This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.
E. Abrahamse , J.-P. van Dijck , S. Majerus & W. Fias (2014) Finding the answer in space: The mental whiteboard hypothesis on serial order in working memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8:932.
N. Burgess , E. A. Maguire & J. O'Keefe (2002) The human hippocampus and spatial and episodic memory. Neuron
G. Campitelli , F. Gobet , K. Head , M. Buckley & A. Parker (2007) Brain localisation of memory chunks in chessplayers. International Journal of Neuroscience 117:1641–59.
W. G. Chase & H. A. Simon (1973) Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology 4:55–81.
N. Cowan (2011) The focus of attention as observed in visual working memory tasks: Making sense of competing claims. Neuropsychologia 49:1401–406.
N. Cowan , Z. Chen & J. N. Rouder (2004) Constant capacity in an immediate serial-recall task: A logical sequel to Miller (1956). Psychological Science 15:634–40.
K. A. Ericsson & W. Kintsch (1995) Long-term working memory. Psychological Review 102:211–45.
F. Gobet (2000a) Retrieval structures and schemata: A brief reply to Ericsson and Kintsch. British Journal of Psychology 91:591–94.
F. Gobet (2000b) Some shortcomings of long-term working memory. British Journal of Psychology
F. Gobet , P. C. R. Lane , S. C. H. Croker , P. Cheng , G. Jones , I. Oliver & J. M. Pine (2001) Chunking mechanisms in human learning. Trends in Cognitive Science 5:236–43.
F. Gobet & H. A. Simon (1996) Templates in chess memory: A mechanism for recalling several boards. Cognitive Psychology 31:1–40.
A. Guida , F. Gobet & S. Nicolas (2013) Functional cerebral reorganization: A signature of expertise? Reexamining Guida, Gobet, Tardieu, and Nicolas' (2012) two-stage framework. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7:590.
A. Guida , F. Gobet , H. Tardieu & S. Nicolas (2012) How chunks, long-term working memory and templates offer a cognitive explanation for neuroimaging data on expertise acquisition: A two-stage framework. Brain and Cognition 79:221–44.
A. Guida & M. Lavielle-Guida (2014) 2011 space odyssey: Spatialization as a mechanism to code order allows a close encounter between memory expertise and classic immediate memory studies. Frontiers in Psychology 5:573.
E. A. Maguire , E. R. Valentine , J. M. Wilding & N. Kapur (2003) Routes to remembering: The brains behind superior memory. Nature Neuroscience 6:90–95.
F. Mathy & J. Feldman (2012) What's magic about magic numbers. Chunking and data compression in short-term memory. Cognition 122:346–62.
L. B. Merabet , R. Hamilton , G. Schlaug , J. D. Swisher , E. T. Kiriakapoulos , N. B. Pitskel , T. Kauffman & A. Pascual-Leone (2008) Rapid and reversible recruitment of early visual cortex for touch. PLoS One
S. E. Petersen , H. van Mier , J. A. Fiez & M. E. Raichle (1998) The effects of practice on the functional anatomy of task-performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
K. M. Petersson , C. Elfgren & M. Ingvar (1997) A dynamic role of the medial temporal lobe during retrieval of declarative memory in man. NeuroImage
R. A. Poldrack , J. E. Desmond , G. H. Glover & J. D. Gabrieli (1998) The neural basis of visual skill learning: An fMRI study of mirror reading. Cerebral Cortex 8:1–10.
B. R. Postle , J. S. Berger & M. D'Esposito (1999) Functional neuroanatomical double dissociation of mnemonic and executive control processes contributing to working memory performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96:12959–64.
B. R. Postle & M. D'Esposito (1999) “What”-then-“Where” in visual working memory: An event-related fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 11:585–97.
J. J. Todd & R. Marois (2004) Capacity limit of visual short-term memory in human posterior parietal cortex. Nature 428:751–54.
J. P. van Dijck & W. Fias (2011) A working memory account for spatial-numerical associations. Cognition 119:114–19.
E. K. Vogel & M. G. Machizawa (2004) Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature 428:748–51.