Skip to main content
×
Home

Vertical and veridical – 2.5-dimensional visual and vestibular navigation

  • David M. W. Powers (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

Does the psychological and neurological evidence concerning three-dimensional localization and navigation fly in the face of optimality? This commentary brings a computational and robotic engineering perspective to the question of “optimality” and argues that a multicoding manifold model is more efficient in several senses, and is also likely to extend to “volume-travelling” animals, including birds or fish.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Cockburn A. & McKenzie B. (2001) 3D or not 3D? Evaluating the effect of the third dimension in a document management system. In: ed. Beaudouin-Lafon M. & Jacob R. J. K., Proceedings of CHI'2001, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 434–41. ACM Press.
Cockburn A. & McKenzie B. (2002) Evaluating the effectiveness of spatial memory in 2D and 3D physical and virtual environments. In: ed. Terveen L., Proceedings of CHI'2002, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 203–10. ACM Press.
Marr D. (1982) Vision. A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. W.H. Freeman.
von der Malsburg C. (1973) Self-organization of orientation sensitive cells in the striate cortex. Kybernetik 14:85100.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 13 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 112 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.