No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 June 2015
Neural reuse is a form of neuroplasticity whereby neural elements originally developed for one purpose are put to multiple uses. A diverse behavioral repertoire is achieved by means of the creation of multiple, nested, and overlapping neural coalitions, in which each neural element is a member of multiple different coalitions and cooperates with a different set of partners at different times. Neural reuse has profound implications for how we think about our continuity with other species, for how we understand the similarities and differences between psychological processes, and for how best to pursue a unified science of the mind. After Phrenology: Neural Reuse and the Interactive Brain (2014; henceforth After Phrenology in this Précis) surveys the terrain and advocates for a series of reforms in psychology and cognitive neuroscience. The book argues that, among other things, we should capture brain function in a multidimensional manner, develop a new, action-oriented vocabulary for psychology, and recognize that higher-order cognitive processes are built from complex configurations of already evolved circuitry.
Target article
Précis of After Phrenology: Neural Reuse and the Interactive Brain
Related commentaries (14)
A registration problem for functional fingerprinting
After phrenology: Time for a paradigm shift in cognitive science
Becoming an expert: Ontogeny of expertise as an example of neural reuse
Beyond disjoint brain networks: Overlapping networks for cognition and emotion
Computational specificity in the human brain
Modularity in network neuroscience and neural reuse
Multisensory integration substantiates distributed and overlapping neural networks
Neural reuse leads to associative connections between concrete (physical) and abstract (social) concepts and motives
Reason for optimism: How a shifting focus on neural population codes is moving cognitive neuroscience beyond phrenology
Scientific intuitions about the mind are wrong, misled by consciousness
The implications of neural reuse for the future of both cognitive neuroscience and folk psychology
The reification objection to bottom-up cognitive ontology revision
Toward mechanistic models of action-oriented and detached cognition
Why a developmental perspective is critical for understanding human cognition
Author response
Reply to reviewers: Reuse, embodied interactivity, and the emerging paradigm shift in the human neurosciences