Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Identity matters to individuals: Group assessment cannot be reduced to collective performance

  • Catherine Belzung (a1), Etienne Billette de Villemeur (a2), Anouk Grevin (a3) and Gennaro Iorio (a4)
Abstract

Although we agree that both identification and differentiation play a key role in explaining individual behaviour in groups, we suggest that (1) cohesion and differentiation should be better articulated, (2) the proposal carries implicit value choices that are not necessarily universal, and (3) the success of a group in shaping individual behaviour should refer to the values of individual members.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Arrow, K. J. (1951/1963) Social choice and individual values. Wiley.
Geertz, C. (1974) “From the native's point of view”: On the nature of anthropological understanding. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 28(1):2645.
Jaynes, J. (1976) The origin of consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameral mind. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Pareto, V. (1913) Il massimo di utilità per una collettività in sociologia. Giornale degli economisti e rivista di statistica 46(4):337–41.
Pareto, V. (1916) Trattato di sociologia generale. G. Barbèra.
Weick, K. E. & Roberts, K. H. (1993) Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative science quarterly 38(3):357–81.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed