Probabilistic Answer Set Programming under the credal semantics extends Answer Set Programming with probabilistic facts that represent uncertain information. The probabilistic facts are discrete with Bernoulli distributions. However, several real-world scenarios require a combination of both discrete and continuous random variables. In this paper, we extend the PASP framework to support continuous random variables and propose Hybrid Probabilistic Answer Set Programming. Moreover, we discuss, implement, and assess the performance of two exact algorithms based on projected answer set enumeration and knowledge compilation and two approximate algorithms based on sampling. Empirical results, also in line with known theoretical results, show that exact inference is feasible only for small instances, but knowledge compilation has a huge positive impact on performance. Sampling allows handling larger instances but sometimes requires an increasing amount of memory.

Advances in incremental Datalog evaluation strategies have made Datalog popular among use cases with constantly evolving inputs such as static analysis in continuous integration and deployment pipelines. As a result, new logic programming debugging techniques are needed to support these emerging use cases.

This paper introduces an incremental debugging technique for Datalog, which determines the failing changes for a rollback in an incremental setup. Our debugging technique leverages a novel incremental provenance method. We have implemented our technique using an incremental version of the Soufflé Datalog engine and evaluated its effectiveness on the DaCapo Java program benchmarks analyzed by the Doop static analysis library. Compared to state-of-the-art techniques, we can localize faults and suggest rollbacks with an overall speedup of over 26.9$\times$ while providing higher quality results.

Solving a decision theory problem usually involves finding the actions, among a set of possible ones, which optimize the expected reward, while possibly accounting for the uncertainty of the environment. In this paper, we introduce the possibility to encode decision theory problems with Probabilistic Answer Set Programming under the credal semantics via decision atoms and utility attributes. To solve the task, we propose an algorithm based on three layers of Algebraic Model Counting, that we test on several synthetic datasets against an algorithm that adopts answer set enumeration. Empirical results show that our algorithm can manage non-trivial instances of programs in a reasonable amount of time.

We present plingo, an extension of the answer set programming (ASP) system clingo that incorporates various probabilistic reasoning modes. Plingo is based on $\textit{Lpmln}^{\pm }$, a simple variant of the probabilistic language Lpmln, which follows a weighted scheme derived from Markov logic. This choice is motivated by the fact that the main probabilistic reasoning modes can be mapped onto enumeration and optimization problems and that $\textit{Lpmln}^{\pm }$ may serve as a middle-ground formalism connecting to other probabilistic approaches. Plingo offers three alternative frontends, for Lpmln, P-log, and ProbLog. These input languages and reasoning modes are implemented by means of clingo’s multi-shot and theory-solving capabilities. In this way, the core of plingo is an implementation of $\textit{Lpmln}^{\pm }$ in terms of modern ASP technology. On top of that, plingo implements a new approximation technique based on a recent method for answer set enumeration in the order of optimality. Additionally, in this work, we introduce a novel translation from $\textit{Lpmln}^{\pm }$ to ProbLog. This leads to a new solving method in plingo where the input program is translated and a ProbLog solver is executed. Our empirical evaluation shows that the different solving approaches of plingo are complementary and that plingo performs similarly to other probabilistic reasoning systems.

DLV2 is an AI tool for knowledge representation and reasoning that supports answer set programming (ASP) – a logic-based declarative formalism, successfully used in both academic and industrial applications. Given a logic program modeling a computational problem, an execution of DLV2 produces the so-called answer sets that correspond one-to-one to the solutions to the problem at hand. The computational process of DLV2 relies on the typical ground & solve approach, where the grounding step transforms the input program into a new, equivalent ground program, and the subsequent solving step applies propositional algorithms to search for the answer sets. Recently, emerging applications in contexts such as stream reasoning and event processing created a demand for multi-shot reasoning: here, the system is expected to be reactive while repeatedly executed over rapidly changing data. In this work, we present a new incremental reasoner obtained from the evolution of DLV2 toward iterated reasoning. Rather than restarting the computation from scratch, the system remains alive across repeated shots, and it incrementally handles the internal grounding process. At each shot, the system reuses previous computations for building and maintaining a large, more general ground program, from which a smaller yet equivalent portion is determined and used for computing answer sets. Notably, the incremental process is performed in a completely transparent fashion for the user. We describe the system, its usage, its applicability, and performance in some practically relevant domains.

In this paper, we compare four different semantics for disjunction in Answer Set Programming that, unlike stable models, do not adhere to the principle of model minimality. Two of these approaches, Cabalar and Muñiz’ Justified Models and Doherty and Szalas’ Strongly Supported Models, directly provide an alternative non-minimal semantics for disjunction. The other two, Aguado et al’s Forks and Shen and Eiter’s Determining Inference (DI) semantics, actually introduce a new disjunction connective, but are compared here as if they constituted new semantics for the standard disjunction operator. We are able to prove that three of these approaches (Forks, Justified Models and a reasonable relaxation of the DI-semantics) actually coincide, constituting a common single approach under different definitions. Moreover, this common semantics always provides a superset of the stable models of a programme (in fact, modulo any context) and is strictly stronger than the fourth approach (Strongly Supported Models), that actually treats disjunctions as in classical logic.

We present ASP Chef Mustache, an extension of ASP Chef that enhances template-based rendering of answer set programming (ASP) solutions using a logic-less templating system inspired by Mustache. Our approach integrates data visualization frameworks such as Tabulator, Chart.js, and vis.js, enabling interactive representations of ASP interpretations as tables, charts, and graphs. Mustache queries in templates support advanced constructs for formatting, sorting, and multi-stage expansion, facilitating the generation of rich, structured outputs. We demonstrate the power of this framework through a series of use cases, including data analysis for the Italian VQR, visualization of blocking sets in graphs, and scheduling problems. The result is a versatile tool for bridging declarative problem solving and modern web-based visual analytics.

In this paper, we delve into Notation3 Logic (N3), an extension of Resource Description Framework (RDF), which empowers users to craft rules introducing fresh blank nodes to RDF graphs. This capability is pivotal in various applications such as ontology mapping, given the ubiquitous presence of blank nodes directly or in auxiliary constructs across the Web. However, the availability of fast N3 reasoners fully supporting blank node introduction remains limited. Conversely, engines like VLog or Nemo, though not explicitly designed for Semantic Web rule formats, cater to analogous constructs, namely existential rules.

We investigate the correlation between N3 rules featuring blank nodes in their heads and existential rules. We pinpoint a subset of N3 that seamlessly translates to existential rules and establish a mapping preserving the equivalence of N3 formulae. To showcase the potential benefits of this translation in N3 reasoning, we implement this mapping and compare the performance of N3 reasoners like EYE and cwm against VLog and Nemo, both on native N3 rules and their translated counterparts. Our findings reveal that existential rule reasoners excel in scenarios with abundant facts, while the EYE reasoner demonstrates exceptional speed in managing a high volume of dependent rules.

Additionally to the original conference version of this paper, we include all proofs of the theorems and introduce a new section dedicated to N3 lists featuring built-in functions and how they are implemented in existential rules. Adding lists to our translation/framework gives interesting insights on related design decisions influencing the standardization of N3.

Catamorphisms are functions that are recursively defined on list and trees and, in general, on algebraic data types (ADTs), and are often used to compute suitable abstractions of programs that manipulate ADTs. Examples of catamorphisms include functions that compute size of lists, orderedness of lists, and height of trees. It is well known that program properties specified through catamorphisms can be proved by showing the satisfiability of suitable sets of constrained Horn clauses (CHCs). We address the problem of checking the satisfiability of those sets of CHCs, and we propose a method for transforming sets of CHCs into equisatisfiable sets where catamorphisms are no longer present. As a consequence, clauses with catamorphisms can be handled without extending the satisfiability algorithms used by existing CHC solvers. Through an experimental evaluation on a nontrivial benchmark consisting of many list and tree processing algorithms expressed as sets of CHCs, we show that our technique is indeed effective and significantly enhances the performance of state-of-the-art CHC solvers.

In the wake of the recent resurgence of the Datalog language of databases, together with its extensions for ontological reasoning settings, this work aims to bridge the gap between the theoretical studies of DatalogMTL (Datalog extended with metric temporal logic) and the development of production-ready reasoning systems. In particular, we lay out the functional and architectural desiderata of a modern reasoner and propose our system, Temporal Vadalog. Leveraging the vast amount of experience from the database community, we go beyond the typical chase-based implementations of reasoners, and propose a set of novel techniques and a system that adopts a modern data pipeline architecture. We discuss crucial architectural choices, such as how to guarantee termination when infinitely many time intervals are possibly generated, how to merge intervals, and how to sustain a limited memory footprint. We discuss advanced features of the system, such as the support for time series, and present an extensive experimental evaluation. This paper is a substantially extended version of “The Temporal Vadalog System” as presented at RuleML+RR ’22.

We introduce the framework FreeCHR which formalizes the embedding of Constraint Handling Rules (CHR) into a host language, using the concept of initial algebra semantics from category theory. We hereby establish a high-level implementation scheme for CHR as well as a common formalization for both theory and practice. We propose a lifting of the syntax of CHR via an endofunctor in the category Set and a lifting of the very abstract operational semantics of CHR into FreeCHR, using the free algebra, generated by the endofunctor. We give proofs for soundness and completeness with its original definition. We also propose a first abstract execution algorithm and prove correctness with the operational semantics. Finally, we show the practicability of our approach by giving two possible implementations of this algorithm in Haskell and Python. Under consideration in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming.

Novel utility computing paradigms rely upon the deployment of multi-service applications to pervasive and highly distributed cloud-edge infrastructure resources. Deciding onto which computational nodes to place services in cloud-edge networks, as per their functional and non-functional constraints, can be formulated as a combinatorial optimisation problem. Most existing solutions in this space are not able to deal with unsatisfiable problem instances, nor preferences, i.e., requirements that DevOps may agree to relax to obtain a solution. In this article, we exploit Answer Set Programming optimisation capabilities to tackle this problem. Experimental results in simulated settings show that our approach is effective on lifelike networks and applications.

Answer set programming (ASP), a well-known declarative logic programming paradigm, has recently found practical application in Process Mining. In particular, ASP has been used to model tasks involving declarative specifications of business processes. In this area, Declare stands out as the most widely adopted declarative process modeling language, offering a means to model processes through sets of constraints valid traces must satisfy, that can be expressed in linear temporal logic over finite traces (LTL$_{\text {f}}$). Existing ASP-based solutions encode Declare constraints by modeling the corresponding LTL$_{\text {f}}$ formula or its equivalent automaton which can be obtained using established techniques. In this paper, we introduce a novel encoding for Declare constraints that directly models their semantics as ASP rules, eliminating the need for intermediate representations. We assess the effectiveness of this novel approach on two Process Mining tasks by comparing it with alternative ASP encodings and a Python library for Declare.

The representation of a temporal problem in answer set programming (ASP) usually boils down to using copies of variables and constraints, one for each time stamp, no matter whether it is directly encoded or expressed via an action or temporal language. The multiplication of variables and constraints is commonly done during grounding, and the solver is completely ignorant about the temporal relationship among the different instances. On the other hand, a key factor in the performance of today’s ASP solvers is conflict-driven constraint learning. Our question in this paper is whether a constraint learned for particular time steps can be generalized and reused at other time steps, and ultimately whether this enhances the overall solver performance on temporal problems. Knowing well the domain of time, we study conditions under which learned dynamic constraints can be generalized. Notably, we identify a property of temporal representations that enables the generalization of learned constraints across all time steps. It turns out that most ASP planning encodings either satisfy this property or can be easily adapted to do so. In addition, we propose a general translation that transforms programs to fulfill this property. Finally, we empirically evaluate the impact of adding the generalized constraints to an ASP solver.

DatalogMTL is an extension of Datalog with metric temporal operators that has found an increasing number of applications in recent years. Reasoning in DatalogMTL is, however, of high computational complexity, which makes reasoning in modern data-intensive applications challenging. In this paper we present a practical reasoning algorithm for the full DatalogMTL language, which we have implemented in a system called MeTeoR. Our approach effectively combines an optimised (but generally non-terminating) materialisation (a.k.a. forward chaining) procedure, which provides scalable behaviour, with an automata-based component that guarantees termination and completeness. To ensure favourable scalability of the materialisation component, we propose a novel seminaïve materialisation procedure for DatalogMTL enjoying the non-repetition property, which ensures that each rule instance will be applied at most once throughout its entire execution. Moreover, our materialisation procedure is enhanced with additional optimisations which further reduce the number of redundant computations performed during materialisation by disregarding rules as soon as it is certain that they cannot derive new facts in subsequent materialisation steps. Our extensive evaluation supports the practicality of our approach.

Probabilistic Logic Programming (PLP) under the distribution semantics is a leading approach to practical reasoning under uncertainty. An advantage of the distribution semantics is its suitability for implementation as a Prolog or Python library, available through two well-maintained implementations, namely ProbLog and cplint/PITA. However, current formulations of the distribution semantics use point-probabilities, making it difficult to express epistemic uncertainty, such as arises from, for example, hierarchical classifications from computer vision models. Belief functions generalize probability measures as non-additive capacities and address epistemic uncertainty via interval probabilities. This paper introduces interval-based Capacity Logic Programs based on an extension of the distribution semantics to include belief functions and describes properties of the new framework that make it amenable to practical applications.

This paper presents a novel simplification calculus for propositional logic derived from Peirce’s existential graphs’ rules of inference and implication graphs. Our rules can be applied to propositional logic formulae in nested form, are equivalence-preserving, guarantee a monotonically decreasing number of variables, clauses and literals, and maximise the preservation of structural problem information. Our techniques can also be seen as higher-level SAT preprocessing, and we show how one of our rules (TWSR) generalises and streamlines most of the known equivalence-preserving SAT preprocessing methods. In addition, we propose a simplification procedure based on the systematic application of two of our rules (EPR and TWSR) which is solver-agnostic and can be used to simplify large Boolean satisfiability problems and propositional formulae in arbitrary form, and we provide a formal analysis of its algorithmic complexity in terms of space and time. Finally, we show how our rules can be further extended with a novel n-ary implication graph to capture all known equivalence-preserving preprocessing procedures.

Product configuration is a successful application of answer set programming (ASP). However, challenges are still open for interactive systems to effectively guide users through the configuration process. The aim of our work is to provide an ASP-based solver for interactive configuration that can deal with large-scale industrial configuration problems and that supports intuitive user interfaces (UIs) via an application programming interface (API). In this paper, we focus on improving the performance of automatically completing a partial configuration. Our main contribution enhances the classical incremental approach for multi-shot solving by four different smart expansion functions. The core idea is to determine and add specific objects or associations to the partial configuration by exploiting cautious and brave consequences before checking for the existence of a complete configuration with the current objects in each iteration. This approach limits the number of costly unsatisfiability checks and reduces the search space, thereby improving solving performance. In addition, we present a UI that uses our API and is implemented in ASP.