Skip to main content Accessibility help

Replications can cause distorted belief in scientific progress

  • Michał Białek (a1) (a2)


If we want psychological science to have a meaningful real-world impact, it has to be trusted by the public. Scientific progress is noisy; accordingly, replications sometimes fail even for true findings. We need to communicate the acceptability of uncertainty to the public and our peers, to prevent psychology from being perceived as having nothing to say about reality.



Hide All
Aklin, M. & Urpelainen, J. (2014) Perceptions of scientific dissent undermine public support for environmental policy. Environmental Science and Policy 38:173–77. Available at:
Dudo, A., Dunwoody, S. & Scheufele, D. A. (2011) The emergence of nano news: Tracking thematic trends and changes in US newspaper coverage of nanotechnology. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 88:5575. Available at:
Freudenburg, W. R., Gramling, R. & Davidson, D. J. (2008) Scientific certainty argumentation methods (SCAMs): Science and the politics of doubt. Sociological Inquiry 78:238. Available at:
Gilbert, D. T., King, G., Pettigrew, S, & Wilson, T. D. (2016) Comment on “estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.Science 351(6277):1037. Available at:
Koehler, D. J. (2016) Can journalistic “false balance” distort public perception of consensus in expert opinion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 22(1):2438. Available at:
Open Science Collaboration (2015) Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349(6251):aac4716. Available at:
Pitt, J. C. (1990) The myth of science education. Studies in Philosophy and Education 10:717. Available at:


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed