To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
We consider the Nusselt–Rayleigh number problem of Rayleigh–Bénard convection and make the hypothesis that the velocity and thermal boundary layer widths, $\delta _u$ and $\delta _T$, in the absence of a strong mean flow are controlled by the dissipation scales of the turbulence outside the boundary layers and, therefore, are of the order of the Kolmogorov and Batchelor scales, respectively. Under this assumption, we derive $Nu \sim Ra^{1/3}$ in the high $Ra$ limit, independent of the Prandtl number, $\delta _T/L \sim Ra^{-1/3}$ and $\delta _u/L \sim Ra^{-1/3} Pr^{1/2}$, where $L$ is the height of the convection cell. The scaling relations are valid as long as the Prandtl number is not too far from unity. For $Pr \sim 1$, we make a more general ansatz, $\delta _u \sim \nu ^{\alpha }$, where $\nu$ is the kinematic viscosity and assume that the dissipation scales as $\sim u^3/L$, where $u$ is a characteristic turbulent velocity. Under these assumptions we show that $Nu \sim Ra^{\alpha /(3-\alpha )}$, implying that $Nu \sim Ra^{1/5}$ if $\delta _u$ were scaling as in a Blasius boundary layer and $Nu \sim Ra^{1/2}$ (with some logarithmic correction) if it were scaling as in a standard turbulent shear boundary layer. It is argued that the boundary layers will retain the intermediate scaling $\alpha = 3/4$ in the limit of high $Ra$.
This chapter discusses two different approaches to describing fluid flow: a Lagrangian approach (following a fluid element as it moves) and a Eulerian approach (watching fluid pass through a fixed volume in space). Understanding each of these descriptions of flow is needed to fully understand the dynamics of fluids. This chapter is devoted to diving into the differences between the two descriptions of fluid motion. Understanding this chapter will help tremendously in the understanding of the upcoming chapters when the Navier–Stokes equations and energy equation are discussed. This chapter will introduce the material derivative. It is extremely important to understand this derivative before the Navier–Stokes equations themselves are tackled.