Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 July 2021
Imaginary worlds are extremely successful. The most popular fictions produced in the last few decades contain such a fictional world. They can be found in all fictional media, from novels (e.g., Lord of The Rings and Harry Potter) to films (e.g., Star Wars and Avatar), video games (e.g., The Legend of Zelda and Final Fantasy), graphic novels (e.g., One Piece and Naruto), and TV series (e.g., Star Trek and Game of Thrones), and they date as far back as ancient literature (e.g., the Cyclops Islands in The Odyssey, 850 BCE). Why such a success? Why so much attention devoted to non-existent worlds? In this paper, we propose that imaginary worlds co-opt our preferences for exploration, which have evolved in humans and nonhuman animals alike, to propel individuals toward new environments and new sources of reward. Humans would find imaginary worlds very attractive for the very same reasons, and under the same circumstances, as they are lured by unfamiliar environments in real life. After reviewing research on exploratory preferences in behavioral ecology, environmental esthetics, neuroscience, and evolutionary and developmental psychology, we focus on the sources of their variability across time and space, which we argue can account for the variability of the cultural preference for imaginary worlds. This hypothesis can, therefore, explain the way imaginary worlds evolved culturally, their shape and content, their recent striking success, and their distribution across time and populations.
Target article
Why imaginary worlds? The psychological foundations and cultural evolution of fictions with imaginary worlds
Related commentaries (32)
All non-real worlds provide exploration: Evidence from developmental psychology
Am I present in imaginary worlds? Intentions, actions, and flow in mediated experiences and fiction
Autism and the preference for imaginary worlds
Brave new world: Imaginative fictions offer simulated safety and actual benefits
Cognitive exploration drives engagement and re-engagement with imaginary worlds, but not spatial exploration as predicted by evolutionary theory
Determining the markers of a preference for imaginary worlds fiction calls for comparisons across kinds of fiction readers and forms of exploration
Does progressive aphantasia exist? The hypothetical role of aphantasia in the diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases
Exploration and arrangement in physical and social worlds
How granular should our explanations of fantastic fiction be?
Imaginary worlds are awesome: Awe provides a key to understanding the individual and social functions of imaginary worlds
Imaginary worlds are attractive because they simulate multiple adaptive problems and encode real-world information
Imaginary worlds pervade forager oral tradition
Imaginative processes in children are not particularly imaginative
Imagining our moral values in the present and future
Influences on the development of imaginary worlds
It's not fiction if you believe it: How imaginary worlds are derived from imaginary realities
Middle-earth wasn't built in a day: How do we explain the costs of creating a world?
Not just a hijack: Imaginary worlds can enhance individual and group-level fitness
Simulation, stories, and fictional worlds
Socioecology and fiction
The allure of the unknown in a tamed, mapped, and homogenized world
The call of the final frontier?
The deep history of imaginary worlds
The development of the imagination and imaginary worlds
The evolution of imagination and the adaptive value of imaginary worlds
The familiar appeal of imaginary worlds
Using imaginary worlds for real social benefits
Why do people create imaginary worlds? The case of Fanfiction
Why frightening imaginary worlds? Morbid curiosity and the learning potential of horror