Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-zzw9c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-28T23:04:00.146Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Disputing deindividuation: Why negative group behaviours derive from group norms, not group immersion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2016

Stephen David Reicher ,
Russell Spears ,
Tom Postmes  and
Anna Kende
Stephen David Reicher
Affiliation:
School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Fife KY169JP, United Kingdom sdr@st-andrews.ac.uk https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/psychology/people/?mode=profile&group=staff&user_id=sdr
Russell Spears
Affiliation:
Department of Social Psychology, University of Groningen, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlands r.spears@rug.nl t.postmes@rug.nl http://www.rug.nl/staff/r.spears/ http://www.rug.nl/staff/t.postmes/
Tom Postmes
Affiliation:
Department of Social Psychology, University of Groningen, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlands r.spears@rug.nl t.postmes@rug.nl http://www.rug.nl/staff/r.spears/ http://www.rug.nl/staff/t.postmes/
Anna Kende
Affiliation:
Department of Social Psychology, Eotvos Lorand University, 1028 Budapest, Hungary. kende.anna@ppk.elte.hu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Strong social identity does not lead to lack of accountability and “bad” behavior in groups and crowds but rather causes group behavior to be driven by group norms. The solution to problematic group behavior is therefore not to individualize the group but rather to change group norms, as underlined by the relational dynamics widely studied in the SIDE tradition.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 39 , 2016 , e161
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Brown, R. (1988) Group processes: Dynamics within and between groups. Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Davis, N. Z. (1973) The rites of violence: Religious riot in sixteenth century France. Past and Present 59:51–91.Google Scholar
Diener, E. (1980) Deindividuation: The absence of self-awareness and self-regulation in group members. In: The psychology of group influence, ed. Paulus, P., pp. 209–42. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Giner, S. (1976) Mass society. Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
Klein, O., Spears, R. & Reicher, S. (2007) Social identity performance: Extending the strategic side of SIDE. Personality and Social Psychology Review 11:28–45.Google Scholar
Le Bon, G. (1896/1960) The crowd: A study of the popular mind [La psychologie des foules]. Viking Press. (Original work published in 1896.)Google Scholar
McPhail, C. (1991) The myth of the madding crowd. Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Postmes, T. & Spears, R. (1998) Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 123:238–59. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.123.3.238.Google Scholar
Prentice-Dunn, S. & Rogers, R. W. (1989) Deindividuation and the self-regulation of behavior. In: The psychology of group influence, second edition, ed. Paulus, P., pp. 87–109. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Reicher, S. D. (2001) The psychology of crowd dynamics. In: Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes, ed. Hogg, M. A. & Tindale, R. S., pp. 182–208. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Reicher, S. D., Spears, R. & Postmes, T. (1995) A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European Review of Social Psychology 6:161–98.Google Scholar
Reicher, S. D. & Stott, C. (2011) Mad mobs and Englishmen? Myths and realities of the 2011 riots. Constable and Robinson.Google Scholar
Spears, R. (2010) Group rationale, collective sense: Beyond intergroup bias. Invited position paper. British Journal of Social Psychology 49:1–20.Google Scholar
Spears, R. & Lea, M. (1994) Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research 21:427–59.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. (1971) The moral economy of the English crowd in the eighteenth century. Past and Present 50:76–136.Google Scholar
Turner, R. H. & Killian, L. M. (1957) Collective behavior. Prentice–Hall.Google Scholar
Van Ginneken, J. (1992) Crowds, psychology and politics, 1871–1899. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar