Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-grvzd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-20T12:01:09.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the forces that bind us

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2025

Edwin J. C. van Leeuwen Open the ORCID record for Edwin J. C. van Leeuwen [Opens in a new window]  and
Tom S. Roth
Edwin J. C. van Leeuwen*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht, the Netherlands e.j.c.vanleeuwen@uu.nl https://www.uu.nl/staff/EJCvanLeeuwen Department of Comparative Cultural Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany t.s.roth@uu.nl https://www.uu.nl/staff/TSRoth
Tom S. Roth
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht, the Netherlands e.j.c.vanleeuwen@uu.nl https://www.uu.nl/staff/EJCvanLeeuwen
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dunbar proposes strategies to solve the fragmentation problem experienced by group-living animals. We highlight that bondedness not only mitigates stress but also provides structural scaffolding for group stability. Furthermore, we posit tolerance as a complementary mechanism smoothing social interactions and argue that variation in cohesion-promoting traits reflects context-dependent socio-ecological pressures, challenging static models linking sociality to cognition. Finally, we propose two further mechanisms—cultural transmission and dominance dynamics—that can enhance social cohesion by aligning behaviour and reducing uncertainty.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 48 , 2025 , e186
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aureli, F., Schaffner, C. M., & Schino, G. (2022). Variation in communicative complexity in relation to social structure and organization in non-human primates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 377(1860), 20210306. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0306 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beisner, B. A., Hannibal, D. L., Finn, K. R., Fushing, H., & McCowan, B. (2016). Social power, conflict policing, and the role of subordination signals in rhesus macaque society. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 160(1), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22945 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, A. V., Richerson, P. J., & McElreath, R. (2009). Culture rather than genes provides greater scope for the evolution of large-scale human prosociality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(42), 17671–17674. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903232106 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berdahl, A. M., Kao, A. B., Flack, A., Westley, P. A. H., Codling, E. A., Couzin, I. D., Dell, A. I., & Biro, D. (2018). Collective animal navigation and migratory culture: From theoretical models to empirical evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 373(1746), 20170009. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0009 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhattacharjee, D., Cousin, E., Pflüger, L. S., & Massen, J. J. M. (2023). Prosociality in a despotic society. iScience, 26(5), 106587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.106587 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantor, M., & Whitehead, H. (2013). The interplay between social networks and culture: Theoretically and among whales and dolphins. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 368(1618), 20120340. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0340 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chudek, M., & Henrich, J. (2011). Culture-gene coevolution, norm-psychology and the emergence of human prosociality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(5), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.Tics.2011.03.003 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cronin, K. A., van Leeuwen, E. J. C., Vreeman, V., & Haun, D. B. M. (2014). Population-level variability in the social climates of four chimpanzee societies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(5), 389–396.10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.05.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeTroy, S. E., Haun, D. B. M., & van Leeuwen, E. J. C. (2022). What isn’t social tolerance? A view on the past, present and future of the use of social tolerance in primatology. Evolutionary Anthropology, 31(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.21923 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (2025). Structural and cognitive mechanisms of group cohesion in primates. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, In press.10.1017/S0140525X2400030XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fichtel, C., Schnoell, A. V., & Kappeler, P. M. (2018). Measuring social tolerance: An experimental approach in two lemurid primates. Ethology, 124(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12706 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flack, J. C., Girvan, M., de Waal, F. B. M., & Krakauer, D. C. (2006). Policing stabilizes construction of social niches in primates. Nature, 439(7075), 426–429. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04326 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foster, E. A., Franks, D. W., Morrell, L. J., Balcomb, K. C., Parsons, K. M., van Ginneken, A., & Croft, D. P. (2012). Social network correlates of food availability in an endangered population of killer whales, Orcinus orca . Animal Behaviour, 83(3), 731–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.12.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grueter, C. C., Qi, X., Zinner, D., Bergman, T., Li, M., Xiang, Z., Zhu, P., Migliano, A. B., Miller, A., Krützen, M., Fischer, J., Rubenstein, D. I., Vidya, T. N. C., Li, B., Cantor, M., & Swedell, L. (2020). Multilevel organisation of animal sociality. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 35(9), 834–847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2020.05.003 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrison, R. A., van Leeuwen, E. J. C., & Whiten, A. (2021). Chimpanzees’ behavioral flexibility, social tolerance, and use of tool-composites in a progressively challenging foraging problem. iScience, 24(2), 102033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.102033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoppitt, W., & Laland, K. N. (2008). Social processes influencing learning in animals: A review of the evidence. Advances in the Study of Behavior, Vol 38, 38, 105–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3454(08)00003-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaburu, S. S. K., & Newton-Fisher, N. E. (2015). Egalitarian despots: Hierarchy steepness, reciprocity and the grooming-trade model in wild chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes. Animal Behaviour, 99, 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.10.018 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerjean, E., van de Waal, E., & Canteloup, C. (2024). Social dynamics of vervet monkeys are dependent upon group identity. iScience, 27(1), 108591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.108591 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koops, K., Akankwasa, W., Camara, H. D., Fitzgerald, M., Keir, A., Mamy, G., Matsuzawa, T., Péter, H., Vicent, K., Zuberbühler, K., & Hobaiter, C. (2024). Flexible grouping patterns in a western and eastern chimpanzee community. American Journal of Primatology, 86(4), e23593. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.23593 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrew, W. C., Marchant, L. F., Scott, S. E., & Tutin, C. E. G. (2001). Intergroup differences in a social custom of wild chimpanzees: The grooming hand-clasp of the Mahale Mountains. Current Anthropology, 42(1), 148–153.10.1086/318441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Corry-Crowe, G., Suydam, R., Quakenbush, L., Potgieter, B., Harwood, L., Litovka, D., Ferrer, T., Citta, J., Burkanov, V., Frost, K., & Mahoney, B. (2018). Migratory culture, population structure and stock identity in North Pacific beluga whales (Delphinapterus leucas). Plos One, 13(3), e0194201. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194201 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perry, S. (2011). Social traditions and social learning in capuchin monkeys (Cebus). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 366(1567), 988–996. https://doi.org/10.1098/Rstb.2010.0317 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radford, A. N., Majolo, B., & Aureli, F. (2016). Within-group behavioural consequences of between-group conflict: A prospective review. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 283(1843), 20161567. https://doi.org/10.1098/RSPB.2016.1567 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rendell, L., & Whitehead, H. (2001). Culture in whales and dolphins. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(2), 309–382. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525x0100396x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rincon, A. V., Waller, B. M., Duboscq, J., Mielke, A., Pérez, C., Clark, P. R., & Micheletta, J. (2023). Higher social tolerance is associated with more complex facial behavior in macaques. eLife, 12, RP87008. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.87008 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samuni, L., Mielke, A., Preis, A., Crockford, C., & Wittig, R. M. (2020). Intergroup competition enhances chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes verus) in-group cohesion. International Journal of Primatology, 41(2), 342–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-019-00112-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siepielski, A. M., Gotanda, K. M., Morrissey, M. B., Diamond, S. E., DiBattista, J. D., & Carlson, S. M. (2013). The spatial patterns of directional phenotypic selection. Ecology Letters, 16(11), 1382–1392. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12174 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silk, J. B. (2025). The natural history of social bonds. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1546(1), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15318 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tibbetts, E. A., Pardo-Sanchez, J., & Weise, C. (2022). The establishment and maintenance of dominance hierarchies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 377(1845), 20200450. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0450 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M. (1999). The human adaptation for culture. Annual Review of Anthropology, 28, 509–529.10.1146/annurev.anthro.28.1.509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Waal, E., Borgeaud, C., & Whiten, A. (2013). Potent social learning and conformity shape a wild primate’s foraging decisions. Science (New York, N.Y.), 340(6131), 483–485. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1232769 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Leeuwen, E. J. C., Cronin, K. A., & Haun, D. B. M. (2018). Population-specific social dynamics in chimpanzees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(45), 11393–11400. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1722614115 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Leeuwen, E. J. C., DeTroy, S. E., Kaufhold, S. P., Dubois, C., Schütte, S., Call, J., & Haun, D. B. M. (2021). Chimpanzees behave prosocially in a group-specific manner. Science Advances, 7(9), eabc7982. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc7982 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, E. J. C. van, Staes, N., Brooker, J. S., Kordon, S., Nolte, S., Clay, Z., Eens, M., & Stevens, J. M. G. (2023). Group-specific expressions of co-feeding tolerance in bonobos and chimpanzees preclude dichotomous species generalizations. iScience, 26(12), 108528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.108528 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Schaik, C. P. (2003). Local traditions in orangutans and chimpanzees: Social learning and social tolerance. In The biology of traditions: Models and evidence (pp. 297–328). https://doi.org/10.2307/302397 Google Scholar