Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Précis of After Phrenology: Neural Reuse and the Interactive Brain

  • Michael L. Anderson (a1)

Abstract

Neural reuse is a form of neuroplasticity whereby neural elements originally developed for one purpose are put to multiple uses. A diverse behavioral repertoire is achieved by means of the creation of multiple, nested, and overlapping neural coalitions, in which each neural element is a member of multiple different coalitions and cooperates with a different set of partners at different times. Neural reuse has profound implications for how we think about our continuity with other species, for how we understand the similarities and differences between psychological processes, and for how best to pursue a unified science of the mind. After Phrenology: Neural Reuse and the Interactive Brain (2014; henceforth After Phrenology in this Précis) surveys the terrain and advocates for a series of reforms in psychology and cognitive neuroscience. The book argues that, among other things, we should capture brain function in a multidimensional manner, develop a new, action-oriented vocabulary for psychology, and recognize that higher-order cognitive processes are built from complex configurations of already evolved circuitry.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Précis of After Phrenology: Neural Reuse and the Interactive Brain
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Précis of After Phrenology: Neural Reuse and the Interactive Brain
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Précis of After Phrenology: Neural Reuse and the Interactive Brain
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

References

Hide All
Aboitiz, F. (1996) Does bigger mean better? Evolutionary determinants of brain size and structure. Brain, Behavior and Evolution 47:225–45.
Agnati, L. F., Guidolin, D., Guescini, M., Genedani, S. & Fuxe, K. (2010) Understanding wiring and volume transmission. Brain Research Review 64:137–59.
Anderson, M. L. (2008a) Circuit sharing and the implementation of intelligent systems. Connection Science 20(4):239–51.
Anderson, M. L. (2010) Neural reuse: A fundamental organizational principle of the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33(4):245–66. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10000853.
Anderson, M. L. (2014) After phrenology: Neural reuse and the interactive brain. MIT Press.
Anderson, M. L. (2015) Beyond componential constitution in the brain: Starburst amacrine cells and enabling constraints. In: Open MIND, ed. Metzinger, T. K. & Windt, J. M.. MIND Group. doi: 10.15502/9783958570429.
Anderson, M. L. & Finlay, B. (2014) Allocating structure to function: The strong links between neuroplasticity and natural selection. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7:918.
Anderson, M. L., Kinnison, J. & Pessoa, L. (2013) Describing functional diversity of brain regions and brain networks. NeuroImage 73:5058.
Anderson, M. L. & Penner-Wilger, M. (2013) Neural reuse in the evolution and development of the brain: Evidence for developmental homology? Developmental Psychobiology 55(1):4251.
Atkinson, J. (1984) Human visual development over the first 6 months of life. A review and a hypothesis. Human Neurobiology 3(2):6174.
Bargh, J. A. & Shalev, I. (2012) The substitutability of physical and social warmth in daily life. Emotion 12(1):154–62.
Bargmann, C. I. (2012) Beyond the connectome: How neuromodulators shape neural circuits. Bioessays 34(6):458–65.
Barrett, H. C. & Kurzban, R. (2006) Modularity in cognition: Framing the debate. Psychological Review 113(3):628.
Barrett, L. F. & Satpute, A. (2013) Large-scale brain networks in affective and social neuroscience: Towards an integrative architecture of the human brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 23:112.
Bauer, M., Heinz, A. & Whybrow, P. C. (2001) Thyroid hormones, serotonin and mood: Of synergy and significance in the adult brain. Molecular Psychiatry 7(2):140–56.
Buss, D. M., ed. (2005) The handbook of evolutionary psychology. John Wiley.
Carruthers, P. (2006) The architecture of the mind: Massive modularity and the flexibility of thought. Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, N. (1957) Syntactic structures. Mouton.
Cisek, P. (1999) Beyond the computer metaphor: Behaviour as interaction. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6 (11–12):125–42.
Cisek, P. (2007) Cortical mechanisms of action selection: The affordance competition hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 362(1485):1585–99.
Cisek, P. & Kalaska, J. F. (2005) Neural correlates of reaching decisions in dorsal premotor cortex: Specification of multiple direction choices and final selection of action. Neuron 45(5):801–14.
Cisek, P. & Kalaska, J. F. (2010) Neural mechanisms for interacting with a world full of action choices. Annual Review of Neuroscience 33:269–98.
Clark, A. (1997) Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. MIT Press.
Clark, H. H. (1996) Using language. Cambridge University Press.
Cole, M. W., Reynolds, J. R., Power, J. D., Repovs, G., Anticevic, A. & Braver, T. S. (2013) Multi-task connectivity reveals flexible hubs for adaptive task control. Nature Neuroscience 16(9):1348–55.
Confer, J. C., Easton, J. A., Fleischman, D. S., Goetz, C. D., Lewis, D. M., Perilloux, C. & Buss, D. M. (2010) Evolutionary psychology: Controversies, questions, prospects, and limitations. American Psychologist 65(2):110–26.
Craver, C. (2007) Explaining the brain: Mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience. Oxford University Press.
Desimone, R. & Duncan, J. (1995) Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience 18(1):193222.
Edelman, S. (2008) Computing the mind: How the mind really works. Oxford University Press.
Finlay, B. L. & Darlington, R. B. (1995) Linked regularities in the development and evolution of mammalian brains. Science 268:1578–84.
Finlay, B. L., Darlington, R. B. & Nicastro, N. (2001) Developmental structure in brain evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24:263307.
Gibson, J. J. (1966) The senses considered as perceptual systems. Houghton-Mifflin.
Gibson, J. J. (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Erlbaum.
Glenberg, A. M. & Kaschak, M. P. (2002) Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9(3):558–65.
Glenberg, A. M., Sato, M. & Cattaneo, L. (2008) Use-induced motor plasticity affects the processing of abstract and concrete language. Current Biology 18(7):R290–91.
Gold, K., Havasi, C., Anderson, M. & Arnold, K. (2011) Comparing matrix decomposition methods for meta-analysis and reconstruction of cognitive neuroscience results. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society 24:2126.
Hermans, E. J., van Marle, H. J., Ossewaarde, L., Henckens, M. J., Qin, S., van Kesteren, M. T., Schoots, V. C., Cousijn, H., Rijpkema, M., Oostenveld, R. & Fernández, G. (2011) Stress-related noradrenergic activity prompts large-scale neural network reconfiguration. Science 334(6059):1151–53.
Holtmaat, A. & Svoboda, K. (2009) Experience dependent structural synaptic plasticity in the mammalian brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 10:647–58.
James, W. (1890) The principles of psychology. Henry Holt.
Johnson, M. H. (2001) Functional brain development in humans. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2(7):475–83.
Johnson, M. H. (2011) Interactive specialization: A domain-general framework for human functional brain development? Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience 1(1):721.
Kanwisher, N. (2010) Functional specificity in the human brain: A window into the functional architecture of the mind. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 107(25):11163–70.
Landy, D. & Goldstone, R. L. (2009) How much of symbolic manipulation is just symbol pushing? In: Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Amsterdam, Netherlands, July 29–August 1, 2009, ed. Taatgen, N. A. & van Rijn, H., pp. 1072–77. Cognitive Science Society.
Lindquist, K. A. & Barrett, L. F. (2012) A functional architecture of the human brain: Emerging insights from the science of emotion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16:533–40.
Lindquist, K. A., Wager, T. D., Kober, H., Bliss-Moreau, E. & Barrett, L. F. (2012) The brain basis of emotion: A meta-analytic review. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35(3):121–43.
Marr, D. (1982) Vision. W. H. Freeman.
Merabet, L. B., Hamilton, R., Schlaug, G., Swisher, J. D., Kiriakapoulos, E. T., Pitskel, N. B., Kauffman, T. & Pascual-Leone, A. (2008) Rapid and reversible recruitment of early visual cortex for touch. PLoS One 3(8):e3046: 112.
Miller, E. K. & Cohen, J. D. (2001) An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience 24:167202.
Murray, D. J., Ellis, R. R., Bandomir, C. A. & Ross, H. E. (1999) Charpentier (1891) on the size-weight illusion. Perception and Psychophysics 61:1681–85.
Noë, A. (2004) Action in perception. MIT Press.
Pfaff, D. W. (2002) Hormones, brain and behavior, five-volume set. Academic Press.
Platt, M. L. (2002) Neural correlates of decisions. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 12:141–48.
Poldrack, R. A. (2010) Mapping mental function to brain structure: How can cognitive neuroimaging succeed? Perspectives on Psychological Science 5(6):753–61.
Poldrack, R. A., Halchenko, Y. O. & Hanson, S. J. (2009) Decoding the large-scale structure of brain function by classifying mental states across individuals. Psychological Science 20:1364–72.
Price, C. J. & Friston, K. J. (2005) Functional ontologies for cognition: The systematic definition of structure and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology 22 (3–4):262–75.
Raichle, M. E., MacLeod, A. M., Snyder, A. Z., Powers, W. J., Gusnard, D. A. & Shulman, G. L. (2001) A default mode of brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98:676–82.
Rigotti, M., Barak, O., Warden, M. R., Wang, X. J., Daw, N. D., Miller, E. K. & Fusi, S. (2013) The importance of mixed selectivity in complex cognitive tasks. Nature 497(7451):585–90.
Roux, F. E., Boetto, S., Sacko, O., Chollet, F. & Trémoulet, M. (2003) Writing, calculating, and finger recognition in the region of the angular gyrus: A cortical stimulation study of Gerstmann syndrome. Journal of Neurosurgery 99(4):716–27.
Rusconi, E., Walsh, V. & Butterworth, B. (2005) Dexterity with numbers: rTMS over left angular gyrus disrupts finger gnosis and number processing. Neuropsychologia 43(11):1609–24.
Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H. & Knoblich, G. (2006) Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10(2):7076.
Shannon, C. E. (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27(3):379423. doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x.
Song, S., Miller, K. D. & Abbott, L. F. (2000) Competitive Hebbian learning through spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity. Nature Neuroscience 3(9):919–26.
Stephan, H., Baron, G. & Frahm, H. D. (1988) Comparative size of brain and brain components. In: Comparative primate biology, ed. Steklis, H. D. & Erwin, J., pp. 138. Alan R. Liss.
Tomasello, M. (1999) The cultural origins of human cognition. Harvard University Press.
van Gelder, T. (1995) What might cognition be, if not computation? The Journal of Philosophy 92(7):345–81.
Xiao, Y. J. & Van Bavel, J. J. (2012) See your friends close and your enemies closer: Social identity and identity threat shape the representation of physical distance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 38(7):959–72.
Yopak, K. E., Lisney, T. J., Darlington, R. B., Collin, S. P., Montgomery, J. C. & Finlay, B. L. (2010) A conserved pattern of brain scaling from sharks to primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 107:12946–51.
Zhu, Q. & Bingham, G. P. (2011) Human readiness to throw: The size-weight illusion is not an illusion when picking the best objects to throw. Evolution and Human Behavior 32(4):288–93. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.11.005.

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed