Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-18T15:57:50.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Constraints on generality statements are needed to define direct replication

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2018

Daniel J. Simons
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, Champaign, IL 61820. dsimons@illinois.eduwww.dansimons.com
Yuichi Shoda
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195. yshoda@uw.eduhttp://www.psych.uw.edu/psych.php?p=358&person_id=2569
D. Stephen Lindsay
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada. slindsay@uvic.cahttps://www.uvic.ca/socialsciences/psychology/people/faculty-directory/lindsaysteve.php

Abstract

Whether or not a replication attempt counts as “direct” often cannot be determined definitively after the fact as a result of flexibility in how procedural differences are interpreted. Specifying constraints on generality in original articles can eliminate ambiguity in advance, thereby leading to a more cumulative science.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J. & Norenzayan, A. (2010) Most people are not WEIRD. Nature 466(7302):29.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2014) A new etiquette for replication. Social Psychology 45(4):310–11.Google Scholar
Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y. & Lindsay, D. S. (2017) Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science 12:1123–28. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630.Google Scholar