Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-mhl4m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-02-28T16:17:33.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evolutionary explanations for financial and prosocial biases: Beyond mating motivation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2017

Anthony C. Little*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AYUnited Kingdoma.little@bath.ac.ukdranthonylittle@gmail.comhttp://www.alittlelab.com

Abstract

Mating motivation likely plays a role in bias to attractive individuals, but there are other complementary theories drawn from the evolutionary literature related to competition, friendship, and leadership selection that also make relevant predictions concerning biases towards attractive individuals. The relative balance of these factors will be context dependent and so help explain why the pattern of bias is sometimes variable.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agthe, M., Spöerrle, M. & Maner, J. K. (2010) Don't hate me because I'm beautiful: Anti-attractiveness bias in organizational evaluation and decision making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46(6):1151–54.Google Scholar
Agthe, M., Spöerrle, M. & Maner, J. K. (2011) Does being attractive always help? Positive and negative effects of attractiveness on social decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 37(8):1042–54.Google Scholar
Andersson, M. (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Berggren, N., Jordahl, H. & Poutvaara, P. (2010) The looks of a winner: Beauty and electoral success. Journal of Public Economics 94(1–2):815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budesheim, T. L. & Depaola, S. J. (1994) Beauty or the beast – the effects of appearance, personality, and issue information on evaluations of political candidates. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 20(4):339–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (2009) The social brain hypothesis and its implications for social evolution. Annals of Human Biology 36(5):562–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lemay, E. P., Clark, M. S. & Greenberg, A. (2010) What is beautiful is good because what is beautiful is desired: Physical attractiveness stereotyping as projection of interpersonal goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36(3):339–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Little, A. C. & Roberts, C. S. (2012) Evolution, appearance, and occupational success. Evolutionary Psychology 10:782801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Little, A. C., Roberts, S. C., Jones, B. C. & DeBruine, L. M. (2012) The perception of attractiveness and trustworthiness in male faces affects hypothetical voting decisions differently in wartime and peacetime scenarios. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology 65:2018–32.Google Scholar
Lucas, M. & Koff, E. (2013) How conception risk affects competition and cooperation with attractive women and men. Evolution and Human Behavior 34(1):1622.Google Scholar
Rosenblat, T. S. (2008) The beauty premium: Physical attractiveness and gender in dictator games. Negotiation Journal 24(4):465–81.Google Scholar
Seyfarth, R. M. & Cheney, D. L. (2012) The evolutionary origins of friendship. Annual Review of Psychology 63:153–77.Google Scholar
Van Vugt, M. (2006) Evolutionary origins of leadership and followership. Personality and Social Psychology Review 10(4):354–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed