Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-8v9h9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-29T01:42:08.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cognitive exploration drives engagement and re-engagement with imaginary worlds, but not spatial exploration as predicted by evolutionary theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2022

Rebecca Dunk
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada rjdunk@yorku.ca; https://rebeccajoydunk.wixsite.com/researcher mar@yorku.ca; yorku.ca/mar/
Raymond A. Mar
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada rjdunk@yorku.ca; https://rebeccajoydunk.wixsite.com/researcher mar@yorku.ca; yorku.ca/mar/

Abstract

The empirical evidence for exploration underlying the appeal of imaginary worlds is mostly absent or contradictory. Openness, and the cognitive exploration it represents, provides a better account than the overall drive to explore predicted by evolutionary theory. Furthermore, exploration cannot explain why imaginary worlds foster frequent re-engagement.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable