Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-hqrjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-20T03:47:39.566Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Metacognition serves allostasis and co-evolves with the social brain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2025

Valery Krupnik Open the ORCID record for Valery Krupnik [Opens in a new window]
Valery Krupnik*
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Health, Naval Hospital Camp Pendleton, H200 Mercy Circle, Oceanside, CA, USA valery.y.krupnik.civ@health.mil
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this commentary, I suggest a complementary view to the target paper’s idea that primate social metacognition evolved as an adaptation to living in large groups. I present metacognition as a necessary step in the development of complex allostatic systems and suggest that intrinsic and social metacognition are dissociable, which can be studied in the mammalian default mode network.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 48 , 2025 , e173
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Commentary on R.I.M. Dunbar “Structural and Cognitive Mechanisms of Group Cohesion in Primates”

References

Alexandre, G., Greer-Phillips, S., & Zhulin, I. B. (2004). Ecological role of energy taxis in microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol Rev, 28(1), 113–126.10.1016/j.femsre.2003.10.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amaral, J. D., Xavier, J. M., Steer, C. J., & Rodrigues, C. M. (2010). The role of p53 in apoptosis. Discovery medicine, 9(45), 145–152.Google ScholarPubMed
Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Smallwood, J., & Spreng, R. N. (2014). The default network and self-generated thought: component processes, dynamic control, and clinical relevance. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1316(1), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12360 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conant, R. C., & Ross Ashby, W. (1970). Every good regulator of a system must be a model of that system †. International Journal of Systems Science, 1(2), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207727008920220 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, K. (2000). Programmed death in bacteria. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 64(3), 503–514. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.64.3.503-514.2000 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lu, H., Zou, Q., Gu, H., Raichle, M. E., Stein, E. A., & Yang, Y. (2012). Rat brains also have a default mode network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(10), 3979–3984. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1200506109 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lucherini Angeletti, L., Scalabrini, A., Ricca, V., & Northoff, G. (2021). Topography of the anxious self: Abnormal rest-task modulation in social anxiety disorder. The Neuroscientist, 29(2), 221–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/10738584211030497 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molnar-Szakacs, I., & Uddin, L. Q. (2013). Self-processing and the default mode network: interactions with the mirror neuron system [Review]. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 7, 571. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00571 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Padmanabhan, A., Lynch, C. J., Schaer, M., & Menon, V. (2017). the default mode network in Autism. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, 2(6), 476–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2017.04.004 Google ScholarPubMed
Schwiedrzik, C. M., Zarco, W., Everling, S., & Freiwald, W. A. (2015). face patch resting state networks link face processing to social cognition. PLoS biology, 13(9), e1002245. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002245 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spreng, R. N., & Andrews-Hanna, J. R. (2015). The default network and social cognition. Brain mapping: An encyclopedic reference, 3(December 2015), 165–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-397025-1.00173-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar