To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Discussions of the family and sexual orientation, the topics of Chapters 8 and 9, would not be complete without a consideration and review of contraception and birth control. Most married and unmarried sexually active women and men in the United States and in the countries of the developed world endeavor to limit their family size and/or to control the timing and spacing of their births.
Chapter 3 explores the relationship between whiteness and the awareness of pretense. For some Cubans, racial mixing could be an effective means to eliminate blackness and the possibility of its communal or political articulation; for others, it would doom the nation. Racial passing and the pretense of acting as if races could be neatly demarcated endowed racism with the flexibility it required to preserve structures of inequality. When writers of African descent began to publish on the question in the 1880s, they often addressed this logic of pretense. Rodolfo de Lagardere, for example, deployed racial doubt in his 1889 booklet Blancos y negros to demonstrate that whiteness entailed a collective effort to forget the African origins of Cuban society. While some people of known African descent participated in whitening processes, others mobilized racial doubt to call attention to the amnesia and denial inherent to whiteness as an institution and set of lived practices.
A growing body of literature has reported on the gendered impact of COVID-19. Unemployment and income loss are two consequences of the pandemic that disproportionately impacted women. Studies have shown that these consequences are associated with the rise in unpaid care work (UCW) following the implementation of public health measures to curb the spread of COVID-19. Around the world, UCW is largely the responsibility of women, including in Latin America, where there is a strong cultural value placed on caregiving roles. This paper undertakes a comparative analysis of the social protection measures introduced in Colombia and Costa Rica during the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic, drawing on core themes of feminist political economy and Elson’s (New Labor Forum, 26(2), 52–61, 2017) Three R Framework to reflect on whether and how measures incorporated care-sensitive approaches and on the factors shaping the countries’ diverging responses. Of the two jurisdictions compared in this paper, Costa Rica’s social protection measures afforded greater visibility and support for UCW. We offer a discussion of potential factors contributing to Costa Rica’s care-sensitive approach, including a robust pre-pandemic social protection infrastructure, better integration of the informal economy into social protection measures, and greater representation of women in politics. Insights from this analysis can inform enhancements of social protection systems in Colombia, Costa Rica, and other comparable jurisdictions across Latin America, while also contributing to pandemic preparedness and more gender-responsive approaches to future global health crises.
What can be learned about pandemic preparedness from greater attention to perspectives of people who live in regions labelled as ‘hotspots’ for disease outbreaks? And how might such attention require us to reconfigure science, policy, and practice – as part of a broader shifting of power in pandemics? These are the questions that motivate and are explored through the papers in this special issue on pandemic preparedness, for which this paper serves as Introduction. All the contributions to this special issue present perspectives, experiences, and reflections from African settings, drawing on research co-designed and conducted in close engagement with local communities or in dialogue with African scientists and public health actors. They approach biosocial questions from the concerns of the disciplinary fields of social, medical, and political anthropology, of engaged interdisciplinary social science, and, crucially, of embedded, ‘grassroots’ fieldwork by researchers who have grown up with the communities they are studying. The team bringing these complementary areas of expertise came together for a collaborative programme on ‘Pandemic preparedness: local and global concepts and practices in tackling disease threats in Africa’ supported by a collaborative award from the Wellcome Trust during 2018–2023. This special issue thus forms part of wider advocacy for rethinking pandemic preparedness and for the value of anthropology in informing its meanings and practices, now more than ever.
East Manchester was the site of one of the most substantial regeneration projects internationally. Urban regeneration was a central plank of New Labour policy and the approach radically altered with the election of the Coalition Government in 2010. East Manchester was one of the most deprived areas of Britain in 1997, referred to as a ‘basket case’ in dire need of regeneration. This book explores the role of Manchester City Council and other public agencies in the regeneration of the area such as New East Manchester, NDC/Beacons and the Housing Market Renewal Programme; the Manchester voluntary sector and the private sector including the major investments linked to Manchester City Football Club and the Etihad Campus. While the book focuses on a single regeneration initiative, it has wider relevance to national and international regeneration processes. The book assesses the outcome of the regeneration initiative although it demonstrates the difficulties in producing a definitive evaluation. It has a political focus and illuminates and challenges many assumptions underpinning three major current academic debates: governance, participatory democracy and ideology.
This chapter provides a brief historical introduction which emphasises the importance of the temporal to the description and evaluation of regeneration initiatives. Based on the assumption that an appreciation of contemporary urban issues requires an understanding of the historical context, this chapter highlights change and continuity in urban regeneration in east Manchester and the wider UK. An overview of the distinctive history of the various neighbourhoods of east Manchester is provided and an analysis of how current regeneration initiatives both draw on and differ from earlier initiatives under the Thatcher Governments such as City Challenge and the Single Regeneration Budget.
This chapter analyses the plethora of structures involved in the regeneration of east Manchester: Manchester City Council and its related Manchester Partnership; New East Manchester which also drew in the North-West Development Agency and English Partnerships; New Deal for Communities/Beacons, the Housing Market Renewal Programme and an array of private sector and voluntary organisations. This array of structure highlights the complexity of the governance of regeneration processes, the importance of partnerships and the theme of continuity as the structures changed over time.
This chapter describes the plethora of projects undertaken in the regeneration of east Manchester in the following thematic areas identified in the Strategic Regeneration Framework: housing and the physical environment; education; employment; crime and community safety; health and well-being; transport; sport and community facilities. This thematic analysis is complemented by an analysis of the different stages of the regeneration process. This highlights the importance of the temporal from the boost to regeneration provided by the Commonwealth Games to the negative impact of global recession and the election of the 2010 Coalition Government. A case-study of Ancoats is presented to illustrate some of the spatial and temporal specificities of regeneration.
This chapter analyses the relationship between the ideological climate of British politics in the 1990s, with specific emphasis on New Labour’s ideology, and the urban regeneration of east Manchester. Attention is also paid to the change in ideology heralded by the election of the Coalition Government in 2010. There is a particular focus on the ideology of ‘Manchester Labour’ and the way in which Manchester City Council mediates politically and ideologically centrally-imposed regeneration policies.
This chapter discusses the methodological difficulties in evaluating the effectiveness of regeneration initiatives before providing an evaluation of the east Manchester initiative which provides evidence to assist in the making of future urban policy. The overall evaluation, drawing on key performance indicators and other key evaluation mechanisms used by New East Manchester and NDC/Beacons, recognises some of the achievements of the initiative while considering the scale of the progress achieved against cost, disruption and deadweight factors.
This chapter uses the practice of the complex governance structures and plethora of partnerships which governed urban regeneration in east Manchester to analyse the utility of governance theories. It posits that the case study of east Manchester undermines theories of governance because it highlights the continuing centrality of the central and local state in governing urban regeneration processes.
This chapter evaluates the nature and extent of resident involvement in the regeneration of east Manchester taking into account the temporal and spatial realities of the area. Participation in formal structures such residents’ associations and neighbourhood planning processes is examined alongside less formal participation in parties in the park and community and social events and instances of protest, both sporadic and sustained, are also examined. The analysis recognises the attempt by the regeneration structures to involve residents while also acknowledging the constraints and barriers to participation.