In livestock production, animal welfare is shaped by the quality of the relationship between animals and the farmers with whom they interact. This study investigated the perceptions of Spanish farmers of extensive mountain cow-calf systems regarding the impact of human intervention on animal behaviour, with attention to the human-animal relationship (HAR), farm management strategies, and interactions between animals and unfamiliar people. The research was conducted within the context of cow-calf systems managed under extensive mountain conditions. Seven focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted, involving 60 mountain cattle farmers from Aragon, Navarra, and the Basque Country. The findings of our study demonstrate that the quality of HAR is contingent upon a multitude of variables, which exert a profound influence on the duration, intimacy, and strength of these relationships, particularly in response to environmental conditions, as reflected, for example, in the changing frequency of human-animal interactions during periods of outdoor grazing compared to times of confinement. Farmers also showed interest in understanding animal behavioural responses in different management scenarios to adapt and individualise their strategies. Across all FGDs, participants recognised the farmer’s role in influencing animals to be less reactive or fearful toward humans through their handling style. Finally, the interactions between people and cows extend beyond farmers and their families, incorporating a variety of unfamiliar individuals who also play a role in each cow’s relationships with humans. Therefore, farmers’ perceptions reveal that animals’ responses to humans are not homogeneous but are highly dependent upon context, ontogeny and levels of familiarity.

Much research has assessed methods of pain control for cattle castration, but there remains a lack of consensus regarding best practice. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published research including both an untreated control (i.e. castrated without pain mitigation) and at least one unimodal or multimodal analgesia treatment (i.e. castrated with a local anaesthetic alone, or in combination with a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug) to summarise findings on castration pain management. Studies were included if they castrated by surgery, elastration or crushing, and reported at least one of the following outcomes: cortisol, change in bodyweight, foot stomping, wound licking, a subjective assessment of pain using a visual analogue scale, or stride length. Our search identified 383 publications, of which 17 were eligible for inclusion. Most publications focused on surgical castration (n = 14), and the most frequently reported outcome was blood cortisol (n = 13). None of the included studies were assessed as having a low risk of bias, mostly due to a lack of reporting blinding procedures and reasons for missing data. Using a three-level random effect model, we concluded that multimodal analgesia reduced blood cortisol concentrations in the first hour following surgical castration in comparison to the control group; this effect was diminished but still evident at 3 and 4 h, but not beyond at 6, 12 and 24 h. Too few data were available to meaningfully assess other outcomes and methods. Variability in methods and outcomes between studies, and risks of bias, hinder our capacity to provide science-based recommendations for best practice.

Depopulation of end-of-lay hens can result in stress and injury for both hens and catchers. A pilot study was assessed to optimise hen and catcher well-being during loading. Two add-on prototypes for attaching to transport container drawers were tested on five commercial aviary farms: prototype 1 (metal tube with vertical flaps); and prototype 2 (frame with horizontal flaps). Per flock, a subset of 800 end-of-lay hens was assigned to one of three treatments: Standard container with 15 drawers; Standard container plus prototype 1; and Standard container plus prototype 2. Parameters (filling duration, number of escapes, number of body part entrapments, restlessness, and loading inefficiency in container) were scored during the catch, supplemented by a post-loading catcher survey, and at the slaughterhouse (loading damage prevalence, number of dead-on-arrivals). The three treatments were compared using a 1–7 Likert scale. Hens were significantly calmer with prototype 1 compared to prototype 2 with no significant difference relative to the standard container. Loading was less efficient for prototype 2 vs the standard container. Catchers preferred prototype 1 and the standard container over prototype 2 for ease of use and hen calmness and prototype 2 showed no advantages for efficiency or animal and catcher well-being. Prototype 1 resulted in fewer breast bruises than the standard container with no difference in loading efficiency and requires larger-scale testing for enhancing effectiveness, animal and catcher well-being.