I have tried to show (Language 3. 109–22) that Hittite h occurs where the Indo-European languages have bh initial, and I can now make two or three additions to the material there presented. In Language 4. 122 f. I have connected halanta ‘head’ with Greek φαλός·λευκός, φαλακρός ‘bald’, and Sanskrit bhālam ‘forehead’, on the assumption that the original meaning of the Hittite word was ‘bald’. Hittite haš-, hašh- ‘open’, must be identified with IE *bhosos ‘naked’, whence Lithuanian bãsas ‘bare-foot’, Old English bær, etc. The verb pihiš-, which, accompanied by the adverb arha, means ‘strike off, cut off, take off’ or the like, contains the verbal prefix pe-, while hiš- is an extension in s of the root which appears in IE *bhei- ‘strike’ (Old High German bīhal ‘axe’, etc.), and whose extended form *bheid- means ‘split’ (Sanskrit bhinadmi, Latin findo, etc). Another instance of h = bh after the verbal prefix pe- is pehar(k)- ‘hold towards’ (Keilschrifttexte aus Boghazköi 4. 2. 2. 25, Keilschrift-Urkunden aus Boghazköi 13. 4. 4. 37) beside har(k)- ‘have’ on which see Language 3. 117 f.