Skip to main content
×
×
Home

MAKING REPLICATION MAINSTREAM

  • Rolf A. Zwaan (a1), Alexander Etz (a1), Richard E. Lucas (a1) and M. Brent Donnellan (a1)
Abstract

Many philosophers of science and methodologists have argued that the ability to repeat studies and obtain similar results is an essential component of science. A finding is elevated from single observation to scientific evidence when the procedures that were used to obtain it can be reproduced and the finding itself can be replicated. Recent replication attempts show that some high profile results---most notably in psychology, but in many other disciplines as well---cannot be replicated consistently. These replication attempts have generated a considerable amount of controversy and the issue of whether direct replications have value has, in particular, proven to be contentious. However, much of this discussion has occurred in published commentaries and social media outlets, resulting in a fragmented discourse. To address the need for an integrative summary, we review various types of replication studies and then discuss the most commonly voiced concerns about direct replication. We provide detailed responses to these concerns and consider different statistical ways to evaluate replications. We conclude there are no theoretical or statistical obstacles to making direct replication a routine aspect of psychological science.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Corresponding author: Rolf A. Zwaan, Department of Psychology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, zwaan@fsw.eur.nl
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 4498 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 2720 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 25th October 2017 - 21st July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.