for all inertial observers. We explore Newtonian gravity and the Principle of Relativity: that identical experiments carried out in different inertial frames give identical results.

The relation between local spacetime curvature and matter energy density is given by the Einstein equation – it is the field equation of general relativity in the way that Maxwell’s equations are the field equations of electromagnetism. Maxwell’s equations relate the electromagnetic field to its sources – charges and currents. Einstein’s equation relates spacetime curvature to its source – the mass-energy of matter. This chapter gives a very brief introduction to the Einstein equation; we consider the equation in the absence of matter sources (the vacuum Einstein equation) and will include matter sources in Chapter 22. Even the vacuum Einstein equation has important implications. Just as the field of a static point charge and electromagnetic waves are solutions of the source-free Maxwell’s equations, the Schwarzschild geometry and gravitational waves are solutions of the vacuum Einstein equation.

Einstein’s 1905 special theory of relativity requires a profound revision of the Newtonian ideas of space and time that were reviewed in the previous chapter. In special relativity, the Newtonian ideas of Euclidean space and a separate absolute time are subsumed into a single four-dimensional union of space and time, called spacetime. This chapter reviews the basic principles of special relativity, starting from the non-Euclidean geometry of its spacetime. Einstein’s 1905 successful modification of Newtonian mechanics, which we call special relativity, assumed that the velocity of light had the same value, c, in all inertial frames, which requires a reexamination, and ultimately the abandonment, of the Newtonian idea of absolute time. Instead, he found a new connection between inertial frames that is consistent with the same value of the velocity of light in all of them. The defining assumption of special relativity is a geometry for four-dimensional spacetime.