Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T09:46:27.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

There is no psychology without inferential statistics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2022

Shilaan Alzahawi Open the ORCID record for Shilaan Alzahawi [Opens in a new window]  and
Benoît Monin
Shilaan Alzahawi
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Knight Management Center, Stanford, CA94305, USAshilaan@stanford.edu; https://shilaan.rbind.iomonin@stanford.edu; https://monin.people.stanford.edu
Benoît Monin
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Knight Management Center, Stanford, CA94305, USAshilaan@stanford.edu; https://shilaan.rbind.iomonin@stanford.edu; https://monin.people.stanford.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Quantification has been constitutive of psychology since its inception and is core to its scientific status. The adoption of qualitative methods eschewing inferential statistics is therefore unlikely to obtain. Rather than discarding useful tools because of improper use, we recommend highlighting how inferential statistics can be more thoughtfully applied.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e2
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ash, M. G. (1992). Historicizing mind science: Discourse, practice, subjectivity. Science in Context, 5(2), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889700001150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coon, D. J. (1993). Standardizing the subject: Experimental psychologists, introspection, and the quest for a technoscientific ideal. Technology and Culture, 34(4), 757–783. https://doi.org/10.2307/3106414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511524059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gigerenzer, G., & Murray, D. J. (1987). Cognition as intuitive statistics. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Hornstein, G. A. (1988). Quantifying psychological phenomena: Debates, dilemmas, and implications. In Morawski, J. G. (Ed.), The rise of experimentation in American psychology (pp. 1–34). Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wasserstein, R. L., Schirm, A. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2019). Moving to a world beyond “p < 0.05.” The American Statistician 73(sup1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2019.1583913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar