Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-7lfxl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-28T06:43:28.155Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Not even wrong: Imprecision perpetuates the illusion of understanding at the cost of actual understanding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2016

Paul E. Smaldino
Paul E. Smaldino*
Affiliation:
Cognitive and Information Sciences, University of California, Merced, Merced, CA 95343. paul.smaldino@gmail.com http://www.smaldino.com/wp/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The target article is plagued by imprecision, making it largely impossible to evaluate the authors' theory in a scientific manner.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 39 , 2016 , e163
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Gallotti, M. & Frith, C. D. (2013) Social cognition in the we-mode. Trends in Cognitive Science 17:160–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gigerenzer, G. (1998) Surrogates for theories. Theory and Psychology 8(2):195–204.Google Scholar
Gowdy, J. & Krall, L. (2016) The economic origins of ultrasociality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39:e92. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1500059X.Google Scholar
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) Why most published research is false. PLOS Medicine 2(8):e124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2014) How to make more published research true. PLOS Medicine 11(10): e1001747.Google Scholar
Levine, J. M. & Moreland, R. L. (1990) Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology 41:585–634. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.003101.Google Scholar
McElreath, R. & Smaldino, P. E. (2015) Replication, communication, and the population dynamics of scientific discovery.PLoS ONE 10(8): e0136088. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136088.Google Scholar
Page, S. E. (2007) The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pashler, H. & Harris, C. R. (2012) Is the replicability crisis overblown? Three arguments examined. Perspectives in Psychological Science 7:531–36.Google Scholar
Popper, K. (1963) Conjectures and refutations. Routledge.Google Scholar
Smaldino, P. E. (2014b) The cultural evolution of emergent group-level traits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37:243–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smaldino, P. E. (in press) The evolution of the social self: Multidimensionality of social identity solves the coordination problems of a society. In: Beyond the meme: Dynamical structures in cultural evolution, ed. Love, A. C. & Wimsatt, W. C.. University of Minnesota Press. Chapter available at: http://smaldino.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Smaldino_SocialIdentityAndComplexitySocieties_2015.pdf.Google Scholar
Theiner, G., Allen, C. & Goldstone, R. L. (2010) Recognizing group cognition. Cognitive Systems Research 11:378–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisberg, M. (2007) Who is a modeler? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58(2):207–33.Google Scholar