Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-g4pgd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-29T22:01:39.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Data replication matters to an underpowered study, but replicated hypothesis corroboration counts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2018

Erich H. Witte
Affiliation:
Institute for Psychology, University of Hamburg, 20146 Hamburg, Germany. witte_e_h@uni-hamburg.dehttps://www.psy.uni-hamburg.de/personen/prof-im-ruhestand/witte-erich.html
Frank Zenker
Affiliation:
Departments of Philosophy and Cognitive Science, Lund University, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden. frank.zenker@fil.lu.sehttp://www.fil.lu.se/en/person/FrankZenker/

Abstract

Before replication becomes mainstream, the potential for generating theoretical knowledge better be clear. Replicating statistically significant nonrandom data shows that an original study made a discovery; replicating a specified theoretical effect shows that an original study corroborated a theory. Yet only in the latter case is replication a necessary, sound, and worthwhile strategy.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable