OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The Indiana CTSI is a partnership with Indiana University, Purdue University, University of Notre Dame, and Regenstrief Inst. IU’s Comprehensive Cancer Center is central to cancer research and education. A partnership between these critical entities ensures certain efficiencies. We provide a potential framework for community outreach efforts. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The Indiana CTSI’s partner institutions have long prioritized community outreach and engagement across the state. However, in environments with limited funding resources, efficiencies are critical to the sustainability of programs and efforts. All IN for Health, an initiative of the Indiana CTSI, has partnered with IU Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center in community outreach by evaluating current practices, aligning staffing, evaluating events, prioritizing outreach efforts, and strategic outcomes. A tool for evaluation was developed and the prioritization matrix along with a database of events now guide outreach efforts. The All IN for Health board continues to be highly engaged in providing feedback and developing strategies. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: This partnership has increased outreach to state-wide events, including urban and rural communities, as well as events contributing to the health of historically marginalized groups in the state. The challenge was our ability to be present at all community events that are critical to the success of all our partners, but most importantly the communities we serve. Opportunities to partner across non-academic and community health partners were evaluated with an assessment of All IN for Health efforts. The resulting approaches are used as an example or a potential framework from which to organize similar partnerships with the goal of advancing research and health equity. Through this partnership, we have extended outreach and added efficiencies, demonstrating creative implementation and strategies. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Unfortunately, limited funding prevents CTSAs and Cancer Centers from engaging everywhere they are needed. Translation research constantly encourages team science and collaboration. Our efforts are a reminder that the same approach applies to operations and synergizing the assets present within our community health and institutional partners.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: In 2021, Frontiers CTSI revamped its evaluation infrastructure to be comprehensive, efficient, and transparent in demonstrating outputs and outcomes. We sought to build a platform to standardize measures across program areas, integrate continuous improvement processes into operations, and reduce the data entry burden for investigators. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: To identify useful metrics, we facilitated each Core’s creation of a logic model, in which they identified all planned activities, expected outputs, and anticipated outcomes for the 5-year cycle and beyond. We identified appropriate metrics based on the logic models and aligned metrics across programs against extant administrative data. We then built a data collection and evaluation platform within REDCap to capture user requests, staff completion of requests, and, ultimately, request outcomes. We built a similar system to track events, attendance, and outcomes. Aligning with other hubs, we also transitioned to a membership model. Membership serves as the backbone of the evaluation platform and allows us to tailor communication, capture demographic information, and reduce the data entry burden for members. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The Frontiers Evaluation Platform consists of 9 redcap projects with distinct functions and uses throughout the Institute. Point-of-service collection forms include the Consultation Request Event Tracking. Annual Forms include a Study Outcome, Impact, and Member Assessment Survey. Set timepoint collections include K & T application, Mock Study Section, and Pilot grant application submission, review, and outcomes. Flight Tracker is used to collect scientific outcomes and integrated with the platform. Using SQL, the membership module has been integrated into all forms to check and collect membership before service access and provide relevant member data to navigators. All relevant data is then synched into a dashboard for program leadership and management to track outputs and outcomes in real-time. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Since the launch of the evaluation platform in Fall 2022, Frontiers has increased its workflow efficiency and streamlined continuous improvement communication. The platform can serve as a template for other hubs to build efficient processes to create comprehensive and transparent evaluation plans.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Our aim is to establish soluble salivary biomarkers indicative of increased risk of oral premalignancy to be used in a point-of-service technology. Our goal is to non-invasively assess risk level for premalignancy by characterizing a molecular signature pattern that can be applied to such a diagnostic tool at routine dental or medical visits. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Adult patients 18 years of age and older who are non-smokers and patients of the University of Maryland School of Dentistry Oral Medicine Clinic and have been diagnosed with oral premalignancy (proliferative verrucous leukoplakia) are eligible. Exclusion criteria include history of immunosuppression or immune compromise; use of antifungal, antibiotic, and/or antiviral medications within the past three months; and gross dental disease. Serial unstimulated saliva samples will be collected at baseline or diagnosis of oral premalignancy, 6 months and 12 months. Solubility testing will be completed to determine whether malignant markers such as EGFR/mTOR/PI3K/p53 are soluble in saliva, and patient samples will be analyzed by ELISA and compared to appropriate controls. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We anticipate demonstrating increased activity of molecular pathways known to be involved in malignant transformation, such as EGFR/mTOR/PI3K/p53, or increased burden of select microbial pathogens to be associated with increased risk of oral premalignancy in the form of proliferative verrucous leukoplakia. Preliminary sensitivity and specificity testing of the identified markers will provide additional insight to the utility of a diagnostic tool with salivary specimen. Therefore, the microbiome and/or molecular profile proposed from these results will serve as a translational application to development of future point-of-service test devices to be used in the prevention and detection of oral premalignant lesions. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Oral cancer is the sixth most common cancer worldwide, and presents challenges in its diagnosis and clinical management. Later diagnosis is associated with poorer patient outcomes—therefore, a molecular and microbiome profile that may be used in a noninvasive diagnostic test technology would prove beneficial to providers and patients.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Participants will be able to identify how partnering with state health departments for a CTSA initiative assists in meeting shared goals by building infrastructure and sharing resources and list key components of a successful county engagement process that can be replicated. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Connections IN Health is a collaborative project with the Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Indiana Department of Health, Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, and community partners. We address chronic disease in Indiana with coalition-based engagement at the grassroots level, and partnering to provide technical assistance, resources, connections and evidence-based strategies to address the health challenges. Our methods of county engagement include surveying the broad community, conducting listening sessions with key community stakeholders, compiling, analyzing and sharing data, collaborating with existing local coalitions, assessing community readiness and suggesting evidence-based practices to implement. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: As a result of county engagement, local coalitions have current, local data to drive their efforts in improving local health rankings and outcomes. Community partners in eight counties have selected and implemented evidence-based strategies to manage and/or prevent diabetes, cardiovascular disease and/or stroke. Some examples include: starting a community garden with cooking classes in a food desert to provide fresh produce and nutrition/cooking knowledge, creating a mobile kitchen on hand for organizations to use to provide education and cooking skills, providing a passport for wellness at existing community events with food samples and health screenings and offering evidence-based educational programming such as Dining with Diabetes and Be Heart Smart. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Moving county health coalitions to evidence-based programming that has the greatest likelihood for success is a critical translational sciences challenge. Our rigorous and well defined approach yields significant improvement in local health coalition activities, sustaining their activities through long-term trusted relationships.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: To identify challenges faced by academic researchers in accessing online regulatory information and/or tools to advance their research work to develop a free, publicly accessible, interactive web portal that provides regulatory support. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The Regulatory Knowledge and Support core of the Southern California Clinical and Translational Science Institute interviewed five local research professionals. These interviews guided the development of a Qualtrics survey, consisting of multiple responses and open-ended questions, submitted to our local institutional review board (IRB). After receiving IRB approval, the survey was disseminated via email, newsletters, flyers, and presentations targeting researchers at academic institutions and members of clinical and translational science hubs. Survey data will be used to identify the challenges academic researchers face in finding regulatory resources and to compile the types of regulatory information or tools they would find helpful for their research. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: According to the interviews, researchers with extensive involvement in clinical trials found regulatory resources easily accessible compared to those with less experience. Additionally, they all stated having a colleague or regulatory specialist whom they can consult about regulatory requirements. Insights from these initial interviews confirmed the need to obtain a comprehensive view across research professionals. Anticipated results will show the challenges in accessibility, source, and type of regulatory resources researchers typically encounter. It is also anticipated that researchers will share what kinds of resources they would find most useful for their work. Ultimately, the information and tools identified as essential by survey takers will be collected and incorporated into the web portal. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Academic researchers find navigating through regulatory hurdles persistently challenging when translating their work from bench to clinic, especially since academia is typically resource-constrained. Findings from this study will allow the creation of a web portal for researchers that is broadly accessible and meets their regulatory needs.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: CASK-related microcephaly with pontine and cerebellar hypoplasia (MICPCH) is a rare X-linked neurodevelopmental disorder caused by mutations in calcium/calmodulin-dependent serine protein kinase (CASK). We aim to rescue CASK expression via an CRISPR/dCas9 epigenetic therapeutic and create iPSC-based CASK relevant in vitro model systems. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: As females have two X-chromosomes, disease causing mutations present with a 50/50 expression of mutant and wildtype, due to the mosaicism caused by random X-chromosome inactivation (XCI). This project will adapt an established CRISPR/dCas9 epigenetic approach to rescue expression from the silenced, wild-type CASK allele. We aim to accomplish this through testing different dCas9 orthologues and a guide RNA screen targeting the CASK promoter. Constructs will be tested for optimal targeting efficacy in vitro and assessed via RT-qPCR. Additionally, epigenetic modifications from our approach will be analyzed through bisulfite sequencing. We also aim to apply this epigenetic rescue technology in disease relevant cell lines and eventually in engineered patient mutation iPSC-derived neurons. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Our results show the ability to target CASK and assess gene expression changes with CRISPR/dCas9 paired with an epigenetic modifier and transcriptional activator. Additionally, our fibroblast model with nonpathogenic single nucleotide polymorphisms within CASKallow for allele specific analysis of our targeted reactivation. We anticipate that following an increase of CASK expression, there would be a decrease in region specific promoter methylation. Further, with the identification of clinically described disease-causing point mutations that result in a loss of function of CASK protein, induction of the mutant sequence onto a healthy cell background will result in a similar reduction of CASK protein in our cell model. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This project will demonstrate the first therapeutic avenue for CASK-related MICPCH, and the potential to utilize targeted X-reactivation as a platform approach for X-linked disorders. Further, investigation of smaller dCas9 orthologues prepares our approach for future translational applications such as packaging into AAV for delivery.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic lung disease characterized by dysregulated collagen accumulation in the lung parenchyma. Our goal is to investigate the role of O-linked N-Acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) transferase (OGT) in pulmonary fibrosis to ultimately discover novel therapies for fibrosis resolution. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Lung tissue from IPF and non-IPF donors was subjected to immunohistochemistry (IHC) to assess O-GlcNAc levels. Primary human lung fibroblasts were treated with OGT or O-GlcNAcase (OGA) inhibitors followed by transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-β1) stimulation to assess O-GlcNAc regulation of fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transition (FMT) markers [alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and type 1 and type 3 collagen (COL1α1, COL3α1)] In Drosophila melanogaster, OGT knockdown (KD)/overexpression (OE) was conditionally induced to assess pericardin, a type IV collagen-like protein, regulation by immunofluorescence. Lastly, a mouse model of bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis was examined following OGT KD and assessed for fibrosis resolution via histology, hydroxyproline assay, and western blotting. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: O-GlcNAc staining was increased in IPF lung tissue compared to non-IPF control lungs. In primary human lung fibroblasts, TGF-α1 administration resulted in increased FMT markers (α-SMA, COL1α1, and COL3α1), which were reduced or increased by OGT or OGA inhibition, respectively. Genetic manipulation in the Drosophila models showed decreased pericardin expression with OGT KD compared to the wild-type, whereas OGT OE increased pericardin compared to control. Additionally, OGT KD in bleomycin treated aged mice resulted in reduced collagen levels at the transcript and protein level and concurrent fibrosis resolution as assessed by Masson’s trichrome staining and total hydroxyproline analysis. Collectively, showing OGT/O-GlcNAc regulating collagen in fibrosis resolution. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: These data suggest that the OGT/O-GlcNAc axis regulates collagen deposition in pulmonary fibrosis, and we show that O-GlcNAc is implicated in the pathogenesis of IPF. We identified OGT as a therapeutic target to overcome current drug limitations, opening new horizons for biomedical treatment.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Community-based primary care autism diagnostic models are one promising solution to delays in autism diagnosis. Our objective is to describe the development and report on outcomes related to primary care professional (PCP) training and sustained engagement in a longitudinal learning collaborative across a statewide network for autism diagnosis. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We developed ADAPT (i.e., Accelerating the Diagnosis of Autism with Primary care Training), a training program to prepare PCPs to develop independent competency in evaluation of autism in children ages 14-48 months. ADAPT includes didactic and case-based modules and expert practice-based coaching delivered by a diagnostic specialist; following training PCPs participate in a longitudinal learning collaborative. Aligned with competency-based medical education standards, measures of autism evaluation knowledge and diagnostic competency are collected. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: To date, 13 PCPs have completed ADAPT didactic and practicum training reaching competency in independent autism evaluation. Clinicians demonstrated significant improvement in total autism knowledge following didactic training (p=.02). There was an overall trend toward increased scoring agreement on an autism observational assessment over case observations and practicum evaluations. Similarly, PCPs demonstrated improved evaluation competence, moving on average from Advanced Beginner to Competent Performer as rated by expert trainers. Following training, PCPs attended 57% of monthly learning collaborative sessions. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Training PCPs to deliver autism evaluations as part of community-based models of care is a promising solution to address access and waitlist challenges. ADAPT is an intensive, standard PCP training model which results in achievement of independent competency and sustained engagement in in autism evaluation.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Investigate the perspectives of people experiencing homelessness (PEH) on clinical trials to uncover knowledge gaps and attitudes. This study aims to offer insights for clinical researchers to enhance engagement with this marginalized group, ushering in a more inclusive clinical trial process. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: A 14-question survey was developed in collaboration with the Street Medicine Team at the University of Southern California and other stakeholders of PEH research. Initial questions assess knowledge of clinical trials, followed by questions gauging sentiments on clinical trial participation, and final questions on the significance, benefits, and risks of clinical trials. Upon approval by the local Institutional Review Board, the survey will be administered in an interview format. Study participants will be from locations within the area of operations of the USC Street Medicine team–in and around Hollywood, South Los Angeles, and/or the Los Angeles Council District 1. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We anticipate that the results of this study will offer valuable insights into the perspectives of PEH regarding clinical trials. Results will also provide varying levels of knowledge and understanding among PEH about clinical trials, along with their past experiences in clinical trial participation, and willingness for future involvement in such trials. Further, the results will reveal whether respondents feel they are being properly represented in clinical research projects that could impact themselves and their community. This project can also enhance our understanding of the expectations and concerns of PEH regarding their potential participation in clinical trials. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The outcomes of this research project have the potential to lay the groundwork for enhancing the involvement of PEH in translational science research, encompassing aspects from study design to participation. This improvement could benefit not only participants but also various stakeholders involved.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Healthcare sectors are rushing to develop AI models. Yet, a dearth of coordinated practices leaves many teams struggling to implement models into practice. The Enterprise AI Translation Advisory Board uses across-disciplinary team to facilitate AI translation. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The Mayo Clinic Enterprise AI Translation Advisory Board was established to assess AI solutions lever aging cross-disciplinary team science to accelerate AI innovation and translation. The 23-member board reflects expertise in data science, qualitative research, user experience, IT, human factors, informatics, regulatory compliance,ethics, and clinical care, with members spanning thought leadership, decision-making, and clinical practice. Taking an approach of respectful communication, transparency, scientific debate, and open discussion, the Board has consulted onover two dozen projects at various stages of the AI life cycle. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Common issues identified for projects earlier in the AI life cycle, sometimes fatal but often address able once identified, include a lack of buy-in from potential product users, a lack of planningabout integration into clinical workflow, inadequately labeled data, and attempting to use machine learning when what is desired is really a causal model for intervening. Recommendations for projects later in the AI life cycle include details of a testing plan (silent evaluation, pragmatic clinical trials), advice about clinical integration, both post-hoc and on going auditing for performance disparities, and planning for regulatory clearance. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Advising is more valuable for projects at the ideation phase, when multi disciplinary interrogation can identify weaknesses. But at all phases, projects have gaps related to a lack of specific disciplinary expertise. A multi disciplinary cluster like the AI Translation Advisory Board seeks to address these gaps.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Partnering with the Housing Authority of Los Angeles, we launched a place-based initiative in the Nickerson Gardens housing development in South Los Angeles, where we apply our community engagement approach of listening and learning, and trust and relationship building, to deliver public health interventions in a discrete community. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Nickerson Gardens is the largest housing development in Los Angeles, with 1,066 units and over 3,000 residents. 58% and 40% of the residents are Hispanic and Black/African American respectively with an average yearly income of less than $30,000. To build trust and establish relationships, our team began attending community events, holding weekly educational workshops, and participating in the summer program for youth. We also held listening sessions in English and Spanish that asked aboutthe overall health of the Nickerson Gardens community, environment and public space, access and barriers to care, needed healthcare services, and the lived experience within Nickerson Gardens. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: To date, we have held eight 90-minute listening sessions in English and Spanish with 59 participants. The sessions provided insight into theneeded health and educational resources and services, the organizational structure of the housing development and how that impacts access to information and services, as well as the nuanced and area-specific transportation issues and the connection to safety concerns. These findings will inform the next phase of this initiative which includes convening a Coordinating Council composed of service providers and Nickerson Gardens residents. This council will oversee the coordination and implementation of needed services, help maintain accountability of the providers, and offer residents the opportunity to take ownership of the process. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Academic-community partnerships are an effective strategy to deliver public health interventions and promote health equity in under-resourced communities. We tested and measured impact in a distinct community to reinforce a widely-applicable place-based model.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The objective of this project was to evaluate the factors that contribute to LGBTQIA2+ patient comfortability. This information was then used to understand how best to create a comfortable space for LGBTQIA2+ patients. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This survey was focused on underinsured and uninsured patients seen at the Rainbow Clinic - a free student-run LGBTQIA2+ clinic. Surveys were distributed by undergraduate volunteers on tablets as a qualtrics survey. Surveys collected demographic information in addition to 5 questions that assessed patient comfortability. These questions included evaluating the patient’s comfort with sharing information with the provider and the patient’s comfort of coming into clinical spaces. These surveys were distributed before and after clinic appointments to capture any changes in comfortability that could have occurred as a result of the appointment. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Up to May of 2023, 49 patients were seen in Rainbow Clinic. 33 patients filled out the intake survey and 31 patients filled out the check-out survey resulting in a 67% and 63% response rate respectively. Questions were asked on a likert scale (1-5) from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree. Questions evaluating patient comfort in sharing information with their provider yielded an average score that was statistically significant, suggesting patients felt comfortable at the Rainbow Clinic. Additionally, patients indicated that the LGBTQIA2+ specific labeling of the Rainbow Clinic made them significantly more comfortable coming into the clinic. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This project suggests that patient comfortability can be improved by training and intentional LGBTQIA2+ labeling. Considering the hesitancy of this community towards healthcare, improving comfortability not only benefits clinical care and outcomes but can also bolster the body of research on this community.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: To describe the strategies our newly created Patient Partners Program has planned for engaging diverse patients in the co-creation of our planned Patient Partner Academy. We will elicit feedback from other CTSAs about their strategies for promoting individual patient partnerships in research. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Our program to promote authentic patient-researcher partnerships to advance clinical and translational research is grounded in participatory approaches to maximize meaningful engagement. The process of creating our Patient Partners Academy is co-led by a patient partner and national leader in re-envisioning the role of patients in research, and a University of Michigan faculty member who advocates for patient partnerships in research. Listening sessions and community engagement studios will involve the developers of patient partner training programs, patient partners who have received research capacity training (as well as researchers and patient partners interested in collaborative research. Insights from these sessions will inform the development of learning models and curriculum content. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Through individual listening sessions and community engagement studios we will collect data on the barriers and facilitators to patient partner engagement in research and the experiences and preferred learning models in patient partner training programs. Both the listening sessions and community engagement studios will be recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for common themes. We aim to answer three questions: What do patient partners need to be meaningfully engaged as equal partners across the research continuum? How can we best engage people who experience serious illness or chronic conditions and may be underserved by healthcare systems? What do researchers, faculty, and clinicians need to create trusting, collaborative relationships with patient partners? DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Integrating patient partners into study teams accelerates innovation and translational science, increases the relevance of research findings, improves health outcomes and patient empowerment, and elevates the value of the patient perspective allowing researchers to gain a new point of view from an individual with lived experience.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Childhood psychopathology is a worsening public health crisis leading to negative life outcomes, including self-harm and suicide. Difficulty in self-control as early as 3 years old predicts psychopathology, but the mediating mechanisms of brain function are unknown. Here, we tested one mechanism: functional connectivity (FC) integration. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We studied a sample of 204 children [53 F/149 M/2 NC; mean age (SD)=11 years (1.7)] with diverse self-control difficulties (e.g., attention deficit disorder [n=80]; autism spectrum disorders [n=91]). We extracted a general factor of psychopathology (“p-factor”) from the parent-reported Child Behavior Checklist. For participants with high quality fMRI data on 3 self-control tasks (n=79), testing flexibility, working memory, and inhibition, we calculated FC connectomes reflecting a general self-control state, and applied connectome predictive modeling (CPM) to reveal connections predicting overall task impairment. We then measured individual variance in cross-network integration of regions with the most predictive connections and tested for association with p-factor in a multiple linear regression. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We repeated CPM 1,000 times with 10-fold cross validation to generate a distribution of accuracies for predicted vs. observed task impairment scores (mean r=0.25, permutation p=0.02). Connections selected a maximum of 10,000 times (10 folds * 1,000 repetitions) were strongly predictive of task impairment (r=-0.5, p<0.001), highlighting connectivity of canonical executive networks as well as the default mode network. Regions (n=22) with the top 5% most selected connections were in lateral parietal and frontal cortices and implicated motor control. Between-network integration, operationalized with the graph theory metric participation coefficient, of one of these regions in left posterior superior frontal gyrus significantly predicted p-factor (R2=0.26, F(22,56) = 0.87; B =-0.49, p<0.05). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: A portion of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, associated with executive control, explained individual variance in p-factor. We plan to test alternative predictive models. Identification of such a neuro behavioral mechanism underlying psychopathology may lead to novel intervention targets.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Sexism harms women’s well-being, affecting life satisfaction and self-doubt in complex ways (Shattell etal., 2008; Oswald etal., 2018). This study examines how hostile and benevolent sexist attitudes moderates the link between experiences of benevolent sexism, self-doubt, and life satisfaction in Latinx women. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Participants included 57 English-speaking Latinx women residing in the United States, with a mean age of 31.89 (SD=10.14) years. The majority (61.4%, n=35) identified as Mexican, and most identified as second generation or later (80.7%, n=46). Participants completed surveys assessing hostile and benevolent sexist attitudes (Glick & Fiske, 1996), self-doubt (Oleson etal., 2000), life satisfaction (Diener etal., 1985), and experiences with three aspects of benevolent sexism – protective paternalism (PP), heterosexual intimacy (HI), and complimentary gender differentiation (CGD) (Oswald etal., 2018). RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Moderation analyses were conducted to examine the moderating role of hostile and benevolent sexist attitudes between experiences of benevolent sexism (PP, HI, & CGD) and well-being measures (self-doubt and life satisfaction). An example finding revealed a significant interaction effect between benevolent sexist attitudes and experiences with CGD on satisfaction with lifeF(1,53)=8.34,p<.01. For participants who endorsed high benevolent sexist attitudes, experiences with CGD was associated with increased satisfaction with life (b=.78, p<.001), while the effect of experiences with CGD on life satisfaction was attenuated for those who endorsed low benevolent sexist attitudes (b=.30, p<.05). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: These findings have important implications on the well-being of Latinx women as they indicate that those who reject sexist attitudes risk their well-being when confronted with benevolent sexism, unlike those who endorse to such beliefs, potentially gaining increased life satisfaction at the cost of embracing benevolent sexist behavior.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Healthcare organizations and payers are moving from accountability to effectiveness frameworks. Static vendor contracts for full-scale implementation limit organizations' ability to evaluate impact before scale-up, or to iteratively improve. Our team science innovation employs science and learning methods as systems engage vendors. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Our team science innovation is a method to assess and model impact of interventions at scale in healthcare delivery systems. We are integrating expertise in learning processes of an academic medical center (UCLA CTSI) with the organizational knowledge and methodological expertise of the nation’s largest Medicaid managed care plan (LA Care Health Plan), which has over 2 million members. The LA Care Advanced Analytics Lab has unique capability in machine learning, while enables deep learning of variation. Our innovative product is a template to quickly mobilize evaluation and learning for a diverse population in a varied and distributed delivery system. The template design enables rapid learning for the full-scale policy implementation often imposed by government, and in the short timeframes involved. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: LA Care and the UCLA CTSI partnered to provide subject matter expertise and design effective pilots for interventions such as transitional care services, complex care management, and physician home visit strategies, accounting for confounding factors affecting the intervention and outcome. So far, collaborative modeling and design has produced a successful pilot of a physician home visit program intended to reduce avoidable emergency department visits. This pilot quickly revealed several major changes that would need to be incorporated for the contracted vendor to produce results if operated at scale, further informed by machine learning, in sufficient time to inform the contracting process. There are multiple evolving applications, including housing/homelessness. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Integrating the large data and analytics of a large healthcare organization with learning methods from the CTSI -- including learning from variation and designs for studying impact during scale-up -- fosters academic-community team science that could significantly improve the value of our largest delivery systems, public and commercial.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The research objectives of this project are to elucidate the effects of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) of varying target specificity on platelet function with regard to platelet aggregation, adhesion, spreading, and intracellular signaling as measured by kinase phosphorylation. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Blood from healthy volunteers was obtained and processed to obtain both washed platelets and platelet-rich plasma. The samples were then treated with one of the BTKi drugs or with vehicle (DMSO) at concentrations matching patient blood concentrations derived from clinical trials and pharmacokinetic studies. The incubated samples were then analyzed in an aggregometer using one of several agonists. Aggregation was stopped after five minutes with a perchloric acid-based lysis buffer. The samples were then analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting to quantify BTK protein and BTK phosphorylation. Adhesion was assessed by incubating washed platelets treated with BTKi on microtiter wells coated with fibrinogen or collagen and quantifying adherent platelets by their endogenous acid phosphatase activity. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We found that ibrutinib, zanubrutinib, and pirtobrutinib all completely inhibited collagen-induced platelet aggregation, whereas they did not inhibit aggregation induced by thrombin, ristocetin, arachidonic acid, or the PAR1 activator peptide SFLLRN (T6). Acalabrutinib inhibited collagen-induced platelet aggregation only at high concentrations (1-2 micromolar). At the lower concentration of 200 nanomolar, comparable to the concentration required for the other BTK inhibitors to completely inhibit platelet aggregation, acalabrutinib failed to inhibit aggregation but did inhibit auto-phosphorylation, indicating an impact on signaling. None of the BTKi drugs inhibited adhesion of platelets to collagen-coated surfaces. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Our data show the inhibitory effect of BTKi on collagen-induced platelet aggregation and signaling. However, it remains unclear whether the inhibition is due to an effect on BTK itself or other related kinases. Better insight into the mechanisms of platelet inhibition by BTKi may help guide the development of BTKi with a lower risk of hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Changes associated with placental vasculature contribute to the progression of gestational hypertensive disease preeclampsia. Caudal-type homeobox-2 (CDX2) regulates trophoblast stem cell differentiation. In this study, we investigate the role of placental CDX2 cells in healthy pregnancy and in conditions of preeclampsia. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: To understand the role of CDX2 cells, here we collected human placenta samples from the prospectively enrolled cohort and also the de-identified cohort (n=84). We studied CDX2 distribution, and function using a lentivirus-based approach. We studied the CDX2 expression and functional differences using transcriptomics and examined the function in invasion and vasculogenesis in the presence and absence of the new target genes we have discovered in our study. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Analysis of healthy human placenta samples showed that CDX2-expressing cells were present in fetal chorionic regions and are associated with HLA-G and cytokeratin-7 confirming their trophoblast identity. CDX2 cells demonstrated the potential to form a capillary network akin to endothelial cells. Placental samples from healthy (n=6) and preeclampsia (n=8) patients revealed higher levels of CDX2 expression in preeclampsia. Within preeclampsia CDX2 cells, Natriuretic peptide receptor 1 (NPR1), RET oncogene, and Homeobox D10 (HOXD10) were significantly differentially regulated, including a unique long-non-coding anti-sense RNA (KANSL1-AS1) that affected the function of CDX2 and trophoblast cells in invasion and normal vasculogenesis. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: In sum, based on these observations, the present study postulates that CDX2 cells present in a healthy human placenta may serve as a prospective cellular reservoir for angiogenesis. Conversely, altered gene programs within CDX2 cells cause aberrant vascular function that could contribute to the progression of preeclampsia.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Promoting Academics and Community Engagement (PACE) Dissemination grants are funding opportunities via the Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research Community Engagement program designed to support the science of clinical and translational research demonstrating community impact. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Two statewide funding announcements over a 3-month period were issued to over 2,000 academic and community partners. Proposals were required to meet the following criteria: 1) data collection from an academic and community partnered research project completed; 2) research findings analyzed; and 3) a community-focused dissemination plan developed. Projects were funded up to $5000. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Six PACE dissemination grants with community-focused plans were funded spanning Southeast, Western, and the Upper Peninsula regions of Michigan, as well as statewide. Examples of funded projects topics areas include the following: firearm safety; housing discrimination; opioid misuse; suicide prevention; and youth mental health. Community dissemination activities include: a) presenting at a community town hall; b) writing a pamphlet for community use; c) creating artwork installation showcase for community display; d) storytelling through community channels; and e) designing and implementing a local social media campaign. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Traditional funding mechanisms often do not provide resources to disseminate research findings with community benefit or impact back to communities. Funding dissemination awards through the PACE mechanism directly supports and accelerates translational science by sharing results directly back to the community in meaningful ways.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Investigators have an ethical obligation to return study results back to participants in a timely and layperson-friendly manner, but most do not. This lack of communication can erode trust in the research enterprise. One solution to this issue is Plain Language Summaries (PLS). METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We investigated and collected best practices for PLS and results dissemination as part of formative research for a pilot PLS project. This pilot was used to inform the development of our own PLS resources, which we will share broadly with other CTSAs. We employed a two-part system for analysis. First, we examined extant PLS resources from five major, publicly accessible sources spanning academia, government, publishing, and nonprofits for themes and best practices. Then, we examined actual PLS from each source and collected more specific feedback. We examined PLS structure, length, inclusion of graphics, multiple language availability, readability, and potential for improvement. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Guidance sources recommended that PLS have logical and organized structures, and included essential trial information (e.g., study drug, adverse events). Suggestions for length varied widely, from 250 words to 15 pages. Guidance also recommended the use of media, including infographics, audio, and video. Only pharma guidance recommended multilingual PLS. Actual PLS included many common trial elements, including study purpose, treatment description, results, and adverse events. PLS in our analyses were 10-12 pages, and contained many infographics, including flow charts of study phases, visual explanations of treatment and participant demographics, and adverse event tables. None were multilingual, and most were readable at the 7th grade level, although one used undergraduate-level language. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: General guidance was similar across sources. In our analyses of PLS, we found novel recommendations, such as including auditory pronunciation guides, and personalized thank you letters to participants. In future research, we recommend focusing on novel dissemination methods such as short interactive videos and patient-actor testimonials.