Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-mzsfj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-18T15:42:25.250Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Omitted evidence undermines sexual motives explanation for attractiveness bias

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2017

Marianne LaFrance
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520 marianne.lafrance@yale.edu http://genderlab.yale.edu
Alice H. Eagly
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60108. eagly@northwestern.edu http://www.psychology.northwestern.edu/people/faculty/core/profiles/alice-eagly.html

Abstract

This commentary makes three points: (1) the existing evidence does not consistently favor the proposed sex difference in attractiveness preferences, nor the fitness-related outcomes of attractiveness; (2) the neglected association of perceived attractiveness and trustworthiness allowed the authors to incorrectly attribute many findings solely to attractiveness, and (3) the importance accorded attractiveness in mate preferences is culturally shaped and likely evolutionarily novel.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable